Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
GutterBoy

Rate my Draft

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

Pro tip. Jacksonville will be a top DST option most of this year. Not just week 1. Not only are they talented but in that division, they will be playing with lots of leads and their overall schedule is very friendly. 

That doesn't surprise me.  The Dolphins are suppose to be one of the top defenses too.  Might just hang on to both for a bit and play the matchups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said:

This is my team in my money league.  12 team half ppr auction.

QB: Joe Burrow

RB: Barkley, D. Cook, Stevenson, Charbonnet and Jamaal Williams

WR: Hill, McLaurin, Aiyuk, Burks, Mooney and Q. Johnston

TE: Tyler Higbee

K: Bass

DST: Jags and Dolphins

I don’t like auction leagues so this is not in my wheelhouse but it looks solid. Burrow is my #5 QB and someone I actually gloss over because I’d rather wait on Fields and Lawrence (again I’m  thinking snake draft mindset)

Barkley and Stevenson is a nice 1-2 punch at RB

even in half ppr my worry is your receivers. If mclaurin gets past the toe quickly, then 👍🏼. If not it’s a little ugly behind Hill. I’m not an Aiyuk believer. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

10-team PPR

QB

Lawrence, Richardson

RB

Chubb, Mixon, Pierce, Mattison, Herbert, Algeier

WR

Chase, Olave, London, Kirk, Thielen

TE

Freiermuth

 

Chase > Chubb (steal) > Olave? > Mixon

Guessing that was your start. Your top 4 RB offer good depth behind your stud. I don’t love the receivers behind Chase in a 10 teamer ppr. Mostly because I’m not as high on Olave as most. If Thomas is healthy and Carr really likes Juwan Johnson, I don’t know that the volume will be there for his lofty ADP. 
 

Lawrence 👍🏼 but while I like Freier I am curious if a London or Pierce pick could have netted you a better TE instead. You’d be fine without Pierce or London and if that could have netted you a Hock or Waller… 🤔 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent looked at the overall fantasy landscape yet.  My strategy is to form a basic cheatsheet, then do a mock draft online to refine it, then enter my genuine draft.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, WhiteWonder said:

Chase > Chubb (steal) > Olave? > Mixon

Guessing that was your start. Your top 4 RB offer good depth behind your stud. I don’t love the receivers behind Chase in a 10 teamer ppr. Mostly because I’m not as high on Olave as most. If Thomas is healthy and Carr really likes Juwan Johnson, I don’t know that the volume will be there for his lofty ADP. 
 

Lawrence 👍🏼 but while I like Freier I am curious if a London or Pierce pick could have netted you a better TE instead. You’d be fine without Pierce or London and if that could have netted you a Hock or Waller… 🤔 

No one drafted Ferguson of Dallas, so I'm betting he's going to be a top TE because Dallas TEs typically do well. This is what I did with Schultz last year. 

I like having five RB1s and five WR1s, and that means other teams are hurting for those positions. 

I was way RB heavy last year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No one drafted Ferguson of Dallas, so I'm betting he's going to be a top TE because Dallas TEs typically do well. This is what I did with Schultz last year. 

I like having five RB1s and five WR1s, and that means other teams are hurting for those positions. 

I was way RB heavy last year. 

Five rb1’s and five wr 1’s? You play in a six team league? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No one drafted Ferguson of Dallas, so I'm betting he's going to be a top TE because Dallas TEs typically do well. This is what I did with Schultz last year. 

I like having five RB1s and five WR1s, and that means other teams are hurting for those positions. 

I was way RB heavy last year. 

But Shultz was already an established solid TE 

you also don’t have 5 RB1s or 5 WR1s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Five rb1’s and five wr 1’s? You play in a six team league? 

I like having the top 5 rbs and top 5 wrs.  I draft my team 15 minutes before the other owners.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Five rb1’s and five wr 1’s? You play in a six team league? 

No, I clearly said 10 teams. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No, I clearly said 10 teams. 

Do they let you make ten picks in a row? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

I havent looked at the overall fantasy landscape yet.  My strategy is to form a basic cheatsheet, then do a mock draft online to refine it, then enter my genuine draft.  

I usually read a few cheat sheets and do 20-25 mock drafts. Then when I get into the real draft I forget everything and make panic decisions. :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2023 at 3:45 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hey guys, stop playing with kickers. You’re welcome.  

and defenses and use team running backs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, MDC said:

I usually read a few cheat sheets and do 20-25 mock drafts. Then when I get into the real draft I forget everything and make panic decisions. :thumbsup: 

Trust the process 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, edjr said:

and defenses and use team running backs. 

And just make everything a flex spot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

Trust the process 

Didn’t you say the Eagles didn’t need AJ Brown because they already had DeVonta?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MDC said:

Didn’t you say the Eagles didn’t need AJ Brown because they already had DeVonta?

absolutely not 

I was saying how dumb of a trade that was for the Titans from the moment it was made. Never trade a proven young stud for an unknown draft pick. One of the worst trades i've seen in a long time. 

(unless I made some comment in jest specifically to you ;))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

absolutely not 

I was saying how dumb of a trade that was for the Titans from the moment it was made. Never trade a proven young stud for an unknown draft pick. One of the worst trades i've seen in a long time. 

