jerryskids

This is typical for the Leftist elite. It is how they justify their machiavellian legal pursuits of Trump. If these numbers continue to mive in Trump's favor, it will be interesting to see what new attacks they can devise. That being said, at least Tim is man enough to admit his feeljngs.

Thanks. Those aren't levels, they are mostly grade bumps. But in the spirit of you actually typing something which reads like an adult typed it, with plurals and everything, I'm moving on.

I am quite aware of hierarchy; I spoke to people up and down them all the times at many companies, including several Fortune 500 companies. I never had to go up 10 levels to get to the assistant report generator for the CFO. Educate me on these 10 levels below you that you quickly ascended? How old are you BTW? You said you were sick "a few years ago," but I thought you had cancer in your young 20s. Could be wrong though. I'm 56, since we are sharing.

Just quoting this for posterity.

Maybe you were too young to enjoy him back in the old skool heyday. He had some great quotes; I still sometimes say "to be the best, you gotta beat the best." WOOOOOOOOOOO$#@!#@!$#@!

Is that this trial? I thought this was the trial they decided to call paying a pron star to stay quiet "election interference." In the interest of justice and all. And by justice, I mean to get the mean orange man bad.

Threesome?

Did you see this? Ric Flair stumbling drunk in the middle of the day. Sad.

You could never fire me, I worked in high tech, where intelligence and pluralization are valued, and finance is a cog. And we get it, you are a corporate finance guy who doesn't like links supporting assertions. You are obviously in the feelz division of finance. Tell us more about the 10 organizational layers below you; how are they structured?

If this is a cancer dig, wrong hole. If ghey secks, then no comment.

Well, and take a dump.

No risk no reward: Hideki Backsuyama Sam Burns @WhiteWonder

Just woke up, getting a coffee.

Struck a nerve, did i? I said data, you said facts. I said no, data. Now you say "data points" and even quote it. Are you special needs? You can't reason, you can barely write, you have no social skills, and now you think you've got 10 layers of bean counters beneath you? Are there windmills outside your executive office suite just waiting to be conquered? They say a person rises to his level of incompetence; if so, I expect you to be CFO of the earth someday.

You are truly a blithering idiot. You claimed this thread was based on trans issues. I pointed out that in the OP, I specifically said that the problem is not these specific issues but the trend of increased moral relativism. You deflected with some pablum about "data points" (another phrase I didn't use). I tried to steer you back to your inability to read the OP and have an intelligent discussion. You then accused me of deflecting above. It is true, people are reading these exchanges and drawing conclusions. It's not what you think, however. I'm once again amazed by your utter and complete lack of self-awareness. I think you honestly think you are winning something here. I feel sorry for you.