jerryskids

I looked back over this page and the last, where I got unfortunately involved in your semantic games. I don't doubt that he said that, but it wasn't over that span. You were talking to Mark Davis and Strike when I stepped in and said you are making distinctions without differences. And now you are stuck in your extremes. Here, I'll give you another win. Hey @EternalShinyAndChrome, it is not true that every person shouting from the river to the sea wants every Jew to be killed! Only some of them want all killed. Some also don't want all killed but are OK with a bunch killed as a result of the Intifada to take back their country which never existed. Happy?

It's interesting how your brethren in the MSM can manipulate simple people. The "claim," within the article, is that Biden proposed it (as is seen in that tweet). But the HEADLINE of the article reads: "Fact check: In 1982, Biden voted in support of an amendment to overturn Roe v. Wade" He did vote in support of it. Why blatantly lie in the headline? Never mind, you know why.

Again with the extremes: "all the Jews in the world." I never said that. I conceded you the win; some Jews will survive! You can't even take a win. Although it is Hamas' goal to kill all the Jews. Just saying...

@edjr Also Ed, I just venmo'd you a hunny for this and the PGA.

When all of these charges started years ago, my hypothesis was that the intention was not to convict him, but rather to keep him in the news in negative light. However, this doesn't seem to be working, as he continues to improve in the polls. As such, it's possible that the new plan is to actually convict him and, possibly, push for jail time. It's a risky plan of course, as it may create even more of a martyr effect. But it would explain why the prosecution doesn't particularly care if the conviction holds up long term.

If they wanted to murder everyone in Gaza, they'd have done it the first week. This past week Hamas bombed a station Israel set up to provide aid to Palestinians. Hamas doesn't care about Palestinian civilians, certainly not as much as Israel. You have a Gen Z, TikTok level understanding of the situation.

"From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free” is a rallying cry for terrorist groups and their sympathizers, from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) to Hamas, which called for Israel’s destruction in its original governing charter in 1988 and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 terror attack on Israeli civilians, murdering over 1,200 people in the single deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust. It is also a common call-to-arms for pro-Palestinian activists, especially student activists on college campuses. It calls for the establishment of a State of Palestine from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, erasing the State of Israel and its people. Another phrase “Globalize the Intifada,” which uses the Arabic word for “uprising” or “shaking off,” also calls for widespread violence against both Israelis and Jews across the globe (see “Globalize the Intifada”). Sometimes the Palestinian flag emoji is used as shorthand for these phrases to spam social media posts related to Jews, whether having to do with Israel or not. There is of course nothing antisemitic about advocating for Palestinians to have their own state. However, calling for the elimination of the Jewish state, praising Hamas or other entities who call for Israel’s destruction, or suggesting that the Jews alone do not have the right to self-determination, is antisemitic. https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/From-the-River-to-the-Sea#:~:text=noun \ 'fruhm 'thə ',River to the Mediterranean Sea

Read my first paragraph again. It is a call for intifada. I conceded that some Jews would likely survive the violent war. What I left unsaid was: congrats, you win the semantic Olympics, Squis Lite! Some Jews would survive! It's pretty much mostly peaceful by your centrist standards!

It's a call for intifada, Squistion Lite. A violent uprising. So yes, some may survive. I don't believe I said anything about all of the Jews, including those that don't live in Israel. But Hamas has; it is their singular charter to kill all Jews both in Israel and the world. So all those who support Hamas implicitly support that. To my knowledge that is the sole charter of Hamas. If you are aware of other goals, please educate me. If not, then it is not a stretch to equate the two. Otherwise, this whole extreme of "everyone" and "noone" is stupid and bores me, so I'll move on.

I don't know if there is precedent, but if not, I'd vote for you picking a replacement now. Losing the #2 overall pick sucks.

I would be surprised if I said "every." Such extremes are in the wheelhouse of folks like @The Real timschochet. I'm more a nuance kinda guy. If you have a link though, I'd be happy to read it.

Apparently for some, it is. Especially since that is the initial meaning. I'm merely saying that your position that NONE of these kids mean it is, well, pretty asinine.

You mean cause Shuffler DNP'd, right? If I lost someone else I'll edjr.

Also: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2024/04/29/columbia-bars-protest-leader-who-threatened-zionists I particularly like how he pulled the double intersectionality card at the end (queer and black) to attempt to shift the narrative to others.

Easiest prediction in the world would be the Lefties here moving from Phase 1 (it isn't happening) to Phase 2 (it happens but it's rare).