Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
edjr

'OJ is innocent': Private investigator claims

Recommended Posts

a lot of you people owe the juice an apology :thumbsdown:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123547/OJ-innocent-Private-investigator-claims-Simpsons-SON-hacked-stars-wife-friend-death--went-trial-cover-up.html

 

 

A Texas private investigator claims he knows who really killed Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman in 1994. And it wasn't OJ Simpson.

In a new book, 'OJ is Innocent and I Can Prove It,' William C. Dear alleges Simpson went on trial, and was acquitted of murder, in an effort to deflect attention from the true killer: His son Jason.

 

Dear says Simpson was at the crime scene -- but not until after his ex-wife and her friend had been stabbed to death.

After a 17-year investigation, Dear says he has found circumstantial evidence that links Jason Simpson, 41, to the murders.

The private eye claims he dug through Jason Simpson's garbage and his abandoned storage locker in search of new evidence, the New York Post reported.

 

In the search, Dear says he found a hunting knife that forensic experts say is the murder weapon that was never recovered during the police investigation.

 

He also found photographs of Jason Simpson wearing a knit cap, similar to one that was discovered at the crime scene.

 

Prosecutors were unable to definitely link the hat to OJ Simpson, though hairs similar to his were found inside.

 

Dear calls Jason Simpson 'the overlooked suspect' and produced a documentary film released in 2010 detailing the accusations that he is the real culprit behind the murder.

 

During the screening of his film in 2011 he displayed a suspected murder weapon from the night of June 12, 1994 at the DocMiami Film Festival.

 

Dear says two months before the murders, Jason Simpson assaulted his girlfriend. The chef also deals with 'intermittent rage disorder,' according to the New York Post.

 

'That person who was wielding and welding that knife, had to know exactly what he was doing and he certainly had to be familiar with a knife. OJ wasn't,' Mr Dear said in his documentary.

 

Despite these alleged findings, Jason Simpson's DNA and fingerprints were never compared to those found at the crime scene. He was never interviewed by police, either, the Post reports.

 

No arrests other than Simpson's were made in the murders.

 

OJ Simpson was the prime suspect for the murders because he helped to cover up his son's crimes and, in effect, allowed himself to take the fall, the book claims.

 

'The LA PD and the district attorney had made a rush to judgement,' Mr Dear said.

 

At the time of the trial, Judge Lance Ito said from his bench: 'Those who say the criminal justice system itself is on trial may be right.'

The Post could not reach Jason Simpson, who is working as a chef in Miami, for a comment.

The paper reports his phone line as disconnected.

 

Dear, a private investigator of 30 years based in Texas, is a former Florida and Texas police officer who has been featured on Current Affair, Unsolved Mysteries and Fox TV.

 

Other investigations he has worked on are the Exhumation of Lee Harvey Oswald, The disappearance of the Teenage Genius and the Alien Autopsy, according to his website.

 

According to Dear's publisher: 'This book includes shocking photos and new evidence about the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman, that was totally overlooked by the original investigators. Evidence that points directly to a surprising new suspect, very close to OJ.'

 

Sounds pretty solid to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could believe this. But, OJ is just as guilty if he covered it up after the fact.

 

You'd want to see your son go to jail?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess there is a book on this that my mom read and was convinced it was the son as well. Has been telling me this for a couple years now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'That person who was wielding and welding that knife, had to know exactly what he was doing and he certainly had to be familiar with a knife. OJ wasn't,' Mr Dear said in his documentary.

 

It takes a lot of practice to kill so skillfully. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It takes a lot of practice to kill so skillfully. :rolleyes:

 

did you see any of the naked guns? OJ had no skillz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the best umpire ive seen in years..... :overhead:

 

you suck at movies. :thumbsdown:

 

one of the greatest scenes ever from a movie.

 

Frank Drebin as the umpire :doublethumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both sides had the best investigators money could buy. And not one of them could figure this out, with access to so much evidence? I call BS.

 

Also, the son would let his dad go through all of this if he was really the one who did it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both sides had the best investigators money could buy. And not one of them could figure this out, with access to so much evidence? I call BS.

 

Also, the son would let his dad go through all of this if he was really the one who did it?

A father's love is unconditional, a child's love...meh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you suck at movies. :thumbsdown:

 

one of the greatest scenes ever from a movie.

 

Frank Drebin as the umpire :doublethumbsup:

 

 

Ahh fock. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it would matter, except that OJ was acquitted :sleep:

 

In the court of public opinion? :rolleyes:

 

You think that trial had nothing to do with why he's in jail now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the court of public opinion? :rolleyes:

 

You think that trial had nothing to do with why he's in jail now?

 

Also it ruined his career, that's why he went from someone that was getting pitched shows to hoping to sell his autograph at a comicon or whatever.

 

He would be able to get out of a parking ticket after his trial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Post could not reach Jason Simpson, who is working as a chef in Miami, for a comment.

 

OJ's son killed Trayvon Martin? :shocking:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this guy has discovered that OJ is innocent because he was only an accessory after the fact to murder.

Why was he an accessory after the fact?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the fact he tried to cover up the fact his son did it make him an accessory after the fact?

Probably. But nothing in that article states anything specific that OJ covered up; it merely states that the book made the claim that he covered it up.

 

I'm sure he is not legally compelled to tell the authorities that his son owns a similar hat, or if he suspected his son might have done it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably. But nothing in that article states anything specific that OJ covered up; it merely states that the book made the claim that he covered it up.

 

I'm sure he is not legally compelled to tell the authorities that his son owns a similar hat, or if he suspected his son might have done it.

 

That's why I referenced the guy who did the investigation. If you claim your investigation proves OJ is innocent because his son killed them, and OJ merely helped cover it up, I think your "innocent" claim is bogus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×