Tucker Carlson Attacked by a Demon

[jbycho 588]

Just now, MDC said:

No, I don’t need to prove that Tucker Carlson didn’t have an encounter with a supernatural being.  

You are accusing it. Of course you don't have to prove it but if you want people to take you seriously, then you need to know what you are talking about. Because in fact, you don't know. You can not support your opinion on the matter. 

In court, the he says she says doesn't prove a thing on either side. 

Never mind. You will never understand logic. You just prefer to believe in what you make up in your head. 

[jbycho 588]

5 minutes ago, Fnord said:

That was my point. Thank you for understanding the absurdity of you asking. Maybe you aren't a lost cause intellectually like you are politically. I'm finally starting to think that you and Trigger might not be the same person.

My point is, if you can't disprove it, you can't prove your opinion it in this situation. That is my point. You just have an opinion based on nothing. Thank you for understanding the absurdity of your take. 

[MDC 7,125]

1 minute ago, jbycho said:

You are accusing it. Of course you don't have to prove it but if you want people to take you seriously, then you need to know what you are talking about. Because in fact, you don't know. You can not support your opinion on the matter. 

In court, the he says she says doesn't prove a thing on either side. 

Never mind. You will never understand logic. You just prefer to believe in what you make up in your head. 

People won’t take me seriously if I don’t disprove the existence of demons. I can live with that!  

[jbycho 588]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

People won’t take me seriously if I don’t disprove the existence of demons. I can live with that!  

No, I don't take you seriously if you say there are no such things as demons. Because you don't know. 

When you accuse someone of lying, you have to prove it. 

[MDC 7,125]

1 minute ago, jbycho said:

No, I don't take you seriously 

Oh no!  

[jbycho 588]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

Oh no!  

So tell us what you factually know about angels, God, demons, and alien life beyond our planet.

[Fnord 2,051]

Just now, jbycho said:

My point is, if you can't disprove it, you can prove your opinion it. That is my point. You just have an opinion based on nothing. Thank you for understanding the absurdity of your take. 

You're tiresome, but not a complete idiot, so what the hell. First of all, WTF does the bolded even mean?

Secondly, my opinion is pretty solidly based in historical reality. I am not aware of demons existing outside of fictional accounts, so I feel pretty comfortable dismissing this as bullshit. Third, you thinking that this whole exercise is somehow novel or instructional in this place is absolutely an opinion based on nothing. Do you really think the "prove it" pablum is some sort of  gotcha? We are all aware that nobody can prove it, which is why your initial post to MDC about it was funny to me.

Have a great weekend.

[SaintsInDome2006 378]

16 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Whitney Webb had a good piece on him being a CIA operative. I think it was her at least. His dad was tied to the CIA. He seems fake.

Carlson's family is filled with nutjobbery, despite all the wealth. It makes his earlier pose as a wannabe young Buckley in bowtie particularly hilarious in retrospect.

[Mike Honcho 5,096]

1 hour ago, jbycho said:

You believe anything any writer says negatively about a conservative. Now move on. This is boring. 

All the writer did was transcribe what was in the video. I believe you are making a total jackass out of yourself and it is boring. 

[HellToupee 1,585]

23 minutes ago, MDC said:

Since when do demons exist?  

The Collins Elite at the pentagon think they exist 

[jbycho 588]

14 minutes ago, Fnord said:

You're tiresome, but not a complete idiot, so what the hell. First of all, WTF does the bolded even mean?

Secondly, my opinion is pretty solidly based in historical reality. I am not aware of demons existing outside of fictional accounts, so I feel pretty comfortable dismissing this as bullshit. Third, you thinking that this whole exercise is somehow novel or instructional in this place is absolutely an opinion based on nothing. Do you really think the "prove it" pablum is some sort of  gotcha? We are all aware that nobody can prove it, which is why your initial post to MDC about it was funny to me.

Have a great weekend.

You have an opinion that he is lying. I didn't read the article but when someone says something happened to them, and you say it didn't, how can you convince someone that you are correct and he is lying. You can get people with the same opinion to support yours but that's the extent of it. I don't even care about this specific topic as it pertains to Carlson, but I'm interested in hearing your factual evidence aliens from another world don't exist. Or the other things people don't believe in.

I'm only saying you all are being definitive in your beliefs and you can't prove that even if I can't definitively prove, for instance, that God exists. I can only go with what my self reasoning is. Some people don't believe because they have never experienced or seen. But none of us know the truth of everything. I have my formed opinions based on certain things, but those are my beliefs. 

