Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BudBro

"A Treasonous Conspiracy" - DNI Gabbard Exposes Obama At Center Of Trump 'Russia Hoax'

Recommended Posts

I bet the leftards are happy that SCOTUS gave immunity to presidents now. Obama should be protected from prosecution for that very reason. Authoritarian! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DOJ and Trump White House hasn’t even brought charges against Obama. They just accused him of treason to distract the stupids. ⬆️ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, MDC said:

DOJ and Trump White House hasn’t even brought charges against Obama. They just accused him of treason to distract the stupids. ⬆️ 

Everyone hates mdpee. Even himself it seems. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Ah...the old "I know you are but what am I" defense

Non sequitor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taibbi said there are 8 thumb drives that contain classified documents pertaining to  Obamagate that as of now have not been reviewed due to them being protected by executive privilege.  But not for long! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They found the burn bags.  Not burned. The call is coming from in the house.  Oh boy.  

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/27/2025 at 12:05 PM, TimHauck said:

I believe most possible charges have passed the statute of limitations except for treason.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They found the burn bags.  Not burned. The call is coming from in the house.  Oh boy.  

Burn bags :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/30/2025 at 8:56 AM, MDC said:

Then why did you say you’d admit you were wrong about Biden if the investigation didn’t find definitive proof of his guilt? :wacko: :doh: 

@RLLD :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Burn bags :lol:

I wonder what will be in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of this Burn Bag reveal? Kash Patel gaslighting it yesterday was pretty funny too. "There was this room, and nobody knew where it was or even what it was, and then we went in there and found all these burn bags that the previous administration didn't burn, so we are going to find all the dirt on the Dems now". Sure Kash. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MDC said:

@RLLD :dunno: 

I say Biden is still guilty, a question i have answered for you many times, yet you still ask as if this is new.  He is guilty.  Why you would protect him now is baffling. 

 

Oh yeah, given the evidence I think Biden is guilty, thats pretty easy.  Now, that they choose to not hold him to account is on them.

Perfect.  They have evidence here as well, just as they do with Biden.  Now, until that evidence proves him guilty we can assume he is based on that evidence, and later if convicted we know he is guilty.  We would have to wait for the outcome of the trial before our beliefs on his guilt can be confirmed.  We have to suspect guilt in order to investigate or charge or prosecute, you start from the suspicion but we wait for the court.

YOU can ignore the banking statements evidence, the whistleblowers and the laptop contents if you choose.  I say prosecute him based on that evidence right now, but I am not making that decision.  If there is evidence that this kid did something, as there is with the Biden crime family, then by all means arrest and prosecute.   Its odd that you do not understand this.

I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter.  Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money.

5) I remain confident based on the whistleblowers, IRS documents, bank records, laptop contents and investigation overall that Biden was absolutely selling influence to benefit financially. If you think that is not "corruption" that is fine for you, I assume Trump is now free to replicate everything documented that Biden did, right?

here is just as much evidence about Biden as Adams.  You want Adams? Take him, by all means. I could give a fock about a politician ( I dont use corrupt here because it is redundant).   Take him out alllll  you want.  But also know this. I saw you and yours defend Biden where there is equitable evidence, and now you suddenly want to take someone out? I see you all for what you are.

I mean, sure they have the details on the LLC's associated with the Biden family members, and maybe they could get them on tax evasion or something, but meh......

 

A few weeks before the 2020 presidential election, the New York Post published an article claiming they had obtained a copy of the laptop’s data. According to them, it contained evidence of Joe Biden engaging in corrupt activities related to foreign policy decisions benefiting Hunter and the companies he worked with.

 

he entire purpose of the investigation is to find that mistake they made as part of their criminal enterprise. The entire reason for the setup with the fake LLC's is to hide the crime.....these people are not just going to admit it.....hand over the fact of what they did.....  Grassley is only alluding to what I have already said.....we do not yet have proof of what Biden did for the money....

 

No they didnt, they focused on the imporant element which was to try to determine what was sold to our adversaries by Biden for them to provide those millions to his family through the fake LLC's.   he effectively protected all that money, and his accomplices in his family,  through the pardons.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I say Biden is still guilty, a question i have answered for you many times, yet you still ask as if this is new.  He is guilty.  Why you would protect him now is baffling. 

 

Oh yeah, given the evidence I think Biden is guilty, thats pretty easy.  Now, that they choose to not hold him to account is on them.

Perfect.  They have evidence here as well, just as they do with Biden.  Now, until that evidence proves him guilty we can assume he is based on that evidence, and later if convicted we know he is guilty.  We would have to wait for the outcome of the trial before our beliefs on his guilt can be confirmed.  We have to suspect guilt in order to investigate or charge or prosecute, you start from the suspicion but we wait for the court.

YOU can ignore the banking statements evidence, the whistleblowers and the laptop contents if you choose.  I say prosecute him based on that evidence right now, but I am not making that decision.  If there is evidence that this kid did something, as there is with the Biden crime family, then by all means arrest and prosecute.   Its odd that you do not understand this.

I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter.  Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money.

