"No Kings" rallies - More than 5 million took part in over 2,100 US cities & towns

[Sandy Loam 24]

No Kings Day sets U.S. protest record.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/data-guru-g-elliott-morris-says-up-to-6-million-people-attended-no-kings-anti-donald-trump-protests/

Quote

“Based on hundreds of crowd-sourced records of No Kings Day event turnout, and extrapolating for the cities where we don’t have data yet, it looks like roughly 4-6m people protested Trump across the U.S. yesterday,” independent data journalist G Elliott posted to X Sunday.

True patriots have awoken and are standing up against authoritarianism!

#nokings

[TimHauck 2,711]

40 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

 

1) The protesters were predominantly college kids who major in gender studies and French Lit who need something to do because they can't get internships.

2) Protests are funded by progressive/anarchic NGOs

3) The purpose of the protests is to keep people busy

4) NGOs are ramping up their protest dollars because they are losing govt grants

5) The purpose of the protests is to grift off people like me and get them to donate to them

Let's start with these 5.

I haven’t followed your whole back and forth here @jerryskids but also curious of your responses to 2-5

[Meglamaniac 440]

2 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

No Kings Day sets U.S. protest record.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/data-guru-g-elliott-morris-says-up-to-6-million-people-attended-no-kings-anti-donald-trump-protests/

True patriots have awoken and are standing up against authoritarianism!

#nokings

They only have to stay awake and stand for 3.5 more years

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I haven’t followed your whole back and forth here @jerryskids but also curious of your responses to 2-5

He's still trying to take a win on #1 despite acknowledging that he was wrong.

I wouldn't expect him to attempt 2-5 any time soon.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,204]

We aren’t six months into his term. Sad. Gutter and Rusty are about to spend 3 1/2 years doing this.  And then some.  

[League Champion 1,909]

On 6/13/2025 at 11:16 PM, Ron_Artest said:

Bootlicker.

It's Trump's birthday parade.

No Kings but they anointed Kamala as the Queen to be, no vote. 

Where's your NO QUEENS PROTEST Lib Boy? 

[RLLD 4,187]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

A vote in the most recent election doesn't prove your claim about their lifetime.

My position remains, they would vote for Trump because Biden had created the worse financial situation of their lifetime, and the fun part is....the demographics bear it out. I am grateful for the morons who refused to accept or see it. We needed those votes.  

[TimHauck 2,711]

Just now, RLLD said:

My position remains, they would vote for Trump because Biden had created the worse financial situation of their lifetime, 

You’re an idiot.

[jerryskids 6,695]

Quote

 

1) The protesters were predominantly college kids who major in gender studies and French Lit who need something to do because they can't get internships.

2) Protests are funded by progressive/anarchic NGOs

3) The purpose of the protests is to keep people busy

4) NGOs are ramping up their protest dollars because they are losing govt grants

5) The purpose of the protests is to grift off people like me and get them to donate to them

Let's start with these 5.

 

#2:

Quote

A coalition of over 200 organizations including the Indivisible movement, the Third Act Movement, American Federation of Teachers, Social Security Works, Communications Workers of America, American Civil Liberties Union, Public Citizen and MoveOn, organized the protests.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Kings_protests#cite_note-m578-10

Some progressive groups in that list.

This is an interesting link:

Quote

Nonprofits linked to the 14 June 2025 NoKings rally

This page lists every nonprofit for which we currently have a reconstructed flow of federal grant money to entities involved in the NoKings demonstration of 14 June 2025. Click “See Federal Grant Flow” to view the full interactive Sankey diagram for any organization.
Note: The list is not exhaustive; additional nonprofits will appear as more filings are processed.

https://datarepublican.com/nokings/

I can't speak to the accuracy, but click into a few of the companies in this link.  Somebody spent a lot of time and effort on this.

Skids 2, Gutter 0

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

#2:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Kings_protests#cite_note-m578-10

Some progressive groups in that list.

This is an interesting link:

https://datarepublican.com/nokings/

I can't speak to the accuracy, but click into a few of the companies in this link.  Somebody spent a lot of time and effort on this.

Skids 2, Gutter 0

Which ones call for anarchy?

[League Champion 1,909]

The World now sees what violent thugs the Liberals are. The Liberals will never win another election 

Unemployed blue haired Men marching with pink gas masks dressed like ghey Stormtroopers  

[jerryskids 6,695]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

So you're admitting that it's much much more than what you described yet say you were still correct and use a youtube video of one college student at a different protest as your source?

 

Different protest?  My post was about all of the summer protests.  Reading is fundamental:

Quote

Ah, protest season... the weather is nice, and college kids are out of school.  The ones who major in things like gender studies and French literature don't have internships, so they need something to do.  Thankfully, a bunch of progressive, anarchic NGOs organize and fund protests against... whatever, doesn't matter, the omnicause$#@! to keep them busy and feeling like they are contributing to society.

I expect a lot of such "organic"  protests this summer.  The gubment money spigot is turning off on these NGOs, and they need to create a feeling of chaos and despair to goad caring people like Gutter to donate to their worthwhile cause.  

Still 2-0

 

 

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Different protest?  My post was about all of the summer protests.  Reading is fundamental:

Still 2-0

 

 

The thread is about the No Kings protests.  You want to show me where any of these NGOs are promoting anarchy?

 

[jerryskids 6,695]

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

Which ones call for anarchy?

Again, RIF.  I said anarchic, not anarchy.  Here are some synonyms:

Quote

criminal

illicit

disorderly

illegal

felonious

lawless

unruly

unlawful

defiant

mutinous

lawbreaking

rebellious

riotous

insubordinate

undisciplined

wrongful

refractory

disobedient

intractable

recalcitrant

illegitimate

https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/anarchic

I bolded a few -- unruly, rebellious, riotous -- which certainly apply to groups which helped organize things, particularly in LA with their face masks: 

Still 2-0

[avoiding injuries 1,552]

He’s playing chess…

https://x.com/wallstreetmav/status/1934667287518396795?s=46

[League Champion 1,909]

3 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

He’s playing chess…

https://x.com/wallstreetmav/status/1934667287518396795?s=46

He owns their little liberal heads 

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Again, RIF.  I said anarchic, not anarchy.  Here are some synonyms:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/anarchic

I bolded a few -- unruly, rebellious, riotous -- which certainly apply to groups which helped organize things, particularly in LA with their face masks: 

Still 2-0

The NGOs do not promote those values.  They do not promote rioting.  We didn't see any riots on No Kings Day.  If you meant to post this in the LA riots thread then you are mistaken.

[jerryskids 6,695]

Quote

1) The protesters were predominantly college kids who major in gender studies and French Lit who need something to do because they can't get internships.

2) Protests are funded by progressive/anarchic NGOs

3) The purpose of the protests is to keep people busy

4) NGOs are ramping up their protest dollars because they are losing govt grants

5) The purpose of the protests is to grift off people like me and get them to donate to them

Let's start with these 5.

#3:  Like #1, this is an opinion.  You clearly can't identify facts. 

That being said, I worded that poorly.  I meant to imply that people participate because they have nothing better to do (a continuation of the jobless college kid theme), not that the NGOs are trying to keep them busy.

I'll split the point.  Jerry 2.5, Gutter 0.5

[Frozenbeernuts 2,227]

5 hours ago, zsasz said:

The richest man in the world was part of this administrations election campaign and staff. You talk about Big Pharma and Coporations donating to Liberal candidates...how much money was/is in Trumps Cabinet and positions of prominence?  

WHATABOUT

You, not surprisingly, completely missed the point of my post. Liberals genuinely think their candidates are morally better than Trump or any conservative candidate. L. O. L. You have been fooled again, and like all of my great questions, liberals cannot answer it.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,000]

15 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

WHATABOUT

You, not surprisingly, completely missed the point of my post. Liberals genuinely think their candidates are morally better than Trump or any conservative candidate. L. O. L. You have been fooled again, and like all of my great questions, liberals cannot answer it.

The Democrat Party has become the party of the wealthy and those facts cannot be denied:

• 65% of Americans who make over 500K a  year are Democrats
• 9 of the 10 richest Counties in America all vote Democrat
• 75% of donations from Silicon Valley and Hedge funds are for Democrats
• 95% of donations from the top 3 Management consulting firms are for Democrats
• Wall Street picked Democrats for the last 3 election cycles
• Democrats have more Billionaires in total than Republicans.  76 Billionaires came out in support of Kamala while only 49 came out in support of Trump

So when liberal cucks like ghey_artest, gas, zsazz, squidtard and many others come out and gaslight and lie about who "the rich" support, let's make sure we point out who "the rich" are actually supporting.

Democrats do not and never have had the moral high ground - or any high ground - for that matter.

 

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

So why is the Republican bill giving the rich the biggest tax cut in history?

[Frozenbeernuts 2,227]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So why is the Republican bill giving the rich the biggest tax cut in history?

WHATABOUT

See, they can never answer the tough ones. I never said Republicans aren't supported by the rich. Liberals have no clue who supports their candidates. Not surprising considering they were sure Kamala was going to win.

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

23 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

WHATABOUT

See, they can never answer the tough ones. I never said Republicans aren't supported by the rich. Liberals have no clue who supports their candidates. Not surprising considering they were sure Kamala was going to win.

What do you want me to answer?  Of course there are rich Democrats.  But the maga terrorist party supports the elites.  They want to steal from the poor and give to the rich.  You can't deny that.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,204]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

The NGOs do not promote those values.  They do not promote rioting.  We didn't see any riots on No Kings Day.  If you meant to post this in the LA riots thread then you are mistaken.

Two people were assassinated and the assassin had No Kings flyers in his car. You can’t make this one go away. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,204]

They need to go to Portland, no warnings given, and overwhelm the scum there. A battalion of Marines with support should do the trick. 

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Two people were assassinated and the assassin had No Kings flyers in his car. You can’t make this one go away. 

The mean the assassin that voted for Trump?  The registered Republican?  The maga terrorist? With the hit list of all Democrats?  You're blaming that guy on the protest?  Human garbage.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,227]

Trump made them back down. As soon as they riot he takes full control.

Which he will do eventually anyway. That or force them to self regulate.

I am enjoying all of the liberals taking a victory lap on the 5 million people who wasted their weekend protesting. Because it doesn't change the fact that Trump is president and will still get the job done.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,204]

7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

The mean the assassin that voted for Trump?  The registered Republican?  The maga terrorist? With the hit list of all Democrats?  You're blaming that guy on the protest?  Human garbage.

Didn’t you vote for Trump? 

[squistion 2,094]

2 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Trump made them back down. As soon as they riot he takes full control.

Which he will do eventually anyway. That or force them to self regulate.

I am enjoying all of the liberals taking a victory lap on the 5 million people who wasted their weekend protesting. Because it doesn't change the fact that Trump is president and will still get the job done.

No, he didn't. Nonsense. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,227]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, he didn't. Nonsense. 

Keep thinking that little homie.

[squistion 2,094]

4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Keep thinking that little homie.

I live in L.A. and like most people here haven't seen any riots, it is a fiction. Yes, there were some vehicle fires and some looting in a two block area in Downtown L.A. (that ended once Karen Bass issued an evening curfew in that area). 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,227]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

I live in L.A. and like most people here haven't seen any riots, it is a fiction. Yes, there were some vehicle fires and some looting in a two block area in Downtown L.A. (that ended once Karen Bass issued an evening curfew in that area). 

Because Trump threatened them so they had to reign it in.

[squistion 2,094]

6 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Because Trump threatened them so they had to reign it in.

There was nothing to reign in. 

[Sandy Loam 24]

14 minutes ago, squistion said:

I live in L.A. and like most people here haven't seen any riots, it is a fiction. Yes, there were some vehicle fires and some looting in a two block area in Downtown L.A. (that ended once Karen Bass issued an evening curfew in that area). 

But MAGA insists that rioters burned the whole city to the ground.

[League Champion 1,909]

Just now, Sandy Loam said:

rioters

Are you denying that Violent Liberals rioted?? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,204]

28 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, he didn't. Nonsense. 

[jerryskids 6,695]

56 minutes ago, squistion said:

I live in L.A. and like most people here haven't seen any riots, it is a fiction. Yes, there were some vehicle fires and some looting in a two block area in Downtown L.A. (that ended once Karen Bass issued an evening curfew in that area). 

You live in like Pasadena, probably Glendale given their recent reluctance to help federal agents enforce immigration law.

Big riot area typically, Pasadena?   

[Ron_Artest 1,301]

17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You live in like Pasadena, probably Glendale given their recent reluctance to help federal agents enforce immigration law.

Big riot area typically, Pasadena?   

You know the riot area was like one city block right?

[League Champion 1,909]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

riot area

@Ron_Artest finally admits there were Liberal Riots 

[Sandy Loam 24]

6 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You know the riot area was like one city block right?

Why roll with that when right-bent media convinces them that the entire continent is burning?