Alias Detective 1,390 Posted April 5, 2017 Another quote by Rep. (D) Joaquin Castro "Theres no doubt about it: Hillary is the best person to be our 45th president. Hillary has always been a tireless advocate for working families - shes never ceased to make sure everybody has a fair shot at achieving the American Dream." I guess he meant everyone EXCEPT Bernie Sanders. To be fair, Sanders' ideas are from a different world. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas, a Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday that he wouldn't be surprised if the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election led to multiple associates of President Donald Trump getting put behind bars. Castro made the stunning comment after Blitzer asked him whether he has seen any "hard evidence" that Trump associates had worked to collude with Russian government officials in any way. Castro did not directly answer that question but offered his "impression." "I guess I would say this that my impression is ... I wouldn't be surprised after all of this is said and done that some people end up in jail," Castro said. A somewhat surprised Blitzer asked, "Really?" He subsequently asked Castro how high his "suspicion" went. "That is yet to be determined," Castro responded, adding he could not divulge any additional information at the time. "If I was betting, I would say yes," he continued. "My impression is that people will probably be charged, and I think people will probably go to jail." https://www.yahoo.com/news/top-democrat-intel-committee-multiple-220254217.html Of course not...Nunesos running interference on the house Committee. Also there has been no hard evidence and everyone from Nunes to Comey says Trump wasn't tapped but you believe he was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 To be fair, Sanders' ideas are from a different world. Was Dwayne Wayne involved? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,390 Posted April 5, 2017 Was Dwayne Wayne involved? Weren't most blacks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted April 5, 2017 Well. Maybe a few less trips and some more contributions to the retirement fund. You said a couple of years ago it wasn't all that hot. PM me and I can give you some tips. Pro tip... become a pensioner and suck off the public teet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted April 5, 2017 Pro tip... become a pensioner and suck off the public teet Oh believe me, Hardcore is back working again. He let some chick trap him into a baby at 50 years old! retirement was short lived. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted April 5, 2017 You misquoted him and I straightened it out. HTH I copied and pasted an article, and didn't bold anything in an effort to draw your eye away from the parts you don't like. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 Of course not...Nunesos running interference on the house Committee. Also there has been no hard evidence and everyone from Nunes to Comey says Trump wasn't tapped but you believe he was. You take everything literal as if someone would have to physically place a tap (in your mind a beer tap maybe) on a wire for the claim to be true. You ever hear of wireless communication? Wifi? Satellites? etc............FFS you must be autistic the way you latch on a word literally. Let's review my assertions: 1. The Russians didn't provide Wikileaks with the hacked emails. This has been proven correct. 2. There's no proof the Russians hacked the DNC. As previously discussed NO Federal investigation was allowed on equipment so that is correct. 3. Trump was right about wiretapping. This has been proven correct (despite your claim there needs to be an actual wire that was tapped). Team Trump was targeted and under surveillance then the names were requested unmasked by yet another Obama lackey (Rice). 4. Most if not all of this Russia angle is nothing more than a smear campaign by the Obama administration. This is proving to be correct. It also has the added benefit of covering up the aforementioned surveillance on Team Trump since Hillary botched the winning that would have kept this quiet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 I copied and pasted an article, and didn't bold anything in an effort to draw your eye away from the parts you don't like. HTH You apparently read a talking point article most likely from CNN or MSNBC (that the reason there wasn't an accompanying link?). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 You take everything literal as if someone would have to physically place a tap (in your mind a beer tap maybe) on a wire for the claim to be true. You ever hear of wireless communication? Wifi? Satellites? etc............FFS you must be autistic the way you latch on a word literally. Let's review my assertions: 1. The Russians didn't provide Wikileaks with the hacked emails. This has been proven correct. 2. There's no proof the Russians hacked the DNC. As previously discussed NO Federal investigation was allowed on equipment so that is correct. 3. Trump was right about wiretapping. This has been proven correct (despite your claim there needs to be an actual wire that was tapped). Team Trump was targeted and under surveillance then the names were requested unmasked by yet another Obama lackey (Rice). 