edjr 6,714 Posted April 2, 2012 a lot of you people owe the juice an apology http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123547/OJ-innocent-Private-investigator-claims-Simpsons-SON-hacked-stars-wife-friend-death--went-trial-cover-up.html A Texas private investigator claims he knows who really killed Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman in 1994. And it wasn't OJ Simpson. In a new book, 'OJ is Innocent and I Can Prove It,' William C. Dear alleges Simpson went on trial, and was acquitted of murder, in an effort to deflect attention from the true killer: His son Jason. Dear says Simpson was at the crime scene -- but not until after his ex-wife and her friend had been stabbed to death. After a 17-year investigation, Dear says he has found circumstantial evidence that links Jason Simpson, 41, to the murders. The private eye claims he dug through Jason Simpson's garbage and his abandoned storage locker in search of new evidence, the New York Post reported. In the search, Dear says he found a hunting knife that forensic experts say is the murder weapon that was never recovered during the police investigation. He also found photographs of Jason Simpson wearing a knit cap, similar to one that was discovered at the crime scene. Prosecutors were unable to definitely link the hat to OJ Simpson, though hairs similar to his were found inside. Dear calls Jason Simpson 'the overlooked suspect' and produced a documentary film released in 2010 detailing the accusations that he is the real culprit behind the murder. During the screening of his film in 2011 he displayed a suspected murder weapon from the night of June 12, 1994 at the DocMiami Film Festival. Dear says two months before the murders, Jason Simpson assaulted his girlfriend. The chef also deals with 'intermittent rage disorder,' according to the New York Post. 'That person who was wielding and welding that knife, had to know exactly what he was doing and he certainly had to be familiar with a knife. OJ wasn't,' Mr Dear said in his documentary. Despite these alleged findings, Jason Simpson's DNA and fingerprints were never compared to those found at the crime scene. He was never interviewed by police, either, the Post reports. No arrests other than Simpson's were made in the murders. OJ Simpson was the prime suspect for the murders because he helped to cover up his son's crimes and, in effect, allowed himself to take the fall, the book claims. 'The LA PD and the district attorney had made a rush to judgement,' Mr Dear said. At the time of the trial, Judge Lance Ito said from his bench: 'Those who say the criminal justice system itself is on trial may be right.' The Post could not reach Jason Simpson, who is working as a chef in Miami, for a comment. The paper reports his phone line as disconnected. Dear, a private investigator of 30 years based in Texas, is a former Florida and Texas police officer who has been featured on Current Affair, Unsolved Mysteries and Fox TV. Other investigations he has worked on are the Exhumation of Lee Harvey Oswald, The disappearance of the Teenage Genius and the Alien Autopsy, according to his website. According to Dear's publisher: 'This book includes shocking photos and new evidence about the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman, that was totally overlooked by the original investigators. Evidence that points directly to a surprising new suspect, very close to OJ.' Sounds pretty solid to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Next Generation 10 Posted April 2, 2012 a lot of you people owe the juice an apology http://www.dailymail...l-cover-up.html Sounds pretty solid to me. I could believe this. But, OJ is just as guilty if he covered it up after the fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,934 Posted April 2, 2012 Well....at least they didnt blame a white guy....errrrr.....hispanic guy for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,714 Posted April 2, 2012 I could believe this. But, OJ is just as guilty if he covered it up after the fact. You'd want to see your son go to jail? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted April 2, 2012 I guess there is a book on this that my mom read and was convinced it was the son as well. Has been telling me this for a couple years now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Next Generation 10 Posted April 2, 2012 You'd want to see your son go to jail? Yes, That's EXACTLY what I said. In fact, I want to see BOTH of my sons go to jail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 2, 2012 He was convicted ? Stupid thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,338 Posted April 2, 2012 'That person who was wielding and welding that knife, had to know exactly what he was doing and he certainly had to be familiar with a knife. OJ wasn't,' Mr Dear said in his documentary. It takes a lot of practice to kill so skillfully. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,714 Posted April 2, 2012 It takes a lot of practice to kill so skillfully. did you see any of the naked guns? OJ had no skillz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted April 2, 2012 did you see any of the naked guns? OJ had no skillz Nordberg was a BADASS! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,934 Posted April 2, 2012 Nordberg was a BADASS! Also the best umpire ive seen in years..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted April 2, 2012 Also the best umpire ive seen in years..... That was Frank Drebin/Enrico Pallazzo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,714 Posted April 2, 2012 Also the best umpire ive seen in years..... you suck at movies. one of the greatest scenes ever from a movie. Frank Drebin as the umpire Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,088 Posted April 2, 2012 Dear OJ, I'm sorry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted April 2, 2012 Both sides had the best investigators money could buy. And not one of them could figure this out, with access to so much evidence? I call BS. Also, the son would let his dad go through all of this if he was really the one who did it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,088 Posted April 2, 2012 Both sides had the best investigators money could buy. And not one of them could figure this out, with access to so much evidence? I call BS. Also, the son would let his dad go through all of this if he was really the one who did it? A father's love is unconditional, a child's love...meh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,934 Posted April 2, 2012 you suck at movies. one of the greatest scenes ever from a movie. Frank Drebin as the umpire Ahh fock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted April 2, 2012 I guess it would matter, except that OJ was acquitted Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,714 Posted April 2, 2012 I guess it would matter, except that OJ was acquitted In the court of public opinion? You think that trial had nothing to do with why he's in jail now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 597 Posted April 2, 2012 In the court of public opinion? You think that trial had nothing to do with why he's in jail now? Also it ruined his career, that's why he went from someone that was getting pitched shows to hoping to sell his autograph at a comicon or whatever. He would be able to get out of a parking ticket after his trial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,944 Posted April 2, 2012 The Post could not reach Jason Simpson, who is working as a chef in Miami, for a comment. OJ's son killed Trayvon Martin? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted April 2, 2012 So this guy has discovered that OJ is innocent because he was only an accessory after the fact to murder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,944 Posted April 2, 2012 So this guy has discovered that OJ is innocent because he was only an accessory after the fact to murder. Why was he an accessory after the fact? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted April 2, 2012 Why was he an accessory after the fact? Wouldn't the fact he tried to cover up the fact his son did it make him an accessory after the fact? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,944 Posted April 2, 2012 Wouldn't the fact he tried to cover up the fact his son did it make him an accessory after the fact? Probably. But nothing in that article states anything specific that OJ covered up; it merely states that the book made the claim that he covered it up. I'm sure he is not legally compelled to tell the authorities that his son owns a similar hat, or if he suspected his son might have done it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted April 2, 2012 Probably. But nothing in that article states anything specific that OJ covered up; it merely states that the book made the claim that he covered it up. I'm sure he is not legally compelled to tell the authorities that his son owns a similar hat, or if he suspected his son might have done it. That's why I referenced the guy who did the investigation. If you claim your investigation proves OJ is innocent because his son killed them, and OJ merely helped cover it up, I think your "innocent" claim is bogus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites