Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

Kamala Harris “throws around F-bombs” and constantly berated her staff when she was California Attorney General, according to a shocking report.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MLCKAA said:

I don’t think your first statement is true.  I know at least 20 Trump voters and I don’t think I’ve ever heard one of them cite Christian values as their reason for voting for him.  I hear most of them reminisce about what their 401k looked like when he was in office.

Fair enough. My 401K is at record high's right now though. Anddddd he's not in office. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Why do I care if she used f bombs? :wacko:

Because you're the effeminate liberal wimp that hides under a desk when people ask you what a "woman" is and cry when someone talks about "grabbing pvssies".

And now you're going to pretend that "f-bombs" don't bother you?  GTFO.  :lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Because you're the effeminate liberal wimp that hides under a desk when people ask you what a "woman" is and cry when someone talks about "grabbing pvssies".

And now you're going to pretend that "f-bombs" don't bother you?  GTFO.  :lol:

The fock? 

You really are retarded

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Because you're the effeminate liberal wimp that hides under a desk when people ask you what a "woman" is and cry when someone talks about "grabbing pvssies".

And now you're going to pretend that "f-bombs" don't bother you?  GTFO.  :lol:

Yep. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

The fock? 

You really are retarded

Sure, dipsh#t.  Sure.  Whatever you need to say to make yourself "feel" better about your femininity.  :lol:

You couldn't even handle a forum reply, much less and "f-bomb".  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, squistion said:

How does she clearly not respect the Constitution? 

Her statement that the government will invade the sanctity of our homes to examine our home storage of firearms based on suspicion or paranoia rather than probable cause shows she does not appreciate or understand the Constitution.

 

https://x.com/i/status/1836841464686424493

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Because you're the effeminate liberal wimp that hides under a desk when people ask you what a "woman" is and cry when someone talks about "grabbing pvssies".

And now you're going to pretend that "f-bombs" don't bother you?  GTFO.  :lol:

You forgot to talk about glory holes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

Good...more people should get the F word used at them

You too. Fired worms 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Her statement that the government will invade the sanctity of our homes to examine our home storage of firearms based on suspicion or paranoia rather than probable cause shows she does not appreciate or understand the Constitution.

 

https://x.com/i/status/1836841464686424493

Where in that statement (or the law she was referring to at the time) does she ever say that the government can enter a home without a warrant? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Good...more people should get the F word used at them

Like Fired.  As in Mooney you’re fired because you play on a message board all day and your students can’t read. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Like Fired.  As in Mooney you’re fired because you play on a message board all day and your students can’t read. 

So you decided on a Monday morning to show you are clueless by 11am?

Shrewd move Mr. Autism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Because you're the effeminate liberal wimp that hides under a desk when people ask you what a "woman" is and cry when someone talks about "grabbing pvssies".

And now you're going to pretend that "f-bombs" don't bother you?  GTFO.  :lol:

Nuked.

Well done. 😆

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

So you decided on a Monday morning to show you are clueless by 11am?

Shrewd move Mr. Autism. 

You’re classless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Where in that statement (or the law she was referring to at the time) does she ever say that the government can enter a home without a warrant? 

She says it.  She says "just because you legally possess the gun".  That factor, the legality which she herself presumes in her statement, precludes the government from having a warrant.  She is speaking generally about doing inspections of registered gun owners over their safe storage.  Lawfully exercising a constitutional right means we are safe in our homes and our possessions from government intrusion.  She believes otherwise.  She has no understanding of, nor respect for the second and fourth amendments and one could make an argument by caselaw that by extension of the third amendment either.  If elected I hope she decides to inspect your home for violations, removed matress tags, out of compliance vehicles. an air conditioner using the wrong, outlawed, coolant.  I hope also that she decides to quarter in your home not just a few illegals, up to one for every 150 square foot of your home, but also a few Redcoats.

 

She will say or do anything to pander to the group she is then presently in front of.  She has no loadstone, no abidding principles.  We cannot know her beliefs.  We can only know that if pressed she will pander to gain and to remain in power, and that is dangerous.

 

None of the foregoing is an argument for Trump, at least not for me.  I find him unfit to be President as well.

 

 

* I will entertain the argument that she does respect the Constitution but is just too stupid to really understand it, or the word "legally", or the word "sanctity", along with thousands of other words.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Yet still more class than you

Maybe you ought to pay attention to yours.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Maybe you should worry about yourself

:dunno:

Maybe he cares about how his tax dollars are spent.    

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/22/2024 at 12:50 PM, purdygood said:

Fair enough. My 401K is at record high's right now though. Anddddd he's not in office. 

$5 is higher than $3. Congratulations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

She says it.  She says "just because you legally possess the gun".  That factor, the legality which she herself presumes in her statement, precludes the government from having a warrant.  She is speaking generally about doing inspections of registered gun owners over their safe storage.  Lawfully exercising a constitutional right means we are safe in our homes and our possessions from government intrusion.  She believes otherwise.  She has no understanding of, nor respect for the second and fourth amendments and one could make an argument by caselaw that by extension of the third amendment either.  If elected I hope she decides to inspect your home for violations, removed matress tags, out of compliance vehicles. an air conditioner using the wrong, outlawed, coolant.  I hope also that she decides to quarter in your home not just a few illegals, up to one for every 150 square foot of your home, but also a few Redcoats.

 

She will say or do anything to pander to the group she is then presently in front of.  She has no loadstone, no abidding principles.  We cannot know her beliefs.  We can only know that if pressed she will pander to gain and to remain in power, and that is dangerous.

 

None of the foregoing is an argument for Trump, at least not for me.  I find him unfit to be President as well.

 

 

* I will entertain the argument that she does respect the Constitution but is just too stupid to really understand it, or the word "legally", or the word "sanctity", along with thousands of other words.

Run from it Timmy.  Run!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×