5) I remain confident based on the whistleblowers, IRS documents, bank records, laptop contents and investigation overall that Biden was absolutely selling influence to benefit financially. If you think that is not "corruption" that is fine for you, I assume Trump is now free to replicate everything documented that Biden did, right?

here is just as much evidence about Biden as Adams.  You want Adams? Take him, by all means. I could give a fock about a politician ( I dont use corrupt here because it is redundant).   Take him out alllll  you want.  But also know this. I saw you and yours defend Biden where there is equitable evidence, and now you suddenly want to take someone out? I see you all for what you are.

I mean, sure they have the details on the LLC's associated with the Biden family members, and maybe they could get them on tax evasion or something, but meh......

 

A few weeks before the 2020 presidential election, the New York Post published an article claiming they had obtained a copy of the laptop’s data. According to them, it contained evidence of Joe Biden engaging in corrupt activities related to foreign policy decisions benefiting Hunter and the companies he worked with.

 

he entire purpose of the investigation is to find that mistake they made as part of their criminal enterprise. The entire reason for the setup with the fake LLC's is to hide the crime.....these people are not just going to admit it.....hand over the fact of what they did.....  Grassley is only alluding to what I have already said.....we do not yet have proof of what Biden did for the money....

 

No they didnt, they focused on the imporant element which was to try to determine what was sold to our adversaries by Biden for them to provide those millions to his family through the fake LLC's.   he effectively protected all that money, and his accomplices in his family,  through the pardons.

 

The question wasn’t “Do you think Biden is guilty.”

The question you keep avoiding is: Why did you say you’d admit you were wrong about Biden if the investigation didn’t find definitive proof of his guilt?

I look forward to your concise reply to only the bolded question above. Thanks! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, MDC said:

The question wasn’t “Do you think Biden is guilty.”

The question you keep avoiding is: Why did you say you’d admit you were wrong about Biden if the investigation didn’t find definitive proof of his guilt?

I look forward to your concise reply to only the bolded question above. Thanks! 

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

The question wasn’t “Do you think Biden is guilty.”

The question you keep avoiding is: Why did you say you’d admit you were wrong about Biden if the investigation didn’t find definitive proof of his guilt?

I look forward to your concise reply to only the bolded question above. Thanks! 

If the investigation does not find definitive proof then I am wrong, and happily will be as I continue to believe that he is absolutely guilty of financial crimes. and absolutely sold us out to our adversaries.  If I find 30 former intelligence officers willing to support my stance, would you then believe it?  Just curious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RLLD said:

If the investigation does not find definitive proof then I am wrong, and happily will be as I continue to believe that he is absolutely guilty of financial crimes. and absolutely sold us out to our adversaries.  If I find 30 former intelligence officers willing to support my stance, would you then believe it?  Just curious. 

The investigation is over, Ray. Both of them.

You can ahead and admit you were wrong now. :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Where are the indictments? Where is the special prosecutor? Treason is a serious crime. If somebody truly committed treason I want them tried, be it Obama or whomever. When is this going to happen? 

Obama has immunity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

Wasn't this known?  Why do all this?

The rest of them don’t. Plus Obama will be called to testify. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2025 at 11:59 AM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Official duties numbness. Being butt hurt because after 8 years Americans rejected you doesn’t fit the criteria. Now you’re a little less  ignorant than you were a few minutes ago. You’re welcome. 

Wait wasn’t this you a few days ago? What happened to my ignorance? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

You told me the other day he didn’t. You called me stupid for not realizing it. Have you adopted my stupidity? 

No. Change of strategy. The immunity fight would just drag on. Let him have it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2025 at 3:40 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Libtards , Squishy/ Real Tim, actually think SCOTUS gave Presidents immunity for anything. The ignorance is thick. 

 

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Obama has immunity. 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

:lol:

Well he doesn’t have it for everything. I’m right. He also doesn’t have it for an anything committed out of office. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2025 at 4:43 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Matt Taibbi says this is going to huge. The documents are irrefutable. Oh boy. No wonder the fake interest in Epstein and his victims from the left. Slime balls. 

irrefutable!!!

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I guess Matt Taibbi has changed his tune since tardcore just repeats whatever he says :lol:

This one is from John Solomon . Hey what are you worried about? It’s a nothing burger. Head on over to the Epstein thread and make believe you care about the victims. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This one is from John Solomon . Hey what are you worried about? It’s a nothing burger. Head on over to the Epstein thread and make believe you care about the victims. 

I'm not worried about anything.  I just like mocking you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I'm not worried about anything.  I just like mocking you.

Oh good. And here I thought you were following this story. Turns out Senator Warner (D) is on the hook as well. No immunity for him though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gowdy: “Comey did generational damage to the FBI”. “Brennan allergic to the truth”. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching cable news and repeating what the hysterical pundits say there is wild stuff. 

 

Put some batteries in the remote that work and change the channel. If you need money for batteries I'll help you out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it’s all a big nothing.  Of course. But if you reverse engineer this thing…..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ten days after Trump said the FBI caught Obummer in a treasonous conspiracy “cold, hard, and blue” there still aren’t charges. 

Sad part is, he could never bring charges and his assboys won’t even realize they’ve been had. 😂 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×