If my kid went to Kent State or I paid taxes in Ohio I'd be plenty PISSED OFF!

[davebg 0]

Yesterday afternoon, I logged on to the "Global War" blog (global-war.bloghi.com) of Associate Professor Julio Pino – a Muslim convert who teaches at Kent State University. The heading for the site used to read "The Worldwide Web of Jihad: Daily News from the Most Dangerous Muslim in America." Now it reads "Are You Prepared for Jihad?" IN THE NAME OF OBL. 2007: THE YEAR OF ISLAMIC VICTORY!"

 

Hardly able to believe what I was reading, I called Pino at his office in Ohio around 4 p.m. According to his secretary, he had not been at work that day (he only has office hours two days of the week). He was drawing a paycheck from the people of the State of Ohio while trying to launch a Jihad against people like me. In fact, just five minutes before I called he posted an entry under the title "Crusaders Can’t Take Anymore in Afghanistan!"

 

Pino began his morning of not going into his office at Kent State by penning a post under the title “Frightened British Crusaders Rush More Troops to Occupied Afghanistan.” Using terms like “occupation” and “Crusaders” it isn’t really necessary to read these posts in order to ascertain who this employee of the State of Ohio is rooting for in the War on Terror.

 

But, just in case you were curious about the purpose of this site, it is provided in the upper right corner: "We are a jihadist news service, and provide battle dispatches, training manuals, and jihad videos to our brothers worldwide. All we want is to get Allah’s pleasure. We will write ‘Jihad’ across our foreheads, and the stars. The angels will carry our message throughout the world."

 

There is also an "Oath of Freedom" in the upper right corner: "We were born free. We will live freely and when death comes to us, we will die freely. Jihad is changing all that can be changed; freeing ourselves through our own efforts; and the conviction that truth will prevail, inshallah."

 

Under the entry "Sister Detonates Herself to Eliminate Shia Traitors" there is a description of a female suicide bomber who recently killed 41 people. Just in case you wondered how the host of the site feels about the suicide bomber, the next line tells you: "Now she lies on the Golden Couch of Paradise."

 

Despite his clear support of mass murder, he once complained that the Jews were engaged in genocide against the Palestinians. He claimed that as a result of that assertion, he was "harassed" and received "death threats."

 

I’ve always assumed that a person who advocates mass murder runs the risk of getting an occasional death threat in the office. Maybe Pino isn’t really the "Most Dangerous Muslim in America." Maybe he’s just a pro-Palestinian pansy whose cushy job with the State of Ohio lets him hide inside his house while real men are doing the work that keeps this great nation going.

 

But, just to be fair to Pino, he is more balanced in his teaching than a lot of my colleagues at UNC-Wilmington. In fact, he’s even willing to criticize an occasional Democrat. He says that John F. Kennedy once planned "genocide against the Cuban people" in the 1960s. He also claims that President Bill Clinton killed "more than 500,000 Iraqi children" in the 1990s.

 

Although obsessed with the notion that America is being over-run by "Christian fascism," he has affectionately referred to his students his "little Jihadists" and his "beloved Taliban." In other words, he makes no bones about the fact that he works to indoctrinate, not educate, the children of the taxpayers of the State of Ohio.

 

Many people believe that Julio Pino deserves to be fired because of his public statements about the War on Terror. I disagree. A simple firing is too light a punishment.

 

Dr. Julio Pino, for his decision to "provide battle dispatches, training manuals, and jihad videos to our (enemies) worldwide" deserves to be arrested and sent to an island off the coast of North America, striped naked, interrogated, and, if necessary, tortured to ascertain the extent of his involvement in assisting our enemies.

 

After we are done with him, he is free to return to Ohio. That is unless, of course, he is found to be something more than a professorial pansy posing as a genuine Jihadist.

 

Dr. Pino is still afraid to return Dr. Adams calls. Allah seems to have blessed the Cuban convert with an unusually small "julio-ju dilly."

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAd..._the_schoolyard

[wiffleball 4,790]

yep, that's pretty focked up. Hopefully this guy does more than just blog about it.

[supermike80 1,911]

DaveBG, you scare me sometimes man.

[Dr. Rosenpenis 0]

Give him a call or drop a note:

 

Dr. Julio César Pino

Associate Professor

Department of History

Kent State University

Kent, Ohio 44242-0001

Office: (330) 672-8911

History Dept. (330) 672-2882

Fax: (330) 672-2943

E-Mail: jpino@kent.edu

[davebg 0]

DaveBG, you scare me sometimes man.

It's people like Professor Julio Pino who should scare you, my friend.

[supermike80 1,911]

It's people like Professor Julio Pino who should scare you, my friend.

If it's legit it does.

But you do this kind of sheet CONSTANTLY.

