Jump to content
Patented Phil

Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He had every right to be there.  The thugs had no right to try and kill him. It’s so easy an effeminate poseur like you can figure it out.  You’re welcome.  

No doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, MDC said:

Rittenhouse wouldn’t have had to defend himself if he didn’t put himself in that situation.

Kyle was a dumb kid. What’s your excuse? 

So Kyle's crime was existing.  Got it you authoritarian bastard.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, MDC said:

Kyle was a dumb kid. What’s your excuse? 

Poor jonmx has obviously lost his marbles :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if a black person goes somewhere he is not supposed to be, it is OK to ambush him and attempt to lynch him...that is where the leftist bastards are. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So Kyle's crime was existing.  Got it you authoritarian bastard.  

Kyle didn’t commit a crime. He made a reckless, stupid decision. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Poor jonmx has obviously lost his marbles :( 

Another pro-lynching dumbfuk. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

Kyle didn’t commit a crime. He made a reckless, stupid decision. 

So you are good with the pedophile and parade of felons chasing Kyle down to kill him?  Because he made a poor choice on where to be?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So you are good with the pedophile and parade of felons chasing Kyle down to kill him?  Because he made a poor choice on where to be?  

No but anyone who thinks he’s a hero is an idiot.

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Another pro-lynching dumbfuk. 

That doesn’t even make sense. You’re not rational, jon :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So you are good with the pedophile and parade of felons chasing Kyle down to kill him?  Because he made a poor choice on where to be?  

“Kyle”? He’s not your friend, buddy :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MDC said:

Kyle didn’t commit a crime. He made a reckless, stupid decision. 

Exactly, he didn't deserve to be killed because of it and had the right to defend himself at that point in time, but it was a stupid decision to put himself in that point in time and be there in the first place.   You know, just like damn near everybody else who was there at that time.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

“Kyle”? He’s not your friend, buddy :( 

That's Mr. Rittenhouse to you.  Give the hero the respect he deserves! ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

That doesn’t even make sense. You’re not rational, jon :( 

He called me a racist and revised it to authoritarian. Dude is having a spasm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

He called me a racist and revised it to authoritarian. Dude is having a spasm.

He keeps forgetting the "bootlicking" in his dumb rants.  Sad.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MDC said:

He called me a racist and revised it to authoritarian. Dude is having a spasm.

Bigot would have been the appropriate term.  You guys are good with lynching of people you disagree with. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

He keeps forgetting the "bootlicking" in his dumb rants.  Sad.  

Only when it is appropriate.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonmx said:

Bigot would have been the appropriate term.  You guys are good with lynching of people you disagree with. 

🤡 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st the leftist bastards wanted Kyle killed by a mob of thugs.

Then the leftist bastards wanted him wrongfully convicted of murder.

Now the leftist bastards want to make Kyle's life hell with an endless parade of frivolous Soros-funded lawsuits.

All for the crime of a teenage kid doing something they think was stupid.  

You really can't make up how purely evil the modern leftist agenda is. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jonmx said:

1st the leftist bastards wanted Kyle killed by a mob of thugs.

Then the leftist bastards wanted him wrongfully convicted of murder.

Now the leftist bastards want to make Kyle's life hell with an endless parade of frivolous Soros-funded lawsuits.

All for the crime of a teenage kid doing something they think was stupid.  

You really can't make up how purely evil the modern leftist agenda is. 

Are the leftist bastards in the room with you right now? :unsure: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

Are the leftist bastards in the room with you right now? :unsure: 

Anyone cheerleading the murder trial or these lawsuits against Kyle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MDC said:

Are the leftist bastards in the room with you right now? :unsure: 

The ones in his haid :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonmx said:

You don't care one bit that they unjustifiable tried to murder Rittenhouse.   It was a lynching and you don't fuking care.  You thought the Rittenhouse had it coming and you wanted him railroaded into jail on fake charges.   

It’s always a little annoying when you keep telling me what I think. I don’t like the kid, think that he had no business being there, and also think that he MIGHT have been guilty of murder (we will never know). But I also wrote at the time that had I been on the jury I would have been forced to acquit him. Apparently you’ve forgotten that. I would have been forced to acquit because I had no idea what actually happened. Unlike you who swallowed everything you were told by this kid and the right wing media as gospel. You spent your time calling him Kyle- really nauseating. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Bigot would have been the appropriate term.  You guys are good with lynching of people you disagree with. 

Also your use of the word lynching, much like your Nazi analogies, is really offensive. You obviously have no sense of history or you would never do this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Also your use of the word lynching, much like your Nazi analogies, is really offensive. You obviously have no sense of history or you would never do this. 

LYNCH....(of a mob) kill (someone), especially by hanging, for an alleged offense with or without a legal trial.

it was an attempted lynching.  They were trying to kill Kyle without any trial.  

and whether the biases was political or racial, makes no difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t like the kid, think that he had no business being there

This is dumb. Who had business there? The people breaking the law? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s always a little annoying when you keep telling me what I think. I don’t like the kid, think that he had no business being there, and also think that he MIGHT have been guilty of murder (we will never know). But I also wrote at the time that had I been on the jury I would have been forced to acquit him. Apparently you’ve forgotten that. I would have been forced to acquit because I had no idea what actually happened. Unlike you who swallowed everything you were told by this kid and the right wing media as gospel. You spent your time calling him Kyle- really nauseating. 

