Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
fandandy

Does Trump Pardon Roger Stone?

Recommended Posts

No doubt. He punishes those who tell the truth and rewards those who commit crimes for him. He will pardon Stone, Manafort, and Flynn. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump will pardon him. Perjury, obstruction and witness tampering are only crimes for us laymen. That’s business as usual for DC swamp creatures.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No fake investigation = no criminal charges.  A full pardon is the only rational thing to do.  Unless you support gestapo tactics.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he doesn’t get a new trial Trump has no choice. What has happened to Stone should scare all Americans but then most American don’t have a clue about the injustice of this case. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Baker Boy said:

If he doesn’t get a new trial Trump has no choice. What has happened to Stone should scare all Americans but then most American don’t have a clue about the injustice of this case. 

You got it wrong. If what happened to Purple Heart recipient Lt Col. Vindman doesn't scare you, you have no clue about authoritative regimes.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Observer said:

You got it wrong. If what happened to Purple Heart recipient Lt Col. Vindman doesn't scare you, you have no clue about authoritative regimes.  

What happened to him? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him.  Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up.  And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Observer said:

Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him.  Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up.  And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? 😂

Did Vindman stub his toe on the way to the mess hall or something?  I love how guys like you try to prop up these traitors and liars with some collateral statements of virtue.  "Career prosecutor with an impeccable record" and all that noise.  There was no crime committed by Trump and no coverup of that non-existent crime.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Did Vindman stub his toe on the way to the mess hall or something?  I love how guys like you try to prop up these traitors and liars with some collateral statements of virtue.  "Career prosecutor with an impeccable record" and all that noise.  There was no crime committed by Trump and no coverup of that non-existent crime.

Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify.  And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Observer said:

Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify.  And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. 

I'm not going off in different directions; you're revealing the limitations of your child-like brain.  Vindman should be charged with treason and sedition for this coup attempt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify.  And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. 

I was interested in your opinion until this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

I'm not going off in different directions; you're revealing the limitations of your child-like brain.  Vindman should be charged with treason and sedition for this coup attempt.

🤣😂  Charged?  So you're suggesting he committed a crime? By telling the truth?  You are the perfect Trump sheep. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him.  Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up.  And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? 😂

He wasn’t fired. He was reassigned. Happens all the time in the military. Obama reassigned people for talking smack to Rolling Stone. You are woefully uninformed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He wasn’t fired. He was reassigned. Happens all the time in the military. Obama reassigned people for talking smack to Rolling Stone. You are woefully uninformed. 

So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route?  I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the lefties on this board have pivoted from the Stone situation shows they have no answers for the corruption of this case.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Observer said:

So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route?  I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops

Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Observer said:

So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route?  I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops

And you are still on the misinformed, liar, track.  If you get your facts straight and maybe you'll realize your argument is a joke.  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. 

Never argue with stupid people, they will only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said:

Did you not see I that I highlighted Trumptard. That's what lost me. Not your opinion. 

I know.  Trumptard is part of my opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. 

King of the word play.  As always, when you're getting owned, you turn to semantics.  Vindman lost his job (as did his brother) because he did what he was legally obligated to do. He was punished for not lying under oath.  It was Hitler sending a message to his minions that anyone who dares part from the cover ups and crimes that he performs on a daily basis will be punished severely.  But hey, he can still put on his uniform.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him.  Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up.  And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? 😂

He worked for the commander in chief. Not the other way around. That insubordinate weasel should be court marshalled.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Observer said:

King of the word play.  As always, when you're getting owned, you turn to semantics.  Vindman lost his job (as did his brother) because he did what he was legally obligated to do. He was punished for not lying under oath.  It was Hitler sending a message to his minions that anyone who dares part from the cover ups and crimes that he performs on a daily basis will be punished severely.  But hey, he can still put on his uniform.  

Word play. That’s funny. You had zero issue when Obama did it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, drobeski said:

He worked for the commander in chief. Not the other way around. That insubordinate weasel should be court marshalled.

This is where we disagree.  I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said:

So you would rather alienate someone than have them consider your opinion. OK. Gotcha. 

You are way too invested in this buddy.  Take a break.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Observer said:

This is where we disagree.  I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse.

I say vidman did lie. Vidman doesnt set foriegn policy, trump does. He's may have committed treason. We'll need all of his communications with team Schiff and the whistleblower in order to prove his innocence.  Without that, he's clearly guilty of insubordination and maybe treason. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said:

I was trying to have a really conversation with you "Buddy." I won't waist my time again. Adios Newbie. 

waste*

I told you, my opinion is that anyone who is still supporting Trump and defending the corruption is a Trumptard.  Sorry if that offends you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice, another thread derailed by Newbie.  Double bonus, he also has no clue WTF he is talking about..

Rinse/Repeat. Most people would slither off to their corner in shame, not this guy..  Double down on the stupidity.

Dunning-Kruger is the only explanation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Observer said:

waste*

I told you, my opinion is that anyone who is still supporting Trump and defending the corruption is a Trumptard.  Sorry if that offends you. 

Not offended. Just not interested in someone that can't offer an opinion with attacking everyone that you respond to. It invalidates your opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Observer said:

This is where we disagree.  I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse.

“Crime”. No crime was alleged. Good god man, pay attention 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Reality said:

Nice, another thread derailed by Newbie.  Double bonus, he also has no clue WTF he is talking about..

Rinse/Repeat. Most people would slither off to their corner in shame, not this guy..  Double down on the stupidity.

Dunning-Kruger is the only explanation. 

Derailed? I talked about Trump's treatment of a criminal like Stone compared to a purple heart recipient like Vindman. That's derailment?  You need to learn that someone not agreeing with your opinion isn't out to derail.  Debate, offer a counter opinion, or move on. Not that difficult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

“Crime”. No crime was alleged. Good god man, pay attention 

Hey, more word play. Fun fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×