Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
The Real timschochet

Trump doesn’t like jobs report, fires head of Bureau of Labor Statistics

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So then she wasn't fired for being 70% off.  Thanks for proving my point.

No. What you said was fantasy. Impossible. We are dealing with what really happened, and what could happen. Says a lot that you think you made a point by introducing a ridiculous premise.  Kids do that a lot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No. What you said was fantasy. Impossible. We are dealing with what really happened, and what could happen. Says a lot that you think you made a point by introducing a ridiculous premise.  Kids do that a lot. 

It's the same point you tried to make by saying what if she was only off by 15% and you think that proved your point. But you're terrible at logic and you're not smart so I one-uped you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's the same point you tried to make by saying what if she was only off by 15% and you think that proved your point. But you're terrible at logic and you're not smart so I one-uped you

15 pct down is possible.   70 pct up is ridiculous. Childish. If it ever happened in modern times it was a lie. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

15 pct down is possible.   70 pct up is ridiculous. Childish. If it ever happened in modern times it was a lie. 

It happened during covid, which of course you're going to say is rigged because it was for Biden. You just repeat Trump's lies like a a ventriloquist dummy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

It happened during covid, which of course you're going to say is rigged because it was for Biden. You just repeat Trump's lies like a a ventriloquist dummy

Yup.  A lie. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he even need a reason to fire her?  Unless Ghey_Artest has actual proof that she was fired based on some protected reason (sex, race, etc...) then the WHY of how she was fired is completely irrelevant is an absurd mountain to stand on.

This Ghey_Artest guy appears to be a clueless teenage girl, getting outraged at even the slightest of events.  Good gosh.  I hope her mom has a lock on the basement door and doesn't allow her up into the rest of the house.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Does he even need a reason to fire her?  Unless Ghey_Artest has actual proof that she was fired based on some protected reason (sex, race, etc...) then the WHY of how she was fired is completely irrelevant is an absurd mountain to stand on.

This Ghey_Artest guy appears to be a clueless teenage girl, getting outraged at even the slightest of events.  Good gosh.  I hope her mom has a lock on the basement door and doesn't allow her up into the rest of the house.

No he doesn't need a reason but he told us anyway.  He said she rigged the numbers.  That is an obvious lie and the fact that he continues to silence dissent and surround himself with lackeys that will repeat his lies is concerning to independent people who respect the truth.  I realize that's not you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

No he doesn't need a reason but he told us anyway.  He said she rigged the numbers.  That is an obvious lie and the fact that he continues to silence dissent and surround himself with lackeys that will repeat his lies is concerning to independent people who respect the truth.  I realize that's not you.

This seems to be a pretty big deal to you. All day long again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

In my opinion, today’s Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad

 https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114955222046259464

 

Seems to me like he fired her because he thought she was purposely misrepresenting the jobs numbers in order to make the administration look bad. 

Not because she didn't lie in order to make him look good, like she did, repeatedly, with the last guy.  :dunno:

These things can be construed however we want. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Seems to me like he fired her because he thought she was purposely misrepresenting the jobs numbers in order to make the administration look bad. 

Not because she didn't lie in order to make him look good, like she did, repeatedly, with the last guy.  :dunno:

These things can be construed however we want. 

Maybe you never noticed this before but anytime trump doesn't like an outcome, he says it's rigged.  He's been doing this for decades.  It's clearly what happened here 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

She wasn't fired to incompetence.  She was fired because she allegedly rigged the numbers.  That malice.  Are you disagreeing with Father?

Nope.  Get correct numbers.  I worked in a very similar position.  I would have been toast if my numbers were consistently that bad and I knew it.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Nope.  Get correct numbers.  I worked in a very similar position.  I would have been toast if my numbers were consistently that bad and I knew it.  

What are the correct numbers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

The posters arguing with @Ron_Artest are: 

A. Morons 

B. Members of a cult

C. Trolls

D. All of the above? 

And have a malevolent disposition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Nope.  Get correct numbers.  I worked in a very similar position.  I would have been toast if my numbers were consistently that bad and I knew it.  

Get better numbers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s all a conspiracy and everyone is out to get poor Don! :cry: 

We’ve all known people like this. Usually teenaged girls. 🧒 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

70 pct. If it were a reasonable number there would be a point.  But not 70. Sorry shitlibs, she deserved to be canned. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

Maybe you never noticed this before but anytime trump doesn't like an outcome, he says it's rigged.  He's been doing this for decades.  It's clearly what happened here 

And he's usually correct. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

70 pct. If it were a reasonable number there would be a point.  But not 70. Sorry shitlibs, she deserved to be canned. 

That's not why she was fired.  SMH.

Trump and all of Trump's minions have said she rigged the numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

That's not why she was fired.  SMH.

Trump and all of Trump's minions have said she rigged the numbers.

Didn’t you say she would not have been fired at 15 pct? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Didn’t you say she would not have been fired at 15 pct? 

I assumed that yesterday because that wouldn't be so bad that Trump would have to accuse her of rigging.  He can't take bad job numbers, so they must be rigged, according to him.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Didn’t you say she would not have been fired at 15 pct? 

If the numbers had been accurate for the last three months without any need of revision, she still would have been fired. It’s the results he doesn’t like. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

My Steelers will not lose any games this year. If I hear otherwise I will fire the scoreboard operator. 

I'll file this under:

2016 Tim: "Hillary Clinton is going to crush Donald Trump"

2024 Tim: "Kamala Harris is going to crush Donald Trump"

2025 Tim: "Tariffs are going to crush Donald Trump"

So, yeah, filed under "Tim's Absolutely Wrong Again".  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'll file this under:

2016 Tim: "Hillary Clinton is going to crush Donald Trump"

2024 Tim: "Kamala Harris is going to crush Donald Trump"

2025 Tim: "Tariffs are going to crush Donald Trump"

So, yeah, filed under "Tim's Absolutely Wrong Again".  :lol:

You forgot all the bets he welched on after guaranteeing Biden would be the nominee 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Horseman said:

You forgot all the bets he welched on after guaranteeing Biden would be the nominee 

If we had to list all of the times Tim wasn't just wrong, but dead-wrong, we'd be spending the next 3 days typing it all up.

Maybe it's just easier if we list out what Tim has been right on.  Hmmmm...I'll start.

Things Tim has been right on:

  •  

Okay, you're up!!!  I can't think of anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×