When asked why she lost the presidential election, Kamala said...

[seafoam1 3,401]

"We didn't have enough time."

That's the reason. 

https://nypost.com/2025/09/23/us-news/kamala-harris-claims-she-didnt-have-enough-time-to-beat-trump-in-2024-election/

[lickin_starfish 2,001]

If anything, the public had too much time to hear her speak.

[weepaws 3,313]

The avg American voter is stupid, they vote party, and not policy, they vote popular, and not moral, they vote evil, not righteousness, so given more time, I think the vote of stupid  American voter could have easily been deceived   

Thanks. 

[Vince44 208]

She is a sore loser. She has no shot at winning nation wide elections and this has been proven twice. She just doesn't have it. I am not sure she can still win in state anymore even though she was good to great in the Senate. I mean her two runs for president were humiliating blowout defeats. 

[BrahmaBulls 913]

Kamala is planning to run in 2028.  

[thegeneral 3,549]

Biden focked the party in 2024 by running again, politically there were many reasons why she inherited the nom after that fiasco.

Kamala won’t get out of the primaries next time around. I don’t get why she didn’t run for Gov of California, that she could have won I think.

[The Real timschochet 7,365]

More power to her if she wants to run. All hands on deck. 
 

This nation is suffering greatly because she did not win last time around. 

[HellToupee 2,164]

1 hour ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Kamala is planning to run in 2028.  

She didn’t get the memo that Newsom has been anointed 

[BrahmaBulls 913]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

More power to her if she wants to run. All hands on deck. 
 

This nation is suffering greatly because she did not win last time around. 

I think you all should just anoint her again.

[thegeneral 3,549]

50 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

I think you all should just anoint her again.

She only got it because Biden pulled that bullshit. At the point she was the only realistic choice.

[squistion 2,476]

No, she didn't say that she is running again in 2028. 

 

[WhiteWonder 2,905]

She lost because the "threat to democracy!" party skipped part of their democratic process and appointed her the nominee. Of course, by the time they admitted Biden was toast, there wasn't enough time, yada yada....

but in all seriousness, had the democrats held a primary, she would not have been your candidate and Trump probably loses. And in hindsight, they could have held a primary super late in the game and it would have been a better result for them. For all the reasons they played the game perfectly in 2020, they failed miserably in 2024. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,656]

6 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Biden focked the party in 2024 by running again, politically there were many reasons why she inherited the nom after that fiasco.

Kamala won’t get out of the primaries next time around. I don’t get why she didn’t run for Gov of California, that she could have won I think.

Yeah, that's what happened. 

[Strike 5,975]

6 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Biden focked the party in 2024 by running again, politically there were many reasons why she inherited the nom after that fiasco.

Kamala won’t get out of the primaries next time around. I don’t get why she didn’t run for Gov of California, that she could have won I think.

Link to your posts complaining about Biden running prior to the debate debacle?

[thegeneral 3,549]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Link to your posts complaining about Biden running prior to the debate debacle?

I’m not going to bother to go back and look but I def posted I thought he would announce at some point in 2023 that he wouldn’t run again. The trappings of the office and ego got him which I get.

Now once he said he was going to run and royal dumbfuk was the opponent, well the choice was easy. 

[thegeneral 3,549]

7 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Yeah, that's what happened. 

He def focked the party. An actual full primary would have allowed a normal process to take place and perhaps a better candidate would have emerged. 

[Strike 5,975]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I’m not going to bother to go back and look but I def posted I thought he would announce at some point in 2023 that he wouldn’t run again. The trappings of the office and ego got him which I get.

Now once he said he was going to run and royal dumbfuk was the opponent, well the choice was easy. 

You could say he shouldn't run while still saying you'd vote for him.  I don't remember you doing that.  It's easy to whine in hindsight.

[thegeneral 3,549]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

You could say he shouldn't run while still saying you'd vote for him.  I don't remember you doing that.  It's easy to whine in hindsight.

I def didn’t think he should run, but also it was his choice. He earned that. I thought he did a decent job as well but didn’t think he’d run again. 

[seafoam1 3,401]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

I def didn’t think he should run, but also it was his choice. He earned that. I thought he did a decent job as well but didn’t think he’d run again. 

[thegeneral 3,549]

On 1/15/2024 at 7:35 PM, thegeneral said:

He won the election and it’s 100% his choice to do what he wants but I was really expecting Biden to step down at the end of this term. Allow there to be another race to pick the replacement nom.

He’s going RBG here. 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Strike said:

You could say he shouldn't run while still saying you'd vote for him.  I don't remember you doing that.  It's easy to whine in hindsight.

Actually found quite a few similar to this with a quick search.

[Strike 5,975]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

 

Actually found quite a few similar to this with a quick search.

So nothing about him focking the Dems.  Got it.

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, Strike said:

So nothing about him focking the Dems.  Got it.

He’s going RGB here is pretty clear