RLLD

I may be a clown....at least I am not coward like you.

It was proposed by the focking defense and it was because they proposed it that the judge was asked to not allow him to be deported there. Dont try this....

I posted the source. You can either pretend the source is not there or that is does not say what it clearly does, how you lie to yourself and the world is up to you, focking little liar

You complete moron....or just outright focking despicable little liar......they used the rival gang defense, pretending that away WILL NOT WORK.....little sh!t.....

Yes....they did.....they insisted he should not be deported back to his home country because of the threat posed by.....THE FOCKING RIVAL GANG.... Not political violence or oppression....they could have tried that.... Not economic hardship.....they could have tried that.. Not even the "preponderance of gang-related violence".....nope.... They stated......a RIVAL......gang.......you stupid and insipid little sh!t....defending such trash is exactly why the democrat party should just evaporate.....

They used it as part of their defense, if you want to pretend their usage that a "rival gang" statement is not admission, that is another example of you pretending proof is not proof, as you always do. You have proof..... but that proof refutes your position, so you just pretend it away. Meanwhile, the outcomes of your ignorance only hurt others.....for now so you have no reason to hold an actual moral position...fock everyone else, right?

But.....I was not talking about deportation.....I was talking about the additional elements about him that we later discovered after his deportation order....and which you called "theatre". Well, if you then believe that such behaviors are simply "theatre" as you put it, then by extension you would accept it from anyone....right? Or....is it just in THIS case, because you think it gives your position some teeth?

So you read it.....the proof...and on queue.....you pretend it away, as you do over and over......quick question can you reference a time where someone provided you proof and you changed your mind? Ever? Honest question....

Answer my question. Would it move from "theatre" to "legitimate" if we could accuse Ron Desantis of this same stuff? Or Trump? Would that make you suddenly care?

I think it very well could be an issue, but so too are many other things. I do not think it is an issue worth discussing unless somehow the legal system which has worked so well to prosecute it seems to be failing. The real problem is that expectation that we can force women to make choices we insist for them is farcical and wrong. If people do not make choices we believe are statistically justified....too bad....

You stupid fock..... his focking attorneys admitted he was and was under threat from the other gang......c'mon man, you need to read.... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k4072e3nno

So they are true.....but you consider them "theatre"....interesting, is there anything about his criminal activity that you do not consider <ahem>...."theatre"? Would it help if say,,,,oh I dont know....these accusations were made against....uhmmmm.....Ron Desantis? Would THAT may these activities suddenly......worthy of scorn?

Its not, which is why I say both do it.....it is more often true that liberals pretend they do not....they are better....hold a more moral position, when in reality they dont. This idea that supporting illegal immigration makes you somehow more moral ignores the moral consequences of that positions. You feel that those consequences are suitable so you stand up for these people.... conversely I see the consequences and stand up for those who endure them, prioritizing our own citizens over immigrants. We are both wrong, and we are both "right" in a sense.

Its not, which is why I say both do it.....it is more often true that liberals pretend they do not....they are better....hold a more moral position, when in reality they dont. This idea that supporting illegal immigration makes you somehow more moral ignores the moral consequences of that positions. You feel that those consequences are suitable so you stand up for these people.... conversely I see the consequences and stand up for those who endure them, prioritizing our own citizens over immigrants. We are both wrong, and we are both "right" in a sense.

Its all I need to support his deportation, that he later admitted to being in a criminal gang....or that he was a wife beater....or a human trafficker is just sprinkles on top.