Mike Hunt 312 Posted yesterday at 04:39 PM 6 minutes ago, squistion said: Oh, the irony. Kind of hard for anyone to take the moral high ground and say that Pelosi lowered the standard expected from her office with Trump as POTUS. Seriously, has anyone lowered the standard expected from the office of President more than Trump? This thread is not about Trump. Talking about Pelosi`s actions in her role as speaker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrancieFootball 161 Posted yesterday at 04:44 PM What a great American and mighty political asset to your country. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,524 Posted yesterday at 04:55 PM 18 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said: This thread is not about Trump. Talking about Pelosi`s actions in her role as speaker. Who made you the thread police? As the originator of this thread, I think the discussion should not be limited just to Pelosi's actions in her role as speaker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Hunt 312 Posted yesterday at 04:58 PM 11 minutes ago, squistion said: Who made you the thread police? As the originator of this thread, I think this discussion should not be limited just to her role as speaker. You have already started numerous threads on Trump. This is Nanners thread. Talk about some of her achievements. Like her uncanny ability to pick winning stocks. Warren Buffett may be considered the greatest investor of our time, but even he can't touch the prowess of California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). As my colleague Omor Ibne Ehsan recently detailed, over the past decade, Pelosi has generated a cumulative return of 816% from her investments, beating the S&P 500 by a whopping 559 percentage points. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,524 Posted yesterday at 05:27 PM Wait, what...this is from Marjorie Taylor Greene? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,515 Posted yesterday at 05:30 PM 30 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said: You have already started numerous threads on Trump. This is Nanners thread. Talk about some of her achievements. Like her uncanny ability to pick winning stocks. Warren Buffett may be considered the greatest investor of our time, but even he can't touch the prowess of California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). As my colleague Omor Ibne Ehsan recently detailed, over the past decade, Pelosi has generated a cumulative return of 816% from her investments, beating the S&P 500 by a whopping 559 percentage points. Thanks for the tip. Once she's done I'm going to see if she is willing to be my financial advisor. Daddy wants to retire early! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrancieFootball 161 Posted yesterday at 05:51 PM 23 minutes ago, squistion said: Wait, what...this is from Marjorie Taylor Greene? She has been moving toward the middle for quite awhile. No doubt she will run in 2028. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,515 Posted yesterday at 05:53 PM 1 minute ago, FrancieFootball said: She has been moving toward the middle for quite awhile. No doubt she will run in 2028. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrancieFootball 161 Posted yesterday at 05:56 PM 1 minute ago, Fnord said: Kudos to her for recognizing Pelosi's greatness while MAGAs in general crap on her 24/7. Pelosi once said this country needs a strong Republican party, but MAGAs would like nothing more than a one-party authoritarian system that allows Trump to do everything he wants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 06:29 PM 3 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: Way overdue. The fossils need to GTFO and let new people take over. Term Limits and Age Limits. agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 06:31 PM 1 hour ago, squistion said: Who made you the thread police? JFC you have zero self awareness Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 06:33 PM Poor Paul , its going to cramp his lifestyle when she’s not in DC most of the time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,124 Posted yesterday at 06:38 PM 3 minutes ago, HellToupee said: Poor Paul , its going to cramp his lifestyle when she’s not in DC most of the time Homeless hippie boy toys won’t be making house calls? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 06:41 PM 2 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Homeless hippie boy toys won’t be making house calls? Yes , less COCKtails for Paul to enjoy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,124 Posted yesterday at 06:58 PM 2 hours ago, squistion said: Oh, the irony. Kind of hard for anyone to take the moral high ground and say that Pelosi lowered the standard expected from her office with Trump as POTUS. Seriously, has anyone lowered the standard expected from the office of President more than Trump? President Barack Hussein Obama was a closeted ghay man with a transgender wife that was from Kenya and admitted to smoking crack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 07:08 PM 9 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: President Barack Hussein Obama was a closeted ghay man with a transgender wife that was from Kenya and admitted to smoking crack. What was the deal with his chef drowning on Nantucket? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,524 Posted yesterday at 07:15 PM As might be expected, Trump remarks are gracious when asked about Pelosi's retirement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,668 Posted yesterday at 07:39 PM She's definitely not retiring because she wants to. She's retiring because she lost control of her party to people more extreme than her. Schumer will be next. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,434 Posted yesterday at 08:04 PM 21 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: She's definitely not retiring because she wants to. She's retiring because she lost control of her party to people more extreme than her. Schumer will be next. He should be next. Not because of ideology but because of energy. Frankly, young people have more energy that old fogies like Schumer, Pelosi, and myself. Time to move on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,881 Posted yesterday at 08:24 PM Did she pick a nepobaby to replace her yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,124 Posted yesterday at 09:12 PM 2 hours ago, HellToupee said: What was the deal with his chef drowning on Nantucket? Many people say he saw the man wife’s Johnson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,594 Posted yesterday at 09:28 PM Millions celebrate this and won’t C U N T Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,434 Posted yesterday at 09:41 PM The comments in this thread are unsurprising and shameful. But on the other hand they’re also a testimony to the achievements of this remarkable woman. There is a reason why so many conservatives can’t stand her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,434 Posted yesterday at 10:05 PM Nasty Nancy is retiring?? Is it to be with her gay husband and his hammer toting boyfriend? Cute Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,081 Posted yesterday at 10:13 PM Meh. She served her country. Kudos. Wont miss her but ive never missed a speaker of the house to date. So no change there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted yesterday at 10:16 PM 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Many people say he saw the man wife’s Johnson. That’s the word on the street. It was all over Cape Cod Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Hunt 312 Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said: The comments in this thread are unsurprising and shameful. But on the other hand they’re also a testimony to the achievements of this remarkable woman. There is a reason why so many conservatives can’t stand her. Pelosi missed her calling. With her uncanny "intuition" on buying stocks that take a meteoric rise soon after is a talent that exceeds Warren Buffet. Pelosi could have made a boatload of $$$$...oh wait..she did. Nanner should be taking Jim Kramers spot on Mad Money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 928 Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said: The comments in this thread are unsurprising and shameful. But on the other hand they’re also a testimony to the achievements of this remarkable woman. There is a reason why so many conservatives can’t stand her. You have no issue with politicians getting rich off insider trading? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,434 Posted 22 hours ago 21 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said: You have no issue with politicians getting rich off insider trading? If somebody proves it fine. Right now it’s all innuendo. But if you’re going to go after people for this stuff go after all of them regardless of party. Right now it APPEARS that our current President is more corrupt than anyone in the history of American politics by far- but again, all innuendo. But even if Nancy Pelosi were proven to be a criminal, found guilty and sentenced to prison, it would not change my estimation of her amazing effectiveness as Speaker. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,208 Posted 22 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: If somebody proves it fine. Right now it’s all innuendo. But if you’re going to go after people for this stuff go after all of them regardless of party I know you’re not this dumb. It’s an issue that crosses both parties. FFS knock off the Pom Pom waving politics In 2024, Rep. Nancy Pelosi quietly posted a 54% return on her stock portfolio — outperforming the most sophisticated hedge funds on the planet. There was no press tour for this massive achievement, and no hedge fund title; just a government salary and a set of disclosures that, to the trained eye, look a lot like market timing. Pelosi’s reported salary is around $223,000. But her net worth stands at over $264 million, making her the richest woman in Congress. And she’s not the only one turning their political seat into a portfolio advantage. In 2024, the highest percentage changes in wealth from stock trading among members of Congress were experienced by Republican David Rouzer, with a gain of approximately 149%, and Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz, with a gain of roughly 142%. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,515 Posted 21 hours ago 12 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I know you’re not this dumb. It’s an issue that crosses both parties. FFS knock off the Pom Pom waving politics In 2024, Rep. Nancy Pelosi quietly posted a 54% return on her stock portfolio — outperforming the most sophisticated hedge funds on the planet. There was no press tour for this massive achievement, and no hedge fund title; just a government salary and a set of disclosures that, to the trained eye, look a lot like market timing. Pelosi’s reported salary is around $223,000. But her net worth stands at over $264 million, making her the richest woman in Congress. And she’s not the only one turning their political seat into a portfolio advantage. In 2024, the highest percentage changes in wealth from stock trading among members of Congress were experienced by Republican David Rouzer, with a gain of approximately 149%, and Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz, with a gain of roughly 142%. I'll go out on a limb and agree with you that it's almost assured that Pelosi and many more congress critters get rich from insider trading and foreknowledge of policy decisions. It's a huge issue and another great reason for asset divestitures and blind trusts being required of our "leaders." But for you of all people, supportive (or trollingly virtue-signaling support) of 99% of what the Don does, to complain about another politician being crooked is some stinky ass bait. Dude is easily the most corrupt POTUS ever, and maintaining willful ignorance of that is quite a feat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 928 Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said: If somebody proves it fine. Right now it’s all innuendo. But if you’re going to go after people for this stuff go after all of them regardless of party. Right now it APPEARS that our current President is more corrupt than anyone in the history of American politics by far- but again, all innuendo. But even if Nancy Pelosi were proven to be a criminal, found guilty and sentenced to prison, it would not change my estimation of her amazing effectiveness as Speaker. It's always (D)ifferent for you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 928 Posted 21 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Fnord said: I'll go out on a limb and agree with you that it's almost assured that Pelosi and many more congress critters get rich from insider trading and foreknowledge of policy decisions. It's a huge issue and another great reason for asset divestitures and blind trusts being required of our "leaders." But for you of all people, supportive (or trollingly virtue-signaling support) of 99% of what the Don does, to complain about another politician being crooked is some stinky ass bait. Dude is easily the most corrupt POTUS ever, and maintaining willful ignorance of that is quite a feat. It's always But Trump. Trump has nothing to do with Pelosi and her insider trading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,881 Posted 21 hours ago 45 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I know you’re not this dumb. It’s an issue that crosses both parties. FFS knock off the Pom Pom waving politics Homie needs proof a like 10 sigma return in the market isn't boosted by insider trading. Yeah, she just hit the lottery in stock picking, but also it's just a coincidence she has access to information to inform trades. That's called willful ignorance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,211 Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, BrahmaBulls said: You have no issue with politicians getting rich off insider trading? You obviously don't with your rabid defense of trump Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,434 Posted 20 hours ago 33 minutes ago, nobody said: Homie needs proof a like 10 sigma return in the market isn't boosted by insider trading. Yeah, she just hit the lottery in stock picking, but also it's just a coincidence she has access to information to inform trades. That's called willful ignorance. Not at all. I’m pretty sure she’s been engaged in insider trading. Nobody however has any proof. Does that put a blot for me on her record? Of course. Does it change my estimation of her as the greatest Speaker ever? It doesn’t. Does it in any way excuse the shameful and juvenile and offensive attacks made against her and her husband here and elsewhere? It does not. And it’s really hard to take you guys seriously when you defend every corrupt thing the President does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 928 Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: You obviously don't with your rabid defense of trump Retard Ron with the But Trump Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 928 Posted 20 hours ago 37 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Not at all. I’m pretty sure she’s been engaged in insider trading. Nobody however has any proof. Does that put a blot for me on her record? Of course. Does it change my estimation of her as the greatest Speaker ever? It doesn’t. Does it in any way excuse the shameful and juvenile and offensive attacks made against her and her husband here and elsewhere? It does not. And it’s really hard to take you guys seriously when you defend every corrupt thing the President does. Ah, okay for you to defend corrupt Democrats but OMG no one better defend Trump or Lying Tim won't take you seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,124 Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: You obviously don't with your rabid defense of trump What is there to defend? Trump is the most scrutinized man in world history and no legitimate court or authority has found anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites