Homan reportedly was recorded accepting $50K, but investigation shut down

[TimHauck 3,161]

3 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Just so I am clear...

You want an answer from me, in the homan thread, about Lisa Cook because you think that Lisa Cook having her lawyer put something out there is a denial, but Tom Homan saying it himself is not a denial. 

I mean that is really weird dude.

"Hi, please answer my question that is off topic to this thread because I made inconsistent statements and I really want to try and make a gotcha that is a big leap," said Tim. 

Fact: Homan denied doing anything illegal.

Fact: Homan did not deny accepting a bag of cash in a Cava bag.

Fact: Cook (through her lawyer, not sure why that matters, even Strike would agree) denied committing mortgage fraud

Fact: Cook did not deny taking out two mortgages that were for primary residences (and I never denied she did either). 

Not sure what your gotcha attempt is.

[jonnyutah 467]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Fact: Homan denied doing anything illegal.

Fact: Homan did not deny accepting a bag of cash in a Cava bag.

Fact: Cook (through her lawyer, not sure why that matters, even Strike would agree) denied committing mortgage fraud

Fact: Cook did not deny taking out two mortgages that were for primary residences (and I never denied she did either). 

Not sure what your gotcha attempt is.

Lol.

This is how everybody knows you are not a serious person. 

 

[TimHauck 3,161]

6 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Lol.

This is how everybody knows you are not a serious person. 

 

This is a weird semantic argument to make.  As Strike would say:

On 8/29/2025 at 11:45 AM, Strike said:

You understand that when her lawyers put something in a court pleasing that they are speaking for their client, don't you?

 

[TimHauck 3,161]

 

 

[jonnyutah 467]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This is a weird semantic argument to make.  As Strike would say:

On 8/29/2025 at 8:45 AM, Strike said:

You understand that when her lawyers put something in a court pleasing that they are speaking for their client, don't you?

"In court documents submitted Wednesday, Rivera's lawyer said that he is here legally and asked that the government not be allowed to say he is here illegally"

This is from the lawyer for the guy that killed Mollie Tibbetts. He made this statement based on the employer saying that Rivera had provided them with paperwork showing legal status. 

Lawyers lie all the time in court documents.

That is why a lawyer putting something out there isn't as good as the actual person going public. 

The lawyer can later just ammend the filing and say he was given incorrect information from the employer drop off the case, or any other number of things.

This isnt a semantic argument. This is literally the crux of your whole tangent here. 

You are trying to say Tom Homan going on TV and actually speaking and saying he did nothing illegal is less of a denial than a line you found in a legal filing.  

If you were saying the two situations are same, you might have a point. But you arent saying that. You have said Lisa Cook denied the allegations and you are saying Tom Homan hasnt. 

[TimHauck 3,161]

34 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

If you were saying the two situations are same, you might have a point. But you arent saying that. You have said Lisa Cook denied the allegations and you are saying Tom Homan hasnt. 

Yes that is what I’m saying, read my post above about what they did and didn’t deny. The “crux of the argument” depends on what exactly you’re calling “the allegation.”

[Tree of Knowledge 2,041]

Why is this thread still going?  It has been DEBUNKED.  
 

 

[seafoam1 3,278]

3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Why is this thread still going?  It has been DEBUNKED.  
 

 

Timhack can never let anything go. I guess he's so sick of losing he's trying to outlast everyone and calling himself victor when no one is paying attention.  

[Mike Honcho 5,362]

Honestly, I don't even think in the Trump WH that $50,000 dollars in a shopping bag is enough to even be considered a bribe.  

[seafoam1 3,278]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

Honestly, I don't even think in the Trump WH that $50,000 dollars in a shopping bag is enough to even be considered a bribe.  

Poor honcho. More money than he's seen in a lifetime of making home movies for a living. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,770]

Liberals who have turned a blind eye to Biden, Pelosi and Granholms obvious theft are now up in arms. Too funny.