If I believed the world was flat, you could prove me wrong. If I believe in God, you can't prove me wrong. You can only say that's not what you believe in. And that's where it ends. 

Yet you "adults" here have fun hating people for things you don't even know about. Maybe I've done it before too, but that doesn't change the fact of my argument on this topic. I'm not one who simply disbelieves only because I don't know something. 

[jbycho 588]

13 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

All the writer did was transcribe what was in the video. I believe you are making a total jackass out of yourself and it is boring. 

Another guy with low IQ who needs pictures in the books he tries to read. Got it. 

[jbycho 588]

It seems no on here has heard of innocent until proven guilty. 

You all are the one's accusing someone. You have the burden of proof. 

[Fnord 2,051]

4 minutes ago, jbycho said:

You have an opinion that he is lying. I didn't read the article but when someone says something happened to them, and you say it didn't, how can you convince someone that you are correct and he is lying. You can get people with the same opinion to support yours but that's the extent of it. I don't even care about this specific topic as it pertains to Carlson, but I'm interested in hearing your factual evidence aliens from another world don't exist. Or the other things people don't believe in.

I'm only saying you all are being definitive in your beliefs and you can't prove that even if I can't definitively prove, for instance, that God exists. I can only go with what my self reasoning is. Some people don't believe because they have never experienced or seen. But none of us know the truth of everything. I have my formed opinions based on certain things, but those are my beliefs. 

If I believed the world was flat, you could prove me wrong. If I believe in God, you can't prove me wrong. You can only say that's not what you believe in. And that's where it ends. 

Yet you "adults" here have fun hating people for things you don't even know about. Maybe I've done it before too, but that doesn't change the fact of my argument on this topic. I'm not one who simply disbelieves only because I don't know something. 

I did not say he was lying, I said I was comfortable calling it bullshit. Perhaps a more accurate personal assessment would be "IDGAF about Tucker and whether he was attacked by a demon, but I find him to be devoid of credibility on most subjects, so I will ignore his thoughts on being assaulted by hellspawn." Better?

The rest of your post other than the last paragraph are all obvious to everyone here, and I doubt you will find disagreement.

I don't hate people, and don't begrudge them their beliefs. Those that I say "mean" things to have all done so to me, and did it first (yes I understand that sounds childish, but it's true). I begin with a position of respect for everyone until they show they are not worthy of it. IIRC, our first exchange involved you insulting me. That's fine, insult away, but expect me to return it in kind. My position on god for instance, seems essentially the same as yours. I don't know, I'm not going to know until I die, but there are a few things that I've experienced or that make sense to me, and those form the foundation of my beliefs. There are a lot of posters here that I have oppositional opinions with, but treat respectfully, mostly. I have no problem with you personally, and am happy to reset our interactions to a respectful posture, if you are.

[OldMaid 2,129]

Occam’s razor: Tucker strikes me as a man with very effeminate finger nails. 

[League Champion 1,896]

Was it a Tranny Demon?  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,930]

He was banging the nanny good and she scratched him up. This is what he came up with. The guy is genius. 

[jbycho 588]

3 hours ago, Fnord said:

I did not say he was lying, I said I was comfortable calling it bullshit. Perhaps a more accurate personal assessment would be "IDGAF about Tucker and whether he was attacked by a demon, but I find him to be devoid of credibility on most subjects, so I will ignore his thoughts on being assaulted by hellspawn." Better?

The rest of your post other than the last paragraph are all obvious to everyone here, and I doubt you will find disagreement.

I don't hate people, and don't begrudge them their beliefs. Those that I say "mean" things to have all done so to me, and did it first (yes I understand that sounds childish, but it's true). I begin with a position of respect for everyone until they show they are not worthy of it. IIRC, our first exchange involved you insulting me. That's fine, insult away, but expect me to return it in kind. My position on god for instance, seems essentially the same as yours. I don't know, I'm not going to know until I die, but there are a few things that I've experienced or that make sense to me, and those form the foundation of my beliefs. There are a lot of posters here that I have oppositional opinions with, but treat respectfully, mostly. I have no problem with you personally, and am happy to reset our interactions to a respectful posture, if you are.

