[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

For starters, how about the Jan 6 insurrection and attempted coup.

And I'll add the "voter fraud" in the 2020 election that was never proven.

Or just go with the latest, watching "Sound of Freedom" will help trafficked children. 

[League Champion 1,896]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

Or just go with the latest, watching "Sound of Freedom" will help trafficked children. 

Or just keep them away from you 

[seafoam1 2,815]

51 minutes ago, nobody said:

If you think J6 was a coup or an insurrection, you're brainwashed.

If you think that Biden hasn't been on the take for years, you definitely are brainwashed

If you think there is systemic racism keeping minorities oppressed, you're brainwashed

If you think cops are systemically killing unarmed black men, you are brainwashed

If you think there is systematic grooming of children to be sexual deviants, your brainwashed.  People are just bad at parenting.

If you think Trump won the 2020 election, you're brainwashed 

If you think covid didn't exist or vaccines didn't save lives, you're brainwashed

If you believe Trump colluded with Russia, you're brainwashed

If you think Putin is a good guy, you're brainwashed

So..."If you don't think like I think...your brainwashed" is your message here. 

[nobody 2,578]

49 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You and Hawkeye are the biggest fake "centrist" NPCs on this site. 

I don't claim to be a centrist.

I think the economy is the most important issue and people who elevate any issue above that are dumb.

I don't care about abortion

I thought masks were stupid

I think if people don't want a vax, coercion to get one is criminal

I don't think it's appropriate to talk about sexual topics with kids until maybe they're at least 15 so I don't think drag story time and all the gender crap being applied to young kids is criminal.

I voted for trump last election even though I think Trump is a poor leader and is a short term, shallow thinker

I think Biden is a worse leader and is even more corrupt and has clearly been taking bribes

I think systemic racism doesn't exist

I think the J6 stuff didn't rise to the level of the BLM protests and the consequences of both should be applied evenly

I think we should close the border

I think we should've funded Ukraine against Russia, but now that Russia knows they have no shot in a fight against NATO, mission is accomplished, and we should look for an off ramp ASAP.

I vote for republicans almost exclusively

What am I?  I'd say I'm more red team than blue.  But the main team I'm on is the stupid people suck team, and your so very stupid.

 

 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

48 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

 I'm only 10% brainwashed

25% brainwashed 

[squistion 1,969]

1 hour ago, Ultra Max Power said:

Kamala Harris promoted donating to the Minnesota Freedom Fund during the riots.  That fund was openly used to bail out rioters of the BLM protests.  Multiple Biden staffers contributed to the fund as well.  

That was not the intent, which was to bail out those jailed for participating in peaceful protesting not those engaged in rioting, burning and looting. A few rioters may have been bailed out, but if so, it was later acknowledged that it was a mistake.

[seafoam1 2,815]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

That was not the intent, which was to bail out those jailed for participating in peaceful protesting not those engaged in rioting, burning and looting. A few rioters may have been bailed out, but if so, it was later acknowledged that it was a mistake.

You should apply for a job at CNN. 

[squistion 1,969]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You should apply for a job at CNN. 

I know what I've read about the bail fund and it was not created to bail out those participating in the riots (that was not Harris and others thought they were donating their money to). 

[seafoam1 2,815]

Just now, squistion said:

I know what I've read about the bail fund and it was not created to bail out those participating in the riots (that was not Harris and others thought they were donating their money to). 

That should help.get you through.your first interview. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

14 minutes ago, squistion said:

That was not the intent, which was to bail out those jailed for participating in peaceful protesting not those engaged in rioting, burning and looting. A few rioters may have been bailed out, but if so, it was later acknowledged that it was a mistake.

Money was redirected from BLM to Act Blue. Act blue=DNC. 

[RLLD 4,145]

 

OK, I am NOT a fan of Hannity.....at all.... that being said, he lays out some of the key elements the DOJ worked rather hard to hide, and the content is indictative as to why they hid it. 

[RLLD 4,145]

 

So they have information from within that company(Burisma?) asserting that Hunter was hired exclusively to leverage Joe to get after the prosecutor who Biden used USA funds to push for removal.  And they have payments showing up in Biden accounts the week after Biden had the prosecutor removed.....

[seafoam1 2,815]

12 minutes ago, RLLD said:

 

So they have information from within that company(Burisma?) asserting that Hunter was hired exclusively to leverage Joe to get after the prosecutor who Biden used USA funds to push for removal.  And they have payments showing up in Biden accounts the week after Biden had the prosecutor removed.....

"You're not gettin the million dollars unless you fire the prosecutor." 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

it was not created to bail out those participating in the riots 

But that's exactly what it was used for, that's problematic in itself. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

Briben

[dogcows 1,030]

37 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So they have information from within that company(Burisma?) asserting that Hunter was hired exclusively to leverage Joe to get after the prosecutor who Biden used USA funds to push for removal.  And they have payments showing up in Biden accounts the week after Biden had the prosecutor removed.....

This is the same unsupported allegation of 17 supposed recordings they trotted out over a month ago. This clown show has already moved onto reruns.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/burisma-owner-17-records-joe-hunter-biden-grassley-fbi

Will this be a pattern going forward? Announce the existence of sketchy unsupported intel, then wait a month and release it? That’s one way to make this nothingburger last longer.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

This is the same unsupported allegation of 17 supposed recordings they trotted out over a month ago. This clown show has already moved onto reruns.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/burisma-owner-17-records-joe-hunter-biden-grassley-fbi

Will this be a pattern going forward? Announce the existence of sketchy unsupported intel, then wait a month and release it? That’s one way to make this nothingburger last longer.

It’s all unfounded. Nothing here. Dammit. Back to the drawing board. Biden shitt his pants and has a d groceries are too expensive.  

[RLLD 4,145]

10 minutes ago, dogcows said:

This is the same unsupported allegation of 17 supposed recordings they trotted out over a month ago. This clown show has already moved onto reruns.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/burisma-owner-17-records-joe-hunter-biden-grassley-fbi

Will this be a pattern going forward? Announce the existence of sketchy unsupported intel, then wait a month and release it? That’s one way to make this nothingburger last longer.

It could be a pattern, you have just described the gambits used against Trump.  So if it turns out to be true that Republicans are simply returning the favor in kind then that is a big problem. I hope they are not simpy mirroring Democrat actions, and frankly....I cannot say they are not doing this.  Politics is the suck, and these people...all of them, should not be trusted.

The only things that suggest it is real are the accounts of the whistleblowers, the texts from Hunter Biden and then the bank account transactions. I think the desire of the FBI to hide these internal Burisma content, and notably to not suggest it is not true, indicate they believe there is veracity to these assertions by these Burisma execs.

There is certainly as much, and would assert MORE, information and evidence available than the Dems had on the first fake impeachment.

Now, I am so far gratified that the Republicans are at least not being as reckless as the Democrats in pointlessly pursuing impeachment.

[dogcows 1,030]

12 minutes ago, RLLD said:

It could be a pattern, you have just described the gambits used against Trump.  So if it turns out to be true that Republicans are simply returning the favor in kind then that is a big problem. I hope they are not simpy mirroring Democrat actions, and frankly....I cannot say they are not doing this.  Politics is the suck, and these people...all of them, should not be trusted.

The only things that suggest it is real are the accounts of the whistleblowers, the texts from Hunter Biden and then the bank account transactions. I think the desire of the FBI to hide these internal Burisma content, and notably to not suggest it is not true, indicate they believe there is veracity to these assertions by these Burisma execs.

There is certainly as much, and would assert MORE, information and evidence available than the Dems had on the first fake impeachment.

Now, I am so far gratified that the Republicans are at least not being as reckless as the Democrats in pointlessly pursuing impeachment.

Were you one of those who thought the X-Files were real back in the day?

Also, you do recall that the Mueller Report was commissioned by a Republican AG, not a Democrat, right? 

And if there is MUCH more evidence, why are they slow-rolling the release of it? Get real. They didn’t have any real evidence, so they had the genius idea to dig up unverified intel reports that never amounted to anything because they turned out not to have any actual intel in them. Conspiracy theorists might buy this ploy (and they seem to be), but the FBI wouldn’t just leave good leads unfollowed. And so far, these FD-1023’s bear that out. None of this stuff leads anywhere.

 

PS - the “‘texts” from Hunter Biden actually aren’t real. Look it up.

[RLLD 4,145]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Were you one of those who thought the X-Files were real back in the day?

Also, you do recall that the Mueller Report was commissioned by a Republican AG, not a Democrat, right? 

And if there is MUCH more evidence, why are they slow-rolling the release of it? Get real. They didn’t have any real evidence, so they had the genius idea to dig up unverified intel reports that never amounted to anything because they turned out not to have any actual intel in them. Conspiracy theorists might buy this ploy (and they seem to be), but the FBI wouldn’t just leave good leads unfollowed. And so far, these FD-1023’s bear that out. None of this stuff leads anywhere.

I might ask you to reconsider even the oblique ad hominem here.   This tactic of suggesting people are crazy or conspiracy theorists has not really panned out well.  Time and again, the people who have been on the receiving end of this tactic have been proven to be correct.  And further, please self reflect on what it says about you when you claim something is so "out there" that you label it crazy, and then later its proven true.....that the people you seek to defend.....are so corrupt that their behaviors, later proven true, initially strike you as too crazy to be real....  

Now.  The DOJ is a profound impediment to all this.  Their behavior suggests a rather active, and admittedly effective, protection of the Biden family.  My biggest fear, right now, is the assignment of a special prosecutor.  The FBI has been using the investigative doctrine in a manner to pointedly protect the Bidens.  Once they assign a special prosecutor it is reasonable to expect that Merrick Garland will leverage it to silence any additional information for us.... he will then "investigate" as long as possible to defend the president from any accountability.

I will restate here, and I ask you to answer honestly......switch this scenerio to Trump and Don jr........would you still be defending THEM?

[dogcows 1,030]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

I might ask you to reconsider even the oblique ad hominem here.   This tactic of suggesting people are crazy or conspiracy theorists has not really panned out well.  Time and again, the people who have been on the receiving end of this tactic have been proven to be correct.  And further, please self reflect on what it says about you when you claim something is so "out there" that you label it crazy, and then later its proven true.....that the people you seek to defend.....are so corrupt that their behaviors, later proven true, initially strike you as too crazy to be real....  

Now.  The DOJ is a profound impediment to all this.  Their behavior suggests a rather active, and admittedly effective, protection of the Biden family.  My biggest fear, right now, is the assignment of a special prosecutor.  The FBI has been using the investigative doctrine in a manner to pointedly protect the Bidens.  Once they assign a special prosecutor it is reasonable to expect that Merrick Garland will leverage it to silence any additional information for us.... he will then "investigate" as long as possible to defend the president from any accountability.

I will restate here, and I ask you to answer honestly......switch this scenerio to Trump and Don jr........would you still be defending THEM?

Yes, these allegations are crazy. The GOP is appealing to the lowest common denominator, rubes who will buy literally anything as long as the message is “BIDEN BAD”. 

Good to see you went even crazier, stating that the entire DOJ is part of a conspiracy to violate their oath to the constitution and defend Joe despite supposedly knowing he committed crimes. Wow, ok. How many people are in on this conspiracy? What do they get out of it? What evidence do you have of this conspiracy? What evidence are they hiding? Who faked the moon landing? What’s really in the middle of a Twinkie?

As for Donald’s spawn, I don’t give the slightest shite what they do or don’t do. If Dems in Congress were stupid enough to chase them around with false accusations like this clown show, I’d sure as hell want them to stop. I don’t want crazy nut-bags flashing porn pics of the president’s kids in the halls of Congress. It’s an utter clown show. 

[seafoam1 2,815]

4 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Yes, these allegations are crazy. The GOP is appealing to the lowest common denominator, rubes who will buy literally anything as long as the message is “BIDEN BAD”. 

Good to see you went even crazier, stating that the entire DOJ is part of a conspiracy to violate their oath to the constitution and defend Joe despite supposedly knowing he committed crimes. Wow, ok. How many people are in on this conspiracy? What do they get out of it? What evidence do you have of this conspiracy? What evidence are they hiding? Who faked the moon landing? What’s really in the middle of a Twinkie?

As for Donald’s spawn, I don’t give the slightest shite what they do or don’t do. If Dems in Congress were stupid enough to chase them around with false accusations like this clown show, I’d sure as hell want them to stop. I don’t want crazy nut-bags flashing porn pics of the president’s kids in the halls of Congress. It’s an utter clown show. 

TRUMP!!! 

TDS must hurt. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

“Appointed by a republican”!  STFU. Seriously.   

[RLLD 4,145]

2 hours ago, dogcows said:

Yes, these allegations are crazy. The GOP is appealing to the lowest common denominator, rubes who will buy literally anything as long as the message is “BIDEN BAD”. 

Good to see you went even crazier, stating that the entire DOJ is part of a conspiracy to violate their oath to the constitution and defend Joe despite supposedly knowing he committed crimes. Wow, ok. How many people are in on this conspiracy? What do they get out of it? What evidence do you have of this conspiracy? What evidence are they hiding? Who faked the moon landing? What’s really in the middle of a Twinkie?

As for Donald’s spawn, I don’t give the slightest shite what they do or don’t do. If Dems in Congress were stupid enough to chase them around with false accusations like this clown show, I’d sure as hell want them to stop. I don’t want crazy nut-bags flashing porn pics of the president’s kids in the halls of Congress. It’s an utter clown show. 

