[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[Wade Garrett 155]

20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That 2.19 a gallon of gas was quite a burden Trump left for Pedo Pete.  

Yea, the crushed economy, tens of millions jobless, negative GDP, and negative price for a barrel of oil agree boyo.

Try to be less stupid boyo. 

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

You really don't know what you are talking about.

About what a joke you are? I think I’m pretty well educated on that subject. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

You really don't know what you are talking about.

Serious question.  Are you retarded?  You come across as bigly retarded. 

[seafoam1 2,797]

Just now, Wade Garrett said:

Serious question.  Are you retarded?  You come across as bigly retarded. 

 

[Wade Garrett 155]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

 

So that's a yes...LOLOLOLOL

Outing yourself as a retard is no way to go through life boyo.

SAD

[seafoam1 2,797]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

So that's a yes...LOLOLOLOL

Outing yourself as a retard is no way to go through life boyo.

SAD

"boyo" 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,906]

Remember that time Trump sanctioned Putins pipeline and then Biden lifted the sanction?  That was awesome 

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

"boyo" 

Hey you spelled it correctly!

Well done boyo!  You're not the 100% moron that everyone here thinks you are!

That'd be Blue Moron...LOL at him. 

buriful. 

[seafoam1 2,797]

2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Hey you spelled it correctly!

Well done boyo!  You're not the 100% moron that everyone here thinks you are!

That'd be Blue Moron...LOL at him. 

buriful. 

"boyo". 

 

[Strike 5,182]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

A fan is not the same as confident she’d win. I wasn’t confident at all despite what Strike thinks. I was nervous all summer. I never predicted Trump would win but I was scared he would. I thought he had like a 30-35% chance which was way higher than most pundits thought. And that made me really nervous. 

The PSF is still there.   I'm sure you can post a link to one of your posts suggesting you thought Trump had a good chance of winning.  TIA.

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

The PSF is still there.   I'm sure you can post a link to one of your posts suggesting you thought Trump had a good chance of winning.  TIA.

I don’t go looking through old posts. Ask @RogerDodger to do it. I don’t give a crap if you believe me or not. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t go looking through old posts. Ask @RogerDodger to do it. I don’t give a crap if you believe me or not. 

If you're looking for advice on how to be the best bottom you can be, gay boi @RogerDodger is your gal.

LOLOLOLOLOL

[Strike 5,182]

51 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t go looking through old posts. Ask @RogerDodger to do it. I don’t give a crap if you believe me or not. 

Can't find something that doesn't exist.  As I thought. 

[seafoam1 2,797]

58 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

If you're looking for advice on how to be the best bottom you can be, gay boi @RogerDodger is your gal.

LOLOLOLOLOL

"boi". 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,691]

1 hour ago, Wade Garrett said:

If you're looking for advice on how to be the best bottom you can be, gay boi @RogerDodger is your gal.

LOLOLOLOLOL

Careful boyo.  You can’t use gay comments or your teammates may ban you again.  They are very sensitive.  

[RLLD 4,143]

23 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Agree, and neither have much if anything to do with stealing the election

Oh I see, you are attempting a correlation, gotcha.  Well I submit that the zeal associated with lockdowns and remote ballets was a strategic move on the part of Democrats to tilt the election in their favor, and I think it worked.  Now, we see them doing it again, this time through the abuse of the DOJ to take down their main political opponent. 

Now I already understand YOU will not accept or see this......until the Republicans do it to YOUR folks....and then you come find me, and we can oppose that together.....because it will still be wrong.  

[RLLD 4,143]

16 hours ago, Reality said:

It's just setting the stage to get the ball rolling again, blasting out mail in ballots etc. 

Ya know, exactly like what happened last time.

This isn't rocket surgery, our local liberal dipshlts playing dumb, it's expected at this point.

If they are considering weaponizing the virus through fear again, to me that suggests they are concerned that Trump could still be able to run and their DOJ gestapo wont be able to get rid of him prior to the election.  Man, I hope they do not turn to the Clintons for help on this....we know very well how they deal with people they want gone...

[TimHauck 2,598]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Oh I see, you are attempting a correlation, gotcha.  Well I submit that the zeal associated with lockdowns and remote ballets was a strategic move on the part of Democrats to tilt the election in their favor, and I think it worked.  Now, we see them doing it again, this time through the abuse of the DOJ to take down their main political opponent. 

Now I already understand YOU will not accept or see this......until the Republicans do it to YOUR folks....and then you come find me, and we can oppose that together.....because it will still be wrong.  

I’m not “attempting” a correlation, I’m refuting one that was previously proposed.

Why did remote ballots tilt the election in their favor?  Because of fraud or merely because it enabled people to vote that may not have otherwise?  If the latter, I’d consider that a good thing.

I personally think it’s stupid that they’re trying to take down Trump, as he’s the candidate that Biden has the best chance to beat, and probably would beat IMO.

[RLLD 4,143]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m not “attempting” a correlation, I’m refuting one that was previously proposed.

Why did remote ballots tilt the election in their favor?  Because of fraud or merely because it enabled people to vote that may not have otherwise?  If the latter, I’d consider that a good thing.

I personally think it’s stupid that they’re trying to take down Trump, as he’s the candidate that Biden has the best chance to beat, and probably would beat IMO.

I am less concerned about the remote ballets, because I think they can both cheat. And in fact I recall that Republicans were caught cheating with this tactic in the past, if memory serves.  That is a key reason I know it can and does happen, so if I see any politician (irrespective of party) pointing toward remote balloting as a great way to go....I am already on high alert.

Now the weaponization of the DOJ is a seperate matter. Ask yourself...what if Trump wins....and rebuilds the FBI and then all the sudded Democrats are targeted, indicted and prosecuted.....THAT IS IS STILL A PROBLEM.    We have to stand up to this, whether something wrong benefits us or not. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

6 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am less concerned about the remote ballets, because I think they can both cheat. And in fact I recall that Republicans were caught cheating with this tactic in the past, if memory serves.  That is a key reason I know it can and does happen, so if I see any politician (irrespective of party) pointing toward remote balloting as a great way to go....I am already on high alert.

Now the weaponization of the DOJ is a seperate matter. Ask yourself...what if Trump wins....and rebuilds the FBI and then all the sudded Democrats are targeted, indicted and prosecuted.....THAT IS IS STILL A PROBLEM.    We have to stand up to this, whether something wrong benefits us or not. 

If the democrats commit crimes at the same level as Trump, bring on the indictments.

That's the difference between us.  I don't automatically assume that the DOJ is weaponized by my guy was charged with crimes.

Try using logic and reason once in a while boyo. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

17 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

A fan is not the same as confident she’d win. I wasn’t confident at all despite what Strike thinks. I was nervous all summer. I never predicted Trump would win but I was scared he would. I thought he had like a 30-35% chance which was way higher than most pundits thought. And that made me really nervous. 

“Yeah he's clearly hoping for a Trump victory, as are a few other disgruntled Bernie fans. But they're few and far between and it's not going to happen. 

What people are going to be talking about Tuesday night and Wednesday morning is how much the polls underestimated Latino turnout. I predict it's going to be huge, and that Hillary is going to win Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Florida, and lose Texas by a much closer margin than any previous recent Democratic candidate. I think the Republican Party is about to be punished bigly for choosing Trump, and ignoring the 2012 autopsy. 

And yeah, I've been wrong many times in this election cycle, and right a few times as well, but mark this one down; I'm feeling good about it.”

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/official-hillary-clinton-2016-thread.721079/post-19575866

[RLLD 4,143]

7 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

If the democrats commit crimes at the same level as Trump, bring on the indictments.

That's the difference between us.  I don't automatically assume that the DOJ is weaponized by my guy was charged with crimes.

Try using logic and reason once in a while boyo. 

No the difference between us is that I see the corruption, and understand how and why it is wrong.  And that I would not support that corruption regardless of participants.....

[Wade Garrett 155]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

No the difference between us is that I see the corruption, and understand how and why it is wrong.  And that I would not support that corruption regardless of participants.....

Of course you only see the corruption when it's your side.

You didn't say boo when Hillary was dragged through the mud for Bhenghazi for years.

I'm onto you boyo and I'll do my best to aware all the others here.

You are a bad faith debater. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am less concerned about the remote ballets, because I think they can both cheat. And in fact I recall that Republicans were caught cheating with this tactic in the past, if memory serves.  That is a key reason I know it can and does happen, so if I see any politician (irrespective of party) pointing toward remote balloting as a great way to go....I am already on high alert.

Now the weaponization of the DOJ is a seperate matter. Ask yourself...what if Trump wins....and rebuilds the FBI and then all the sudded Democrats are targeted, indicted and prosecuted.....THAT IS IS STILL A PROBLEM.    We have to stand up to this, whether something wrong benefits us or not. 

