WhiteWonder

for standard... Olave and ..... I guess Diggs. You could make an argument for Watson because its non ppr. ... but if the Pats are in a shootout, then I like Diggs.

decision made for you

if you didn't start Higgins, I would go Boutte between the other two. Probably would have been my answer regardless.

Sit Swift... arguments can be made for Hall and Henderson but I expect the Pats/Bengals game to be fairly high scoring so even with Stevenson back I think Henderson will score plenty this week... The change at QB to Tyrod should help Hall a bit. Barkley is a must start and Tucker has a tough matchup but I think you have to start with Bucky out another week.

yes, I was going to use her as an example of how it's that character not the actress because that character had a look AND and attitude and even if she wasn't played by margot robbie, she probably gets played by a very attractive woman who can pull off the same attitude. but punchable face seems more literal and tied directly to the actor

question/comment from the peanut galllery punchable face. how literal is that? is it anyone whose face you just want to punch or are you heavily factoring in attitude and role of the character? curious because somewhere early in the thread I read you guys say you're drafting character, not actor/actress. punchable face kind of feels like drafting the actor. hot chick you'd wanna bang kind of leans that way but i think a character in a movie who is supposed to be a hot chick is going to be played by an attractive woman even in reboots or sequels with a different casting. Also, I think its part looks and part personality. I think Daniel Craig has a punchable face, but i'd never pick James Bond for that category So is punchable face more like a "this character is just the worst in a memorable way"?

I don't think so. I think the idea is that greater risk tolerance among investors will have them piling back in to things like bitcoin. I do have basic understanding of how bitcoin works and it certainly has plenty of utility... somewhere way back in this 188 pages i've been on record saying it won't replace fiat currency unless governments allow it (regulate it) which part of the big initial selling point on btc was its unregulated nature and how it was going to be the new world currency.... So I think a lot of reasons it was being touted several years ago are totally bunk. Anyone invested in btc, or any other cc's quickly became simply interested in how much their investments were worth in USD. I am all for a good trade. the last time I had eth I sold it in 2024. It's definitely back on my radar

oddly I think I liked him more with Flacco under center. Not sure with Burrow back. If there is ever a time to play him its this week with Chase out and the Pats being a better run D. If Gonzalez is on Higgins, Iosivas could have a nice day. Someone mentioned Fant but Gesicki sounds like he will be back.

but this is at least 97% of what liberals spend their day doing

did a lib get Helltoupee banned?

on my hopeful undrafted list for Villian good pick

Tyler durden was atop my villian list... i jotted down a bunch of heroes, villians, sports, funny, hot chicks after round 5, all bur durden are still available. Im hoping I have enough ammo at the end to submit a fun undrafted team

(peefoam) "Its real"

Add me. I’m your nemesis