Gaetz withdraws: Pam Bondi is selected.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

1 hour ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

The presumptive Secretary of Education is married to a man whose former employee alleges he forced her to perform sex acts with his friend for an hour and a half after he defecated on her head. The presumptive Commerce Secretary preemptively sued his former assistant in 2018, after her lawyer threatened to publicize “not pretty” 2 a.m. text messages she’d received from him and his wife. The presumptive Health and Human Services director’s explanation for forcibly groping a former nanny’s breasts while holding her hostage in a kitchen pantry was that he “had a very, very rambunctious youth”; he was 46 at the time. The White House efficiency czar, currently a defendant in a putative class-action lawsuit filed by eight former employees who accuse him of perpetrating an “Animal House” work environment of “rampant sexual harassment,” and paid a quarter of a million dollars to a flight attendant who says he got naked and asked her to touch his erect in exchange for the gift of a horse. 

 

And of course the presumptive Defense Secretary was accused of raping a woman who was tasked with monitoring what she described to police as his “creeper vibes” after a Republican women’s conference at which he was a keynote speaker, just a month and change after the birth of his fourth child with a woman who was not his wife at the time. (Reader, she married him.)

 

The aggressive rapeyness of the second Donald Trump administration is so tyrannical it’s almost enough to make a girl wistful for Matt Gaetz, the Florida congressman who withdrew his name from attorney general contention yesterday (to make way for the despicable Pam Bondi) amid an orgy of leaks from two investigations into his sexploits with a 17-year-old procured by a convicted sex trafficker friend. Multiple witnesses testified that Gaetz did not actually know the 17-year-old was underage, you see, and that he ceased having sex with her when he found out. 

 

She forgot that Biden molested his own Daughter 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

HUNTER BIDEN CALLS HIS FATHER "PEDO PETER". 

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

44 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Looks like gutter boy was into the Beaujolais last night with the other wine moms at their cry/rage get together last night.  

He's on full wine tilt!!! 

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  You're own candidate's husband knocked up his affair partner while still married to his first wife. 

And it's clear you don't know what "rape" means.  Like all the other words the far-left uses to describe their opponents, it has lost all meaning.

You can get off your moral high-horse - your shaming techniques aren't fooling anyone.  As a card-carrying member of the far-left, you're the LAST person that should be discussing anything about morals.  Maye clean your own house before you start pointing fingers, d0uche.  GTFO. 

It's a new low, even for you.  You're the one that has to look into the mirror at the face of a louse that supports such depravity and aggression towards women.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,424]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He's on full wine tilt!!! 

Grown men upset that Kamala Harris won’t be leading the country. They don’t think they have become at least a partial woman? 

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

47 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Looks like gutter boy was into the Beaujolais last night with the other wine moms at their cry/rage get together last night.  

You claim to have a daughter.  I'm sure she'll be proud of a guy that supports sex crimes against women.

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

She forgot that Biden molested his own Daughter 

Using the unfounded accusations to support an entire culture of violence against women.  You've hit rock bottom.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

1 minute ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

You claim to have a daughter.  I'm sure she'll be proud of a guy that supports sex crimes against women.

But you support grown men with wigs entering the girls bathroom? That's what you want for your Daughter? You say you're pro-Woman?

Sounds like you're Pro-Tranny to me. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

11 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

It's a new low, even for you.  You're the one that has to look into the mirror at the face of a louse that supports such depravity and aggression towards women.

New low? 

Your candidate's husband had an affair on his first wife, your candidate was a wh0re who slept her way to the top, your side supports full term abortions, chemicals and surgeries for kids and hates the 1st amendment (unless it's speech that agrees with you).  

You have no morals, much less a "moral high ground" to stand on.  Take your delusion and your revisionist history to the trash heap of failed ideologies where it belongs.  You lost in a historic electoral landslide.  America resoundingly rejected you, your religion and your ideology.  Sorry, pal, you'll have to face the truth.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

8 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Using the unfounded accusations to support an entire culture of violence against women.  You've hit rock bottom.

And yet Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein were MAJOR contributors to the Democrat Party. 

