jerryskids

It's not conservative groups, boyo. It's any group that caters to children. Because that's where the pedos go. Willie Sutton, when asked why he robbed banks: "Because that's where the money is." School teachers (mostly Lefties) and employees commit by far the most sexual abuses. An estimated 10% of K–12 students will experience sexual misconduct by a school employee by the time they graduate from high school.

Then you would particularly dislike the people who are scared and go painfully slow, but don't think to step aside for the people moving at a normal pace... Seriously though, I am the most impatient person in the world, to which my wife will gladly attest. It really wasn't too bad. You just need to breathe deeply and enjoy the spectacular views throughout the landing a few times in the hike.

Deep thoughts...

At least two people did; they tagged it with confused faces. Probably more who didn't bother to tag. Yip yip, carry on being wrong.

I understand quite well. The quoted part is attributed to me in the context of the Revolutionary War. If I said: In the words of the great TimHauck, football helmets are "made of metal" to protect your head... would the reader think you said "made of metal" in the context of football helmets, or say, copper piping in your house? Learn something and apologize, or don't, I'm done with this and don't feel like responding to your yip yip dog utterly incorrect arguments for the rest of the day.

Yes, we did it two years ago. We got lucky with the day-before option, especially since we were only in Zion one day (it was part of driving back from Michigan to AZ). They did check when we went. Also we use AllTrails which I agree is great -- we just used it to find a random hike in Clinton NJ to kill time before meeting my cousin. Anyway, tips/suggestions... You have to go uphill a ways to get to the actual landing, but it's either paved or very smooth. Parts of that have good views, especially if you enjoy watching out of shape people in poor shoes/clothing struggle with the climb. The Angel's Landing part is chained off very well; there was maybe one small part that was a little sketchy. But unless you have a fear of heights, you are protected quite well. Heck, I did two more dangerous hikes this past year in Sedona (Fay Canyon arch, and Devil's Bridge in the snow which was somewhat risky). We went in the morning to avoid the heat, but not crazy early. Nevertheless, the earlier you go, the less crowded it will be. My biggest advice is to bring your patience -- many parts are one-way, and you'll find yourself in a group waiting for a pile of people to finish going the other way. Hope you get to do it! Let us know how it goes.

Grammatically, this says that I said the quoted part in the context of the Revolutionary War. It was a misrepresentation of my words, Squis Lite. Just apologize and move on.

I've said it multiple times. Hint: Venn Diagram. Also, I pivoted to Hillary because we had beaten your Spinal Tap explanation to death. The "obstruction of justice" comment made me think of it. Might smashing and erasing devices qualify as being uncooperative, and/or as not returning confidential info in a timely matter? If so, the only difference is that Hillary is Clinton royalty. Well, that's not true. The main difference IMO, which you alluded to, is that before Trump, high-level politicians had infinite rope. The model for all politicians but Trump: default is to excuse everything but the most egregious offense, like a body in your freezer-level egregiousness. With Trump, the default is to charge him. That is why these Venn Diagrams are created, and it is why NY calls paying off a wh0re "election interference." And simps like @Ron_Artestlap them up.

No, we haven't. And if your response to "why didn't the feds do anything about Hillary's clear crimes" is "the feds decided not to do anything about Hillary's clear crimes," that's Spinal Tap "this one goes to 11" territory. Otherwise, good post, good effort.

Thanks again. Are you OK with training current and future terrorist regimes that if they hide behind their civilians with no concern about their welfare whatsoever, the onus is on the victims (Israel, 10/7) to just acquiesce and let the terrorists survive, stay in power, and rape and murder more women and children in the future?

Just wondering, if a person were to set up an illegal server with access to confidential info, and upon being confronted, smashed phones and lobotomized computers... would this be obstruction of justice?

Comeback Kid?

Well, that would be good, but that wasn't really my question, since for that to happen, Israel would have to do way worse than anything they've done to date. My question was: you and the Left have all kinds of moral requirements of Israel. What are your similar requirements for Hamas? For instance, is it unreasonable to ask them to release the (live, if any) hostages? To stop hiding behind civilians? The Left seems willing to train current and future terrorist regimes that if they hide behind their civilians with no concern about their welfare whatsoever, the onus is on the victims (Israel, 10/7) to just acquiesce and let the terrorists survive, stay in power, and rape and murder more women and children in the future. And as a bonus, the majority of "civilians" that the SJWs are so concerned about, continue to support the rapist murderers. There is just so little moral confusion here, it is painstakingly clear. And I find it so frustrating.

Also, you twisted my words. I never said that about the Revolutionary War.

Thanks. So, why does this make things difficult for Israel? Asked another way: what is your expectation of Hamas, the elected and supported leaders of Gaza, in all of this?