Hardcore troubadour 12,831 Posted August 23, 2018 Why must you always try to put words in my mouth...go back and read what was written...nobody was saying "deporter in chief" it was about separations...and the whole, Obama did it too just the same comparison has been shown to be inaccurate from the start. Not that this crew will ever admit it. Entering "deporter in chief" into the google results in numerous stories referring to Obama as that, by such noted right wing media outiets Al Jazeera and NPR, amongst others. Yup, nobody called him that. Slownuff indeed, just making it up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,933 Posted August 23, 2018 Who is more likely to commit crimes - illegal immigrants or members of Trumps campaign team? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,819 Posted August 23, 2018 Who is more likely to commit crimes - illegal immigrants or members of Trumps campaign team? Only a liberal would be more concerned about campaign Finance then their child murdered by an illegal immigrant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted August 23, 2018 Who is more likely to commit crimes - illegal immigrants or members of Trumps campaign team? Eagles fans. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,499 Posted August 23, 2018 "We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants in this country," Barack Obama   Years of backlash: Obama policy on illegal immigrants' children was also slammed by critics  The Obama administration actually expanded the system of detaining families – typically mothers and their minor children – after a huge surge of Central Americans along the U.S.-Mexican border in 2014.  Videos and photos at the time showed children in tears, many of them still wearing dirty clothes, in detention facilities where they were kept with their families. The conditions -- which ranged from six adults and children sleeping crammed on two mattresses laid out on concrete floors, to sick minors not receiving medical care -- were documented in many news accounts and reports by human rights groups.  At the time, Obama administration officials argued they had no choice but to implement policies intended to deter families from entering the U.S. illegally. Trump administration officials have made similar arguments Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 23, 2018 Only a liberal would be more concerned about campaign Finance then their child murdered by an illegal immigrant.they really are sickos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,933 Posted August 23, 2018 Only a liberal would be more concerned about campaign Finance then their child murdered by an illegal immigrant. Can I be concerned about both? Im good at multitasking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,659 Posted August 23, 2018 Sounds like Trump is fixing to try to fire sessions. Which means he'll have to fire Rosenstein. Then look at the list of people he's already fired? Oh yeah, there's no there there. Â At some point, McConnell's going to have to crawl out of his turtle shell. Â A bunch of Republicans including McConnell said that Trump can't touch Justice. (Again)That will be a Line in the Sand too far. We'll see if they mean it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,418 Posted August 23, 2018 Who is more likely to commit crimes - illegal immigrants or members of Trumps campaign team? Illegal immigrants have a 100% crime rate. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted August 23, 2018 Illegal immigrants have a 100% crime rate. This is true, but I still say Eagles fans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,933 Posted August 23, 2018 Illegal immigrants have a 100% crime rate. So do Americans if you count misdemeanors. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,819 Posted August 23, 2018 Can we just fast-forward to someone posting about what white men has done to the Indians and get it over with? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted August 23, 2018 So do Americans if you count misdemeanors. Hmmm. This also is true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofTEK 71 Posted August 23, 2018 Can we just fast-forward to someone posting about what white men has done to the Indians and get it over with? We gave them phone support jobs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,306 Posted August 23, 2018 Can we just fast-forward to someone posting about what white men has done to the Indians and get it over with? They won the 1995 World Series... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,819 Posted August 23, 2018 Haha you basterds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,659 Posted August 23, 2018 Has anybody else noticed that this thread title sounds like something your middle eastern cab driver would say out loud? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,499 Posted August 23, 2018 illegal aliens are not immigrants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted August 23, 2018 Huh? He paid off Stormy Daniels on October 27th 2016. Â As for for McDougal? Â August 6, 2016: McDougal, on advice of attorney Keith Davidson, signed a nondisclosure deal with AMI, for which she was paid $150,000 and promised she would be featured on the companys magazine covers and in its health and fitness columns. This effectively buries the story; Â -------------- Â The whole point is they did this during the campaign. Â 10 27 16 and the election was what? 11816? Â Not sure how far back you think this actually goes. But they got bank records are signed and dated. And oh yeah, Trump's lawyer. And the women's lawyers. And the women. And soon, a couple of trump Corporation officers. Do you honestly care about a candidate paying women hush money for consensual sex a decade earlier? Â Or is this part of your Trump is the devil shtick? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,500 Posted August 23, 2018 He doesn't really care. He just wants Trump impeached. Â If Obama was into women, and paid off a side-piece, you wouldn't have heard a peep from the Lefties. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,659 Posted August 23, 2018 Do you honestly care about a candidate paying women hush money for consensual sex a decade earlier?  Or is this part of your Trump is the devil shtick? What's the one thing the entire country learned from Nixon? It ain't the crime, it's the cover-up.  Might want to go back and ask Gary hart and John Edwards and Gary Condit and Mark Sanford and Elliot spitzer, and others,etc whether or not the American people give a shiit about covering up adultery on your pregnant wife by paying off a hooker or two WEEKS before the God damn election.  What? Trump should get a lower standard because he's been a sleazy incompetent fuuck his entire life?  If what he did was so inconsequential, why commit multiple felonies to cover it up? He's a man of the people right? Just lay it out there for everybody to see and vote for or against accordingly. Except he didn't do that now did he?  Why not? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 23, 2018 Only a liberal would be more concerned about campaign Finance then their child murdered by an illegal immigrant. That isnt what he said. Why do you continue to make such false statements? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,933 Posted August 23, 2018 Do you honestly care about a candidate paying women hush money for consensual sex a decade earlier? Seems kind of odd that Donald paid these women hundreds of thousands of dollars to not talk about it then. He couldve saved the cash and been like I fock around - so what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,659 Posted August 23, 2018 Seems kind of odd that Donald paid these women hundreds of thousands of dollars to not talk about it then. He couldve saved the cash and been like I fock around - so what? You said it more succinctly than I did. Â God, I'd love to be Mels divorce lawyer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,819 Posted August 23, 2018 That isnt what he said. Why do you continue to make such false statements?He compared illegal immigrants..who actually kill people....to a campaign he doesn't like because Russia! Payoffs! Flynn. Pretty obvious except to you.. which isn't surprising.  You do understand people don't have to say the exact words to know what someone's saying right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 23, 2018 He compared illegal immigrants..who actually kill people....to a campaign he doesn't like because Russia! Payoffs! Flynn. Â Pretty obvious except to you.. which isn't surprising. Â You do understand people don't have to say the exact words to know what someone's saying right? ITs obvious he never said what you claimed or even inferred it and you do this all the focking time.You do inderstand words have meaning and he never came close to what you stated. Never mind...you dont understand such a simple concept or you wouldn't do this show often. He said who is more likely to commit a crime. He didnt compare anything liar. Â And not surprised that you ran from the Manafort thread after slinging crap at me. I bet you still think Donny just pulled out hhis own money there too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,748 Posted August 23, 2018 He compared illegal immigrants..who actually kill people....to a campaign he doesn't like because Russia! Payoffs! Flynn. Â Pretty obvious except to you.. which isn't surprising. Â You do understand people don't have to say the exact words to know what someone's saying right? Yep, it was clearly a comparison of likely criminality between two groups of people. I mean, it was in plain English FFS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 24, 2018 Yep, it was clearly a comparison of likely criminality between two groups of people. I mean, it was in plain English FFS. It wasnt a comparison of crimes but of percentage from each group. Its not difficult logic and was obviously a focking joke. But you jackasses can even fock that up in order to defend Trump and whine about libs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,748 Posted August 24, 2018 It wasnt a comparison of crimes but of percentage from each group. Its not difficult logic and was obviously a focking joke. But you jackasses can even fock that up in order to defend Trump and whine about libs. "Likely criminality" shitdick. AKA the likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior. You're the only jackass in this conversation, which is now over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites