Jump to content
NewbieJr

What if it's found that Trump did help the Russians

Recommended Posts

 

You are insane.

Yeah...sorry for posting news about the actual topic and investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah...sorry for posting news about the actual topic and investigation.

 

It is going to be so funny when all of this backfires on you and your party. And oh is it going to backfire. Be careful what you ask for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is going to be so funny when all of this backfires on you and your party. And oh is it going to backfire. Be careful what you ask for.

Backfire on me? How is pointing out that special counsel now has a grand jury involved going to backfire on me? How is posting the news of this going to backfire on me?

Ive said several times I don't know of it will all even reach Trump...

And party? Special Counsel was appointed by Trumps own deputy AG...this isn't the democrats investigating Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backfire on me? How is pointing out that special counsel now has a grand jury involved going to backfire on me?

When your psychiatrist finds out you've been talking politics again he's going to lock you up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A grand jury. Now this gets good. This will help get to the truth. Whichever side that happens to fall on. Now there will be sworn testimony. Under oath. Now they can contact telephone companies for call and text records. If there was no wrongdoing by Trump and the administration, this is exactly what they should want. To get this all out of the way and have doubt removed so they can get on with running the country. Because right now this is bogging them down every single day. That's why they're not getting one thing done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about Russian oligarchs funding Trump and several big boys of the GOP?

 

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2017/08/03/tangled-web-connects-russian-oligarch-money-gop-campaigns

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/31/pro-putin-russian-oligarch-dumps-money-into-establishment-gop-candidates-campaign-coffers/

 

They (he and his wife) gave to both Repubs AND Democrats.

 

George Soros meanwhile gave BILLIONS to the left leaning organizations including Democratic Candidates. That's with a B........

Just part of Hillary's Pay to Play in her time at the Secretary of State

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/stunning_revelation_wikileaks_hack_shows_that_soros_called_the_shots_on_us_policy_toward_albania.html

 

https://www.rt.com/usa/243017-ukraine-clinton-foreign-donors/

​Ukraine oligarch ‘top cash contributor’ to Clinton Foundation prior to Kiev crisis.

Democrats love them some foreign money and especially Ukrainian. Hillary took between 10-25 million from the Saudis too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/emails-show-clinton-denied-then-met-with-ukrainian-donor/article/2600040

 

How much does dinner with Secretary of State Hillary cost? Ukrainian businessman Victor Pinchuk donated $25 million and got invited to Hillary's home. Pricey but I'm sure it was worth it.

 

Emails made public Tuesday show a Ukrainian businessman and major Clinton Foundation donor was invited to Hillary Clinton's home during the final year of her diplomatic tenure, despite her spokesman's insistence in 2014 that the donor never crossed paths with Clinton while she served as secretary of state.

Victor Pinchuk, who has given up to $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, appeared on the guest list that was sent between Dennis Cheng, an executive at the foundation, and Huma Abedin, then Clinton's deputy chief of staff at the State Department, ahead of a June 2012 dinner. Abedin noted in a subsequent email that the gathering would be hosted in Clinton's home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Victor Pinchuk also donated to the Trump Foundation as well and was one of the largest individual donors to that organization.

 

Monica Crowley (remember her?) serves as his lobbyist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Victor Pinchuk also donated to the Trump Foundation as well and was one of the largest individual donors to that organization.

 

Monica Crowley (remember her?) serves as his lobbyist.

 

Yeah........makes you wonder what was Sho's point of bringing up foreign donors in the first place.

 

I agree with disregarding donations (of small size) to Democratic candidates. Hiring people connected with the Clinton Foundation to investigate foreign involvement is laughable though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly power corrupts.

The greed in Washington consumes all parties. Republican or Democrat is a word for the serfs. They're all wolves in sheep's clothing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But someone from Mueller's team donated $200 to a Democratic governor in a Podunk state 7 years ago!

So...much less than Trump has donated to the Clintons and Democrats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/31/pro-putin-russian-oligarch-dumps-money-into-establishment-gop-candidates-campaign-coffers/

 

They (he and his wife) gave to both Repubs AND Democrats.

 

George Soros meanwhile gave BILLIONS to the left leaning organizations including Democratic Candidates. That's with a B........

Just part of Hillary's Pay to Play in her time at the Secretary of State

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/stunning_revelation_wikileaks_hack_shows_that_soros_called_the_shots_on_us_policy_toward_albania.html

 

https://www.rt.com/usa/243017-ukraine-clinton-foreign-donors/ ​Ukraine oligarch top cash contributor to Clinton Foundation prior to Kiev crisis.

Democrats love them some foreign money and especially Ukrainian. Hillary took between 10-25 million from the Saudis too.

Russia Today as a source

And lots of "whataboutism" yet again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yeah........makes you wonder what was Sho's point of bringing up foreign donors in the first place.

 

I agree with disregarding donations (of small size) to Democratic candidates. Hiring people connected with the Clinton Foundation to investigate foreign involvement is laughable though.

