jerryskids

Thems fighting words. They were in my Mount Rushmore of favorite bands in the late 70s moving into the 80s. Although I was hugely disappointed with 90210

Big fan of their music, but I saw them in Worcester MA in the late 80s and it was probably the worst concert I've ever seen. Just boring, no energy.

Not if you think you need a QB.

Or not. Nabers. I guess Jones is the man in NYG.

Now it gets interesting? McCarthy, one of the WRs? My guess is McCarthy.

Harrison to the Cards, so far on script. If the Chargers draft Alt I more than recoup the money I lost listening to Gutter

#2 Daniels. Thanks for nothing, @Ron_Artest

Yeah, I was wrong with the absolute. And perhaps in this day of mostly CC purchases the CC itself receives the request instantly, and then there are the amorphous couple of days of "bank processing" as you mentioned. Honestly, most of my purchases these days are on Amazon and with the occasional return, they are good about doing it quickly. And when I return stuff bought online to other places, who knows how long it really took to get there and for them to process it? Anyway, I deleted my post as I'm probably living in the past. Now get off my lawn!

And you find this fairy tale consistent with all of the "death to Israel" and "we want it all" chants? @Mark Davisis correct, although I would argue that the marxist "oppressed vs. oppressor" is what's primarily being used to program these student flesh bots, so it is hard to separate the two.

Yeah... and to me the more egregious thing was keeping kids out of school. People like me said from day 1 that they were going to significantly impair their growth and development. "Nah," we were told, "kids are resilient." We had many such debates here. And now there is universal recognition of exactly that happening. But hey, they meant well, right?

I don't think all liberalism, or conservatism, is evil either. The bad of conservatism is that it sometimes stops good progress. The bad of liberalism is that it sometimes pushes bad progress. The difference I tried to point out is that the bad in conservatism is easy to see: you are being mean by not allowing [xxx]. The bad in liberalism is less easy to see (hence "insidious") because it seems like you are just trying to be nice in all cases.

Thanks. I'd be OK with either and another first (plus maybe more) over a potentially slightly better receiver in Harrison. I feel pretty good about our GM Monti Ossenfort; I thought he ran a good draft last year, his first. And he certainly made deals, trading up then back down in the first IIRC. If he decides to stand pat and take Harrison, then they must have a really good feeling about him.

Yes, that's what they claim, that's why they are prosecuting. I began my post "FWIW," and presented what it appears their defense will be. The link you disparage, that I posted, said "they viewed themselves as contingent electors." That is their defense. It didn't argue that they were in fact contingent electors. But the other link about contingent electors laid out some historical precedence. And yes, The Epoch Times leans right. I have in general found their reporting to be fairly good, albeit with a right bent. BTW, the AP is not as objective as you think with your high and mighty link. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/associated-press-media-bias#:~:text=About Associated Press's Bias Rating,-Associated Press is&text=Associated Press is a news,Rating™ of Lean Left.

I'll throw some shekels on it at that price. If you are wrong, of course you will be dead to me.