You read an article on the web, copy and paste it, with no verification or backup. You just took this guy's story and spread it further with absolutely no confirmation.

 

That's scary to me as well. What if it isn't true? What if this guy is no where near whan this ONE columnist says?

Your gullibility as times really makes me fearful for what the rest of America is swallowing out there.

[Toro 1]

Dear Julio,

 

You suck.

 

Sincerly,

Allah

[davebg 0]

If it's legit it does.

But you do this kind of sheet CONSTANTLY.

You read an article on the web, copy and paste it, with no verification or backup. You just took this guy's story and spread it further with absolutely no confirmation.

 

That's scary to me as well. What if it isn't true? What if this guy is no where near whan this ONE columnist says?

Your gullibility as times really makes me fearful for what the rest of America is swallowing out there.

Well, after reading the article, but before posting this thread, I visited this guy's website. All of the quotes attributed to the site in the article I posted are plainly visible on the home page.

 

Maybe you would do well to take some of your own advice and click on the link to this dooshbag professor's jihadist website to see it for yourself BEFORE you take me to task.

[supermike80 1,911]

Well, after reading the article, but before posting this thread, I visited this guy's website. All of the quotes attributed to the site in the article I posted are plainly visible on the home page.

 

Maybe you would do well to take some of your own advice and click on the link to this dooshbag professor's jihadist website to see it for yourself BEFORE you take me to task.

 

Are you talking about the website linked to in the article? Because there are questions about whether it truly is HIS website.

 

But that's inconsequential right?

 

The sky is still falling in your mind. Enough. I know where you're coming from.

[Isotopes 1]

It sounds like this is probably true.

 

Kent State University has been dealing for several years with the case of a Muslim professor, Julio Pino, who calls himself "the most dangerous Muslim in America."

 

Pino, a tenured associate history professor, angered some faculty members in 2002 when he wrote a column in the school newspaper that was an ode to a Palestinian suicide bomber. Pino called the bomber a martyr.

 

English professor Lewis Fried called on the university to fire Pino, but Kent State President Carol Cartwright said at the time that the school supports the free exchange of ideas.

 

Pino now has a blog on the Internet where he writes that U.S. servicemen are butchers who massacre Iraqis and urges readers to "join the Islamic resistance."

 

Pino said yesterday he had no comment.

 

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/news-story...0421-A1-02.html

[davebg 0]

Are you talking about the website linked to in the article? Because there are questions about whether it truly is HIS website.

Really? Do you have a link to the story where Professor Jihad denies that this is his site? Do you believe him? What type of independent research have you done to confirm or deny the validity of his denials?

 

I mean, if you're going to hold me to a certain standard, it would only seem fair that you hold yourself to those same high standards, no?

[MDC 7,428]

Really? Do you have a link to the story where Professor Jihad denies that this is his site? Do you believe him? What type of independent research have you done to confirm or deny the validity of his denials?

 

I mean, if you're going to hold me to a certain standard, it would only seem fair that you hold yourself to those same high standards, no?

 

The onus of truth is on the person making the claim. Like, if I were to say that blog was YOUR site, it would be my responsibility to prove it - not your responsibility to disprove it.

 

Isotope's link seems legit though. Just saying, it's irresponsible to post those kind of claims online without knowing for sure whether the facts are straight.

 

It's an interesting question, how far academic freedom goes? Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit is a law professor at Tennessee and he's been posting on his blog his support for some clearly illegal activities, like suggesting we covertly kill off Iranian nuclear scientists.

 

I don't know whether he should be fired for that. I also don't know if this jihad guy should be fired for what he said, although I support Kent State alumni and potential students who want to put pressure on the guy.

[supermike80 1,911]

Really? Do you have a link to the story where Professor Jihad denies that this is his site? Do you believe him? What type of independent research have you done to confirm or deny the validity of his denials?

 

I mean, if you're going to hold me to a certain standard, it would only seem fair that you hold yourself to those same high standards, no?

 

I am not denying anything, I am just challenging you posting all this stuff, constantly, every focking day, withno verification.

That is all.

[Fumbleweed 547]

The free exchange of ideas ends when a person celebrates mass murder. The guy should be fired or worse.

[davebg 0]

The onus of truth is on the person making the claim. Like, if I were to say that blog was YOUR site, it would be my responsibility to prove it - not your responsibility to disprove it.

 

Isotope's link seems legit though. Just saying, it's irresponsible to post those kind of claims online without knowing for sure whether the facts are straight.

Agreed, which is why, after reading the outrageous claims made in the article, I checked out the website in question. Everything attributed to the website in the article was right there for anyone to see..

 

As far as I'm concerned I fulfilled the onus of truth in posting the article.

 

Then, after pointing that out to Supermike, HE made the claim that there were questions as to whether or not the site actually was Professor Jihad's website. When I prompted Supermike to provide any evidence to support HIS allegations what did we get?

 

:crickets:

[MDC 7,428]

Agreed, which is why, after reading the outrageous claims made in the article, I checked out the website in question. Everything attributed to the website in the article was right there for anyone to see..

 

Is the professor's name attached to the site? I visited it but I didn't see it.

[Isotopes 1]

The free exchange of ideas ends when a person celebrates mass murder. The guy should be fired or worse.

 

I think he should have the right to express his ideas but I do not think that I would want him representing my University if I were Kent. They should fire him.

[supermike80 1,911]

Agreed, which is why, after reading the outrageous claims made in the article, I checked out the website in question. Everything attributed to the website in the article was right there for anyone to see..

 

As far as I'm concerned I fulfilled the onus of truth in posting the article.

 

Then, after pointing that out to Supermike, HE made the claim that there were questions as to whether or not the site actually was Professor Jihad's website. When I prompted Supermike to provide any evidence to support HIS allegations what did we get?

 

:crickets:

 

My claim was based on the comments made on his article site, that is all.

Wash it anyway you want, spin it anyway you feel. You're a scary, easily influnced, sky-is-falling gullibee----and that is scary.

[davebg 0]

I am not denying anything, I am just challenging you posting all this stuff, constantly, every focking day, withno verification.

That is all.

You said...

Are you talking about the website linked to in the article? Because there are questions about whether it truly is HIS website.

Where did you get that information from?

 

You are taking me to task for posting an article (which anyone here can read for themselves and form their own opinion about) b/c I did not verify the information. Yet, when I pointed out to you that before posting this I went to the site in question and did, in fact, verify that everything attributed to the site was actually on the site you made a completely unsubstantiated claim that there are questions as to whether or not the site is really the professor's site.

 

So, where did you get the information that this maybe wasn't his site? What steps did you take to verify that your information was correct?

 

Seems to me as if you are holding me to a higher standard than that which you are willing to apply to yourself. Are you practicing for a run for political office or something?

[wiffleball 4,790]

It sounds like this is probably true.

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/news-story...0421-A1-02.html

 

 

I dunno if SuperMike has some kind of bitter, angry unrequited man-crush on Dave, but he's flailing and failing pretty badly...

[davebg 0]

My claim was based on the comments made on his article site, that is all.

Wash it anyway you want, spin it anyway you feel. You're a scary, easily influnced, sky-is-falling gullibee----and that is scary.

I'm still trying to figure out where you got the notion that there is some question as to whether or not the site is actually Pino's.

 

Are you saying that you based your assertion on the anonymous comments posted on the article page?

 

Aside from the fact that I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to the article's author, who provides his name and contact information, not to mention is an author on the very subject of the slanted idealogical nature of our secondary education system, over that of an anonymous poster in the comments section of an article on the web...aside form all of that...it would seem HIGHLY HYPOCRITICAL of you to take me to task for being "gullible" and believing everything I read when you seemingly require no evidence or credibility to post something that you read somewhere.

[supermike80 1,911]

I'm still trying to figure out where you got the notion that there is some question as to whether or not the site is actually Pino's.

 

Are you saying that you based your assertion on the anonymous comments posted on the article page?

 

Aside from the fact that I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to the article's author, who provides his name and contact information, not to mention is an author on the very subject of the slanted idealogical nature of our secondary education system, over that of an anonymous poster in the comments section of an article on the web...aside form all of that...it would seem HIGHLY HYPOCRITICAL of you to take me to task for being "gullible" and believing everything I read when you seemingly require no evidence or credibility to post something that you read somewhere.

 

You are gullible, easily influenced by other's opinions, and WORST OF ALL, you spread it around while chanting

"THE SKY IS FALLING THE SKY IS FALLING"

 

Back to my original point, you scare me man. You really do.

[MDC 7,428]

You are taking me to task for posting an article (which anyone here can read for themselves and form their own opinion about) b/c I did not verify the information. Yet, when I pointed out to you that before posting this I went to the site in question and did, in fact, verify that everything attributed to the site was actually on the site you made a completely unsubstantiated claim that there are questions as to whether or not the site is really the professor's site.

 

You did not verify that the Kent State U. professor in the article was actually responsible for the site before posting the article. Based on Isotope's link it looks like he is, but still - I'd have dug that up before accusing the guy or advocating the murder of US troops or posting his contact info (someone else did that).

 

I'm pretty much in agreement with you on this story, just sayin.

[davebg 0]

You did not verify that the Kent State U. professor in the article was actually responsible for the site before posting the article. Based on Isotope's link it looks like he is, but still - I'd have dug that up before accusing the guy or advocating the murder of US troops or posting his contact info (someone else did that).

 

I'm pretty much in agreement with you on this story, just sayin.

Well, Isotopes' link pretty much made the same assertions as the original article, right? How do we know that the information from one of these articles isn't based upon information posted in the other article?

 

Short of contacting the ISP that the site is on to confirm who it is registered to (IF the ISP would be wililng to provide that information), I'm not sure how you can 100% verify it when the person who puts up the site is too much of a coward to attribute their name to it and the person who is accused of putting up the site refuses comment.

 

As I said, when in doubt in such situations I tend to give more credence to the person who puts his name, picture and contact information on his article/web page over the person who post inflamatory stuff and hides behind his burka.

 

You are gullible, easily influenced by other's opinions, and WORST OF ALL, you spread it around while chanting

"THE SKY IS FALLING THE SKY IS FALLING"

 

Back to my original point, you scare me man. You really do.

Yeah...uh...when you decide to present us w/a link to where you came up w/your completely unsubstantiated assertion that there were questions as to whether it was Pino's site or not, you let us know.

 

Until then, please refrain from your utterly worthless "do as I say, not as I do" schtick.

[jerryskids 6,799]

I dunno if SuperMike has some kind of bitter, angry unrequited man-crush on Dave, but he's flailing and failing pretty badly...

supermike gets ornery if sawilson doesn't post an attention wh0re thread. Has she not been around today?

[wiffleball 4,790]

Because there are questions about whether it truly is HIS website.

 

 

Since you didn't answer Daves question, I'll ask the same. What's the basis for your statement above?

 

Link?

[Boz/BoFan 0]

You are gullible, easily influenced by other's opinions, and WORST OF ALL, you spread it around while chanting

"THE SKY IS FALLING THE SKY IS FALLING"

 

Back to my original point, you scare me man. You really do.

 

Hey Supermike, is this how you handle sh!t every time you are proved wrong? You stomp your feet and scream like a little b!tch. More than enough evidence has been provided and where the phuck have you been, this story has been out for some time now.

 

Its nice to see you give Jihadists the benefit of the doubt over the average American. That is scary. You got owned little boy, go home.

[Riddlen 1]

Dear FFtodayers,

 

Everything on the web is true.

 

Sincerely,

 

Wikipedia

[jets24 6]

The onus of truth is on the person making the claim. Like, if I were to say that blog was YOUR site, it would be my responsibility to prove it - not your responsibility to disprove it.

 

Isotope's link seems legit though. Just saying, it's irresponsible to post those kind of claims online without knowing for sure whether the facts are straight.

 

It's an interesting question, how far academic freedom goes? Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit is a law professor at Tennessee and he's been posting on his blog his support for some clearly illegal activities, like suggesting we covertly kill off Iranian nuclear scientists.

 

I don't know whether he should be fired for that. I also don't know if this jihad guy should be fired for what he said, although I support Kent State alumni and potential students who want to put pressure on the guy.

 

 

you're a focking waste of flesh. why not just join the other side already so we can kick your assss?

[supermike80 1,911]

Hey Supermike, is this how you handle sh!t every time you are proved wrong? You stomp your feet and scream like a little b!tch. More than enough evidence has been provided and where the phuck have you been, this story has been out for some time now.

 

Its nice to see you give Jihadists the benefit of the doubt over the average American. That is scary. You got owned little boy, go home.

 

Yeah, that took longer than I thought it would.

 

As far as proven wrong....I am NOT debating the validity of the article....I barely read it. I am stomping my feet about the chicken littles on this bored....like DaveBG.

 

That's all.

But yes, I do tend to get ornery, I need FFtoday anger management I guess...cause the majority of you fockers piss me off.

[Voltaire 5,316]

The free exchange of ideas ends when a person celebrates mass murder. The guy should be fired or worse.

 

I agree. His conduct is unacceptable for a university professor. I mean even far left or right professors should be tollerated if they keep their perspective in the classroom and use valid arguments to justify their positions otherwise. That's free speech; but celebrating mass murder as you put it, this clearly is crossing a line.

[Boz/BoFan 0]

 

As far as proven wrong....I am NOT debating the validity of the article....I barely read it. I am stomping my feet about the chicken littles on this bored....like DaveBG.

 

 

 

Oh, you weren't? And I quote.....

 

 

"If it's legit it does.

But you do this kind of sheet CONSTANTLY.

You read an article on the web, copy and paste it, with no verification or backup. You just took this guy's story and spread it further with absolutely no confirmation."

[ZeroTolerance 584]

So, the American government is clearly the sworn enemy of these people's Islam (note, not all muslims are whackjob jihadists) but being employed by said government is ok by Allah? This guy is a jackass who probably failed at being a suicide bomber.

[joneo 556]

Muslims dead in O-HI-O. Muslims dead in O-HI O