fandandy 3,313 Posted February 20, 2020 Could he do it as soon as they sentence him? Will he? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 I think he will and I think he should. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 No doubt. He punishes those who tell the truth and rewards those who commit crimes for him. He will pardon Stone, Manafort, and Flynn. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,431 Posted February 20, 2020 Trump will pardon him. Perjury, obstruction and witness tampering are only crimes for us laymen. That’s business as usual for DC swamp creatures. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 20, 2020 No fake investigation = no criminal charges. A full pardon is the only rational thing to do. Unless you support gestapo tactics. 2 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,699 Posted February 20, 2020 If he doesn’t get a new trial Trump has no choice. What has happened to Stone should scare all Americans but then most American don’t have a clue about the injustice of this case. 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, Baker Boy said: If he doesn’t get a new trial Trump has no choice. What has happened to Stone should scare all Americans but then most American don’t have a clue about the injustice of this case. You got it wrong. If what happened to Purple Heart recipient Lt Col. Vindman doesn't scare you, you have no clue about authoritative regimes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, The Observer said: You got it wrong. If what happened to Purple Heart recipient Lt Col. Vindman doesn't scare you, you have no clue about authoritative regimes. What happened to him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him. Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up. And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, The Observer said: Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him. Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up. And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? Did Vindman stub his toe on the way to the mess hall or something? I love how guys like you try to prop up these traitors and liars with some collateral statements of virtue. "Career prosecutor with an impeccable record" and all that noise. There was no crime committed by Trump and no coverup of that non-existent crime. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Casual Observer said: Did Vindman stub his toe on the way to the mess hall or something? I love how guys like you try to prop up these traitors and liars with some collateral statements of virtue. "Career prosecutor with an impeccable record" and all that noise. There was no crime committed by Trump and no coverup of that non-existent crime. Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify. And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, The Observer said: Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify. And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. I'm not going off in different directions; you're revealing the limitations of your child-like brain. Vindman should be charged with treason and sedition for this coup attempt. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, The Observer said: Why are you going off in a bunch of different directions? I was talking about the injustice to Lt Col Vindman. He did what an American is legally supposed to do when asked to testify. And it cost him his career. I know it's impossible for you Trumptards to look at anything without your MAGA glasses on, but no one in their right mind would ever think that's acceptable if they didn't know which "team" was which. I was interested in your opinion until this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 6 minutes ago, Casual Observer said: I'm not going off in different directions; you're revealing the limitations of your child-like brain. Vindman should be charged with treason and sedition for this coup attempt. Charged? So you're suggesting he committed a crime? By telling the truth? You are the perfect Trump sheep. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said: I was interested in your opinion until this. That is my opinion. Sorry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,439 Posted February 20, 2020 21 minutes ago, The Observer said: Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him. Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up. And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? He wasn’t fired. He was reassigned. Happens all the time in the military. Obama reassigned people for talking smack to Rolling Stone. You are woefully uninformed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: He wasn’t fired. He was reassigned. Happens all the time in the military. Obama reassigned people for talking smack to Rolling Stone. You are woefully uninformed. So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route? I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,699 Posted February 20, 2020 The fact that the lefties on this board have pivoted from the Stone situation shows they have no answers for the corruption of this case. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,439 Posted February 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, The Observer said: So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route? I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, The Observer said: So you're not taking the 'treason' track, you're going with the 'not fired, reassigned' route? I've seen the sheep go either direction. Too bad Don Jr tweeted that he was fired. Ooops And you are still on the misinformed, liar, track. If you get your facts straight and maybe you'll realize your argument is a joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 9 minutes ago, The Observer said: That is my opinion. Sorry Did you not see I that I highlighted Trumptard. That's what lost me. Not your opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,699 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. Never argue with stupid people, they will only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said: Did you not see I that I highlighted Trumptard. That's what lost me. Not your opinion. I know. Trumptard is part of my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Don Jr. Knows as much about the military as you. Great source. Besides, you get discharged from the military, not fired. Last I checked Vindman can still put on his uniform when it suits him. King of the word play. As always, when you're getting owned, you turn to semantics. Vindman lost his job (as did his brother) because he did what he was legally obligated to do. He was punished for not lying under oath. It was Hitler sending a message to his minions that anyone who dares part from the cover ups and crimes that he performs on a daily basis will be punished severely. But hey, he can still put on his uniform. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2020 Yes he should Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Observer said: I know. Trumptard is part of my opinion. And that is the problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said: And that is the problem. I know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2020 40 minutes ago, The Observer said: Was asked to testify under oath. Told the truth. Which infuriated Der Fuhrer. Who promptly fired him. Yes, a bone spur pussie fired a purple heart recipient because he wouldn't take part in a criminal cover up. And you're worried about poor Roger Stone? He worked for the commander in chief. Not the other way around. That insubordinate weasel should be court marshalled. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,439 Posted February 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, The Observer said: King of the word play. As always, when you're getting owned, you turn to semantics. Vindman lost his job (as did his brother) because he did what he was legally obligated to do. He was punished for not lying under oath. It was Hitler sending a message to his minions that anyone who dares part from the cover ups and crimes that he performs on a daily basis will be punished severely. But hey, he can still put on his uniform. Word play. That’s funny. You had zero issue when Obama did it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, The Observer said: I know. So you would rather alienate someone than have them consider your opinion. OK. Gotcha. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, drobeski said: He worked for the commander in chief. Not the other way around. That insubordinate weasel should be court marshalled. This is where we disagree. I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said: So you would rather alienate someone than have them consider your opinion. OK. Gotcha. You are way too invested in this buddy. Take a break. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, The Observer said: You are way too invested in this buddy. Take a break. I was trying to have a really conversation with you "Buddy." I won't waist my time again. Adios Newbie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, The Observer said: This is where we disagree. I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse. I say vidman did lie. Vidman doesnt set foriegn policy, trump does. He's may have committed treason. We'll need all of his communications with team Schiff and the whistleblower in order to prove his innocence. Without that, he's clearly guilty of insubordination and maybe treason. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt said: I was trying to have a really conversation with you "Buddy." I won't waist my time again. Adios Newbie. waste* I told you, my opinion is that anyone who is still supporting Trump and defending the corruption is a Trumptard. Sorry if that offends you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted February 20, 2020 Nice, another thread derailed by Newbie. Double bonus, he also has no clue WTF he is talking about.. Rinse/Repeat. Most people would slither off to their corner in shame, not this guy.. Double down on the stupidity. Dunning-Kruger is the only explanation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Webtoed Porkbutt 155 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, The Observer said: waste* I told you, my opinion is that anyone who is still supporting Trump and defending the corruption is a Trumptard. Sorry if that offends you. Not offended. Just not interested in someone that can't offer an opinion with attacking everyone that you respond to. It invalidates your opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,439 Posted February 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, The Observer said: This is where we disagree. I left a job once because my boss asked me to lie on tax exempt certificates. You're not obligated to honor crimes just because it's your boss committing them. And had he lied under oath, that would not have been a valid excuse. “Crime”. No crime was alleged. Good god man, pay attention Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, Reality said: Nice, another thread derailed by Newbie. Double bonus, he also has no clue WTF he is talking about.. Rinse/Repeat. Most people would slither off to their corner in shame, not this guy.. Double down on the stupidity. Dunning-Kruger is the only explanation. Derailed? I talked about Trump's treatment of a criminal like Stone compared to a purple heart recipient like Vindman. That's derailment? You need to learn that someone not agreeing with your opinion isn't out to derail. Debate, offer a counter opinion, or move on. Not that difficult. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: “Crime”. No crime was alleged. Good god man, pay attention Hey, more word play. Fun fun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites