Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

Fetterman defends Trump's 'tasteful' $200M White House ballroom makeover

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

This thread was created in Aug.  There is a foxnews article in the first post.

From the article...

This will be just the latest step in a radical architectural overhaul intent on making the 225-year-old executive mansion less redolent of stuffy Washington and more evocative of Mar-a-Lago, his gaudy palace in Palm Beach, Florida.

“But starting now with the paving of the Rose Garden, and coming soon with the construction of a garish ballroom, they will see a physical representation of a low and shameful time. The once graceful executive mansion will be transformed into something tasteless and embarrassing. It will be both awful and fitting.”

Enjoy your L

I don't see those "quotes" in that article.  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Strike said:

I don't see those "quotes" in that article.  :dunno:

Oh, you know what, I'm an idiot.  I'll take my own L.  That's what I get for posting during a call.

This was the article I took the quotes from, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/07/trump-white-house-ballroom

From August as well

THIS is from the FoxNews article...

"The project at the White House is a gigantic boondoggle," Blumenthal said. "The important question is not only the damage that it could do to the architecture of the White House, but also what contributors would have over Trump if they are giving to this project."

So the size was raised previously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

Oh, you know what, I'm an idiot.  I'll take my own L.  That's what I get for posting during a call.

This was the article I took the quotes from, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/07/trump-white-house-ballroom

From August as well

THIS is from the FoxNews article...

"The project at the White House is a gigantic boondoggle," Blumenthal said. "The important question is not only the damage that it could do to the architecture of the White House, but also what contributors would have over Trump if they are giving to this project."

So the size was raised previously.

Sorry man.  You had an opportunity.  I don't do wild goose chases.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

It is symbolic watching him literally destroy the white house.

Also no surprise the trump cucks are here defending everything he does.

He did lie, but he always lies.  This didn't go for any kind of architectural or historical review.

He doesn't respect the country or it's history.  First the rose garden paving over, then the car lot flags, now the destruction of the east wing and the construction of a football field sized ballroom fitting for a man with small d problems.

You're obsessed with his d1ck size now?  I think your crush on him has gotten a little too weird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Strike said:

From the Dems and the media.  All the outrage has been about him touching the WH.  Only in the past day or two has the messaging shifted to the scale and/or the "historical" aspects of the project.  Apparently the original reasoning for outrage didn't resonate so your side pivoted.  Which is just more proof of how fake your outrage is.

This argument doesn’t even make sense, because we didn’t know him saying the WH wouldn’t be touched was a lie until a couple days ago.  In fact I’d argue there wasn’t much outrage at all until the past few days when the pictures started coming out, showing that 1) it was being touched contrary to his claim, and 2) seeing how massive the addition actually is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This argument doesn’t even make sense, because we didn’t know him saying the WH wouldn’t be touched was a lie until a couple days ago.  In fact I’d argue there wasn’t much outrage at all until the past few days when the pictures started coming out, showing that 1) it was being touched contrary to his claim, and 2) seeing how massive the addition actually is.

Timhack is really hurting here.

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve now seen multiple MAGA “influencers” share this image thinking it was from Obama, lol.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you Libs are threatening anyone who helps fund the BBB.  What is wrong with you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Excellent. This is progress in the right direction. 

Liberal politicians will whine about this forever but soon will find plenty of ways to use the space and the whole freak out about it will disappear. 

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×