Do you support deportation of illegal immigrants? Sho Nuff?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

If they are here illegally, they need to be kicked out. It doesn't need to be more complicated than that. If there are economic set backs and whatever issues arise because of deportation it is a direct result of letting to many illegal immigrants into the country (thanks Democrats). Fix the underlining issue and you fix the problem. It is that simple.

 

Whatever issues arise because of the deportation need to be addressed now, and not passed onto the future generations of America. You can thank Trump for that.

 

So...if it hurts our economy (it will...you can research it but I doubt you will take the time to look at that impact). It will cost the tax payers a lot to deport (you can research that as well).

To claim its the democrats fault if that happens is just again showing how simple minded and partisan hack you are.

You are seriously utterly clueless and every time you post you keep proving that. Its getting really funny.

Trump hasn't done anything yet...why should I thank him?

[iam90sbaby 2,720]

 

So...if it hurts our economy (it will...you can research it but I doubt you will take the time to look at that impact). It will cost the tax payers a lot to deport (you can research that as well).

To claim its the democrats fault if that happens is just again showing how simple minded and partisan hack you are.

You are seriously utterly clueless and every time you post you keep proving that. Its getting really funny.

Trump hasn't done anything yet...why should I thank him?

 

There is a price to pay for the good of the country. And kicking illegals out is good for the country.

[Strike 5,869]

 

So...inform us all how I am ill informed. Not with your usual failure to answer questions...

Point out to us where it is as simple as just kick them all out...how that will not have a negative economic impact and won't cost the taxpayers a large amount of money to do? You won't do that though...I predict you ignore my question and ask more questions because you simply can't refute what I have said.

 

Also...still funny that you run and hide from what alias you post under at FBG...focking sissy.

 

I've told you before. I don't post at FBG's any more. Why do you keep asking?

 

As far as illegals go, I detailed what needs to be done in ANOTHER thread about illegal immigration recently. Go ahead and read it. Pretty sure you responded to the post so you shouldn't have too much trouble finding it. But it's not that complicated. It really isn't.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

There is a price to pay for the good of the country. And kicking illegals out is good for the country.

 

That is a highly biased and simplistic opinion you have.

You think raising prices of goods is for the good of teh country? Your opinion is that all illegal immigrants are net negatives for the country. I disagree highly with your statement and I think many others do as well.

I don't think most agree with just kick all illegals out no matter what...and for good reason.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I've told you before. I don't post at FBG's any more. Why do you keep asking?

 

As far as illegals go, I detailed what needs to be done in ANOTHER thread about illegal immigration recently. Go ahead and read it. Pretty sure you responded to the post so you shouldn't have too much trouble finding it. But it's not that complicated. It really isn't.

 

You don't post there...you just go to read? That seems even worse.

 

Its more complicated than 90s baby though isn't it? Did you even read my post of who I am in favor of deporting here?

Yet you jumped right in because of your contempt for me eventhough I doubt even you agree with 90s solution if its just as easy as kicking all illegals out.

[Strike 5,869]

 

You don't post there...you just go to read? That seems even worse.

 

Its more complicated than 90s baby though isn't it? Did you even read my post of who I am in favor of deporting here?

Yet you jumped right in because of your contempt for me eventhough I doubt even you agree with 90s solution if its just as easy as kicking all illegals out.

 

I agree with him that our goal should be the removal of all illegals. That's a fundamental difference in POV from you.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I agree with him that our goal should be the removal of all illegals. That's a fundamental difference in POV from you.

 

Interesting...I doubt you believe its just as simple as that though...or do you also ignore the cost of deportation/removal...and the impact to our economy?

 

I think most polls support a path to citizenship and not just a deportation/removal of all illegals.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,766]

It's no fun

Being an illegal alien

[Strike 5,869]

 

Interesting...I doubt you believe its just as simple as that though...or do you also ignore the cost of deportation/removal...and the impact to our economy?

 

I think most polls support a path to citizenship and not just a deportation/removal of all illegals.

 

This is idiotic fear mongering talking point drivel. As I said previously, you are as ill informed about this topic as you are most.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

This is idiotic fear mongering talking point drivel. As I said previously, you are as ill informed about this topic as you are most.

Bullshit.

You can dislike illegal immigrants all you want. This isn't fear mongering. They do...in fact contribute to our economy. There will, in fact, be a high cost to find, round up, and deport illegal immigrants.

 

You are so focking full of .

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Bullshit.

You can dislike illegal immigrants all you want. This isn't fear mongering. They do...in fact contribute to our economy. There will, in fact, be a high cost to find, round up, and deport illegal immigrants.

 

You are so focking full of ######.

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/

 

About 51% of immigrant-led households receive at least one kind of welfare benefit, including Medicaid, food stamps, school lunches and housing assistance, compared to 30% for native-led households, according to the report from the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for lower levels of immigration.

Those numbers increase for households with children, with 76% of immigrant-led households receiving welfare, compared to 52% for the native-born.

 

And that's USA Today left leaning rag.

 

I know between this and their exploitation of the earned income tax credit, I'd rather pay to see them leave than keep funding their illegal a$$es.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/

 

5]About 51% of immigrant-led households receive at least one kind of welfare benefit, including Medicaid, food stamps, school lunches and housing assistance, compared to 30% for native-led households, according to the report from the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for lower levels of immigration.

5]Those numbers increase for households with children, with 76% of immigrant-led households receiving welfare, compared to 52% for the native-born.

And that's USA Today left leaning rag.

 

I know between this and their exploitation of the earned income tax credit, I'd rather pay to see them leave than keep funding their illegal a$$es.

The CIS is the crapass source that put together that bogus report in the 74 terrorists. They are basically an anti immigration outfit.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

The CIS is the crapass source that put together that bogus report in the 74 terrorists. They are basically an anti immigration outfit.

 

So, despite being left leaning, the USA Today can't be trusted either? Don't you think they ran down those figures?

 

Again, you prove you have zero credibility because the evidence opposes your talking points.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

So, despite being left leaning, the USA Today can't be trusted either? Don't you think they ran down those figures?

 

Again, you prove you have zero credibility because the evidence opposes your talking points.

They are citing statistics from CIS. If you want me to discuss real numbers...from me. Feeling be them from an accurate source. USA Today is t the source here...CIS is and they have proven to be untrustworthy and a tool of anti immigration proponents.

 

And I don't give a rats ass what a Pizzagate believing whack job thinks of my credibility.

[Strike 5,869]

They are citing statistics from CIS. If you want me to discuss real numbers...from me. Feeling be them from an accurate source. USA Today is t the source here...CIS is and they have proven to be untrustworthy and a tool of anti immigration proponents.

 

And I don't give a rats ass what a Pizzagate believing whack job thinks of my credibility.

 

Did you read the article? Because if you do it comes off as very valid data. The report is based on data from the U.S. Census. Seems legit. But that's what you do. Attack the source instead of evaluating the data/report on it's merits.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

They are citing statistics from CIS. If you want me to discuss real numbers...from me. Feeling be them from an accurate source. USA Today is t the source here...CIS is and they have proven to be untrustworthy and a tool of anti immigration proponents.

 

And I don't give a rats ass what a Pizzagate believing whack job thinks of my credibility.

 

Are you saying you've done surveys on illegal immigrants on public assistance? Really? Wow..........is that before or after Sesame Street at the house? Typical of you to dismiss the data even though I made sure it came from a left leaning publication.

 

Secondly, are you still defending the pedophile Podestas? Maybe you should chime in on the Sandusky thread; that's right up your back alley.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Did you read the article? Because if you do it comes off as very valid data. The report is based on data from the U.S. Census. Seems legit. But that's what you do. Attack the source instead of evaluating the data/report on it's merits.

 

It comes off as valid data to those who want to believe it.

Its based on data from CIS...and also note this is a 2015 report...based on 2012 data from the census that CIS used to spin its tale.

Seems legit because its what you want to believe.

I attack that source of CIS because I have seen their agenda mutliple times.

 

But you want to me to refute..

 

https://newrepublic.com/article/122714/immigrants-dont-drain-welfare-they-fund-it

It discusses that article.

https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use

 

Want me to keep going?

http://www.citylab.com/work/2015/09/are-half-of-americas-immigrants-really-on-welfare/403657/

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Are you saying you've done surveys on illegal immigrants on public assistance? Really? Wow..........is that before or after Sesame Street at the house? Typical of you to dismiss the data even though I made sure it came from a left leaning publication.

