Trump's residence raided by the FBI

[Horseman 2,480]

3 hours ago, MDC said:

First article I found is this one:

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3616579-zuckerberg-tells-rogan-that-facebook-suppressed-hunter-biden-laptop-story-after-fbi-warning-defends-agency-as-legitimate-institution/amp/

Zuck said the FBI warned him to take note of potentially polarizing content without specifically mentioning the laptop story.

Did anything ever come of the laptop? When the story broke I was told there would be kiddie pron and proof of pay to play. It’s almost 2 years later. 

The Hill can be fair in their reporting, but here is a tip:  If you read an article telling you what people said without actually using direct quotes, I'd keep looking.  You do know you can listen to the actual video of the interview itself, right?

--------

Rogan: "How do you handle things when they are a big news item that's controversial, like there was a lot of attention on Twitter during the election because of the Hunter Biden laptop story...

Zuckerberg: "..yeah.."

Rogan: "..yeah so you guys censored that as well?"

Zuckerberg: "So we took a different path than Twitter. Um, basically the background here is that the FBI, um basically came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, um, just so you know, you should be on high alert, there was, we thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump of of um that's similar to that. So just be vigilant'."

-------

Rogan: "Did they say you had to be on guard about that specific story?"

Zuckerberg: "I, uh, no. I don't remember if it was that specifically but it basically fit the pattern."

-------

The FBI still has the laptop and what is in the rest of the thousands of emails that weren't leaked is a different discussion.  The fact here is that the Hunter Biden laptop story was NOT Russian propaganda.

[Horseman 2,480]

34 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Here is the redacted warrant:

 

 

People are already stealing my stuff.

On 8/19/2022 at 9:39 AM, Horseman said:

Leaked first paragraph!!!

 

 

[Horseman 2,480]

And just to help people put 2 + 2 together, even if you believe Zuckerberg's poor memory that maybe the FBI didn't say Hunter specifically -> All that was in the news about Russia disinformation at the time was Hunter Biden's laptop.  You wouldn't have to say it.  Remember this?

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

Exact same time period.  The FBI had the laptop and all the emails for almost a full year at that time.  The FBI knew the laptop and the Post's story was genuine.

[MDC 7,497]

39 minutes ago, Horseman said:

The Hill can be fair in their reporting, but here is a tip:  If you read an article telling you what people said without actually using direct quotes, I'd keep looking.  You do know you can listen to the actual video of the interview itself, right?

--------

Rogan: "How do you handle things when they are a big news item that's controversial, like there was a lot of attention on Twitter during the election because of the Hunter Biden laptop story...

Zuckerberg: "..yeah.."

Rogan: "..yeah so you guys censored that as well?"

Zuckerberg: "So we took a different path than Twitter. Um, basically the background here is that the FBI, um basically came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, um, just so you know, you should be on high alert, there was, we thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump of of um that's similar to that. So just be vigilant'."

-------

Rogan: "Did they say you had to be on guard about that specific story?"

Zuckerberg: "I, uh, no. I don't remember if it was that specifically but it basically fit the pattern."

-------

The FBI still has the laptop and what is in the rest of the thousands of emails that weren't leaked is a different discussion.  The fact here is that the Hunter Biden laptop story was NOT Russian propaganda.

The facts of the article I posted are consistent with the quotes above. The FBI warmed Zuckerberg about general misinformation but didn’t specifically mention Hunter’s laptop or any other story.

Also, the FBI didn’t jail January 6 protestors for protesting FBI interference. They jailed people for breaking into a government building, damaging properly, assaulting cops and making violent threats.

I’ve got a tip for you: If you have to lie and spin to prove your point, it probably wasn’t all that good of a point in the first place.  

 

[Chronic Fockster 106]

Just now, MDC said:

The facts of the article I posted are consistent with the quotes above. The FBI warmed Zuckerberg about general misinformation but didn’t specifically mention Hunter’s laptop or any other story.

Also, the FBI didn’t jail January 6 protestors for protesting FBI interference. They jailed people for breaking into a government building, damaging properly, assaulting cops and making violent threats.

I’ve got a tip for you: If you have to lie and spin to prove your point, it probably wasn’t all that good of a point in the first place.  

 

He's just repeating what he's being told on Twitter

 

[Horseman 2,480]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

The facts of the article I posted are consistent with the quotes above. The FBI warmed Zuckerberg about general misinformation but didn’t specifically mention Hunter’s laptop or any other story.

 

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Zuckerberg: "So we took a different path than Twitter. Um, basically the background here is that the FBI, um basically came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, um, just so you know, you should be on high alert, there was, we thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump of of um that's similar to that. So just be vigilant'."

You're way too easy.  Can you at least try?

56 minutes ago, Horseman said:

And just to help people put 2 + 2 together, even if you believe Zuckerberg's poor memory that maybe the FBI didn't say Hunter specifically -> All that was in the news about Russia disinformation at the time was Hunter Biden's laptop.  You wouldn't have to say it.  Remember this?

