Flyfreak 84 Posted June 18, 2015 Notice how there are no riots or looting going on in SC. Just prayer vigils and a memorial fund being set up to remember the victims. Al Sharpton saying he is going down there and a lot of the AA community speaking out saying they don't want him there because he stirs up trouble. so much hatred in the world today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 Really? What fer regulation would you adopt right now that would have kept is feller from obtaining a handgun? I mean right now at 4:24 pm est. What regulation? I don't know much about this murderer so I'm waiting to be enlightened. Every situation is different. I stand by my statement that guns are too easy to get in many parts of our country. They may also be too hard to get in some other parts, but the current system isn't working. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 I disagree. The people who were slaughtered weren't the problem. Gun regulations are.His dad bought the gun and gave it to him even though he wasn't legally supposed to have one. That is against the law in S.C. D!ckhead was a felon, so his possession of a firearm was against the law everywhere. Carrying a concealed weapon without permit is against the law in S.C. Carrying a gun into a church is against the law in S.C. There were several gun laws that were broken in this instance but more laws will solve the problem. Gun laws only work on law abiding people like Carol Bowne. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted June 18, 2015 Every situation is different. I stand by my statement that guns are too easy to get in many parts of our country. They may also be too hard to get in some other parts, but the current system isn't working. the gun control issue will never go away until there is a major sweeping reform in this country starting with the repealing of the 2nd amendment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 His dad bought the gun and gave it to him even though he wasn't legally supposed to have one. That is against the law in S.C. D!ckhead was a felon, so his possession of a firearm was against the law everywhere. Carrying a concealed weapon without permit is against the law in S.C. Carrying a gun into a church is against the law in S.C. There were several gun laws that were broken in this instance but more laws will solve the problem. Gun laws only work on law abiding people like Carol Bowne. Everything you say is probably true. I still say our current system is not working. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 Everything you say is probably true. I still say our current system is not working.There are 300 million or so guns in private hands in this country. An astronomically small percentage are used to commit crimes. I'd say the system works well. There's definitely a problem with sick/evil individuals committing barbaric acts of violence, it's just not a gun problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 There are 300 million or so guns in private hands in this country. An astronomically small percentage are used to commit crimes. I'd say the system works well. There's definitely a problem with sick/evil individuals committing barbaric acts of violence, it's just not a gun problem. We would never tolerate a product from any other industry that culminated in as much death that comes from this product. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JTB 52 Posted June 18, 2015 Every situation is different. I stand by my statement that guns are too easy to get in many parts of our country. They may also be too hard to get in some other parts, but the current system isn't working. I agree. To use a gun regulation mishap as to why those in Charleston were murdered is not true. I got your point, but I felt you were way to early to blame regulations as to why the folks were murdered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 360 Posted June 18, 2015 Charleston shooter Dylann Storm Roof was reportedly taking a drug that has been linked with sudden outbursts of violence, fitting the pattern of innumerable other mass shooters who were on or had recently come off pharmaceutical drugs linked to aggression. According to a CBS News report, earlier this year when cops searched Roof after he was acting suspiciously inside a Bath and Body Works store, they found “orange strips” that Roof told officers was suboxone, a narcotic that is used to treat opiate addiction. According to a Courier-Journal report, suboxone “is increasingly being abused, sold on the streets and inappropriately prescribed” by doctors. For users, it is even more addictive than the drugs it’s supposed to help them quit. As we previously highlighted, virtually every major mass shooter was taking some form of SSRI or other pharmaceutical drug at the time of their attack, including Columbine killer Eric Harris, ‘Batman’ shooter James Holmes and Sandy Hook gunman Adam Lanza. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 We would never tolerate a product from any other industry that culminated in as much death that comes from this product.But we do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JTB 52 Posted June 18, 2015 But we do. I'll play. Do tell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 But we do. I stand corrected. Pharmaceuticals as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted June 18, 2015 We would never tolerate a product from any other industry that culminated in as much death that comes from this product. As long as there are humans there will be violence. In early times it was rocks and clubs. Then bows and arrows along with knives. Then swords. Now guns and explosives. Even if more restrictions are put on gun regulations humans will still find a way to kill someone if they want. Personally I don't care if they make it a little harder to get guns (longer process or more extensive background checks) as long as I can still legally own a firearm such as a handgun, rifle, shotgun, ect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 As long as there are humans there will be violence. In early times it was rocks and clubs. Then bows and arrows along with knives. Then swords. Now guns and explosives. Even if more restrictions are put on gun regulations humans will still find a way to kill someone if they want. Personally I don't care if they make it a little harder to get guns (longer process or more extensive background checks) as long as I can still legally own a firearm such as a handgun, rifle, shotgun, ect. I doubt this freak could have taken out 9 people with a knife. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 I'll play. Do tell.There are plenty. Swimming pools for one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 360 Posted June 18, 2015 No excuse. I don't see it as an excuse but something that plays into inherent potential. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 There are plenty. Swimming pools for one. Swimming pools purpose is not to kill. A guns is. It's why it's made. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 Swimming pools purpose is not to kill. A guns is. It's why it's made.And yet every year more people die in pools than by getting shot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 And yet every year more people die in pools than by getting shot. For your correlation to fit you would have to divide the amount of people who died while using a pool versus the amount that died when a gun was used for its intended purpose. I Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,062 Posted June 18, 2015 And yet every year more people die in pools than by getting shot. Id need a stat to back this up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 For your correlation to fit you would have to divide the amount of people who died while using a pool versus the amount that died when a gun was used for its intended purpose. I You said we wouldn't tolerate a product that culminated in as many deaths as guns produce. Far more deaths are caused by pools than guns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted June 18, 2015 Id need a stat to back this up. Do you need to see stats for alcohol and tobacco too? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 Id need a stat to back this up.I'd provide one if I weren't on my phone. I'm sure its googleable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 18, 2015 You said we wouldn't tolerate a product that culminated in as many deaths as guns produce. Far more deaths are caused by pools than guns. Ok. A product used for its intended purpose is what I should have said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 18, 2015 Ok. A product used for its intended purpose is what I should have said.Intended purpose is relative to the person holding the gun. A gun's intended purpose could be to save a life. If we compare the number of defensive use instances to the number of illegal use instances I'm sure the defensive use would dwarf illegal use. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted June 18, 2015 I doubt this freak could have taken out 9 people with a knife. Not saying that. Having a gun definitely helps create more bodies. But he could have definitely still killed people regardless. I don't care if there are stricter gun laws I just don't want the government to take away my right to own a gun. They say assault rifles are the worst but like in this situation a handgun is the most commonly used weapon in a shooting because it can be concealed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,338 Posted June 19, 2015 Less G's then usual That's pretty good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,062 Posted June 19, 2015 5-points won this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 19, 2015 5-points won this thread. So you conclude a pool is more dangerous than a gun? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JTB 52 Posted June 19, 2015 So you conclude a pool is more dangerous than a gun?Maybe. My guns haven't harmed anyone. My pool caused me to stub my toe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,062 Posted June 19, 2015 So you conclude a pool is more dangerous than a gun? Overall, no. For young children, probably. Why do you hate kids? I was including alcohol and tobacco, which in hindsight was brought up by parrot, not 5-points. So I amend my statement to... you lost this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 19, 2015 Overall, no. For young children, probably. Why do you hate kids? I was including alcohol and tobacco, which in hindsight was brought up by parrot, not 5-points. So I amend my statement to... you lost this thread. Aw shucks. If I wasn't on the Newbie spice watch list I would respond with my usual wit that I am renowned for, but she says its bullying. Carry on without me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,062 Posted June 19, 2015 Aw shucks. If I wasn't on the Newbie spice watch list I would respond with my usual wit that I am renowned for, but she says its bullying. Carry on without me. I'm a big boy who has never considered reporting anyone or flexing my internet muscles that I can rally a group of people to get somebody banned, so go for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,751 Posted June 19, 2015 So you conclude a pool is more dangerous than a gun? Overall, no. For young children, probably. Why do you hate kids? I was including alcohol and tobacco, which in hindsight was brought up by parrot, not 5-points. So I amend my statement to... you lost this thread. Yeah, I've found Parrot to be on point most of the time. I didn't want to go with alcohol, tobacco or automobiles. I tried to dig a little deeper and after further review, I think I may have come up short on the pool thing. You get my point though, I hope. We do, in fact, tolerate a lot of behavior that is far more dangerous, percentage wise, than gun ownership. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 19, 2015 I'm a big boy who has never considered reporting anyone or flexing my internet muscles that I can rally a group of people to get somebody banned, so go for it. Huh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted June 19, 2015 Huh? Jerry's still being a butthurt little biatch over RP's permabannoration Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,062 Posted June 19, 2015 Huh? Jerry's still being a butthurt little biatch over RP's permabannoration Actually my response was describing Newbie's behavior today. Not surprised it was lost on you two. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted June 19, 2015 Actually my response was describing Newbie's behavior today. Not surprised it was lost on you two. Oh, my mistake. Haven't been here hardly at all today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted June 19, 2015 Oh, my mistake. Haven't been here hardly at all today I was notified by Newbie that I'm on his watch list and that I may face banishment. He says I'm a board bully and you're one of my victims. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites