nobody

Schumer Shutdown hurting real people. SAD

One thing about palantir. I'm sure a bunch of the SW they do is classified, but if they can solve what I call the Connected Battlespace, the market for that is quite large. What I mean is I think there is a huge demand for real time situational awareness on the battlefield, and with the proliferation of drones in warfare, the need to coordinate and deploy large numbers of diverse units in an efficient manner is a problem that a company like palantir can solve. Then if you get really good, there is the sensor fusion piece where you can combine data from diverse units and create a web of surveillance that would give a warfighter a huge advantage given that the guys who spot the other team first usually win.

Homie needs proof a like 10 sigma return in the market isn't boosted by insider trading. Yeah, she just hit the lottery in stock picking, but also it's just a coincidence she has access to information to inform trades. That's called willful ignorance.

At least with TSLA there is the lingering robotics market. If that ever comes to fruition, that's a multi-trillion dollar TAM until China reverse engineers the tech and undercuts the market. What they really should invest in is security hardening their tech against reverse engineering. But I'll never own TSLA again since I don't trust Elon to not fock retail investors over if it suits his interest. he sees us as NPCs in his simulation and all.

F no. I wasn't following it at all, but I was saw the interview and was laughing my ass off. I was so intrigued by this Karp guy that I started looking into the company. Market cap at 400 billion on like 4.4 billion of revenue? P/E of 400... no thanks. It's already priced for perfection. The only upside is that it becomes some kind of mega-cap like the MAG-7. And then what? You're looking at a 3x over the next 5 years if they can grow revenue by about 100x. The risk doesn't seem worth the reward. META for instance is 1.5T market cap with 40x the revenue and a P/E of 27.

I don't feel comfortable interacting with people with your views on statutory rape.

Did she pick a nepobaby to replace her yet?

I bet Weepaws on SNAP. NTTAWWT

This guy is great...

This guy is fascinating https://www.businessinsider.com/palantir-ceo-alex-karp-calls-company-anti-woke-revenue-surge-2025-11 I know if you go woke, you go broke, but if you go anti-woke, you get rich?

The rest of your post wasn't directly related to the sub-thread about fatties on SNAP, so I didn't address it. To recap: Someone made some joke about there are too many fatties on SNAP and losing some food will be good for them One of the bigger dummies here starts talking about they're only fat cuz food deserts Things as usual fall along Blue and Red Team lines as we all laugh at the dummy for buying the BS that the average poor fatty on SNAP can't get to a grocery store Per usual, the dummy felt defensive and then tried to reframe the discussion as people laughing saying there are 0 SNAP recipients with reduced access to healthy food. The classic I'll say you're saying something extreme so I have a shot in hell of defending this stupid thing I said. I point out that most SNAP recipients live in cities and cities have easily accessible grocery stores HauckTua comes in with what he thinks is the gotcha of a lifetime saying 50% of people are within 0.6 miles of a grocery store. But even he knows that doesn't help his team, so he tries to reframe and say getting to a location half a mile away is hard too. Dummy responds with "Boom" for some reason. Then I suspect you picked up the sub-thread about 75% in and thought the argument was as dummy originally tried to reframe it as there are 0 people on SNAP that have difficult access to grocery stores. My larger point is that in the larger context of policy decisions (i.e., should SNAP recipients be required to buy healthy food), you go by the majority and not the outliers when making policy decisions. In the context of this thread, my point is that the vast majority of fatties you would see on a daily basis have plenty of access to grocery stores even though everyone probably knows some poor person that doesn't have a car or whatever that lives in the mountains, and then I have a bonus point that the concept of a food desert when there is a grocery store a mile away is stupid if you have any kind of common sense. Wokies are once again trying to endorse bad decisions out of empathy for people who don't need it. You can laugh at the 80% of fatties on SNAP that live less than a mile from a grocery store, and also feel bad for the 2% of fatties on SNAP who are legitimately forced to buy all their food from the KWIK-E-MART.

Again. Your anecdote doesn't matter. We make nation nal policy decisions on statistics and data. Some rural mountain town shouldn't drive national policy.

You said they had 1500 years of conquest ideology. He threatened you with some notion of comparing 1500 years of Christian violence is suppose, but Christians learned their lesson somewhere along the way and stopped slaughtering people in the name of their religion, so his proposed framework for an argument is flawed from the get go.

Biden's America.

I didn't watch, but it's clearly AI.