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

Exact same time period.  The FBI had the laptop and all the emails for almost a full year at that time.  The FBI knew the laptop and the Post's story was genuine.

 

[Horseman 2,480]

4 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

He's just repeating what he's being told on Twitter

 

I'm not even on Twitter dummyguttervomitpedofocksterlgbtqr+.  

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Here is the redacted warrant:

 

 

That’s actually really funny. 

[MDC 7,497]

9 minutes ago, Horseman said:

 

You're way too easy.  Can you at least try?

 

So in a nutshell, according to Zuckerberg the FBI didn’t bring up Hunter’s laptop. We have to read Zuck’s exact quotes, but then also rely on your interpretation to get all the way there.  

Anything on the claim that the January 6 rioters were jailed for protesting? Or are you going to let that one go? 🏳 

[Chronic Fockster 106]

15 minutes ago, Horseman said:

I'm not even on Twitter dummyguttervomitpedofocksterlgbtqr+.  

Claims to not be on Twitter.  Has dozens of posts linked to Twitter.

Dude stop.

[Horseman 2,480]

13 minutes ago, MDC said:

So in a nutshell, according to Zuckerberg the FBI didn’t bring up Hunter’s laptop.

C'mon.  At least try to read.

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Rogan: "Did they say you had to be on guard about that specific story?"

Zuckerberg: "I, uh, no. I don't remember if it was that specifically but it basically fit the pattern."

So unimportant that he had to testify in front of congress.  But, yeah he just forgot.

But it doesn't matter anyway.  THE Russian misinformation story in October was the laptop.  FBI says please watch out for those stories (even though they knew the laptop was real).

Even you can piece that together if you wanted to.

[Horseman 2,480]

13 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Claims to not be on Twitter.  Has dozens of posts linked to Twitter.

Dude stop.

Do I really have to explain to you how the internet works?  Are you sure you want to be made a fool again?

[MDC 7,497]

20 minutes ago, Horseman said:

C'mon.  At least try to read.

So unimportant that he had to testify in front of congress.  But, yeah he just forgot.

But it doesn't matter anyway.  THE Russian misinformation story in October was the laptop.  FBI says please watch out for those stories (even though they knew the laptop was real).

Even you can piece that together if you wanted to.

First we have to go to the quotes. But the quotes don’t say what you want them to say. So now we have to piece it together.

And people are getting thrown in jail just for asking the tough questions! 

Muh fraud.  

[wiffleball 4,790]

184 documents.  Wowsa. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,512]

So what’s the deal? Nothing burger? Fishing expedition? Worse than Watergate? 

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

184 documents.  Wowsa. 

Oh boy. That's incredible that working people have documents. Crazy. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,512]

2 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

184 documents.  Wowsa. 

Democracy hangs in the balance. 

[Horseman 2,480]

16 minutes ago, MDC said:

First we have to go to the quotes. But the quotes don’t say what you want them to say. So now we have to piece it together.

And people are getting thrown in jail just for asking the tough questions! 

Muh fraud.  

The main difference between you and I, and that Hill reporter you quoted and I, is that I don't have to misquote to get to my conclusion.  Sorry you're not picking up on that.  

[Chronic Fockster 106]

33 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Do I really have to explain to you how the internet works?  Are you sure you want to be made a fool again?

Yes, explain to me why you keep posting tweets, but you're not on Twitter.  Oh you don't have an account, you just read the tweets and repost them here, but as long as you don't have an account then you're good, right?  You're a joke.  You're brainwashed by Twitter.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,512]

I feel safer that these very important documents are in safe hands now. Thanks FBI! You guys are very brave. 

[Chronic Fockster 106]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I feel safer that these very important documents are in safe hands now. Thanks FBI! You guys are very brave. 

Nice to see you have no respect for the law

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Nice to see you have no respect for the law

Coming from a VomitBreath. 

[MDC 7,497]

8 minutes ago, Horseman said:

The main difference between you and I, and that Hill reporter you quoted and I, is that I don't have to misquote to get to my conclusion.  Sorry you're not picking up on that.  

Ironic, since 1) I didn’t quote Zuckerberg at all and 2) the transcript you fetched for me doesn’t support your conclusion. 

You may now have the last word.  

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

17 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Nice to see you have no respect for the law

He won't even watch Law & Order

[Hardcore troubadour 15,512]

19 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Nice to see you have no respect for the law

I never thought much of the FBI. Famous But Incompetent.  Whitey Bulger showed that. 

[craftsman 1,045]

2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

He won't even watch Law & Order

That's where you get your information from.  

[Horseman 2,480]

14 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Yes, explain to me why you keep posting tweets, but you're not on Twitter.  Oh you don't have an account, you just read the tweets and repost them here, but as long as you don't have an account then you're good, right?  You're a joke.  You're brainwashed by Twitter.

You've made two statements now:

"You're brainwashed by Twitter."

and

"He's just repeating what he's being told on Twitter."

Indeed, both imply that I have a Twitter account and a feed where I am fed, brainwashed and told what to believe.  I don't have an account at any social media site for that very reason.  Unlike you I'm guessing, I am uninfluenced by social media.  It appears that you've figure out that you don't need an account at Twitter to read posts.  The part you haven't figured out yet is the first three sentences.  

So why Twitter in my posts?  Because Twitter and YouTube are the only sites that bring videos and images into the posts in this forum you foking retaard.  

Want to illustrate a point - search YouTube or Twitter, it's that simple, simpleton. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,512]

6 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

He won't even watch Law & Order

No, I won’t. It’s ridiculous.  You probably like it though. I had no idea after working in NYC for twenty years there were so many white people doing murders.In the rich parts of town no less.  Must have got by me. 

[Chronic Fockster 106]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

You've made two statements now:

"You're brainwashed by Twitter."

and

"He's just repeating what he's being told on Twitter."

Indeed, both imply that I have a Twitter account and a feed where I am fed, brainwashed and told what to believe.  I don't have an account at any social media site for that very reason.  Unlike you I'm guessing, I am uninfluenced by social media.  It appears that you've figure out that you don't need an account at Twitter to read posts.  The part you haven't figured out yet is the first three sentences.  

So why Twitter in my posts?  Because Twitter and YouTube are the only sites that bring videos and images into the posts in this forum you foking retaard.  

Want to illustrate a point - search YouTube or Twitter, it's that simple, simpleton. 

 

Ok, so you're posting tweets because you want to post video and images?  That's your story?Has nothing to do with the context of each tweet?  Shut up clown.

[Horseman 2,480]

29 minutes ago, MDC said:

Ironic, since 1) I didn’t quote Zuckerberg at all and 2) the transcript you fetched for me doesn’t support your conclusion. 

You may now have the last word.  

1) I didn't say you quoted him. I said you miss quoted him. I highlighted at least two instances for you.

2) It's pretty clear you either can't read or are ignorant so I won't take your word for it.

Mental midgets run when they are outmatched.   

[Horseman 2,480]

6 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Ok, so you're posting tweets because you want to post video and images?  That's your story?Has nothing to do with the context of each tweet?  Shut up clown.

Of course it has to do with the context, and content.  I even mentioned the search.  Where did you get the idea it was extraneous?  

If you're reading along in the thread you should be able to tell they have context.  FFS.  

[Chronic Fockster 106]

3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Of course it has to do with the context, and content.  I even mentioned the search.  Where did you get the idea it was extraneous?  

If you're reading along in the thread you should be able to tell they have context.  FFS.  

Yes exactly my point.  You're not good at this.

What you're trying to say is that you form an opinion, but instead of sharing it, you want to share a video or image, so you go to Twitter and search for a video or image that shares your opinion, and then you post it.

No one believes you.  But go ahead have the last word here.

[Horseman 2,480]

10 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Yes exactly my point.  You're not good at this.

What you're trying to say is that you form an opinion, but instead of sharing it, you want to share a video or image, so you go to Twitter and search for a video or image that shares your opinion, and then you post it.

No one believes you.  But go ahead have the last word here.

A picture is worth a 1000 words.

20 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Mental midgets run when they are outmatched.   

 

[OldMaid 2,130]

Like these kind of metal midgets?

[Chronic Fockster 106]

Bonus points for posting the tweet too

[Horseman 2,480]

Now that the kids have finally gone to bed.  Anybody read the redacted affidavit besides me?  I know it's 38 pages, but, with all the redactions it's really only about 3.

Quote

 

On June 8, 2022, DOJ COUNSEL sent FPOTUS COUNSEL 1

a letter, which reiterated that the PREMISES are not authorized to store classified information and requested the preservation of the STORAGE ROOM and boxes that had been moved from the White House to the PREMISES. Specifically, the letter stated in relevant part: As I previously indicated to you, Mar-a-Lago does not include a secure location authorized for the storage of classified information. As such, it appears that since the time classified documents were removed from the secure facilities at the White House and moved to Mar-a-Lago on or around January 20, 2021, they have not been handled in au appropriate manner or stored in au appropriate location. Accordingly, we ask that the room at Mar-a-Lago where the documents had been stored be secured and that all of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago (along with any other items in that room) be preserved in that room in their current condition until further notice.

 

Lots of arguing and letters back and forth about storage requirements. Why not demand return of the documents instead of fussing about storage?  

The affidavit was filled out by just one FBI agent's testimony, that we can tell, who became concerned back in May.  If it was so important what the fok took so long.  

Fishy.

[Horseman 2,480]

4 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Like these kind of metal midgets?

Grammar Police! 

Hauck give you the day shift today?

Vomit is the one on the far right.

[OldMaid 2,130]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Grammar Police! 

Hauck give you the day shift today?

Vomit is the one on the far right.

Just admit it was funny. We all make a mistake now and then.

[Horseman 2,480]

3 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Just admit it was funny. We all make a mistake now and then.

I don't see any mistake. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Why didn't he just make copies?