Ballot harvesting systems fundamentally favors urban democrat party machines. It’s a lot easier to ballot harvest an apartment block than it is to drive back roads.

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

Of course you only see the corruption when it's your side.

You didn't say boo when Hillary was dragged through the mud for Bhenghazi for years.

I'm onto you boyo and I'll do my best to aware all the others here.

You are a bad faith debater. 

Yoiur lying and misrepresentation of me wont get you far. In many previous posts the lie to attempt to apply to me above has already been refuted.  You are not someone who discusses topics in gooth faith. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,906]

If we have to lockdown again, will we still be able to go to Social justice protests but not church? 

[Wade Garrett 155]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Yoiur lying and misrepresentation of me wont get you far. In many previous posts the lie to attempt to apply to me above has already been refuted.  You are not someone who discusses topics in gooth faith. 

Please give me an example when you've called out conservative corruption...oh that's right you can't.

You're a liar.  You're not a serious person.

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

7 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

“Yeah he's clearly hoping for a Trump victory, as are a few other disgruntled Bernie fans. But they're few and far between and it's not going to happen. 

What people are going to be talking about Tuesday night and Wednesday morning is how much the polls underestimated Latino turnout. I predict it's going to be huge, and that Hillary is going to win Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Florida, and lose Texas by a much closer margin than any previous recent Democratic candidate. I think the Republican Party is about to be punished bigly for choosing Trump, and ignoring the 2012 autopsy. 

And yeah, I've been wrong many times in this election cycle, and right a few times as well, but mark this one down; I'm feeling good about it.”

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/official-hillary-clinton-2016-thread.721079/post-19575866

Yep I was pretty mercurial about my thoughts that summer. If I wanted to go back I could find posts where I expressed a lot of concern about Trump winning- but ai don’t want to go back. 

I want to go forward. My position is that Trump is very unlikely to win this time around because (a) he is a known commodity, unlike 2016, amd he is firmly disliked by around 60% of the public and (b) because the abortion issue is hurting Republican support in battleground states. There are other reasons as well but these are the two main ones. 

Do you agree with analysis? If you disagree, how come? 

[RLLD 4,143]

2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Please give me an example when you've called out conservative corruption...oh that's right you can't.

You're a liar.  You're not a serious person.

I am not your research assistant, and you are apparently either too lazy to support your false claims or perhaps lying now to yourself. But there are examples, from the abuse of SCOTUS appointments, to impeachment and on and on....they are all readily available. But instead you leverage your bias and then lie to build a false narrative.

That you continue to lie when caught is particularly concerning.

[Wade Garrett 155]

9 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am not your research assistant, and you are apparently either too lazy to support your false claims or perhaps lying now to yourself. But there are examples, from the abuse of SCOTUS appointments, to impeachment and on and on....they are all readily available. But instead you leverage your bias and then lie to build a false narrative.

That you continue to lie when caught is particularly concerning.

Please post an example of you calling out conservative corruption and I will acknowledge I'm wrong.

You won't because you don't because you're nothing but a conservative shill.

Here's your chance to show me up boyo. 

[RLLD 4,143]

8 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Please post an example of you calling out conservative corruption and I will acknowledge I'm wrong.

You won't because you don't because you're nothing but a conservative shill.

Here's your chance to show me up boyo. 

Recent Example

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

20 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yep I was pretty mercurial about my thoughts that summer. If I wanted to go back I could find posts where I expressed a lot of concern about Trump winning- but ai don’t want to go back. 

I want to go forward. My position is that Trump is very unlikely to win this time around because (a) he is a known commodity, unlike 2016, amd he is firmly disliked by around 60% of the public and (b) because the abortion issue is hurting Republican support in battleground states. There are other reasons as well but these are the two main ones. 

Do you agree with analysis? If you disagree, how come? 

I know it must be hard to keep track of all of your lies when you have half a million posts on obscure fantasy football message boards. This one took me 15 seconds to find I’m sure there are hundreds of posts like this.

[RLLD 4,143]

26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yep I was pretty mercurial about my thoughts that summer. If I wanted to go back I could find posts where I expressed a lot of concern about Trump winning- but ai don’t want to go back. 

I want to go forward. My position is that Trump is very unlikely to win this time around because (a) he is a known commodity, unlike 2016, amd he is firmly disliked by around 60% of the public and (b) because the abortion issue is hurting Republican support in battleground states. There are other reasons as well but these are the two main ones. 

Do you agree with analysis? If you disagree, how come? 

I think your post has merit.  I think the question as to whether or not Trump could win a general election is well-founded.  Sure he would dominate the Republican selection process.  But can he win over Independants. I think he is a tough pill to swallow, and if we can get his policies without his bluster.....that is inherently more palatable. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

8 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Recent Example

There you go!  You did call out corruption from a conservative.

I apologize for saying that you never do.  That's my bad and was unfair.  I won't accuse you of that again and will read your posts in the future with this in mind.

Thank you boyo. 

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think your post has merit.  I think the question as to whether or not Trump could win a general election is well-founded.  Sure he would dominate the Republican selection process.  But can he win over Independants. I think he is a tough pill to swallow, and if we can get his policies without his bluster.....that is inherently more palatable. 

Which of Trump’s policies do you approve of the most? Just curious. 

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

14 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

I know it must be hard to keep track of all of your lies when you have half a million posts on obscure fantasy football message boards. This one took me 15 seconds to find I’m sure there are hundreds of posts like this.

You avoided my question. Why? 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

You avoided my question. Why? 

Because it’s irrelevant to your lies 

[RLLD 4,143]

8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Which of Trump’s policies do you approve of the most? Just curious. 

Great question!  And there were so many things that picking just a few is actually a challenge, right off the top of my head....

Signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Doubled the standard deduction
Doubled the child tax credit.
Virtually eliminated the unfair Estate Tax, or Death Tax.
Cut the business tax rate from 35 percent – the highest in the developed world – all the way down to 21 percent.
Moved the Federal Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Initiative back to the White House.
Signed into law the FUTURE Act, making permanent $255 million in annual funding for HBCUs and increasing funding for the Federal Pell Grant program.
Signed legislation that included more than $100 million for scholarships, research, and centers of excellence at HBCU land-grant institutions.
Fully forgave $322 million in disaster loans to four HBCUs in 2018, so they could fully focus on educating their students.
Signed an Executive Order on Modernizing the Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Biotechnology Products

 

There is much more, but these are among my favorites.....they helped so many people!!

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

25 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Great question!  And there were so many things that picking just a few is actually a challenge, right off the top of my head....

Signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Doubled the standard deduction
Doubled the child tax credit.
Virtually eliminated the unfair Estate Tax, or Death Tax.
Cut the business tax rate from 35 percent – the highest in the developed world – all the way down to 21 percent.
Moved the Federal Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Initiative back to the White House.
Signed into law the FUTURE Act, making permanent $255 million in annual funding for HBCUs and increasing funding for the Federal Pell Grant program.
Signed legislation that included more than $100 million for scholarships, research, and centers of excellence at HBCU land-grant institutions.
Fully forgave $322 million in disaster loans to four HBCUs in 2018, so they could fully focus on educating their students.
Signed an Executive Order on Modernizing the Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Biotechnology Products

 

There is much more, but these are among my favorites.....they helped so many people!!

Not a bad list. 

Interestingly Donald Trump has, to the best of my knowledge, failed to mention a single one of the above accomplishments in his current campaign. I doubt he will. One major reason is, per the book The Divider (which I highly recommend) almost all of the actions you listed were conceived by underlings, and Trump had to be talked into them, often with great reluctance, and most of these people were fired by the end of Trump’s term. 

[RLLD 4,143]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Not a bad list. 

Interestingly Donald Trump has, to the best of my knowledge, failed to mention a single one of the above accomplishments in his current campaign. I doubt he will. One major reason is, per the book The Divider (which I highly recommend) almost all of the actions you listed were conceived by underlings, and Trump had to be talked into them, often with great reluctance, and most of these people were fired by the end of Trump’s term. 

I do not need Trump for these, make no mistake that I am perfectly happy with someone else. I care little for WHO it is so much as OUTCOMES from their leadership.

The many...many things done within the Trump administration were warmly welcomed by me, and observing the meaningful improvement for the average American, notably the historically disenfranshised was beyong awesome.

So....outcomes through sound policies are all I ask. And frankly I would prefer it not be Trump. I think the enourmous resources and time wasted on a targeted campaign against him were just unhelpful and exhausting. So give us someone else, by all means....

But lets get back to policies that work.