 

Secondly, are you still defending the pedophile Podestas? Maybe you should chime in on the Sandusky thread; that's right up your back alley.

Was a typo...meant, fine by me. The point is...don't cite crap from CIS as if its something big.

The left leaning publication only summarized CIS's findings. They didn't report the actual data. And to continue to characterize USA Today as left leaning is also pretty damn funny.

The data didn't focking come from USA Today...again, its hard to take you seriously and not call you stupid when you keep saying stuff so focking dumb like that. The Data came from CIS's interpretation of numbers from 2012.

 

I have never defended pedophilia...that is your lie. What I have done is mocked your belief in pizzagate a debunked conspiracy theory.

Focking moron.

[Strike 5,869]

 

It comes off as valid data to those who want to believe it.

Its based on data from CIS...and also note this is a 2015 report...based on 2012 data from the census that CIS used to spin its tale.

Seems legit because its what you want to believe.

I attack that source of CIS because I have seen their agenda mutliple times.

 

But you want to me to refute..

 

https://newrepublic.com/article/122714/immigrants-dont-drain-welfare-they-fund-it

It discusses that article.

https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use

 

Want me to keep going?

http://www.citylab.com/work/2015/09/are-half-of-americas-immigrants-really-on-welfare/403657/

 

None of those refutes the data. They just want to try to favorably compare the illegal immigrant usage to native American's usage. Who gives a sh*t about American's usage of welfare in a discussion about ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? It's not relevant, and just a diversionary tactic.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

None of those refutes the data. They just want to try to favorably compare the illegal immigrant usage to native American's usage. Who gives a sh*t about American's usage of welfare in a discussion about ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? It's not relevant, and just a diversionary tactic.

 

They actually quite clearly call into question the data presented but CIS.

 

Also...much of the data isn't even about Illegal Immigrants..but those that are actually legalized (or didn't you actually read the report).

[Hardcore troubadour 15,766]

So, the children of illegal aliens don't go to school? I've seen a few class pictures over the years. I think they are.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

It comes off as valid data to those who want to believe it.

Its based on data from CIS...and also note this is a 2015 report...based on 2012 data from the census that CIS used to spin its tale.

Seems legit because its what you want to believe.

I attack that source of CIS because I have seen their agenda mutliple times.

 

But you want to me to refute..

 

https://newrepublic.com/article/122714/immigrants-dont-drain-welfare-they-fund-it

It discusses that article.

https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use

 

Want me to keep going?

http://www.citylab.com/work/2015/09/are-half-of-americas-immigrants-really-on-welfare/403657/

 

https://newrepublic.com/ First link CLEARLY a left leaning website.

 

https://www.cato.org/blog Second link CLEARLY a left leaning BLOG

 

http://www.citylab.com/ Third link CLEARLY a left leaning urban snowflake zone

 

JFC................Yes keep going. Keep posting your reading material so we can see where the fock you go to get your wacky left ideology.

[iam90sbaby 2,720]

They are citing statistics from CIS. If you want me to discuss real numbers...from me. Feeling be them from an accurate source. USA Today is t the source here...CIS is and they have proven to be untrustworthy and a tool of anti immigration proponents.

 

And I don't give a rats ass what a Pizzagate believing whack job thinks of my credibility.

 

Yes you do. You care more about what people think here than what they think of you in the real world. Which is why you post here a 100 times a day (I also heard you are very active on other boards as well), it is really the only thing you do care about. But it doesn't go along with this imaginary ego you have built up, so you'll never admit it.

 

You are the least creditable person here and highly focking annoying now. You are one of those people that people just want to punch in the mouth to see if you bleed.

 

By the way, 32 to 5 now.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

Yes you do. You care more about what people think here than what they think of you in the real world. Which is why you post here a 100 times a day (I also heard you are very active on other boards as well), it is really the only thing you do care about. But it doesn't go along with this imaginary ego you have built up, so you'll never admit it.

You are the least creditable person here and highly focking annoying now.