It wasn't foreign donors...it was guy with direct ties to Oligarchs and Putin.

 

Which of course never stops you from more Hillary whining as a defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Slo Nutt....................can't see the forest for the trees.

 

I posted those examples because Washington is AWASH with foreign money. You want to point at one blade of grass (or several) in a field and say "LOOK, foreign money!!!!".

 

JFC, come back when Mueller has some concrete (and he may already) evidence of illegal funds flowing into the Trump Campaign but again, judge EVERYONE by that measure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You posted those examples because you have nothing other than "but Hillary " as a defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You want me to answer why someone else did something.

Think about that for a minute...then realize your question was idiotic.

 

You posted those examples because you have nothing other than "but Hillary " as a defense.

 

:wave:

 

Do you realize how batsh!t crazy you are and that you reply so contradictory most times?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

:wave:

 

Do you realize how batsh!t crazy you are and that you reply so contradictory most times?

There is nothing contradictory about my statements.

And conspiracy boy thinking someone else is batshit crazy...priceless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing contradictory about my statements.

 

You need a picture painted? Where's Bob Ross?

 

A. "You want me to answer why someone else did something.

B. "You posted those examples because you have nothing other than "but Hillary " as a defense."

 

You can't see the contradictory nature of those two statements? Really?

 

I guess you really are the most clueless poster here. Congrats I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You need a picture painted? Where's Bob Ross?

 

A. "You want me to answer why someone else did something.

B. "You posted those examples because you have nothing other than "but Hillary " as a defense."

 

You can't see the contradictory nature of those two statements? Really?

 

I guess you really are the most clueless poster here. Congrats I guess.

The statements are not related in any way, shape, or form.

You are completely nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The statements are not related in any way, shape, or form.

You are completely nuts.

 

So no..........you can't then.

 

It's a wonder you can manage to log in here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So no..........you can't then.

 

It's a wonder you can manage to log in here.

Considering you are comparing two different statements that are not related or contradictory...no...I can't. Because I'm not a fockig moron like you.

Seriously...seek help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://imgur.com/gallery/c22GCFY

 

You've gone over the edge Slo....

 

Thats your response to posting two unrelated things...and wrongly claiming they are contradictory statements?

Are you only this dumb online...or that bad in real life too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thats your response to posting two unrelated things...and wrongly claiming they are contradictory statements?

Are you only this dumb online...or that bad in real life too?

 

It's two separate posts but wholly related as you scoff at answering a question regarding someone's motive then claim to know my motive for posting something. Still can't see?

 

Not surprising though. I'm still waiting for you to post a link where you gave Trump props.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's two separate posts but wholly related as you scoff at answering a question regarding someone's motive then claim to know my motive for posting something. Still can't see?

 

Not surprising though. I'm still waiting for you to post a link where you gave Trump props.

 

A. I don't answer for other people...nor did I ask what you thought someone else was doing.

B. I didn't speak to your motivation. I spoke to your lack of any logical defense so you bring up Hillary.

 

Not surprising that you don't understand this.

And you can keep waiting...I don't give a what you think about me giving Trump props...it happened...you just don't accept that.

Fock off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You posted those examples because you have nothing other than "but Hillary " as a defense.

 

 

 

B. I didn't speak to your motivation. I spoke to your lack of any logical defense so you bring up Hillary.

 

Not surprising that you don't understand this.

And you can keep waiting...I don't give a ###### what you think about me giving Trump props...it happened...you just don't accept that.

Fock off.

 

You certainly did speak to my motivation and you did it again (B. i.e. bring up Hillary)

 

You're certifiable. If any geek knows Slo's address might want to either do an intervention or call Dept of Family Services. :wacko:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
does the fbi often hold press conferences to list all the things a subject is guilty of only to finish it off by recommending no charges be filed ?

See snuff, to normal humans..the fbi has some credibility issues of their own making.

None of your selective outrage and selective fbi ball sucking will change that.

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does the fbi often hold press conferences to list all the things a subject is guilty of only to finish it off by recommending no charges be filed ?

See snuff, to normal humans..the fbi has some credibility issues of their own making.

None of your selective outrage and selective fbi ball sucking will change that.

HTH

 

You realize this was done...with a warrant...under the direction of Special Counsel for the Russian Investigation, right?

Selective outrage?

Says the guy who does not give two shits that the guy he voted for and defends was very likely acting in a criminal behavior and working with an adversary to fock with our election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does the fbi often hold press conferences to list all the things a subject is guilty of only to finish it off by recommending no charges be filed ?

See snuff, to normal humans..the fbi has some credibility issues of their own making.

None of your selective outrage and selective fbi ball sucking will change that.

HTH

LOL And when did those 'credibility issues' surface? When you retards voted a TV reality star into office. And were/are dumb enough to believe his bullsh1t.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL And when did those 'credibility issues' surface? When you retards voted a TV reality star into office. And were/are dumb enough to believe his bullsh1t.

I pointed that out dumbo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×