Elon says that Trump is in the Epstein files.

[Horseman 2,718]

2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Prepare yourself, Bondi will get the contempt charge from the House, not the Clintons. 

Who cares.  Find a new hobby.  

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

4 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Who cares.  Find a new hobby.  

Apparently Pam Bondi cares very much.

[Horseman 2,718]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Apparently Pam Bondi cares very much.

So?

[dogcows 1,258]

The DoJ released the names of some victims in the files. They clearly weren’t thinking about protecting them when they were redacting names. Too busy protecting the rapists.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/22/politics/epstein-survivors-files-redactions

They were able to quickly take out a picture of the fat guy in the White House but still haven’t fixed things for this victim.

 

[dogcows 1,258]

2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

So?

You don’t care if Trump raped kids. And you’re a proud Nazi? You are an embarrassment to horses everywhere.

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

So?

The law requires all political persons’ names not receive redactions. You may not have known this. Now you do.

[MDC 8,111]

6 minutes ago, dogcows said:

You don’t care if Trump raped kids. And you’re a proud Nazi? You are an embarrassment to horses everywhere.

And men!

[Ron_Artest 2,467]

23 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Who cares.  Find a new hobby.  

Who cares about child sex trafficking.  Horseman doesnt

[lickin_starfish 2,033]

There should be no redactions whatsoever. Anyone pictured or involved with Epstein in any way should be removed from their government position, regardless of guilt. They are tainted and compromised. Start from scratch with fresh representation. 

Same goes for politicians who took money from AIPAC.

[Hardcore troubadour 16,050]

40 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Prepare yourself, Bondi will get the contempt charge from the House, not the Clintons. 

Maybe you ought to lay off predictions about legal doings considering your track record. Just sayin. 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Maybe you ought to lay off predictions about legal doings considering your track record. Just sayin. 

Fair point, I agree the Republicans may never hold Bondi or anyone accountable for flouting their own law.

[TimHauck 3,435]

12 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

There should be no redactions whatsoever. Anyone pictured or involved with Epstein in any way should be removed from their government position, regardless of guilt. They are tainted and compromised. Start from scratch with fresh representation. 

Same goes for politicians who took money from AIPAC.

So no punishment needed for Bill Clinton?

As I’m sure you’re aware, many politicians including Trump have taken money from AIPAC

[blick 41]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Trump just said he doesn’t want photos of Clinton to be released?????

https://www.threads.com/@aaron.rupar/post/DSlWkVbia31

Also admits other powerful people such as lawyers and bankers are in the files too.

But I’m sure they are all innocent friends of Jeffrey and had NO IDEA what he was up to.

 

I don’t understand why it’s up to Joe Public to decide if someone is guilty or innocent. I’d hope our judicial system would do its job and string up anyone they have sufficient evidence to do so. If we can’t trust our government to do so, we have much bigger problems than this. 

[seafoam1 3,522]

30 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

There should be no redactions whatsoever. Anyone pictured or involved with Epstein in any way should be removed from their government position, regardless of guilt. They are tainted and compromised. Start from scratch with fresh representation. 

Same goes for politicians who took money from AIPAC.

So if you are at a party with somebody and that person later leaaves the party, drives home and on the way kills someone because of drunken driving, you should lose your job and have possible other consequences done to you? 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

So if you are at a party with somebody and that person later leaaves the party, drives home and on the way kills someone because of drunken driving, you should lose your job and have possible other consequences done to you? 

Ok now try this with close to a thousand victims & several hundred under 18.

[seafoam1 3,522]

Just now, blick said:

I don’t understand why it’s up to Joe Public to decide if someone is guilty or innocent. I’d hope our judicial system would do its job and string up anyone they have sufficient evidence to do so. If we can’t trust our government to do so, we have much bigger problems than this. 

 

Agreed. Liberals play judge day and night. If someone was wronged, then get a lawyer and press charges. 

[lickin_starfish 2,033]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So no punishment needed for Bill Clinton?

As I’m sure you’re aware, many politicians including Trump have taken money from AIPAC

The bare minimum for being involved in any way with Epstein should be expulsion from the government. If found guilty of child abuse, immediately dropped in the wood chipper.

[seafoam1 3,522]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ok now try this with close to a thousand victims & several hundred under 18.

Now it's a thousand. Soon to be a billion. Gotta string somebody for the people outraged because they want the US presedent to suffer. 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Now it's a thousand. Soon to be a billion. Gotta string somebody for the people outraged because they want the US presedent to suffer. 

Yes.

[seafoam1 3,522]

Just now, lickin_starfish said:

The bare minimum for being involved in any way with Epstein should be expulsion from the government. If found guilty of child abuse, immediately dropped in the wood chipper.

So a store clerk who epstein knew and was friendly to for 10 years should do prison time? I don't agree with guilt by association. 

[seafoam1 3,522]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Yes.

Wow. You liberals really dropped the ball not jumping on this early. You gave creepy joe years to cover this up and now those files can not in the least be trusted. 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Wow. You liberals really dropped the ball not jumping on this early. You gave creepy joe years to cover this up and now those files can not in the least be trusted. 

Epstein was convicted in 2008, again in 2019, & Maxwell as well after. They were prosecuted by Republicans & Democrats.

[blick 41]

5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

 

Agreed. Liberals play judge day and night. If someone was wronged, then get a lawyer and press charges. 

…all political. 

[seafoam1 3,522]

22 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So no punishment needed for Bill Clinton?

As I’m sure you’re aware, many politicians including Trump have taken money from AIPAC

Bill clinton lied under oath. Nothing happened to him and no outrage from the liberals. 

Stupid me thought lying under oath was a serious crime. 

[dogcows 1,258]

5 minutes ago, blick said:

I don’t understand why it’s up to Joe Public to decide if someone is guilty or innocent. I’d hope our judicial system would do its job and string up anyone they have sufficient evidence to do so. If we can’t trust our government to do so, we have much bigger problems than this. 

The current DOJ spent its time trying and failing multiple times to convict a guy for throwing a sandwich. They’ve publicly stated they will go after political enemies, which means actual criminals will walk. They will never prosecute Trump or his allies. If we want actual accountability, we need to remove the GOP from power.

[seafoam1 3,522]

Just now, blick said:

…all political. 

Yep. Not a peep from anyone for years until Trump was in office and all of a sudden the outrage from the left. Absolutely nothing prior to that. 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

9 minutes ago, blick said:

I don’t understand why it’s up to Joe Public to decide if someone is guilty or innocent. I’d hope our judicial system would do its job and string up anyone they have sufficient evidence to do so. If we can’t trust our government to do so, we have much bigger problems than this. 

Good. Give them the evidence.

[dogcows 1,258]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Epstein was convicted in 2008, again in 2019, & Maxwell as well after. They were prosecuted by Republicans & Democrats.

He was given a sweetheart deal in 2008 by a Republican guy (Acosta, who later worked for Trump) that allowed him to keep raping kids and getting paid to let other men rape them for another decade.

That is your typical Republican.

[seafoam1 3,522]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

The current DOJ spent its time trying and failing multiple times to convict a guy for throwing a sandwich. They’ve publicly stated they will go after political enemies, which means actual criminals will walk. They will never prosecute Trump or his allies. If we want actual accountability, we need to remove the GOP from power.

Focking liberals. 

[TimHauck 3,435]

10 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

So if you are at a party with somebody and that person later leaaves the party, drives home and on the way kills someone because of drunken driving, you should lose your job and have possible other consequences done to you? 

Good to know you think Clinton did nothing wrong 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

He was given a sweetheart deal in 2008 by a Republican guy (Acosta, who later worked for Trump) that allowed him to keep raping kids and getting paid to let other men rape them for another decade.

That is your typical Republican.

Some of the memoranda from that prosecution have been released. One of them includes Acosta refusing to meet with victims.

[seafoam1 3,522]

3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Good. Give them the evidence.

They are supposed to be the evidence. We don't need biden "cooking the books" on that documentation for 4 years and now be all of sudden  considered, "the truth". 

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

They are supposed to be the evidence. We don't need biden "cooking the books" on that documentation for 4 years to now be all of sudden be considered, "the truth". 

Giuffre brought Andrew down with one photo.

[seafoam1 3,522]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Good to know you think Clinton did nothing wrong 

Ooof. 

[blick 41]

5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Good. Give them the evidence.

Give who the evidence?  The public?  Why? Again, if we can’t trust our government (multiple administrations) to do their job, we have much bigger problems that elections won’t solve. 

[lickin_starfish 2,033]

8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

So a store clerk who epstein knew and was friendly to for 10 years should do prison time? I don't agree with guilt by association. 

I said "found guilty". That means court of law.

[SaintsInDome2006 797]

Just now, blick said:

Give who the evidence?  The public?  Why? Again, if we can’t trust our government (multiple administrations) to do their job, we have much bigger problems. 

The victims.

[dogcows 1,258]

3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Some of the memoranda from that prosecution have been released. One of them includes Acosta refusing to meet with victims.

He is very creepy. My guess is that Epstein let him sample his wares for free in exchange for the deal.

[dogcows 1,258]

1 minute ago, blick said:

Give who the evidence?  The public?  Why? Again, if we can’t trust our government (multiple administrations) to do their job, we have much bigger problems that elections won’t solve. 

Jury trials are the public deciding who is convicted. We elect the leaders who establish polices and hire prosecutors and judges. We own the whole process. I, for one, don’t believe in just checking out and letting “the government” decide it all. We the People are self-governed.

[seafoam1 3,522]

8 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

I said "found guilty". That means court of law.

 

I'm just saying a hell of a lot of people held high regards for Ted Bundy prior to him getting caught as a serial killer. Getting questioned in one thing, but liberals are automatically assuming guilt on to people here. 

And nobody knows what the liberals had done to those files over the four years they had them in their possession and stayed silent about everything. How about they work a little harder on how Epstein died to start things off. And learn why those files weren't released years ago before they focked with them.