Artist Formerly Known as Big O 0 Posted April 12, 2007 Perhaps the Flinstones were accurate all along! *rolleyes* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toro 1 Posted April 12, 2007 Dude, we should get hammered and go. How much fun would that be!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted April 12, 2007 sigh. I hate this topic cause I caznt really fet behind either idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZeroTolerance 584 Posted April 12, 2007 Dude, we should get hammered and go. How much fun would that be!!! Stagger over to a tour guide and ask where the baby elephant vacuum cleaner is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 987 Posted April 12, 2007 Ham often asks of evolutionists: “How do you gain knowledge about the past when you weren’t there?” But what of the argument that the same question could be asked of creationists who believe—also without having been there—that the Bible was written by men who reflected the word of God? “Man by himself could not have written such a consistent, non-contradictory book,” says Ham. But how does he know man wrote it with divine inspiration? “Because of what the Bible itself claims of itself,” he says. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 it's so easy to understand, a caveman could do it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZeroTolerance 584 Posted April 12, 2007 “Man by himself could not have written such a consistent, non-contradictory book,” "such a consistent, non-contradictory book" "non-contradictory" ...he is kidding. Right? RIGHT?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted April 12, 2007 that God created man and animals simultaneously, and that the flood wiped out every living creature that wasn’t inside Noah’s Ark. Okay but... Genesis 6 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. 20 Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive Maybe some bible scholars can help me out here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toro 1 Posted April 12, 2007 that God created man and animals simultaneously, and that the flood wiped out every living creature that wasn’t inside Noah’s Ark. Okay but... Genesis 6 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. 20 Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive Maybe some bible scholars can help me out here They took two of everything. The flood wiped out every animal except the two they took. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Artist Formerly Known as Big O 0 Posted April 12, 2007 it's so easy to understand, a caveman could do it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voice_Of_Reason 0 Posted April 12, 2007 that God created man and animals simultaneously, and that the flood wiped out every living creature that wasn’t inside Noah’s Ark. Okay but... Genesis 6 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. 20 Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive Maybe some bible scholars can help me out here You seen the size of a Dino egg? They weren't born big. I don't remember it saying take two of every kind, but get the biggest of every kind and pack them in tight. It just said two of every kind. I'm going to go ahead and assume Noah was smart enough to let the biggins alone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted April 12, 2007 They took two of everything. The flood wiped out every animal except the two they took. According to this article, creationist believe the flood killed the dinosaurs. However the bible says Noah was instructed to take two of everything. How is this not a contradiction? You seen the size of a Dino egg? They weren't born big. I don't remember it saying take two of every kind, but get the biggest of every kind and pack them in tight. It just said two of every kind. I'm going to go ahead and assume Noah was smart enough to let the biggins alone Okay... so why don't we have dinosaurs today? Also God said they would come to Noah. Did the egg roll itself? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 there were certainly dinosaurs that were smaller than elephants and rhinos. the size argument doesn't work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 Okay... so why don't we have dinosaurs today? that's a good question, i'm sure the scientific community has this question answered as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 987 Posted April 12, 2007 According to this article, creationist believe the flood killed the dinosaurs. However the bible says Noah was instructed to take two of everything. How is this not a contradiction? Everything = everything God wanted saved. Therefore, no contradiction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 Everything = everything God wanted saved. so god hates dinosaurs. he murdered them, in fact. i'm glad we learned something here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted April 12, 2007 that's a good question, i'm sure the scientific community has this question answered as well. They went extinct. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 They went extinct. HTH true and works well for both theories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted April 12, 2007 According to the Bible, it was two of every species PLUS whatever needed to be used as 'food animals' for the carnivores. So that means two antelopes (lets say) showed up to be the breeders of future antelopes... and other just 'showed up' to be eaten??? hoe did that owrk? Was it the first ones that showed up would be the uneaten ones? Was it like some sick animal version of The Amazing Race? It's all very perplexing. Plus why did all the swimming creatures get a pass? And there were plenty of sea-faring dinosaurs. What happened to them? What did the plant eaters eat on the boat? And mostly - if he created everythign and then decide to wipe it all out: Why go through the trouble of saving anything? Just focking re-create it all!!! Or is the almighty just too lazy? He could have learned from him mistakes and not given the ostrich wings and skipped the entire platypus fiasco. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted April 12, 2007 Everything = everything God wanted saved. Therefore, no contradiction. So when they say "Welcome, instead, to the Creation Museum. Here, dozens of exhibits attempt to show the Bible as the literal truth and the theory of evolution as unsupportable by science." They don't mean literal truth... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snoopy1 0 Posted April 12, 2007 According to this article, creationist believe the flood killed the dinosaurs. However the bible says Noah was instructed to take two of everything. What do you think Noah used to feed to the other animals...that's right Dinosaurs! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 true and works well for both theories. they went extinct awfully quickly in the creationist version. not that that couldn't happen. of course, you have to decide whether you're a 'dinosaurs never existed' creationist or a 'dinosaurs wennt extinct practically the instant god created them' creationist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 i just think it's funny how people that nitpick the hell out of the intelligent design theory don't ever turn the keen eye of observation on evolution. there's noway you can can believe everything about the theory of evolution without the same faith that it takes to believe in creation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted April 12, 2007 'dinosaurs wennt extinct practically the instant god created them' creationist. God: "Hmmm... and I'll make some ponies, and some birdies and some more birdies" "And some insects for the birdies to eat, and some plants for the insects to eat" "And some hippos and tigers and bears" "And there's some dinosaurs" "Oh fock!!!! Oh fock!!! The dinosaurs are eating everyone!! Fock!!! Fock!!! EXTINCTION!!! EXTINCTION!!!" "Whew! That was dumb of me. Now where was I. Oh yeah! And some fishies, and some more fishies..." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 i just think it's funny how people that nitpick the hell out of the intelligent design theory don't ever turn the keen eye of observation on evolution. there's noway you can can believe everything about the theory of evolution without the same faith that it takes to believe in creation. the thing is that creationism only takes faith. facts are not needed, and are in fact not welcomed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted April 12, 2007 i just think it's funny how people that nitpick the hell out of the intelligent design theory don't ever turn the keen eye of observation on evolution. there's noway you can can believe everything about the theory of evolution without the same faith that it takes to believe in creation. There is a huge difference between Intelligent Design theory and "everthing happened just like in the Bible" theory. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,177 Posted April 12, 2007 i just think it's funny how people that nitpick the hell out of the intelligent design theory don't ever turn the keen eye of observation on evolution. there's noway you can can believe everything about the theory of evolution without the same faith that it takes to believe in creation. I think it's funny that you don't understand the difference between science and faith. I also think it's funny that you have one eyebrow and drool a lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 the thing is that creationism only takes faith. facts are not needed, and are in fact not welcomed. so you agree that it takes faith to believe the theory of evolution? and which "FACTS" are you talking about? i'd be interested to see what evolution "facts" are completely indisputable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 and i won't agree that subscribing to evolution requires faith. it may be just the wrong word. scientists regularly discard theories, or refine them, or discard portions of theories, as new eveidence indicates that they should. faith, on the other hand, requires creedence without evidence, or despite contrary evidence. so you agree that it takes faith to believe the theory of evolution? and which "FACTS" are you talking about? i'd be interested to see what evolution "facts" are completely indisputable. oh, i'm just not interested enough to debate about it. you believe what you want. that's your right and i have no intent of belittling you for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,278 Posted April 12, 2007 If you believe in creationism intelligent design someone putting two of every animal on a boat YOU ARE A FOCKING MORON. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 you believe what you want. that's your right and i have no intent of belittling you for it. acreed. it's late in the day and these types arguments are just like pissing in the wind...as fun as that is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 acreed. it's late in the day and these types arguments are just like pissing in the wind...as fun as that is. i'd hate to do your laundry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted April 12, 2007 i'd hate to do your laundry. so does my wife. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toro 1 Posted April 12, 2007 If you believe in creationism intelligent design someone putting two of every animal on a boat YOU ARE A FOCKING MORON. Wrong thread. fishing thread is farther down Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted April 12, 2007 true and works well for both theories. Creationism is a theory? I thought the Bible was the truth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted April 12, 2007 You guys are thoroughly missing the point on the whole dinosaur angle. Can YOU tell the difference between a male T-Rex and a female? I didn't think so. Neither could Noah. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brinett9 0 Posted April 12, 2007 Can YOU tell the difference between a male T-Rex and a female? I didn't think so. Neither could Noah. good point. could be two married homo t-rex's that show up. that'd explain the extinction. and the origin of porn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 517 Posted April 12, 2007 If you believe in creationism intelligent design someone putting two of every animal on a boat YOU ARE A FOCKING MORON. Cool. Count me in. This thread has been done before in numerous forms...too numerous to count Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,278 Posted April 12, 2007 Wrong thread. fishing thread is farther down Not fishing Completely serious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted April 12, 2007 good point. could be two married homo t-rex's that show up. that'd explain the extinction. and the origin of porn. EXACTLY. There's a crapload of other species that died off shortly after Noah's Love Boat docked. ..sure, they were all gay, but still.... You know how the gays adore cruises. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