Of course they are "crazy" right now, and as with past examples that came true, it might be the case that your portrayal for this one does not age well.  Rather than viewing this through the prism of your bias, your hatred of Trump is not equitable to others when they seek to hold Biden accountable.   We should not be painted with a brush based on how YOU act. 

And yes, the DOJ is clearly not behaving well.  That should concern all of us. And if it later arises that they can be proven to have been improper in actions toward a Democrat, its.....still....wrong....

So rather than pretend everyone else, notably me, thinks with the same kind of hatred and bias as you.  Please allow that I am simply pointing out a clear problem.

Now.....if it becomes clear that the Republicans are just doing the same illicit stuff the Democrats did....and i allow that it is absolutely plausible that they could be....that are all politicians after all.  Then we can codemn THEM together.  Because, unlike you, I am not bound in my stance by political ideology.

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

5 hours ago, RLLD said:

 

So they have information from within that company(Burisma?) asserting that Hunter was hired exclusively to leverage Joe to get after the prosecutor who Biden used USA funds to push for removal.  And they have payments showing up in Biden accounts the week after Biden had the prosecutor removed.....

 

Great videos, thanks for sharing. You've always got good insight and something valuable to add in the engagement. 

[dogcows 1,030]

44 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Of course they are "crazy" right now, and as with past examples that came true, it might be the case that your portrayal for this one does not age well.  Rather than viewing this through the prism of your bias, your hatred of Trump is not equitable to others when they seek to hold Biden accountable.   We should not be painted with a brush based on how YOU act. 

And yes, the DOJ is clearly not behaving well.  That should concern all of us. And if it later arises that they can be proven to have been improper in actions toward a Democrat, its.....still....wrong....

So rather than pretend everyone else, notably me, thinks with the same kind of hatred and bias as you.  Please allow that I am simply pointing out a clear problem.

Now.....if it becomes clear that the Republicans are just doing the same illicit stuff the Democrats did....and i allow that it is absolutely plausible that they could be....that are all politicians after all.  Then we can codemn THEM together.  Because, unlike you, I am not bound in my stance by political ideology.

I don’t see how calling out this sham “investigation” by Comer and Jordan is hateful.

I’m unclear on something: how is it that the DOJ is not behaving well?

You aren’t pointing out a clear problem. You are imagining a problem, and hoping someday that evidence will come along to support your imagined problem.

And I’m still confused what illicit stuff you are talking about that the Democrats did. Are you talking about the Republican AG-ordered Mueller report during the Trump presidency?

[dogcows 1,030]

Good reminder here that the Hunter Biden investigation by the DOJ was started under Trump, and that Biden didn’t remove the assigned prosecutor when he took office. He allowed Weiss to finish his work.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Good reminder here that the Hunter Biden investigation by the DOJ was started under Trump, and that Biden didn’t remove the assigned prosecutor when he took office. He allowed Weiss to finish his work.

 

Who does Weiss work for now? Makes me think you may have never had a job. 

[RLLD 4,145]

10 hours ago, dogcows said:

I don’t see how calling out this sham “investigation” by Comer and Jordan is hateful.

I’m unclear on something: how is it that the DOJ is not behaving well?

You aren’t pointing out a clear problem. You are imagining a problem, and hoping someday that evidence will come along to support your imagined problem.

And I’m still confused what illicit stuff you are talking about that the Democrats did. Are you talking about the Republican AG-ordered Mueller report during the Trump presidency?

This investigation is no more of a "sham"than those applied to Trump.  Were this situation to arise and the participants to be the Trump family, my position would be the same.  Your allowance for criminality, depending on your personal political motivations, is where I surmise you and I diverage.  Were this situation applied to Trump, you and I would likely be arm-in-arm.....and you would view me as some kind of ally....though that would not exactly be true, would it?

The evidence shows clear here.  It might not be associated the the right political person for you, but the criminality remains.

[dogcows 1,030]

9 minutes ago, RLLD said:

This investigation is no more of a "sham"than those applied to Trump.  Were this situation to arise and the participants to be the Trump family, my position would be the same.  Your allowance for criminality, depending on your personal political motivations, is where I surmise you and I diverage.  Were this situation applied to Trump, you and I would likely be arm-in-arm.....and you would view me as some kind of ally....though that would not exactly be true, would it?

The evidence shows clear here.  It might not be associated the the right political person for you, but the criminality remains.

You keep putting out hypotheticals. I’m asking you for what evidence you have the DOJ is covering things up, what evidence there is that Joe did something….. and you keep coming up empty. Trying to paper over that by making assumptions about some hypothetical doesn’t cut it.

You keep saying the evidence is clear. It definitely isn’t, and much of it is highly unreliable, some of it actually proven false.

Something that IS clear is that you are presuming guilt until everybody you accuse is proven innocent.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

57 minutes ago, dogcows said:

You keep putting out hypotheticals. I’m asking you for what evidence you have the DOJ is covering things up, what evidence there is that Joe did something….. and you keep coming up empty. Trying to paper over that by making assumptions about some hypothetical doesn’t cut it.

You keep saying the evidence is clear. It definitely isn’t, and much of it is highly unreliable, some of it actually proven false.

Something that IS clear is that you are presuming guilt until everybody you accuse is proven innocent.

Whistleblower testimony isn’t evidence? But the Steel Dossier was? 

[Reality 3,107]

So much smoke, definitely no fire though.

[dogcows 1,030]

5 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Whistleblower testimony isn’t evidence? But the Steel Dossier was? 

TRUMP!

[League Champion 1,896]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

TRUMP!

 

You voted for Joe Biden. A noted Kid groper and racist. 

Save your holier than thou BS for your Pedocrat Friends. 

[RLLD 4,145]

11 hours ago, dogcows said:

You keep putting out hypotheticals. I’m asking you for what evidence you have the DOJ is covering things up, what evidence there is that Joe did something….. and you keep coming up empty. Trying to paper over that by making assumptions about some hypothetical doesn’t cut it.

You keep saying the evidence is clear. It definitely isn’t, and much of it is highly unreliable, some of it actually proven false.

Something that IS clear is that you are presuming guilt until everybody you accuse is proven innocent.

The problem might be that you are not entirely up to date on the information being harvested.   But the factor of most media outlets suppressing it could be part of that reason for this.  

I continue to raise the "hypotheticals" in an earnest desire to help you see your bias, and then perhaps we can talk about the danger of allowing criminality based on political ideology.

I suggest that there is enough evidence to dig more, I am not convicting anyone.....well, perhaps I am somewhat convicting the leadership of the DOJ for their blatant political shikanery. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

5 hours ago, dogcows said:

TRUMP!

Weren’t you asking for evidence? I provided it. I’ll take that as another surrender from you, Frenchy.

[dogcows 1,030]

54 minutes ago, RLLD said:

The problem might be that you are not entirely up to date on the information being harvested.   But the factor of most media outlets suppressing it could be part of that reason for this.  

I continue to raise the "hypotheticals" in an earnest desire to help you see your bias, and then perhaps we can talk about the danger of allowing criminality based on political ideology.

I suggest that there is enough evidence to dig more, I am not convicting anyone.....well, perhaps I am somewhat convicting the leadership of the DOJ for their blatant political shikanery. 

I’ve been keeping up with the hearings and so far there is nothing tying Joe to any criminal conduct or foreign quid pro quos. And I’m actually pretty impressed by the DOJ. The FD-1023’s that they failed to investigate further? Yeah, it’s because there’s nothing to find. The GOP digging this stuff up, then coming up empty… just shows us the DOJ has done a good job pursuing real leads instead of wasting time and money on dead ends.

If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to toss a few links my way. 

[seafoam1 2,815]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

I’ve been keeping up with the hearings and so far there is nothing tying Joe to any criminal conduct or foreign quid pro quos. And I’m actually pretty impressed by the DOJ. The FD-1023’s that they failed to investigate further? Yeah, it’s because there’s nothing to find. The GOP digging this stuff up, then coming up empty… just shows us the DOJ has done a good job pursuing real leads instead of wasting time and money on dead ends.

If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to toss a few links my way. 

 What a focking stooge. 

[RLLD 4,145]

2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I’ve been keeping up with the hearings and so far there is nothing tying Joe to any criminal conduct or foreign quid pro quos. And I’m actually pretty impressed by the DOJ. The FD-1023’s that they failed to investigate further? Yeah, it’s because there’s nothing to find. The GOP digging this stuff up, then coming up empty… just shows us the DOJ has done a good job pursuing real leads instead of wasting time and money on dead ends.

If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to toss a few links my way. 

 So then, I ask again, and I truly want an answer this time.   If this evidence.....pointed instead toward Trump and his son, you would also then suggest there is nothing worth pursuing?  Please answer this. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,966]

3 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I’ve been keeping up with the hearings and so far there is nothing tying Joe to any criminal conduct or foreign quid pro quos. And I’m actually pretty impressed by the DOJ. The FD-1023’s that they failed to investigate further? Yeah, it’s because there’s nothing to find. The GOP digging this stuff up, then coming up empty… just shows us the DOJ has done a good job pursuing real leads instead of wasting time and money on dead ends.

If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to toss a few links my way. 

If the 1023 contained nothing then why can’t all of congress see it? Why is it confidential?