 

And he's afraid people are PMing each other discussing what a focking headcase he is.

[iam90sbaby 2,720]

 

And he's afraid people are PMing each other discussing what a focking headcase he is.

 

They are. Speaking from experience.

[parrot 789]

 

 

https://www.cato.org/blog Second link CLEARLY a left leaning BLOG

 

 

 

[iam90sbaby 2,720]

Lets just all agree with Sho so he will go away?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

https://newrepublic.com/ First link CLEARLY a left leaning website.

 

https://www.cato.org/blog Second link CLEARLY a left leaning BLOG

 

http://www.citylab.com/ Third link CLEARLY a left leaning urban snowflake zone

 

JFC................Yes keep going. Keep posting your reading material so we can see where the fock you go to get your wacky left ideology.

 

I combatted your use of CIS with CATO (the Koch brothers libertarian think tank)

 

Get a real source for your bogus info from 2012 next time.

[mobb_deep 920]

Deport 'em all. Let Mexico sort 'em out.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Deport 'em all. Let Mexico sort 'em out.

How many do you think aren't Mexican?

[mobb_deep 920]

How many do you think aren't Mexican?

 

We'll let them figure that out. If it's brown, flush it down. That's what they get for not paying for the wall. MAGA.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,766]

One was an Iraqi convicted of rape.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

We'll let them figure that out. If it's brown, flush it down. That's what they get for not paying for the wall. MAGA.

[LOD01 198]

Yes, deport Slo Nuff

That's making America great again.

[gocolts 300]

 

We'll let them figure that out. If it's brown, flush it down. That's what they get for not paying for the wall. MAGA.

POTD

[gocolts 300]

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/

 

About 51% of immigrant-led households receive at least one kind of welfare benefit, including Medicaid, food stamps, school lunches and housing assistance, compared to 30% for native-led households, according to the report from the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for lower levels of immigration.

Those numbers increase for households with children, with 76% of immigrant-led households receiving welfare, compared to 52% for the native-born.

 

And that's USA Today left leaning rag.

 

I know between this and their exploitation of the earned income tax credit, I'd rather pay to see them leave than keep funding their illegal a$$es.

 

Plus, they literally take billions out of our economy. Remittances from Mexican immigrants in the United States to their families back home is now the number one source of foreign income in Mexico. It looks like it finally surpassed oil.

 

Where is the outrage like when we hear about offshore banks??? I know it is not as much as some of these really rich people, but billions is a lot.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/doliaestevez/2016/05/16/remittances-supersede-oil-as-mexicos-main-source-of-foreign-income/#30b4343f703b

 

 

Remittances, the earnings that Mexican workers in the U.S. send home, quietly replaced oil revenues as Mexico's number one source of foreign income last year. In late 2014, oil was still Mexico's main source of foreign exchange, but due to a dramatic fall in oil production following a lack of investment and a plunge in international oil prices, this is no longer the case.

"Remittances surpassed crude oil revenues for the first time in history in December of 2014. Since then, remittances have continued to increase even to the point of representing more than twice the value of crude oil exports since December of 2015," José Alfredo Coutiño, Moody’s Director for Latin America, told me.

In 2016, first quarter remittances of $6.2 billion were 56.7% higher than the $2.6 billion earned from oil exports for the same period. The remittances for the quarter represents an 8.6% jump over the funds sent in the same period in 2015, according to Mexico's Central Bank data.

Last year, Mexican remittances were $24.8 billion, while oil exports were $18.7 billion. With remittances growing and oil revenues decreasing, the pattern is likely to continue.

 

 

 

They can come over here, get everything they need from the tax payers, work for cash under the table and just send most everything they make back to Mexico. Not only are they adding to the strain our current programs no matter what the number is, they are also taking billions directly out of economy.

 

[kutulu 1,692]

Anyone know how many illegals pay a mortgage on a house in the US?

[Sho Nuff 720]

You want me to be outraged that they work here and send money to their families in Mexico?

[mobb_deep 920]

Anyone know how many illegals pay a mortgage on a house in the US?

Around 250,000. But they only own 15 houses combined.

[kutulu 1,692]

Around 250,000.

I think you're off a couple million~