TimHauck 3,332 Posted 9 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Are you actually too dumb where you don't understand what is happening? Honestly, what is happening now? Is he just saying that now because the vote will probably pass? Or are they going to say they can’t release them again because there’s an active investigation (into Dems only)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,921 Posted 9 hours ago 10 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Honestly, what is happening now? Is he just saying that now because the vote will probably pass? Or are they going to say they can’t release them again because there’s an active investigation (into Dems only)? Back when Bondi had the files on her desk, I assumed they’d release a version with all mentions of Trump and other Republicans redacted. Not sure why they didn’t. Maybe that’s the plan now? I don’t think many people will fall for it beyond the jonmx and Beernuts types. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,332 Posted 9 hours ago On 11/15/2025 at 5:07 PM, Mike Honcho said: Wait - you don't think pizzagate was made up? Wait, the entire Pizzagate thing was based on a message about getting pizza? lololol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 9 hours ago 35 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Honestly, what is happening now? Is he just saying that now because the vote will probably pass? Or are they going to say they can’t release them again because there’s an active investigation (into Dems only)? Trump has been fighting the release of these files for months now. Why? We assume he has something to hide. Now that the democrats have enough signatures to bring the release to a vote in the house, Trump was told he was going to lose, so he jumped to the other side to avoid a political loss. We're still a long way from actually getting the release, but this allows Trump to live another day and continue to block the release. And his supporters can say "See, he wants them released too" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,548 Posted 8 hours ago 57 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Honestly, what is happening now? Is he just saying that now because the vote will probably pass? Or are they going to say they can’t release them again because there’s an active investigation (into Dems only)? This is exactly what I expect to happen. It's already being choreographed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 8 hours ago My sense right now is they want to turn this into another Mueller report fight. Redactions, these files but not those files, foia & committee fights. Weird conspiracies that rile up the great unwashed. It’s all Trump & Co. know how to do. We’ve already seen the Hoax theme deployed like a dozen times. The maga coyotes fall for it every time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,332 Posted 8 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Fnord said: This is exactly what I expect to happen. It's already being choreographed. Which one? Option B? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,332 Posted 8 hours ago 13 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: So it turns out Bill Pulte’s father ran a shake ‘n bake with Trump to snipe the Wexler property from Epstein. The property was then sold to Dmitry Rybolovlev, the Russian oligarch who bought the property soon after from Trump for 4 times its value. Rybolovlev later redeveloped it with Pulte. As a reminder, Pulte is the Fannie Mac director who has been scraping through private mortgage records to send referrals on supposed mortgage fraud against Trump’s most hated Dems to DOJ. I’m a little confused here. Trump’s friend Pulte was bidding against him? And it looks like it wasn’t until 3 years later that he sold it. I’m sure Trump has committed a lot of real estate fraud, but I’m not sure this is one of them. Just him getting lucky by selling right before the bubble fully popped. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,332 Posted 8 hours ago I searched Rybolovlev on x, and this email was probably more interesting to me, with Epstein suggesting Trump was paid off for “overruling Congress on Yemen.” 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,548 Posted 8 hours ago 35 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Which one? Option B? Yup, but they'll leave out that last bit. 1 hour ago, TimHauck said: Or are they going to say they can’t release them again because there’s an active investigation (into Dems only)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,650 Posted 7 hours ago Any maga care to answer why Bondi reopened the investigations she said were complete and case closed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 7 hours ago 22 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I searched Rybolovlev on x, and this email was probably more interesting to me, with Epstein suggesting Trump was paid off for “overruling Congress on Yemen.” This is the kinda stuff I think Trump wants hidden. Yeah sure Trump is disgusting, a rapist, probably a pedo but we know he's as corrupt as anyone that has ever lived. I think that is what he is afraid of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 7 hours ago 29 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I searched Rybolovlev on x, and this email was probably more interesting to me, with Epstein suggesting Trump was paid off for “overruling Congress on Yemen.” This is the kinda stuff I think Trump wants hidden. Yeah sure Trump is disgusting, a rapist, probably a pedo but we know he's as corrupt as anyone that has ever lived. I think that is what he is afraid of. Thanks for the replies, I’ll respond to the one above as well. Right, on, Rybolovlev - he’s an old name. He came up in & around 2016 in reports of Trump getting paid millions of dollars over long periods of time by shady Russian sources. Rybolovlev specifically is about influence. There’s no allegation of fraud about him, though when his name used to come up it was most usually associated with Russian oligarch (or transnational criminal) money laundering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, TimHauck said: I’m a little confused here. Trump’s friend Pulte was bidding against him? And it looks like it wasn’t until 3 years later that he sold it. I’m sure Trump has committed a lot of real estate fraud, but I’m not sure this is one of them. Just him getting lucky by selling right before the bubble fully popped. I wasn’t suggesting there was fraud & neither was Epstein. - As you pointed out Rybolovlev is a name that goes back with Trump. The suggestion back around 2016 was Rybolovlev had laundered money through the purchase of the Wexler property through Trump. - On that email IMO Epstein was suggesting Trump was a stalking horse, someone who drove up the sale price and then got paid for that. - Epstein was angry about that & he claimed (as did his brother) that that was the reason he & Trump had a falling out. Epstein considered it a dirty thing to do a friend. Wexler was Epstein’s client & he considered that property as rightfully going to him. - Afterwards Rybolovlev partnered with Pulte to further develop the property. - Epstein also seems to suggest Trump committed tax fraud by claiming material expenses which he didn’t expend. - My sole point about Pulte is I didn’t realize he & his father went way back with Trump, apparently they used to be business partners in South Florida, maybe still are. - Also seems like an important point that Pulte, who’s using his office to frame indictments around Trump’s enemies, also was or is in bed with a Russian oligarch. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 7 hours ago Remember "Drain the Swamp"? I'll admit, I fell for it, that was the main reason I voted for Trump in 2016. But it was clear that he's a swamp creature. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 7 hours ago Mike Johnson now ranting about how bad it is to release these files. Give it up bro. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 7 hours ago Strong words from a survivor. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 6 hours ago “At just 16 years old, she took a job at Mar a Lago, believing she had secured a dream summer position. But that dream quickly morphed into a nightmare when Ghislaine Maxwell preyed upon her…. They trafficked her” 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 5 hours ago Here we go - They’re going to amend the discharge in the Senate to add “Protections”. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,085 Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Here we go - They’re going to amend the discharge in the Senate to add “Protections”. Will the Senators also be paying themselves $500,000 each time one of their names appears in the files? They are going to redact everything incriminating for any politician from the files. And will they ever release the hundreds of GB of files from captured hard drives? Presumably it is video evidence. Trump lied to America about releasing this, and now he will "release" just the parts he wants people to see, and hide the rest. MAGA, you got PLAYED. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,650 Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, dogcows said: Will the Senators also be paying themselves $500,000 each time one of their names appears in the files? They are going to redact everything incriminating for any politician from the files. And will they ever release the hundreds of GB of files from captured hard drives? Presumably it is video evidence. Trump lied to America about releasing this, and now he will "release" just the parts he wants people to see, and hide the rest. MAGA, you got PLAYED. Did this get talked about? These fockers trying to pay themselves for getting their phone records checked…because they were complicit in trying to change the focking election results. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 5 hours ago “And he called me a traitor for standing with these women and refusing to take my name off the discharge petition. Let me tell you what a traitor is. A traitor is a is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves. A patriot is an American that serves the United States of Americans and Americans like the women standing behind me.” Bloody hell. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, dogcows said: Will the Senators also be paying themselves $500,000 each time one of their names appears in the files? They are going to redact everything incriminating for any politician from the files. And will they ever release the hundreds of GB of files from captured hard drives? Presumably it is video evidence. Trump lied to America about releasing this, and now he will "release" just the parts he wants people to see, and hide the rest. MAGA, you got PLAYED. I have a feeling they’re going to learn it’s not that easy being Bill Barr. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Did this get talked about? These fockers trying to pay themselves for getting their phone records checked…because they were complicit in trying to change the focking election results. The House is trying to appeal it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,466 Posted 4 hours ago 44 minutes ago, dogcows said: Will the Senators also be paying themselves $500,000 each time one of their names appears in the files? They are going to redact everything incriminating for any politician from the files. And will they ever release the hundreds of GB of files from captured hard drives? Presumably it is video evidence. Trump lied to America about releasing this, and now he will "release" just the parts he wants people to see, and hide the rest. MAGA, you got PLAYED. Chicken feed compared to the 250M Trump wants the DOJ to pay him for some of the investigations that were started by the DOJ in his first term. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 4 hours ago Rep. Van Orden: the Senate will close loopholes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,275 Posted 4 hours ago Say it ain’t so Hakeem “GOP Rep. James Comer reveals Hakeem Jeffries solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013: "Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately with Hakeem Jeffries..." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, HellToupee said: Say it ain’t so Hakeem “GOP Rep. James Comer reveals Hakeem Jeffries solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013: "Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately with Hakeem Jeffries..." Oh well, Goodbye Hakeem. All the trash needs to be taken out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 682 Posted 3 hours ago 37 minutes ago, HellToupee said: Say it ain’t so Hakeem “GOP Rep. James Comer reveals Hakeem Jeffries solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013: "Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately with Hakeem Jeffries..." Odd, why not post the email? - ETA Here’s the email. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,277 Posted 3 hours ago I have no doubts that Democrats are involved. Bring them all down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,165 Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, thegeneral said: Did this get talked about? These fockers trying to pay themselves for getting their phone records checked…because they were complicit in trying to change the focking election results. Technically, the election results were changed on election night in 2020 with the vote dump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,466 Posted 2 hours ago Quote House takes major step: The chamber has overwhelming passed a bipartisan bill to compel the Justice Department to release all of its case files tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a dramatic turnaround after months of GOP infighting. The House voted 427-1 to advance the measure, with GOP Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana the only member voting against it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,548 Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, HellToupee said: Say it ain’t so Hakeem “GOP Rep. James Comer reveals Hakeem Jeffries solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013: "Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately with Hakeem Jeffries..." Whatever would we do without Hakeem Jeffries? Let him burn if he's part of it. But soliciting political donations from a criminal isn't exactly shattering news... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,650 Posted 2 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Technically, the election results were changed on election night in 2020 with the vote dump. Tinhats be tinhatting! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,548 Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Tinhats be tinhatting! Just pray for lightning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,275 Posted 2 hours ago 57 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Technically, the election results were changed on election night in 2020 with the vote dump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,650 Posted 1 hour ago Are the MAGAs claiming that Don was the one who got the files released yet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,650 Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Who is it you think has been holding this up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,165 Posted 57 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Who is it you think has been holding this up Democrats sat on this for years. Trump finally just ripped the band aid off 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites