Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jbycho

Dem immigration talking points fizzle as dark picture of Abrego Garcia emerges

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I know I'm missing something, these are the orders I'm familiar with:

  • Bond hearing 2019 - ordered held.
  • Hearing on asylum and removal - request for removal denied, Trump DHS released him.
  • USSC and prior district and appeals courts, ordered feds return him.
  • Judge Xini, enforcing the USSC order, strictly ordered him returned.
13 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

 

We did this yesterday.  Not doing it again unless you will accept a bored ban if I prove he had a final order of deportation.  I mean, no one is disputing that or they wouldn't be whining about WHERE he got deported; they would be whining about him getting deported at all.  As I said, if you want to have a discussion on our difference of opinion that's one thing.  If you want to argue that he doesn't have a final order of deportation GFY.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

We did this yesterday.  Not doing it again unless you will accept a bored ban if I prove he had a final order of deportation.  I mean, no one is disputing that or they wouldn't be whining about WHERE he got deported; they would be whining about him getting deported at all.  As I said, if you want to have a discussion on our difference of opinion that's one thing.  ...

Buddy, it's all right you don't have to prove anything. Not asking you to either. Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

We did this yesterday.  Not doing it again unless you will accept a bored ban if I prove he had a final order of deportation.  I mean, no one is disputing that or they wouldn't be whining about WHERE he got deported; they would be whining about him getting deported at all.  As I said, if you want to have a discussion on our difference of opinion that's one thing.  If you want to argue that he doesn't have a final order of deportation GFY.

💥

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberal Cities with first class SID level TDS.  

New York police attacked by Tren de Aragua gang. 

Quote

 

Eleven teen members of the ultra-violentTren de Aragua Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua were allegedly involved in an attack against two NYPD officers on Friday night in Times Square, police sources told Fox News.

Five of the suspects, all illegal aliens from Venezuela, have been arrested in connection with the alleged attack, which involved the migrant crew throwing glass bottles, basketballs and rocks at NYPD officers who were responding to a robbery.

Gang is responsible for over 240 robberies. 

 

Mayor and police chief won't turn the over to ICE when they show up. 

Quote

 

We are also aware that ICE was present at one of our precincts on Sunday morning. And while we are looking into how they got there, I want to stress that our officers followed the procedure outlined in our January directive. They did exactly what we asked of them. We will, of course, continue to work with our federal partners on criminal enforcement.

But I will say it once again, the NYPD does not engage in civil immigration enforcement, period. 

 

You get what you vote for I guess.  Must be the tarrifs keeping people from traveling to New York.  🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Mayor and police chief won't turn the over to ICE when they show up. 

Actually Adams - pardoned/released by Trump - has recently supported giving ICE access to Rikers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Actually Adams - pardoned/released by Trump - has recently supported giving ICE access to Rikers.

Actually they didn't cooperate with ICE in this recent situation, the one I brought up, I even quoted their response.  WTF is wrong with you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Actually they didn't cooperate with ICE in this recent situation, the one I brought up, I even quoted their response.

I said Adams. Adams doesn’t run the jail. That law is the work of the NYC council.

FWIW I agree with you, however it’s an option for Trump’s DOJ to bring charges here. If they want to slap charges on they can do that & gain access.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Strike said:

To be clear, my stance is not that I support sending illegals to El Salvador prisons, especially when they have an order specifically prohibiting it.  I just think that it's done and don't really care that we do anything to get him back.  That would just be a waste of resources IMO.

Do you include publicly asking among “anything”?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Do you include publicly asking among “anything”?

Dang. You are desperate. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Do you include publicly asking among “anything”?

I said I don't care.  That means "I don't care."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's a shame they can't bring him back to the US and charge him :lol:

It’s a little late for that Kojak. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2025 at 1:26 PM, TimHauck said:

Thanks for calling out his age. So he was only 16 when he left El Salvador.  Which would seem to make it not that likely (but yes, theoretically possible) that he was already in a “rival gang” by then.

At what age do you imagine boys join gangs?  Why wouldmit be unlikely that a 16 year old ws in a gang?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

At what age do you imagine boys join gangs?  Why wouldmit be unlikely that a 16 year old ws in a gang?

I honestly have no idea, but in doing a quick search, I’ll admit I was wrong (at least based on US data), which seems to say the most common age to join is between 13-15.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

At what age do you imagine boys join gangs?  Why wouldmit be unlikely that a 16 year old ws in a gang?

According to the facts of the case Barrio 18 first tried to "recruit" Gacia when he was 12. He resisted and his family moved twice to help him (and themselves) avoid the pressure.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I honestly have no idea, but in doing a quick search, I’ll admit I was wrong (at least based on US data), which seems to say the most common age to join is between 13-15.

That comports with my admittedly uneducated impression of the recruitment process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Strike said:

Hey all.  Remember that story about this guy getting stopped for suspected human trafficking?  Turns out it's true.  Shocking, I KNOW!!!!

https://tennesseestar.com/justice/doj-reportedly-gave-limited-immunity-to-human-smuggler-who-owned-van-driven-by-kilmar-abrego-garcia-for-details-on-2022-trip/tpappert/2025/05/06/

So, more evidence he’s not a great guy, but does nothing to help prove the claim that he’s in MS-13, which as a reminder is the reason he was sent to CECOT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So, more evidence he’s not a great guy, but does nothing to help prove the claim that he’s in MS-13, which as a reminder is the reason he was sent to CECOT.

Court already determined he was MS-13.  We're past that, no matter how much you want to rehash it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Court already determined he was MS-13.  We're past that, no matter how much you want to rehash it. 

 One judge believed he was, but it wasn’t a “determination”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 One judge believed he was, but it wasn’t a “determination”

Yes it was.  Use whatever word you want.  A court decided he was MS-13.  He had a final deportation order.  And we keep finding more and more evidence that he SHOULD have been deported.  He's gone.  Hopefully he never comes back.  Amazing that so many of you libs want him to come back.  You should be happy he's gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Yes it was.  Use whatever word you want.  A court decided he was MS-13.  He had a final deportation order.  And we keep finding more and more evidence that he SHOULD have been deported.  He's gone.  Hopefully he never comes back.  Amazing that so many of you libs want him to come back.  You should be happy he's gone.

No, they did not “decide he was MS-13” no matter how many times you say it.  One judge just thought the evidence he was was enough to deny him bail.  

I don’t want him to come back.  I just want him to be released from prison in El Salvador.  Because as far as I’m aware he has not been charged with any crime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

No, they did not “decide he was MS-13” no matter how many times you say it.  One judge just thought the evidence he was was enough to deny him bail.  

I don’t want him to come back.  I just want him to be released from prison in El Salvador.  Because as far as I’m aware he has not been charged with any crime.

Then send a letter to El Salvador and ask them to release him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

According to the facts of the case Barrio 18 first tried to "recruit" Gacia when he was 12. He resisted and his family moved twice to help him (and themselves) avoid the pressure.

By "facts," you mean Garcia's testimony, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

Then send a letter to El Salvador and ask them to release him.

I know a guy who could do that and has a lot more power than me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I know a guy who could do that and has a lot more power than me

Oh, he can lift 15 whole pounds over his head? Dang..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

By "facts," you mean Garcia's testimony, right?

That’s from the court’s opinion. It’s the judge’s findings based on all evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I know a guy who could do that and has a lot more power than me

I would NEVER send that later, so don't ask.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

That’s from the court’s opinion. It’s the judge’s findings based on all evidence.

All the evidence was his testimony. This has been discussed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

All the evidence was his testimony. This has been discussed. 

The government did participate. And they had the right to appeal but did not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

The government did participate. And they had the right to appeal but did not.

Ok

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like to revisit the tattoo discussion for a second with a point I haven’t really seen discussed elsewhere.  Here is the “gang field interview sheet” which is essentially the entirety of the evidence that was used in court leading the one judge to believe he was in MS-13 in order to deny him bail:

https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

Interestingly, the report included comments about the tattoos of one of the other guys arrested as being attributed to “Hispanic gang culture.”   But there were zero comments about Abrego-Garcia’s tattoos.  If his tattoos “obviously signified MS-13” as some claim, wouldn’t that have been mentioned, especially if the tattoos of someone else WERE mentioned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They stopped making those tatoos. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’d like to revisit the tattoo discussion for a second with a point I haven’t really seen discussed elsewhere.  Here is the “gang field interview sheet” which is essentially the entirety of the evidence that was used in court leading the one judge to believe he was in MS-13 in order to deny him bail:

https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

Interestingly, the report included comments about the tattoos of one of the other guys arrested as being attributed to “Hispanic gang culture.”   But there were zero comments about Abrego-Garcia’s tattoos.  If his tattoos “obviously signified MS-13” as some claim, wouldn’t that have been mentioned, especially if the tattoos of someone else WERE mentioned?

You'd have to ask the cop who wrote the report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, what a thread. 

This is what liberalism does to you.

Such a sad existence.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this POS didn’t have the tattoos he has now six years ago. Tim Hack is borderline retarded. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Strike said:

You'd have to ask the cop who wrote the report.

True, I’d also like to ask the one judge if she’d still consider that cop trustworthy since he got fired, indicted and pled guilty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’d like to revisit the tattoo discussion for a second with a point I haven’t really seen discussed elsewhere.  Here is the “gang field interview sheet” which is essentially the entirety of the evidence that was used in court leading the one judge to believe he was in MS-13 in order to deny him bail:

https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

Interestingly, the report included comments about the tattoos of one of the other guys arrested as being attributed to “Hispanic gang culture.”   But there were zero comments about Abrego-Garcia’s tattoos.  If his tattoos “obviously signified MS-13” as some claim, wouldn’t that have been mentioned, especially if the tattoos of someone else WERE mentioned?

Quote

Officers then interviewed Kilmar Armando ABREGO-GARCIA. During the interview officers observed he was wearing a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie with rolls of money covering the eyes, ears and mouth of the presidents on the separate denominations. Officers know such clothing to be indicative of the Hispanic gang culture. The meaning of the clothing is to represent "ver, oir y caliar" or "see no evil, hear no evil and say no evil". Wearing the Chicago Bulls hat represents that they are a member in good standing with the MS-13 . Officers contacted a past proven and reliable source of information, who advised Kilmar Armando ABREGO-GARCIA is an active member of MS-13 with the Westerns clique. The confidential source further advised that he is the rank of "Chequeo" with the moniker of "Chele".

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but this is the whole basis for the allegation that Garcia is MS13.

There's a specific section for scars, marks & tattoos - there is nothing there. Tattoos had nothing to do with identifying Garcia as MS13.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but this is the whole basis for the allegation that Garcia is MS13.

There's a specific section for scars, marks & tattoos - there is nothing there. Tattoos had nothing to do with identifying Garcia as MS13.

Are you guys under the serious impression that people in this country ILLEGALLY get a criminal trial like OJ Simpson?  This is simply absurd.

I wish you marxists would fight for actual American citizens with 25% of the effort that you defend illegal aliens that are not only here illegally, but committing additional crimes while they are here.  Unf'nbelievable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Are you guys under the serious impression that people in this country ILLEGALLY get a criminal trial like OJ Simpson?  This is simply absurd.

I wish you marxists would fight for actual American citizens with 25% of the effort that you defend illegal aliens that are not only here illegally, but committing additional crimes while they are here.  Unf'nbelievable.

Their whole strategy is to let as many millions of illegals as they can in to the country, and then overwhelm the immigration and/or court system such that those people can't be removed.  It's ridiculous and why reasonable people such as myself don't give a sh*t how these people are removed as long as they are removed. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×