Ok, I lumped you in with MDC who I think made a statement that demons aren't real. It may sound stupid to some, but I believe in both the duality of life, and I believe in God. That's my thing. I don't push it on people. But on this Earth, we are humans have the duality mindset and if something like light didn't exist, then neither would darkness. If there was no daytime as we call it, there would be no nighttime because "nighttime" would just be status quo. If there was no bad, there could be no good. So the fact that I believe in decent unexplainable goodness, I can only believe there is unexplainable evil. 

MDC avoided saying he can prove they aren't real. No big deal. I was just saying someone started the assertion that they aren't real. So therefore the proof is on you or someone else who claims it. I never came out and said they are real. I don't doubt it if someone tells it, but I also don't care enough to endorse it if I have no clue what happened. Carlson wasn't trying to convince people of anything that I know of but again, it's all based on things that can't necessarily be proven logically or proven false logically. The accusers are the ones who bear the burden of proof since they are the ones accusing. Not the guy who simply says he experienced something. I'm guessing he doesn't care enough to try to prove it. 

I probably called you a name after you called someone else a name or whatever. I have proven that calling me names does not affect my points and I'm fine with that.. 

I always look at things like "live by the sword, die by the sword". And I hold others accountable for the same. Meaning, if calling people names are part of someone's repertoire, don't be mad if someone uses the same technique against those people. 

If I care about the subject, I will ignore the cut down and stick to the subject. Usually anyway. 

But cool. "Reset". 

 

[jbycho 588]

3 hours ago, OldMaid said:

Occam’s razor: Tucker strikes me as a man with very effeminate finger nails. 

I don't know about that. I have no clue about Carlson, but there are things that can't be explained by the simplest explanation. Some of the smartest people who ever walked the Earth at one time believed heart and soul that we have a geocentric universe. 

I have a couple things I experienced that have me still scratching my head. They mean nothing to most others but to me they were real as day. And I don't always doubt my senses. 

 

[Engorgeous George 2,126]

5 hours ago, MDC said:

In logic class, you would have learned that it’s on Tucker to convince me of the existence of demons - not on me to disprove existence.  

I was hoping you could prove the negative.  Some day, somebody just might be able to do so.  Me, I never have been able to do so.

[Engorgeous George 2,126]

My first wife was a sex demon.  She clawed me up pretty good more than once.

[Fnord 2,051]

Just now, Engorgeous George said:

My first wife was a sex demon.

go on

[Engorgeous George 2,126]

2 minutes ago, Fnord said:

go on

After 7 years the crazy outweighed the sexy.  Minimum of 5 times a day, every day, sometimes in semi public places.  I just did the math.  12775 times, or more.

[thegeneral 2,899]

10 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

My first wife was a sex demon.  She clawed me up pretty good more than once.

How many times did she draw blood?

[Engorgeous George 2,126]

Just now, thegeneral said:

How many times did she draw blood?

A few dozen times.

[OldMaid 2,129]

1 hour ago, jbycho said:

I don't know about that. I have no clue about Carlson, but there are things that can't be explained by the simplest explanation. Some of the smartest people who ever walked the Earth at one time believed heart and soul that we have a geocentric universe. 

I have a couple things I experienced that have me still scratching my head. They mean nothing to most others but to me they were real as day. And I don't always doubt my senses. 

 

I don’t know about what you just posted, but it definitely wouldn’t be considered Occam’s razor. HTH

[thegeneral 2,899]

6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

A few dozen times.

But you always remembered. Unlike Tucker.

Maybe that bow tie messed him up.

[jbycho 588]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

I don’t know about what you just posted, but it definitely wouldn’t be considered Occam’s razor. HTH

Right. No more assumptions than necessary. Just pick the simple answer (even though it may not be right). That does not explain everything. And that does not explain things from a generic uneducated point of view on the subject.

When talking about spiritual occurrences, or the occult, Occam's razor does not apply.

If someone has is overly tired all the time, it's not necessarily because they have been working a lot. 

[OldMaid 2,129]

13 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Right. No more assumptions than necessary. Just pick the simple answer (even though it may not be right). That does not explain everything. And that does not explain things from a generic uneducated point of view on the subject.

When talking about spiritual occurrences, or the occult, Occam's razor does not apply.

If someone has is overly tired all the time, it's not necessarily because they have been working a lot. 

Do you suck the fun out of every joke? Because I now feel compelled to explain it to you.

[jbycho 588]

20 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Do you suck the fun out of every joke? Because I now feel compelled to explain it to you.

I like funny jokes. HTH.