Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
IGotWorms

President of planned parenthood

Recommended Posts

 

And in many rural areas...there is not much beyond planned parenthood for those services.

 

30% of the market is a damn good share...but you don't want to ever admit that.

 

Spin...funny coming from you right now on this topic.

 

As for baby parts...glad you bought into the edited videos...seems the rest of America didn't...nor the authorities who have found they did nothing illegal.

 

 

30% of the market is a good share. But ou said without Planned Parenthood they didn't have many other options. You were wrong. Admit it. For every three Planned Parenthoods, there are seven others offering the same services.

 

Editing? Weak. Did they sell baby body parts? Yes or no? Were they caught on film doing so? Only a fawking idiot could conclude they weren't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

30% of the market is a good share. But ou said without Planned Parenthood they didn't have many other options. You were wrong. Admit it. For every three Planned Parenthoods, there are seven others offering the same services.

 

Editing? Weak. Did they sell baby body parts? Yes or no? Were they caught on film doing so? Only a fawking idiot could conclude they weren't.

 

Math isn't your strong suit, eh? :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Editing? Weak. Did they sell baby body parts? Yes or no? Were they caught on film doing so? Only a fawking idiot could conclude they weren't.

 

They are expressly permitted to recoup their costs. And if they WEREN'T recouping their costs, the same focktards would be pissed about that. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

30% of the market is a good share. But ou said without Planned Parenthood they didn't have many other options. You were wrong. Admit it. For every three Planned Parenthoods, there are seven others offering the same services.

 

Editing? Weak. Did they sell baby body parts? Yes or no? Were they caught on film doing so? Only a fawking idiot could conclude they weren't.

In many areas they are the only option for for some services.

 

Did they sell them with consent?

Probably...again, at this point there is no evidence of wrongdoing.

 

And yes, the videos you fell for are highly edited by an anti abortion group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In many areas they are the only option for for some services.

 

Did they sell them with consent?

Probably...again, at this point there is no evidence of wrongdoing.

 

And yes, the videos you fell for are highly edited by an anti abortion group.

 

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/editing-flap-tv-edits-5-hour-planned-parenthood-hearing-to-1-minute/article/2573109

 

Looks like the MSM doesn't want us knowing much either with all that editing after a five hour hearing. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/editing-flap-tv-edits-5-hour-planned-parenthood-hearing-to-1-minute/article/2573109

 

Looks like the MSM doesn't want us knowing much either with all that editing after a five hour hearing. :doh:

 

You want the nightly news to play 5 hours of house oversight hearings?

Nice source too...former tabloid turned into a conservative mouthpiece.

oof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You want the nightly news to play 5 hours of house oversight hearings?

Nice source too...former tabloid turned into a conservative mouthpiece.

oof.

and the hackmastsr shoots the messenger again :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and the hackmastsr shoots the messenger again :lol:

 

So you think that rag is credible?

Glad you bring something of substance to the topic...oops, no, just more trolling by the king hack troll of the board now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So you think that rag is credible?

Glad you bring something of substance to the topic...oops, no, just more trolling by the king hack troll of the board now.

do you consider the nyt credible ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do you consider the nyt credible ?

 

Have you seen me link to the NYT as evidence of anything?

 

Nice strawman...not unexpected.

 

Do you think the nightly news should play more than snippets of a 5 hour hearing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Have you seen me link to the NYT as evidence of anything?

 

Nice strawman...not unexpected.

 

Do you think the nightly news should play more than snippets of a 5 hour hearing?

no, do you think the should be referring the the videos as heavily edited ? Do you think they aren't selling body parts ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i changed my profile pic on facebook to a pink shade and hashtagged it #istandwithpp

 

the world needs free baby killing whether we like it or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, do you think the should be referring the the videos as heavily edited ? Do you think they aren't selling body parts ?

They are heavily edited videos...that is fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So you think that rag is credible?

Glad you bring something of substance to the topic...oops, no, just more trolling by the king hack troll of the board now.

Too Fawking funny. So they state a fact about how much time the TV networks spent on the story, and are accurate about it, but it means nothing.

 

When you throw around editing by one source and discredit facts that prove editing by the MSM, who are supposed to be credible, you look really Fawking stoopid. Par for the course.

 

The simple fact the MSM spent so little time covering such a story is proof of their bias. Unreal that you and those like you defend them and then try and compare and contrast the two. If it doesn't fit the narrative, my argument has zero merit?

 

Media bias at its finest. :rollseyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what was edited out ? They sell body parts, no ?

A whole lot was edited out.

Did they do anything illegal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too Fawking funny. So they state a fact about how much time the TV networks spent on the story, and are accurate about it, but it means nothing.

 

When you throw around editing by one source and discredit facts that prove editing by the MSM, who are supposed to be credible, you look really Fawking stoopid. Par for the course.

 

The simple fact the MSM spent so little time covering such a story is proof of their bias. Unreal that you and those like you defend them and then try and compare and contrast the two. If it doesn't fit the narrative, my argument has zero merit?

 

Media bias at its finest. :rollseyes:

They story has been covered...investigation turning up nothing illegal.

Why should they keep covering a hatchet job by that group that has been discredited in the past?

The article whined that they didn't show more of a 5 hour hearing...but they hit right in line with the nutjob eighty base.

 

Your argument has little merit because the story has been covered.

Have any info they were doing anything illegal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A whole lot was edited out.

Did they do anything illegal?

The problem with them selling body parts is that they have a financial incentive to encourage women to abort their babies. HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They story has been covered...investigation turning up nothing illegal.

Why should they keep covering a hatchet job by that group that has been discredited in the past?

The article whined that they didn't show more of a 5 hour hearing...but they hit right in line with the nutjob eighty base.

 

Your argument has little merit because the story has been covered.

Have any info they were doing anything illegal?

what do you mean covered ? Aren't the hearings ongoing and basically just underway ?

My god are you pathetic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean covered ? Aren't the hearings ongoing and basically just underway ?

My god are you pathetic

So there have been no stories covering this?

 

Talk about pathetic...you have zero clue...just repeat the righy mantra on everything. Good little sheep you are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with them selling body parts is that they have a financial incentive to encourage women to abort their babies. HTH

A non-profit organization has a financial incentive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with them selling body parts is that they have a financial incentive to encourage women to abort their babies. HTH

If not coveting costs...perhaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A whole lot was edited out.

Did they do anything illegal?

Nothing illegal. But morally incomprehensibe? And sic? Id say so. Sitting over lunch and giving prices for baby parts is pretty fawked up. At least to me it is.

 

I highly doubt that's a job many would feel good about or even knew existed before they were uncovered. Regular folks had no idea until the video came out that this was one of their practices up until now. Which we now because of that investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A non-profit organization has a financial incentive?

Really? Wow. Last time I checked, gawking kunts like Lois Lerner were denying tax exempt status to righties for far less than what PP do within the IRS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The origins behind PP are sinister at best, as a result I question their doctrine and motivations in general. They do tend to provide substantial assistance to lower income people who really need it, but at the same time their support for other areas is questionable. Its a mixed bag, if the question is should they be funded through tax dollars.....I just dont know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? Wow. Last time I checked, gawking kunts like Lois Lerner were denying tax exempt status to righties for far less than what PP do within the IRS.

Loosen the straps on your helmet, you are making absolutely no sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing illegal. But morally incomprehensibe? And sic? Id say so. Sitting over lunch and giving prices for baby parts is pretty fawked up. At least to me it is.

 

I highly doubt that's a job many would feel good about or even knew existed before they were uncovered. Regular folks had no idea until the video came out that this was one of their practices up until now. Which we now because of that investigation.

There are a lot of jobs I find that are like that. That is why I don't do them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loosen the straps on your helmet, you are making absolutely no sense.

Of course I'm not. A tax free entity that syhpons money from government tax money and parlays it into a party they support and rely on and counts on their donations makes absolutely no sense.

 

Only in liberal socialist world does that make any Fawking sense. Love it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurance adjusters, for one.

.

 

Cute. I guarantee I have more say so in handling insurance claims than you ever have. And have done ten times the better job than you ever would.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of jobs I find that are like that. That is why I don't do them.

Pat yourself on the back. And then question those that don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurance adjusters, for one.

How do you sleep at night knowing one wrong decision, right or wrong, determines the outcome of your life depending on a decision you, and your staff make, made by those who make them based on training you have through a med school training via attorneys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A non-profit organization has a financial incentive?

Umm... yeah. Things like stay in operation, let alone pay $520K salaries. Is this a trick question? :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of jobs I find that are like that. That is why I don't do them.

 

Well to be fair, you don't do any of them.

I kid; I've never made fun of you staying at home, but this was too easy$#@!
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×