seafoam1 2,805 Posted July 13, 2024 1 minute ago, Gepetto said: Well he cried because he was happy, not sad. I'm not sure how that brings you joy when you're against him. I don't try to interpret the emotions of out of touch actors much but, I gave it a shot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,291 Posted July 13, 2024 2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Her lawyers are already filing an appeal. The news is that basically she has a good chance of being released. https://deadline.com/2024/07/alec-baldwin-trial-dismissed-rust-1236008918/ I understand. Someone or multiple people on the set of that movie failed and so did some people involved in the case against them. Lots of people focked up at their jobs. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,805 Posted July 13, 2024 I don't feel the need to send baldwin to prison for 40 years, but he definitely is partially responsible. At the very least 50% responsible. At best, it would be like a really good guy who made a poor choice who drove drunk and killed someone and was devistated by it. Except baldwin is too busy blaming others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,121 Posted July 13, 2024 51 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Her lawyers are already filing an appeal. The news is that basically she has a good chance of being released. https://deadline.com/2024/07/alec-baldwin-trial-dismissed-rust-1236008918/ They can appeal, but at first glance, I don't know how much it's going to help. Her lawyer did know of this evidence and didn't want it coming into trial because it wouldn't have been favorable to her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,291 Posted July 13, 2024 3 hours ago, Mike Honcho said: They can appeal, but at first glance, I don't know how much it's going to help. Her lawyer did know of this evidence and didn't want it coming into trial because it wouldn't have been favorable to her. I'm not sure how that could be true, because they said today that this information just came to light that it was filed under a different case. If that's true, then Alec Baldwin had better lawyers, he probably had better lawyers in any case since he paid top dollar and I heard his lawyer question a witness today and he was impressive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,805 Posted July 13, 2024 1 hour ago, Gepetto said: I'm not sure how that could be true, because they said today that this information just came to light that it was filed under a different case. If that's true, then Alec Baldwin had better lawyers, he probably had better lawyers in any case since he paid top dollar and I heard his lawyer question a witness today and he was impressive. Dude is worth $70 million. He had the best lawyers on earth. And most importantly, there was no social or political cause against him. Most people don't give shlt about the outcome of the trial. He was in a good position to get away with his crime. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,121 Posted July 13, 2024 7 hours ago, Gepetto said: I'm not sure how that could be true, because they said today that this information just came to light that it was filed under a different case. If that's true, then Alec Baldwin had better lawyers, he probably had better lawyers in any case since he paid top dollar and I heard his lawyer question a witness today and he was impressive. I watched the entirety of the hearing and the bullets were first presented to Hannah's lawyer. It's pretty complicated, but he supposedly first told witness who had them to bring them to the trial, saw them and then told him to take them away, he didn't want them as they were not exculpatory for Hannah. This was during Hannah's trial, they had been sitting at this third parties house for 2 years. After Hannah's trial he took them to the police and it was then that they were filed under a different case number(early March). This all came out during the hearing. That part is very strange, sketchy and I think the CST will have some explaining to do about that. The lead detective on the case had never saw these bullets but did know about them. It doesn't seem either special prosecutor knew about the separate case number(I think that's why the one resigned at lunch---this was too focked up for her, not that BS excuse they gave). The question is how and when did Baldwin's lawyers find out about these bullets. My instinct's tell me that they spoke with Hannah's lawyers, he tells them the story of the bullets. They get discovery and find out those bullets have not been listed(separate case #) and then they sat on it. On day 2, the asked the CST about it, day 3 they introduce the motion to have the case dismissed. Cued up to the beginning of the hearing, it's pretty long. First is the CST - who accepted the bullets and a cop who had body camera on when they arrived. Then Kenny, gives a history of the live ammunition used to train actors on another Yellowstone. The theory being that the live ammunition that killed Halyna Hutchins and the Yellowstone rounds all originally came from a the same batch. Then the lead detective, testified-she's was pretty clueless and confused about all of this. Finally, and the craziest thing I've ever seen, the Special Attorney took the stand too and testified about this too and how she didn't know...yada yada yada. Anyway, long story, but I'd don't think this helps Reed, if it's proven her lawyer knew about and had access to the bullets. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted July 13, 2024 Sh1t I think I read about the bullets in the NYTimes several months ago, during the armorer’s trial Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,494 Posted July 13, 2024 This reminds me of when the prosecution in Sleepers threw the case Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,158 Posted July 13, 2024 Another famous person gets away with murder, I thought immunity was for the president, I guess if you are famous , you to can kill or do anything you want throw up your arms and yelling immunity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,121 Posted September 30, 2024 On 7/12/2024 at 8:59 PM, Mike Honcho said: They can appeal, but at first glance, I don't know how much it's going to help. Her lawyer did know of this evidence and didn't want it coming into trial because it wouldn't have been favorable to her. ‘Rust’ armorer denied new trial, conviction upheld for fatal shooting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites