Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

Recommended Posts

 

The problem is people like you keep reporting misleading information or straight up lies. I would love to talk about his actual tax plan but it's near impossible with people like you.

Bullshit. You all keep claiming that while defending aman who has used actual bogus news and lies to gain more support.

Criticizing and analyzing Trumps actual plans and words aren't using lies or misinformation. Its using what he has actually said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The link you posted is what falls under misleading information.

 

"Howmuch.net also notes that "the graph does not take into account other aspects of the Trump tax plan not directly related to the changes to income tax bands, such as the increase of standard deductions and a cap on itemized deductions, although of course these would also have an impact on net incomes."

 

I want you to ask yourself. Why would they leave out these things? The title of the article says, Chart shows exactly how Trump's tax plan could affect you

 

Where is the "exactly" part when they leave out VERY important information like tax deductions. I'll tell you where, those things they left out do not fit the narrative they are feeding you. Show me the tax plan WITH EVERYTHING included. Otherwise you, me and everyone is being lied to.

Why do the ultra wealthy need a 7% tax cut while we get a few bones from an added standard deduction? Why no tax cut for our bracket? Who needs the help more in this country? A family of 4 in the middle class where the parents are trying to save as much as possible to send two kids to college, making between 75 and 120k, or the guy who makes $500k a year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do the ultra wealthy need a 7% tax cut while we get a few bones from an added standard deduction? Why no tax cut for our bracket? Who needs the help more in this country? A family of 4 in the middle class where the parents are trying to save as much as possible to send two kids to college, making between 75 and 120k, or the guy who makes $500k a year?

 

That's not what we are talking about. I was asked to defend the reporting of a #fakenews article and I refuse to, because they purposely leave out important information to fit a narrative of their choice..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullshit. You all keep claiming that while defending aman who has used actual bogus news and lies to gain more support.

Criticizing and analyzing Trumps actual plans and words aren't using lies or misinformation. Its using what he has actually said.

 

Sounds good. Except that's not what happens. Most of the time (in this thread for example) someone will post a POS fakenews article that purposely leaves out very important information. Or someone will post an article that attacks Trump over a cherry picked quote. I especially love it when they take the quote literally rather than figuratively.

 

Trump has made some mistakes (just like every single person who has ever lived has) that much is true. But he's not the Hitler/sexist/racist/Islamophobic/mexican hating person the crap media paints him to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still see nothing that says they did anything to help Trump win

No matter intent, it should be a concern to all that a foreign government tried to influence an election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sounds good. Except that's not what happens. Most of the time (in this thread for example) someone will post a POS fakenews article that purposely leaves out very important information. Or someone will post an article that attacks Trump over a cherry picked quote. I especially love it when they take the quote literally rather than figuratively.

 

Trump has made some mistakes (just like every single person who has ever lived has) that much is true. But he's not the Hitler/sexist/racist/Islamophobic/mexican hating person the crap media paints him to be.

Yeah..,you are certifiably nuts.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter intent, it should be a concern to all that a foreign government tried to influence an election.

 

TIL learning the truth is bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter intent, it should be a concern to all that a foreign government tried to influence an election.

Happens every election Pollyanna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah..,you are certifiably nuts.

 

Ahhh good. If you don't believe what I do I'll attack you. Keep up the good work that line of thinking has been working so well for the democrats the past 6 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As often as we disagree I'm with hardcore on this one..... all they did was release information

 

Clinton was accepting campaign support from middle eastern countries

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ahhh good. If you don't believe what I do I'll attack you. Keep up the good work that line of thinking has been working so well for the democrats the past 6 years.

No...the fake news..,people are mean to Trump narrative is utterly crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That puzzy grabbing story was total bullshit and most normal people saw it for what it is. Snowflakes lost their shite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That puzzy grabbing story was total bullshit and most normal people saw it for what it is. Snowflakes lost their shite

Agreed it was literally the weakest attempt of track covering I have ever seen. You could tell they had been sitting on that footage to use when they needed a small media bump.

 

It becomes so transparent it's comical

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went home with a waitress, the way I always do

How was I to know she was with the Russians too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love seeing these crybaby articles on the mainstream news sites. Trump won, and you titty-babies can suck it for at least four years! HAHA!

 

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever happened to that guy who got kicked out of running

 

Trump's campaign (or whatever) for his obvious (and possibly illegal?)

 

ties to Russia?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever happened to that guy who got kicked out of running

 

Trump's campaign (or whatever) for his obvious (and possibly illegal?)

 

ties to Russia?

He got a raise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As often as we disagree I'm with hardcore on this one..... all they did was release information

 

Clinton was accepting campaign support from middle eastern countries

Campaign support?

Foundation and campaign are two different things.

 

And notice no Trump guy has said a thing about the recent SoftBank announcement..where did much of what they plan to invest here come from? Psst..,it was the Saudis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed it was literally the weakest attempt of track covering I have ever seen. You could tell they had been sitting on that footage to use when they needed a small media bump.

 

It becomes so transparent it's comical

How is reporting on acandidate admitting to sexual assault weak?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is reporting on acandidate admitting to sexual assault weak?

You need a victim for an assault. Where are they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is reporting on acandidate admitting to sexual assault weak?

Because it was just bs'ing guys messing around. I have said much worse in my life and I've never sexually assaulted anybody but myself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it was just bs'ing guys messing around. I have said much worse in my life and I've never sexually assaulted anybody but myself

Exactly. And lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like listen I think trump is an idiot and a huge portion of his supporters are also but come on, I'm not an idiot too. I'm not going to buy into stupid stories like the cat grabbing story that was clearly just media play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it was just bs'ing guys messing around. I have said much worse in my life and I've never sexually assaulted anybody but myself

Admitting to grabbing people is not just guys messing around.

And you also weren't a candidate for the presidency and had multiple people accuse you of such things in your life.

 

It was a story because there was a recording and enough other info on his behavior towards women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being accused of sexual assault is not grounds to disqualify someone from being president. Even by numerous women. Even if you pay them off. See Clinton, William Jefferson. 42nd US President.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Admitting to grabbing people is not just guys messing around.

And you also weren't a candidate for the presidency and had multiple people accuse you of such things in your life.

 

It was a story because there was a recording and enough other info on his behavior towards women.

But it was so outlandish they just sat on it till it was convenient to release it as a misdirection

 

 

Now you are making me mad that I'm an apologist for this bozo stop it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah..,you are certifiably nuts.

 

Awww, Sho with the personal insults again. How cute. And the Libs are the "tolerant" ones LOL

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Admitting to grabbing people is not just guys messing around.

And you also weren't a candidate for the presidency and had multiple people accuse you of such things in your life.

 

It was a story because there was a recording and enough other info on his behavior towards women.

 

Absolutely. Many people thought his behavior was despicable. And yet your side put up a candidate so bad she couldn't even beat him. And now they blame the Russians. You seriously can't make this sh*t up. ]

 

:clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No...the fake news..,people are mean to Trump narrative is utterly crazy.

 

Nah it's totally cool a foreigner owns the NY times which has been attacking Trump from the very beginning. But that's not a foreigner influencing our election at all.

 

But those evil Russians. How dare they (the Russians actually had nothing to do with it) release proof of Hillary and the DNC breaking the law. I am so mad at them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need a victim for an assault. Where are they?

 

They were finally able to come forward 30 days before the election. You know because they could never find Trump due to him being out of the public eye for decades. Oh and he didn't have anything of value to sue over so what's the point?

 

That's sarcasm for our lib friends BTW. I want to make sure to point that out since for some reason they can tell the difference between 867 genders but don't know when someone is being sarcastic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is reporting on acandidate admitting to sexual assault weak?

 

Have you ever heard of the expression "I've got him by the balls" or "she's got you by the balls" or the other dozens ways it's said?

 

Of course you've heard it before, everyone has heard that expression. Honestly, I'm kind of embarrassed to tell you this. It does not mean to literally have a man by his balls. Just like Trump did not mean to literally grab a woman in the . So no it's not sexually assault on a fictitious woman.

 

...Jesus and people wonder why Hillary lost and Trump won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Awww, Sho with the personal insults again. How cute. And the Libs are the "tolerant" ones LOL

 

:lol:

Yeah..,you all never do that.

His position was crazy...and crying about insults from you...hypocrisy at its finest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Absolutely. Many people thought his behavior was despicable. And yet your side put up a candidate so bad she couldn't even beat him. And now they blame the Russians. You seriously can't make this sh*t up. ]

 

:clap:

My side? You once again show your ignorance. Again..,Hillary is your ridiculous defense. Psst..wanting to know the truth does not equal blaming. Again...should be something all Americans should want to know and keep out of our elections.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Nah it's totally cool a foreigner owns the NY times which has been attacking Trump from the very beginning. But that's not a foreigner influencing our election at all.

 

But those evil Russians. How dare they (the Russians actually had nothing to do with it) release proof of Hillary and the DNC breaking the law. I am so mad at them...

Posting his positions and words equals attacking?

Just stop..,such a weakness position. They had nothing to do with it..,yeah, you claim others are believing fake things...as I said, you are nuts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Have you ever heard of the expression "I've got him by the balls" or "she's got you by the balls" or the other dozens ways it's said?

 

Of course you've heard it before, everyone has heard that expression. Honestly, I'm kind of embarrassed to tell you this. It does not mean to literally have a man by his balls. Just like Trump did not mean to literally grab a woman in the ######. So no it's not sexually assault on a fictitious woman.

 

...Jesus and people wonder why Hillary lost and Trump won.

Holy focking spin...it is nothing close to that expression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a billionaire with his name plastered on buildings from coast to coast and all over the world, who happens to be the star of a hit television show, was grabbing women by the puzzy left and right, yet nobody came forward until right after the tape was released. And then poof! They were gone. I mean, seriously, if you can't figure this out....you're kinda slow. Nuff said. Clintons skanks hung around for their payday at least. These broads scurried back in their holes before anyone could scrutinize them. Do you fools think if there was any truth to this the press would have moved on so fast?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×