4. Most if not all of this Russia angle is nothing more than a smear campaign by the Obama administration. This is proving to be correct. It also has the added benefit of covering up the aforementioned surveillance on Team Trump since Hillary botched the winning that would have kept this quiet. 1. You've proven a man who previously stated he didn't know the sources of wiki information says it wasn't Russia. Which is irrelevant to who hacked it...who directed the timing...who was in communication about all of it. 2. No...you disagree with the IC with no evidence supporting your opinion against theirs. 3. False...the IC and even Nunes won't say they were targeted. 4. Again...zero evidence to back up your claim. Also no real motive for Obama in that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 It's all coming unraveled and the left is the little kid with their fingers in the dam trying desperately to avoid disaster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 It's all coming unraveled and the left is the little kid with their fingers in the dam trying desperately to avoid disaster. The only thing coming unraveled are your excuses. Every day there is another connection from a Trump associate and Russia. You can keep claiming it's unraveling...but literally nothing out there is indicating this. Your four points of beliefs are built on lies, unsupported opinions, and belief in Assange only when he tells you what he wants. Face it...leaks were good when they shined bad things about the DNC...source didn't matter. Leaks are bad when they shined bad things about Trump...sources are all that matter. Great logic to live by. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted April 5, 2017 It's all coming unraveled : You got that right. Can't think of a Prez who's ever started off with scandal and hearings so quickly. WH controls both houses and still can't unfock themselves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted April 5, 2017 The only thing coming unraveled are your excuses. Every day there is another connection from a Trump associate and Russia. You can keep claiming it's unraveling...but literally nothing out there is indicating this. Your four points of beliefs are built on lies, unsupported opinions, and belief in Assange only when he tells you what he wants. Face it...leaks were good when they shined bad things about the DNC...source didn't matter. Leaks are bad when they shined bad things about Trump...sources are all that matter. Great logic to live by. Rice didn't want to disclose what she new in a PBS interview!#$@^&@# Obviously there was no collusion with the Russians. (rightie logic) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,011 Posted April 5, 2017 Pro tip... become a pensioner and suck off the public teet If you can. But a lot of pensions aren't that great. Mine is though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 The only thing coming unraveled are your excuses. Every day there is another connection from a Trump associate and Russia. You can keep claiming it's unraveling...but literally nothing out there is indicating this. Your four points of beliefs are built on lies, unsupported opinions, and belief in Assange only when he tells you what he wants. Face it...leaks were good when they shined bad things about the DNC...source didn't matter. Leaks are bad when they shined bad things about Trump...sources are all that matter. Great logic to live by. Of course you're okay with classified information being leaked after your girl Hillary was the queen of it. Understandably you're okay with rigging of a National Election so long as it was Democrats doing it. That's the biggest revelation of all the Wikileaks and you guys want the head of those who exposed it. What a sad confused bunch you are. Leaks of emails and leaks of classified information are apples and oranges. But again, your girl was guilty of it so I suspect you can't see the difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 You got that right. Can't think of a Prez who's ever started off with scandal and hearings so quickly. WH controls both houses and still can't unfock themselves. Yeah, too busy winning to care the MSM and the former admin launching a war against Trump. Illegal immigration down, jobs up, stock market up, etc..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 Of course you're okay with classified information being leaked after your girl Hillary was the queen of it. Understandably you're okay with rigging of a National Election so long as it was Democrats doing it. That's the biggest revelation of all the Wikileaks and you guys want the head of those who exposed it. What a sad confused bunch you are. Leaks of emails and leaks of classified information are apples and oranges. But again, your girl was guilty of it so I suspect you can't see the difference. Who said I'm ok with it? Anyone caught leaking it should be charged as appropriate. You calling Hillary my girl won't make it so either chief. Again...not ok with rigging elections either...but you can keep making up more in order to argue. The point remains hypocrisy of leaks are good and sources don't matter when it helped you...just the information that came fromit. Leaks are bad and the source is what matters now...but not what has come from the leaks. That's just fake news and a smear campaign by Obama (who gains nothing from it of course) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 5, 2017 I'm already on record to investigate it and let the chips fall where they may. BUT investigate it all. Trump, Hillary, Obama, Rice, etc.........I don't give a fock who goes down just judge everyone by the same focking measure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 5, 2017 Yeah, too busy winning to care the MSM and the former admin launching a war against Trump. Illegal immigration down, jobs up, stock market up, etc..... Winning? Haha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted April 10, 2017 Nice tread #orangechickenlittle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted April 10, 2017 Nice tread #orangechickenlittle Thanks for the bump, turkey neck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 11, 2017 What if it's true Trump did eat steak with ketchup? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,011 Posted April 11, 2017 Putins puppet, remember that one? Putin invaded other countries on Obamas watch. Putins pal got out of line and Trump smacked him in the face. Who's the puppet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted April 11, 2017 #orangetinfoilhat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted April 12, 2017 Supposedly the FBI obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page last year. Former Trump advisor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 12, 2017 Supposedly the FBI obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page last year. Former Trump advisor.Cue the Trump was right posts...ignoring that the FBI found and presented probable cause for an FISA warrant to look into a man who was likely working closely with Russia. And they will ignore this too. http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/11/politics/intelligence-contradicts-nunes-unmasking-claims/index.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,011 Posted April 12, 2017 More proof Trump was right, but we knew that already. He's crazy like a fox. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 12, 2017 Supposedly the FBI obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page last year. Former Trump advisor. It's becoming clear that the previous administration has had its eye on Trump and Associates for quite some time. Hillary was supposed to win in this was all going to be swept under the carpet but that's not the case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 12, 2017 It's becoming clear that the previous administration has had its eye on Trump and Associates for quite some time. Hillary was supposed to win in this was all going to be swept under the carpet but that's not the case. Yes...the FBI had their sites on guys that have tendencies to be in bed with the Russians like Page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 12, 2017 Yes...the FBI had their sites on guys that have tendencies to be in bed with the Russians like Page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,011 Posted April 12, 2017 Yes...the FBI had their sites on guys that have tendencies to be in bed with the Russians like Page. How about the Podesta brothers if that's the criteria? You lose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 12, 2017 How about the Podesta brothers if that's the criteria? You lose. Oh and Hillary/Bill with their focked up Uranium One cash grab. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,011 Posted April 12, 2017 Oh and Hillary/Bill with their focked up Uranium One cash grab. They just won't see. Blinded by their bloodlust. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 12, 2017 Oh and Hillary/Bill with their focked up Uranium One cash grab. Again...more signs of your ignorance and dishonesty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted April 12, 2017 Again...more signs of your ignorance and dishonesty.Says the board's biggest hack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 12, 2017 Again...more signs of your ignorance and dishonesty. Once again, enough material has been posted and I believe I had Bob Ross paint you a lovely picture of the Clinton Foundations' dirty trail of money with that deal. For someone who claims you're not a Hillary supporter you get pretty vehement in defending them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 12, 2017 Yes...the FBI had their sites on guys that have tendencies to be in bed with the Russians like Page.Podesta? The guy took in hundreds of thousands from a russian state bank. Fisa warrants on him ? If not, it's pretty evident the FBI had become politicized. (As if that's not obvious already) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted April 12, 2017 Why was it OK for Obama is give 20% of our uranium supply to Russia? I think it makes more sense to assume the Russians helped Obama get elected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted April 12, 2017 Once again, enough material has been posted and I believe I had Bob Ross paint you a lovely picture of the Clinton Foundations' dirty trail of money with that deal. For someone who claims you're not a Hillary supporter you get pretty vehement in defending them. The Uranium One stuff you all have posted has been completely destroyed. One does not need to be a Hillary supporter to understand what happened there...that she had zero power to do anything on her own. That we didn't give away Uranium...and so many other idiotic claims you made that are simply false. You get your ass handed to you every time you bring up Uranium...yet you are too dumb to know that so you keep doing it. Fock man...open your eyes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites