nobody

Okay. I'm slow. Why don't you guys just explain it?

I believe it'll get stolen. Just not by Qatar or Trump. I just don't see the angle is all. With Biden's kid it was so so so obvious. Here, I don't see how trump steals it. I would assume the oil companies will get it as a subsidy for investing in repair of Venezuelan infrastructure. I guess maybe he could give it to chevron and the Chevron hires Trump's family for a job he doesn't do like Hunter?

I don't get it. Why is this corruption staring me in the face? Revenue from the oil sales is currently being held in bank accounts controlled by the US government, as indicated in Friday’s order, according to the administration official. The main account, according to a second senior administration official, is located in Qatar. The second official described Qatar as a neutral location where money can flow freely with US approval and without risk of seizure. Trump’s order noted that at least some of the revenue would be held in US Treasury accounts.

He doesn't think some chick actively instructing their movement is probable cause to detain?

Someone should do a 5 whys analysis. That would probably be hilarious from each side.

Dude gonna get charlie kirked if he's not careful

The dangerous situation is hitting a guy with your car, driving while someone is holding your door, and driving too close to people standing in the street on an icy day where your haste can cause the car to act unpredictably. I get no one was seriously hurt except for the guy's bruise, but that doesn't mean it wasn't dangerous. Excessive speeding is dangerous. Driving drunk is dangerous. It doesn't mean someone dies every time someone does those things.

So we agree! Yessssss!

Non-athlete Doesn't understand how adrenaline can help you perform through injury.

Agreed My point is we all are watching the same videos and everyone is "clearly" seeing completely different things.

I guess I don't understand why it's too much to ask people don't put people's lives in danger with their vehicle. I mean whether you think the officer felt his life was in danger or not, his life was in danger. I mean driving a vehicle inches from someone on an icy street is extremely dangerous. Can we at least agree on that?

Remember when they saw the exact same videos and were claiming the car never hit him at all at first?

"...and/or others" is an underrated nuance to the law in this case. When the wokie committed the incredibly reckless and dangerous maneuver with her vehicle, his fellow agent was still holding on to the vehicle and was also in danger. Thankfully the other agent was able to safely disengage, but by that time, events were already in motion.

I was just popping in to get my daily dose of toxic political propaganda, but even I would have to fact check this one. For one Germans spoke German, so you're relying on translation to say it's a Nazi slogan - might be a stretch. Secondly, I've seen that sentiment many times over the years, so even if it the idea originated with Germans in WW2 (doubtful), it was probably used in many contexts since then. I'm calling fake news