It took 30 seconds of watching the tape to realize it was a slam-dunk case of self-defense.   It was an abuse of power to charge someone who was clearly innocent.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Reality said:

This is dumb. Who had business there? The people breaking the law? :wacko:

Nobody had business being there. Get it?

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MDC said:

Nobody had business being there. Get it?

So why was Kyle charged when he was the one who was clearly attacked?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s always a little annoying when you keep telling me what I think. I don’t like the kid, think that he had no business being there, and also think that he MIGHT have been guilty of murder (we will never know). But I also wrote at the time that had I been on the jury I would have been forced to acquit him. Apparently you’ve forgotten that. I would have been forced to acquit because I had no idea what actually happened. Unlike you who swallowed everything you were told by this kid and the right wing media as gospel. You spent your time calling him Kyle- really nauseating. 

What do you mean we will never know? He was found not guilty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What do you mean we will never know? He was found not guilty. 

It was the most videoed self-defense case in history.   There was never a case that could have succeeded unless they loaded the jury with brain-dead authoritarian leftists who want to kill conservatives (about 25 percent of the population).

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

 I would have been forced to acquit because I had no idea what actually happened. Unlike you who swallowed everything you were told by this kid and the right wing media as gospel. You spent your time calling him Kyle- really nauseating. 

What don't we know????

 

1.  We saw video of Rosenbaum threatening to kill the armed defenders (including Kyle) if he ever saw them alone.

2.  We saw Rosenbaum and Joshua Ziminski and wife paling around together that evening.

3.  We saw Rosenbaum and Ziminskis run ahead and set up an ambush when they saw Kyle walking alone.

4.  We saw Ms. Ziminski on video cut off Kyle and steer him right into Joshua Ziminski who was holding a pistol in his hand.

5.  We saw Kyle stop and the Rosenbaum sneaking up behind Kyle in an attempt to tackle him and beat his arse and probably kill him.

6.  We saw Kyle duck out of the way and take off running for his life.

7.  We saw Rosenbaum go in hot pursuit of Kyle and then Ziminski fire his pistol.  

8.  We saw Kyle turn around as he was running into a crowd of cars with Rosenbaum lunging towards him screaming 'fuk you'.  

9.  We saw Kyle shooting Rosenbaum microseconds before he was able to grab his gun.  

This wasn't some rightwing media you fuking moron.  This was all shown at trial and was on tape and reported by witnesses who were right there.   What more could we possibly need to know.   Just GTFO.  You watched nothing but the leftist propaganda and still don't know sh1t about this case.  There wasn't one shred of evidence which suggested this was not self-defense.   

You are so fuking brainwashed by the media it is not funny.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, HellToupee said:

You must not have a lot going on in your life to be such an ugly hateful person

Oh, the irony!

I'm not the hateful person who dozens of times has called Latinos "Bad Hombres" (that is you amigo).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, squistion said:

Oh, the irony!

I'm not the hateful person who dozens of times has called Latinos "Bad Hombres" (that is you amigo).

Oh yes, you are an ugly and hateful person.  Make no mistake:  You aren't the virtuous person you think you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonmx said:

So why was Kyle charged when he was the one who was clearly attacked?  

Actions tend to get more scrutiny when they result in 2 dead. Hundreds of rioters were charged in Kenosha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MDC said:

Rittenhouse wouldn’t have had to defend himself if he didn’t put himself in that situation.

Who's dumb enough to chase & attack someone with an AR-15? That's why they got shot, say it Narc Boy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Who's dumb enough to chase & attack someone with an AR-15? That's why they got shot, say it Narc Boy. 

MDC reported someone again? Not surprising. He does that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, MDC said:

Actions tend to get more scrutiny when they result in 2 dead. Hundreds of rioters were charged in Kenosha.

It was all on videotape.  Convicted felon Gaige Grosskreutz was not only part of the mob attacking Rittenhouse, he had an illegal firearm pointed at Rittenhouse when he got shot.  Grosskreutz was in the process of shooting Rittenhouse, but backed of as Kyle pointed his gun at him.  Kyle then disengage as Grosskreutz backed off, but then Grosskreutz went back to raising his gun towards Rittenhouse who reacted bt shooting Grosskreutz before he could get his shot off.  It was a perfect case of self-defense against an attempted murder by Grosskreutz.  The leftist nut prosecutor charged the wrong guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonmx said:

It was all on videotape.  Convicted felon Gaige Grosskreutz was not only part of the mob attacking Rittenhouse, he had an illegal firearm pointed at Rittenhouse when he got shot.  Grosskreutz was in the process of shooting Rittenhouse, but backed of as Kyle pointed his gun at him.  Kyle then disengage as Grosskreutz backed off, but then Grosskreutz went back to raising his gun towards Rittenhouse who reacted bt shooting Grosskreutz before he could get his shot off.  It was a perfect case of self-defense against an attempted murder by Grosskreutz.  The leftist nut prosecutor charged the wrong guy. 

Did I defend anyone attacking Rittenhouse? You’re arguing with voices in your head. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

Did I defend anyone attacking Rittenhouse? You’re arguing with voices in your head. 

I never said you did.  But you were defending the leftwing kook prosecutor for bringing the charges against Kyle.  I documented why Kyle should not have been charged, but Grosskreitz should have been.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×