What if it's found that Trump did help the Russians

[Sho Nuff 720]

Lol just keep on pretending. Talk around town is you're a nobody who lives in fantasyland

Such a fantasy land that you can never refute what I say.

Pathetic as always Cdub

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

Such a fantasy land that you can never refute what I say.

Pathetic as always Cdub

 

I mean the man has a quote from Donald Trump talking about God in his sig. It doesn't get dumber than that.

[Alias Detective 1,389]

Can someone bring me up to speed?

[Reality 3,107]

Can someone bring me up to speed?

Any day now bubba, Russia!

[Baker Boy 1,691]

Can someone bring me up to speed?

To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Mark Twain

[TimmySmith 2,782]

1st post. So, how are we doing on this? I'll come back in 3 weeks and ask the same thing. snonuts will have 8 pages of posts by then.

At least one prediction in this thread is spot on.

 

As for the rest, keep me posted.

[mobb_deep 920]

"It’s difficult to talk with people who confuse Austria and Australia" Vlad Putin

[Cdub100 3,850]

Soooo, any day now?

[Baker Boy 1,691]

The former journalist who commissioned the unverified anti-Trump dossier repeatedly refused to answer basic questions about his client – including how much his firm Fusion GPS was paid and whether he knew the sources behind the dossier’s sensational allegations – according to a source familiar with Glenn Simpson’s closed-door interview last month with Senate Judiciary Committee staffers.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/06/fusion-boss-refused-to-answer-basic-questions-on-anti-trump-dossier-source-says.html

 

We are getting closer......soon we will know......we are still gathering evidence.....

[Sho Nuff 720]

The former journalist who commissioned the unverified anti-Trump dossier repeatedly refused to answer basic questions about his client – including how much his firm Fusion GPS was paid and whether he knew the sources behind the dossier’s sensational allegations – according to a source familiar with Glenn Simpson’s closed-door interview last month with Senate Judiciary Committee staffers.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/06/fusion-boss-refused-to-answer-basic-questions-on-anti-trump-dossier-source-says.html

 

We are getting closer......soon we will know......we are still gathering evidence.....

 

Single source huh?

Funny how you all with "according to sources"...but believe single sourced stuff on fox.

 

Why is that?

BTW...we are getting closer...3 committees now in full on investigations. Mutliple Trump Org people being called in to testify soon. Mueller working with the NY AG.

Manafort and Flynn are likely to be screwed big time. We will see how much higher up will take any of this.

[Baker Boy 1,691]

Single source huh?

Funny how you all ###### with "according to sources"...but believe single sourced stuff on fox.

 

Why is that?

BTW...we are getting closer...3 committees now in full on investigations. Mutliple Trump Org people being called in to testify soon. Mueller working with the NY AG.

Manafort and Flynn are likely to be screwed big time. We will see how much higher up will take any of this.

I found a new Hagfish!

 

#slohagfish

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I found a new Hagfish!

 

#slohagfish

Sometimes the fish literally jump in the boat.

 

[Cdub100 3,850]

 

I mean the man has a quote from Donald Trump talking about God in his sig. It doesn't get dumber than that.

 

What do you have against freedom, family, country and God? Other than hating them?

[Baker Boy 1,691]

Or the Fusion GPS guy will testify today and turn over 40,000 documents.

The former journalist who commissioned the unverified anti-Trump dossier repeatedly refused to answer basic questions about his client – including how much his firm Fusion GPS was paid and whether he knew the sources behind the dossier’s sensational allegations – according to a source familiar with Glenn Simpson’s closed-door interview last month with Senate Judiciary Committee staffers.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/06/fusion-boss-refused-to-answer-basic-questions-on-anti-trump-dossier-source-says.html

We are getting closer......soon we will know......we are still gathering evidence.....

Single source huh?

Funny how you all ###### with "according to sources"...but believe single sourced stuff on fox.

 

Why is that?

BTW...we are getting closer...3 committees now in full on investigations. Mutliple Trump Org people being called in to testify soon. Mueller working with the NY AG.

Manafort and Flynn are likely to be screwed big time. We will see how much higher up will take any of this.

#slohagfish

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Fusion GPS, Russian Lawyer, DNC, Unmasking on unprecedented scale.....