Rest assured, everyone, when a lefty or far-lefty accuses you of something, they're already doing it! 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,424]

7 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

You claim to have a daughter.  I'm sure she'll be proud of a guy that supports sex crimes against women.

You claim to have daughters and are upset that they can’t butcher your grandchild in the womb. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Grown men upset that Kamala Harris won’t be leading the country. They don’t think they have become at least a partial woman? 

I'd say using "grown men" when describing a lefty is a bit too generous.  "Simp" or "Cuck" is the more fitting term.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

GUTTERBOY is speechless  

That's why they're the Pedo Party! 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

GUTTERBOY is speechless  

That's why they're the Pedo Party! 

Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Joe Biden approved!!!

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Grown men upset that Kamala Harris won’t be leading the country. They don’t think they have become at least a partial woman? 

Grown men with daughters supporting other men that treat women however they want

[Hardcore troubadour 15,424]

1 minute ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Grown men with daughters supporting other men that treat women however they want

You really are worried about abortion going away. That’s something women worry about. Why are you? 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

You really are worried about abortion going away. That’s something women worry about. Why are you? 

That's EXACTLY what lost them the election. 

A grown ass Man's biggest worry is abortion? WTF is wrong with Pedocrats? 

How many abortions do their Girls get? 

[Voltaire 5,316]

36 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

That's EXACTLY what lost them the election. 

A grown ass Man's biggest worry is abortion? WTF is wrong with Pedocrats? 

How many abortions do their Girls get? 

Since they only have this one single large and popular issue, their only move is to wring it for all its worth by talking about it all the time. Even though this is a male dominated forum and this is a female dominated issue it remains the singular reason to vote for Democrats for those that support the abortion position.

Actually, in Gutterboy's case preserving the access Drag Queens have to little children is another hill to die on as well.

[The Real timschochet 6,762]

15 hours ago, jerryskids said:

You know the filibuster still exists, right? 

If the filibuster is used successfully to stop important parts of Trump’s agenda, he will insist that it be removed, just as he did 4 years ago, and this time I suspect the Senate Republicans will go along. 

[shadrap 228]

8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

If the filibuster is used successfully to stop important parts of Trump’s agenda, he will insist that it be removed, just as he did 4 years ago, and this time I suspect the Senate Republicans will go along. 

I hope your wrong although if the Dems would have won there is no doubt they would have got rid of it.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

57 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You really are worried about abortion going away. That’s something women worry about. Why are you? 

Turns out, most women weren't worried about it either except those on the extreme left. 

In fact, it appears that women also buy milk and eggs and the economy was much more important!

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Turns out, most women weren't worried about it either except those on the extreme left. 

In fact, it appears that women also buy milk and eggs and it seems the economy was much more important!

And still the Democrats haven't learned a damn thing from the election. 

Sticking to their guns, haha  

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

10 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

New low? 

Your candidate's husband had an affair on his first wife, your candidate was a wh0re who slept her way to the top, your side supports full term abortions, chemicals and surgeries for kids and hates the 1st amendment (unless it's speech that agrees with you).  

You have no morals, much less a "moral high ground" to stand on.  Take your delusion and your revisionist history to the trash heap of failed ideologies where it belongs.  You lost in a historic electoral landslide.  America resoundingly rejected you, your religion and your ideology.  Sorry, pal, you'll have to face the truth.

I know Trump likes to say so, but Trump thinks everything associated with him is the most outstanding example of that thing.  The fact is that his victory does not rate in the top ten eloectoral college victories and in fact is in the bottom half. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,424]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Turns out, most women weren't worried about it either except those on the extreme left. 

In fact, it appears that women also buy milk and eggs and the economy was much more important!

They’ll never get it. They cling to it like it’s a life preserver when  it’s really an anchor. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

I knmow Trump likes to say so, but Trump thinks everything associated with him is the most outstanding example of that thing.  The fact is that his victory does not rate in the top ten eloectoral college victories and in fact is in the bottom half. 

right, maybe the use of the word "historical" was a bit of an exaggeration on my part so I'll retract that, but the fact of the matter is that even the pundits and talking heads on the left are saying this was a landslide/major butt whooping.

[The Real timschochet 6,762]

37 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

right, maybe the use of the word "historical" was a bit of an exaggeration on my part so I'll retract that, but the fact of the matter is that even the pundits and talking heads on the left are saying this was a landslide/major butt whooping.

I agree. And I’ll add, while it’s fine for a guy like @Engorgeous George to argue that it was not really a thrashing, liberals shouldn’t do it. It looks weak and whiny. 
 

We lost. No excuses, no “yeah but”, no “it was closer than it seems.” Fock that. We got our asses kicked. Take the l, hope we can do better next time. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I agree. And I’ll add, while it’s fine for a guy like @Engorgeous George to argue that it was not really a thrashing, liberals shouldn’t do it. It looks weak and whiny. 
 

We lost. No excuses, no “yeah but”, no “it was closer than it seems.” Fock that. We got our asses kicked. Take the l, hope we can do better next time. 

It was such a weird election. Traditionally, if you replaced your candidate a few months before the general election you were probably losing in an historic landslide. On top of that you had all kinds of headwinds with an unpopular incumbent administration, high inflation that left everyone very grump, a global trend of incumbents losing for similar reasons, and a huge anti/establishment/anti “elitist” sentiment that Trump has been successfully tapping into for years. On top of that your candidate is a black woman in a country that’s never had a female president, period, much less a female president of color.

So in many ways it’s pretty amazing that they were not thoroughly trounced.

But, on the other hand, Trump is a focking awful candidate in his own right. So many red flags and such a tremendously unpalatable piece of sh1t. And he should have paid a huge price for overturning Roe v Wade and January 6 and all that. Just shocking that you could lose to such an unquestionably unsuitable “leader.”

And it was a bad loss, no Trump didn’t get 400 electoral votes and he didn’t top 50% of the popular vote, but he did take all the swing states and the Dems lost the Senate and they didn’t get anywhere in the House. It was a trouncing, though a bit of a “shallow” one, if you will.

Anyways, Dems definitely gotta adjust their priorities and message. I’d drop the grievance mentality (call it wokeism or identity politics or whatever, it’s all similar) and especially don’t take the bait on tranny stuff. Focus on working class issues and stop telling them they’re doing fine because they obviously don’t feel that way. Also focus on morality because you’ve got a huge focking piece of garbage in the White House stacking his administration with equally disgusting pieces of trash, so that’ll be an easy sell. Don’t scream about every little thing but do point out that, hey, we don’t have to be like this, and there is an alternative

[jerryskids 6,792]

15 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

It was such a weird election. Traditionally, if you replaced your candidate a few months before the general election you were probably losing in an historic landslide. On top of that you had all kinds of headwinds with an unpopular incumbent administration, high inflation that left everyone very grump, a global trend of incumbents losing for similar reasons, and a huge anti/establishment/anti “elitist” sentiment that Trump has been successfully tapping into for years. On top of that your candidate is a black woman in a country that’s never had a female president, period, much less a female president of color.

So in many ways it’s pretty amazing that they were not thoroughly trounced.

But, on the other hand, Trump is a focking awful candidate in his own right. So many red flags and such a tremendously unpalatable piece of sh1t. And he should have paid a huge price for overturning Roe v Wade and January 6 and all that. Just shocking that you could lose to such an unquestionably unsuitable “leader.”

And it was a bad loss, no Trump didn’t get 400 electoral votes and he didn’t top 50% of the popular vote, but he did take all the swing states and the Dems lost the Senate and they didn’t get anywhere in the House. It was a trouncing, though a bit of a “shallow” one, if you will.

Anyways, Dems definitely gotta adjust their priorities and message. I’d drop the grievance mentality (call it wokeism or identity politics or whatever, it’s all similar) and especially don’t take the bait on tranny stuff. Focus on working class issues and stop telling them they’re doing fine because they obviously don’t feel that way. Also focus on morality because you’ve got a huge focking piece of garbage in the White House stacking his administration with equally disgusting pieces of trash, so that’ll be an easy sell. Don’t scream about every little thing but do point out that, hey, we don’t have to be like this, and there is an alternative

Pretty good summary, but you missed a few things in Kamala's favor.