 

Add to that FBI wanted to pay Christopher Steele and DOJ letting Russian lawyer in country. Oh and don't forget the Ukrainians too.

[Baker Boy 1,691]

Fusion GPS, Russian Lawyer, DNC.....

Add to that FBI wanted to pay Christopher Steele and DOJ letting Russian lawyer in country. Oh and don't forget the Ukrainians too.

And what we found is that Obama, Hillary, the DNC, and CNN are the ones responsible for tampering.

 

The Left represents a new kind of stupid. They are not logical. They make no sense whatsoever. But they are going to have the media on their side, and that's the danger.

 

#slohagfish

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

#slohagfish

You should find other sources outside of Fox sometime.

 

You might look less stupid when you post.

Now run along and find someone else to plagiarize.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Fusion GPS, Russian Lawyer, DNC, Unmasking on unprecedented scale.....

 

Add to that FBI wanted to pay Christopher Steele and DOJ letting Russian lawyer in country. Oh and don't forget the Ukrainians too.

[Sho Nuff 720]

And what we found is that Obama, Hillary, the DNC, and CNN are the ones responsible for tampering.

 

The Left represents a new kind of stupid. They are not logical. They make no sense whatsoever. But they are going to have the media on their side, and that's the danger.

 

#slohagfish

Link? To any of this bullshit?

[Baker Boy 1,691]

The chairman of the House Intelligence Community threatened to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Chris Wray in contempt of Congress if they did not respond to a subpoena for documents or testimony relating to the dossier alleging President Donald Trump's ties with Russian officials.

 

In a letter dated September 1 and obtained by CNN, Rep. Devin Nunes vented about the pair's "insufficient responsiveness to the committee's numerous Russia-investigation related requests over the past several months."

http://www.businessinsider.com/devin-nunes-jeff-sessions-fbi-chris-wray-trump-russia-dossier-2017-9

 

 

#slohagfish

[Sho Nuff 720]

Hey...you found a source outside of Fox.

Nunes' fake venting is funny.

[Cdub100 3,850]

Guys did Trump help the Russians yet?

[Sho Nuff 720]

Guys did Trump help the Russians yet?

Probably.

It's been established they lied over and over aga N about contacts and meetings with the Russians.

It's now being shown they lied about what business they had with the Russians (Felix Sater may have been flipped).

Manafort and Flynn are very likely focked.

 

All nothing, right?

[drobeski 3,061]

Probably.

It's been established they lied over and over aga N about contacts and meetings with the Russians.

It's now being shown they lied about what business they had with the Russians (Felix Sater may have been flipped).

Manafort and Flynn are very likely focked.

 

All nothing, right?

if giving the Russians 20% of our uranium for massive donations to the Clinton foundation is nothing, then it's safe to say this is even less nothing.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

It's looking more and more like the FBI was funding at least in part the anti-Trump research. Tell us again how trustworthy and unbiased Comey was?

[Sho Nuff 720]

if giving the Russians 20% of our uranium for massive donations to the Clinton foundation is nothing, then it's safe to say this is even less nothing.

Good thing nobody gave them 20% of our Uranium.

And it had nothing to do with Clinton foundation donations.

[Sho Nuff 720]

It's looking more and more like the FBI was funding at least in part the anti-Trump research. Tell us again how trustworthy and unbiased Comey was?

No actual link to support this either...shocking.

[12th Man 884]

No actual link to support this either...shocking.

The buzzfeed king wants links. Crassic.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Good thing nobody gave them 20% of our Uranium.

And it had nothing to do with Clinton foundation donations.

 

Sure it didn't. Wikileaks (100% accuracy record) had a good breakdown on that which, if my memory serves me correctly made you have a breakdown.

 

No actual link to support this either...shocking.

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-next-stop-for-trump-dossier-probe-the-fbi/article/2632711

 

"That's because the FBI played a role in the case as it happened. Sometime in the process of collecting anti-Trump allegations from paid, Kremlin-linked Russian informants, Christopher Steele — the former British spy hired by Fusion to dig dirt in Russia — decided to take his information to the FBI. That appears to have been in the fall of 2016, at the height of the presidential campaign.

The FBI took the dossier seriously, in part because agents had dealt with Steele before in 2010 in the investigation into FIFA, the world soccer organization. So in October, Steele "reached an agreement with the FBI a few weeks before the election for the bureau to pay him to continue his work," according to a Washington Post report.

It was a mind-boggling development: Federal law enforcement agreeing to fund an ongoing opposition research project being conducted on behalf of one of the candidates in a presidential election. In the end, the FBI reportedly did not pay Steele, possibly because of publicity concerns.

One person whose mind was boggled by the news was Grassley. The Judiciary Committee chairman thought through the implications of the FBI adopting the Fusion-Steele dossier project, and on March 6sent then-FBI Director James Comey a letter.

"The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI's independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration's use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends," Grassley wrote.

Grassley demanded all FBI materials relating to the dossier, plus information on what, if any, actions the bureau undertook to try to verify its contents, and how the bureau used the information. Grassley was particularly concerned about whether the FBI ever presented material from the dossier — unverified, from paid informants — to a court as a basis for obtaining a warrant in the Russia investigation. To do so would amount to using false pretenses to seek court permission to put someone under surveillance."

The FBI and DOJ are currently stonewalling releasing the information for reasons unknown. The FBI blocked 2 people from testifying that could shed light on the matter as well.

Something stinks to high heaven there........

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

 

Sure it didn't. Wikileaks (100% accuracy record) had a good breakdown on that which, if my memory serves me correctly made you have a breakdown.

 

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-next-stop-for-trump-dossier-probe-the-fbi/article/2632711

 

"That's because the FBI played a role in the case as it happened. Sometime in the process of collecting anti-Trump allegations from paid, Kremlin-linked Russian informants, Christopher Steele — the former British spy hired by Fusion to dig dirt in Russia — decided to take his information to the FBI. That appears to have been in the fall of 2016, at the height of the presidential campaign.

The FBI took the dossier seriously, in part because agents had dealt with Steele before in 2010 in the investigation into FIFA, the world soccer organization. So in October, Steele "reached an agreement with the FBI a few weeks before the election for the bureau to pay him to continue his work," according to a Washington Post report.

It was a mind-boggling development: Federal law enforcement agreeing to fund an ongoing opposition research project being conducted on behalf of one of the candidates in a presidential election. In the end, the FBI reportedly did not pay Steele, possibly because of publicity concerns.

One person whose mind was boggled by the news was Grassley. The Judiciary Committee chairman thought through the implications of the FBI adopting the Fusion-Steele dossier project, and on March 6sent then-FBI Director James Comey a letter.

"The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI's independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration's use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends," Grassley wrote.

Grassley demanded all FBI materials relating to the dossier, plus information on what, if any, actions the bureau undertook to try to verify its contents, and how the bureau used the information. Grassley was particularly concerned about whether the FBI ever presented material from the dossier — unverified, from paid informants — to a court as a basis for obtaining a warrant in the Russia investigation. To do so would amount to using false pretenses to seek court permission to put someone under surveillance."

The FBI and DOJ are currently stonewalling releasing the information for reasons unknown. The FBI blocked 2 people from testifying that could shed light on the matter as well.

Something stinks to high heaven there........

 

 

Wikileaks accurately shows the documents...their opining on what things are is not close to 100% accurate btw. We did not give anyone 20% of our Uranium...that is the first lie. A canadian company that controls it sold their share to the Russian company. The US could approve or deny the sale based on many things...but there was not reason to do so. The State department was one part of that...so Hillary didn't approve it on its own at all.

Its a bogus claim still used by the simple minded like you and drobeski who are too ignorant to read through wiki's opinion and form a real one based on the facts.

 

And your link...

First paragraph

 

 

Citing the Mueller special prosecutor investigation, Justice stated "confidentiality" and the "sensitivity of information relating to pending matters" made it impossible for the two officials, Carl Ghattas and James Rybicki, to talk to the Senate committee that oversees the FBI.

 

 

In addition...nothing in that article states the FBI is suspected to have funded the dossier.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

In addition...nothing in that article states the FBI is suspected to have funded the dossier.

 

FBI may have funded anti-Trump research as I stated. Go back and read what you quoted me as saying.

 

That they were even offing to pay the guy is unfathomable...........that they may have done it remains to be seen. They're sure as hell playing Stonewall Jackson in requests for information.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

 

FBI may have funded anti-Trump research as I stated. Go back and read what you quoted me as saying.

 

That they were even offing to pay the guy is unfathomable...........that they may have done it remains to be seen. They're sure as hell playing Stonewall Jackson in requests for information.

I read it that the FBI said they would pay and skipped out on the bill when it got hot.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

FBI may have funded anti-Trump research as I stated. Go back and read what you quoted me as saying.

 

That they were even offing to pay the guy is unfathomable...........that they may have done it remains to be seen. They're sure as hell playing Stonewall Jackson in requests for information.

 

And nothing in the article you posted alleges they may have funded it.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

And nothing in the article you posted alleges they may have funded it.

 

It's indisputable that the FBI agreed to pay Steele to keep investigating Trump. That news is everywhere. It's whether or not they did pay him and paying a guy who they knew was being paid by Democrats to fund the Dossier is a huge black eye on the agency's reputation.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/chuck-grassley-fbi-christopher-steele-trump-dossier-235728

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

It's indisputable that the FBI agreed to pay Steele to keep investigating Trump. That news is everywhere. It's whether or not they did pay him and paying a guy who they knew was being paid by Democrats to fund the Dossier is a huge black eye on the agency's reputation.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/chuck-grassley-fbi-christopher-steele-trump-dossier-235728

That is a supposed plan to pay him to keep doing his work. Yet...they never paid him.

And he was being paid by a group that supported Clinton after being paid by those supporting his republican opponents.

 

None of which refutes the information in the dossier or other issues being investigated by Mueller.

 

Yeah...go ahead and hold in to that while denying all else.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Wikileaks accurately shows the documents...their opining on what things are is not close to 100% accurate btw. We did not give anyone 20% of our Uranium...that is the first lie. A canadian company that controls it sold their share to the Russian company. The US could approve or deny the sale based on many things...but there was not reason to do so. The State department was one part of that...so Hillary didn't approve it on its own at all.

Its a bogus claim still used by the simple minded like you and drobeski who are too ignorant to read through wiki's opinion and form a real one based on the facts.

 

And your link...

First paragraph

 

 

In addition...nothing in that article states the FBI is suspected to have funded the dossier.

are you saying that the state dept and the white house did not have to sign off on the uranium deal ?

[Sho Nuff 720]

are you saying that the state dept and the white house did not have to sign off on the uranium deal ?

 

Im saying if they were going to not sign off on it...it was a national security review.

It wasn't "our Uranium". It was a company selling its stake. We didn't sell our Uranium...we didn't give away our Uranium.

Im saying your narrative is factually inaccurate at best...but more likely a continued lie as is been explained over and over to you fools who keep bringing it up.

Its how it is easy to spot an idiot. they spout off about uranium one and have zero clue what even happened with that deal.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Im saying if they were going to not sign off on it...it was a national security review.

It wasn't "our Uranium". It was a company selling its stake. We didn't sell our Uranium...we didn't give away our Uranium.

Im saying your narrative is factually inaccurate at best...but more likely a continued lie as is been explained over and over to you fools who keep bringing it up.

Its how it is easy to spot an idiot. they spout off about uranium one and have zero clue what even happened with that deal.

so they did sign of on it but had nothing to do with it.

That makes so much sense.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

 

"Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta's communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called "Uranium One" which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment's review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as "baseless".

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: "Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that "Jose Fernandez has personally attested that 'Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter',” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: "Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I'm finding extremely rewarding."

Julian Assange"

 

 

Can anyone tell me how often Wikileaks/Assange has been wrong?

[Sho Nuff 720]

so they did sign of on it but had nothing to do with it.

That makes so much sense.

 

She was one of 9 cabinet members on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US...that signed off on the deal.

Their approval was from a standpoint of national security.

The committee by law could not even veto the transaction.

Hillary may not have even been in on that as the Asst Sec of State often participated as the rep on that committee.

The Russian company purchased a 51% share in the company. The Uranium doesn't leave the US either...

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20170129043258/https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

 

 

Uranium One is a non-issue and only pushed by idiots. (like you).