1. The MSM gaslit the public 24/7 that Kamala was hip and popular and well-spoken, and who needs press conferences or any unscripted, difficult discussion?

2. The Leftist elites donated > $1B to the Kamala campaign (and they inexplicably overspent), flooding the airwaves with ads.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Pretty good summary, but you missed a few things in Kamala's favor.

1. The MSM gaslit the public 24/7 that Kamala was hip and popular and well-spoken, and who needs press conferences or any unscripted, difficult discussion?

2. The Leftist elites donated > $1B to the Kamala campaign (and they inexplicably overspent), flooding the airwaves with ads.

Definitely true on the second point. First point I’m not so sure. She had a favorable media outside of Fox News and the podcast bros but they pretty much dominate the media scene now. And Trump was running scared refusing to do another debate (which was smart, but kinda undercuts the idea that Kamala was not willing to get out there)

[The Real timschochet 6,762]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

 

2. The Leftist elites donated > $1B to the Kamala campaign (and they inexplicably overspent), flooding the airwaves with ads.

2 competing theories regarding this: 

1. In the social media age, in which people are more tuned in to TikTok, podcasts, Netflix etc than they are to live television, spending money on campaign ads doesn’t really work anymore. Folks aren’t paying attention. 
 

2. Donald Trump is such a unique figure in American politics that none of the election rules applied to him. But because he is so unique we shouldn’t over correct in terms of how to spend campaign money; when he’s gone the old rules will still apply.

 

I don’t know which is true. Perhaps they’re both partly true. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

It was such a weird election. Traditionally, if you replaced your candidate a few months before the general election you were probably losing in an historic landslide. On top of that you had all kinds of headwinds with an unpopular incumbent administration, high inflation that left everyone very grump, a global trend of incumbents losing for similar reasons, and a huge anti/establishment/anti “elitist” sentiment that Trump has been successfully tapping into for years. On top of that your candidate is a black woman in a country that’s never had a female president, period, much less a female president of color.

So in many ways it’s pretty amazing that they were not thoroughly trounced.

But, on the other hand, Trump is a focking awful candidate in his own right. So many red flags and such a tremendously unpalatable piece of sh1t. And he should have paid a huge price for overturning Roe v Wade and January 6 and all that. Just shocking that you could lose to such an unquestionably unsuitable “leader.”

And it was a bad loss, no Trump didn’t get 400 electoral votes and he didn’t top 50% of the popular vote, but he did take all the swing states and the Dems lost the Senate and they didn’t get anywhere in the House. It was a trouncing, though a bit of a “shallow” one, if you will.

Anyways, Dems definitely gotta adjust their priorities and message. I’d drop the grievance mentality (call it wokeism or identity politics or whatever, it’s all similar) and especially don’t take the bait on tranny stuff. Focus on working class issues and stop telling them they’re doing fine because they obviously don’t feel that way. Also focus on morality because you’ve got a huge focking piece of garbage in the White House stacking his administration with equally disgusting pieces of trash, so that’ll be an easy sell. Don’t scream about every little thing but do point out that, hey, we don’t have to be like this, and there is an alternative

Good write up, 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Good write up, 

Thanks!

[purdygood 352]

5 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

She forgot that Biden molested his own Daughter 

Trump is sooooo jealous. 

[Horseman 2,457]

12 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Grown men with daughters supporting other men that treat women however they want

RIP

It was a good run. You should just take solace in that and go away like the owner and majority of posters in this place wants.

Take a hint. 

Hit the road. 

Good grief you're pathetic.  

 

[Horseman 2,457]

8 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

It was such a weird election. Traditionally, if you replaced your candidate a few months before the general election you were probably losing in an historic landslide. On top of that you had all kinds of headwinds with an unpopular incumbent administration, high inflation that left everyone very grump, a global trend of incumbents losing for similar reasons, and a huge anti/establishment/anti “elitist” sentiment that Trump has been successfully tapping into for years. On top of that your candidate is a black woman in a country that’s never had a female president, period, much less a female president of color.

So in many ways it’s pretty amazing that they were not thoroughly trounced.

But, on the other hand, Trump is a focking awful candidate in his own right. So many red flags and such a tremendously unpalatable piece of sh1t. And he should have paid a huge price for overturning Roe v Wade and January 6 and all that. Just shocking that you could lose to such an unquestionably unsuitable “leader.”

And it was a bad loss, no Trump didn’t get 400 electoral votes and he didn’t top 50% of the popular vote, but he did take all the swing states and the Dems lost the Senate and they didn’t get anywhere in the House. It was a trouncing, though a bit of a “shallow” one, if you will.

Anyways, Dems definitely gotta adjust their priorities and message. I’d drop the grievance mentality (call it wokeism or identity politics or whatever, it’s all similar) and especially don’t take the bait on tranny stuff. Focus on working class issues and stop telling them they’re doing fine because they obviously don’t feel that way. Also focus on morality because you’ve got a huge focking piece of garbage in the White House stacking his administration with equally disgusting pieces of trash, so that’ll be an easy sell. Don’t scream about every little thing but do point out that, hey, we don’t have to be like this, and there is an alternative

3rd grade summaries are the best.

[jonmx 2,429]

12 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

It was such a weird election. Traditionally, if you replaced your candidate a few months before the general election you were probably losing in an historic landslide. On top of that you had all kinds of headwinds with an unpopular incumbent administration, high inflation that left everyone very grump, a global trend of incumbents losing for similar reasons, and a huge anti/establishment/anti “elitist” sentiment that Trump has been successfully tapping into for years. On top of that your candidate is a black woman in a country that’s never had a female president, period, much less a female president of color.

So in many ways it’s pretty amazing that they were not thoroughly trounced.

But, on the other hand, Trump is a focking awful candidate in his own right. So many red flags and such a tremendously unpalatable piece of sh1t. And he should have paid a huge price for overturning Roe v Wade and January 6 and all that. Just shocking that you could lose to such an unquestionably unsuitable “leader.”

And it was a bad loss, no Trump didn’t get 400 electoral votes and he didn’t top 50% of the popular vote, but he did take all the swing states and the Dems lost the Senate and they didn’t get anywhere in the House. It was a trouncing, though a bit of a “shallow” one, if you will.

Anyways, Dems definitely gotta adjust their priorities and message. I’d drop the grievance mentality (call it wokeism or identity politics or whatever, it’s all similar) and especially don’t take the bait on tranny stuff. Focus on working class issues and stop telling them they’re doing fine because they obviously don’t feel that way. Also focus on morality because you’ve got a huge focking piece of garbage in the White House stacking his administration with equally disgusting pieces of trash, so that’ll be an easy sell. Don’t scream about every little thing but do point out that, hey, we don’t have to be like this, and there is an alternative

How about stop being authoritarian bastards who want to strip all our rights and centralize power in Washington DC to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who are in bed with corporate monopolies.   Today's Democrat party is one that hates America and it's people. I have no idea the Jedi mind tricks they play to get more than two percent of the vote.  Are people really that brainwashed?

[seafoam1 3,018]

4 hours ago, Horseman said:

3rd grade summaries are the best.

You are being kind to him. 

[seafoam1 3,018]

8 minutes ago, jonmx said:

How about stop being authoritarian bastards who want to strip all our rights and centralize power in Washington DC to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who are in bed with corporate monopolies.   Today's Democrat party is one that hates America and it's people. I have no idea the Jedi mind tricks they play to get more than two percent of the vote.  Are people really that brainwashed?

wormy is one of them. And yes, he's that brainwashed. 

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

8 hours ago, Horseman said:

RIP

It was a good run. You should just take solace in that and go away like the owner and majority of posters in this place wants.

Take a hint. 

Hit the road. 

Good grief you're pathetic.  

 

Keep smashing that report button and crying about me. 

Love this for you.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

56 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Keep smashing that report button and crying about me. 

Isn't that your job BOYO?