(unless I made some comment in jest specifically to you ;))

I got you mixed up with someone else. You’re the Greg Oden 2.0 guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

I got you mixed up with someone else. You’re the Greg Oden 2.0 guy. 

yup. the one comment you can cling to from when he was in the midst of spending most of his first years in the NBA injured, with foot issues, ala Greg Oden (knee and foot issues).   Glad everything worked out for him. Too bad He's all they have to show from "the process". I know you were just praying for them to win a title so you could post. Probably even after they abandoned the process and went the buy a title route. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WhiteWonder said:

yup. the one comment you can cling to from when he was in the midst of spending most of his first years in the NBA injured, with foot issues, ala Greg Oden (knee and foot issues).   Glad everything worked out for him. Too bad He's all they have to show from "the process". I know you were just praying for them to win a title so you could post. Probably even after they abandoned the process and went the buy a title route. 

No need to get defensive. Just wanted to make sure you were the guy who said the reigning MVP was Greg Oden 2.0.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

No need to get defensive. Just wanted to make sure you were the guy who said the reigning MVP was Greg Oden 2.0.  

You were sure 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WhiteWonder said:

You were sure 

I like when you admit it. :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

I like when you admit it. :lol: 

Why wouldn't I admit it? Unlike some people I have no issue admitting when I was wrong about something... even when it was a flippant comment made to a sixers fan.  Like, I know sports isn't necessarily your forte, but I think you are smart enough to know I was comparing the injuries. Maybe not. Even so, to this day I like to let you have that one. 

Plus, I feel like you told me the Nets would be a wasteland for decades and somehow they have managed to attract big names (albeit cancerous ones) and go just as far in the playoffs as the Sixers have gone with the reigning MVP :D

  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2023 at 12:28 PM, GutterBoy said:

I have to think you've never seen Bijon play football.  Fock you even live in Texas.  Put the cats down.

🤡

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

🤡

Bijon looked pretty damn good and was your RB7 this week.  You're clowning yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Bijon looked pretty damn good and was your RB7 this week.  You're clowning yourself.

You're overlooking what you smartassedly responded to, which was me suggesting we could see RBBC on the Falcons, considering Algeier and their run-heavy offense. I never questioned Bijon's abilities, and I watched him play almost every game last season and read all the hype written about him..

At least for Week 1 with the Falcons, it was very much RBBC, and Algeier was your RB4 this week, scoring 7.1 more fantasy points than Bijon.

So your rating for seeing this potential RBBC is an F, as is fock you.

Now go get your steppy stool, climb up and tell me how my ass tastes, strawberry shortcake.

🤣

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You're overlooking what you smartassedly responded to, which was me suggesting we could see RBBC on the Falcons, considering Algeier and their run-heavy offense. I never questioned Bijon's abilities, and I watched him play almost every game last season and read all the hype written about him..

At least for Week 1 with the Falcons, it's was very much RBBC, and Algeier was your RB4 this week, scoring 7.1 more fantasy points than Bijon.

So your rating for seeing this potential RBBC is an F, as is fock you.

Now go get your steppy stool, climb up and tell me how my ass tastes, strawberry shortcake.

🤣

One. Week.

Bijon had more carries in the first half and more targets.  Allgeier got the grind out carries in clean up duty.

It's not gonna be a RBBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2023 at 2:49 PM, WhiteWonder said:

This doesn't look much better than a 12 team squad. 

Don't get me wrong, I like it... and obviously the depth is a little better but the starting unit looks similar to a 12 teamer.  

I assume you went Tyreek/CeeDee in rounds 1 and 2. Rhamondre/Etienne in rounds 3/4 (thats part of what feels like a 12 teamer). Waller/Fields 5/6?  

Cook or Dionte should be your flex. 

150 points in PPR yesterday, tops in my league - Tyreek, Etienne and Elliot killed it. :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MDC said:

150 points in PPR yesterday, tops in my league - Tyreek, Etienne and Elliot killed it. :thumbsup: 

I did say I liked it. :thumbsup:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

I did say I liked it. :thumbsup:

I expect 45 from Tyreek every week.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

One. Week.

Bijon had more carries in the first half and more targets.  Allgeier got the grind out carries in clean up duty.

It's not gonna be a RBBC.

Who cares? Algeier had way more fantasy points, and this is a thread you started about rating your fantasy team. At least for Week1, I was right about it looking like a potential RBBC there. Perhaps you'd be better off playing fantasy pickleball or cornhole.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Who cares? Algeier had way more fantasy points, and this is a thread you started about rating your fantasy team. At least for Week1, I was right about it looking like a potential RBBC there. Perhaps you'd be better off playing fantasy pickleball or cornhole.

Do you want to bet on who will finish with more FF point?  I'll take Bijon, you take Allgeier?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Do you want to bet on who will finish with more FF point?  I'll take Bijon, you take Allgeier?

I'm not saying Algeier is better. I'm not saying Bijon won't finish as their top guy. All I was saying was that we could see RBBC in Atlanta. All this other noise you're making is just nonsense. I was right, at least for Week 1. Suck it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Do you want to bet on who will finish with more FF point?  I'll take Bijon, you take Allgeier?

that doesn't even make sense.  Pimple is correct on this one. Stating that Allgeier could form an RBBC and devalue Bijon a bit from a fantasy perspective can be 100% true and doesn't mean he thinks Allgeier will outscore Bijon in fantasy. :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm not saying Algeier is better. I'm not saying Bijon won't finish as their top guy. All I was saying was that we could see RBBC in Atlanta. All this other noise you're making is just nonsense. I was right, at least for Week 1. Suck it!

Bijon had 65% of the snaps, it's not an RBBC.  Bijon will be a top 5 back.  You're an idiot.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

Bijon had 65% of the snaps, it's not an RBBC.  Bijon will be a top 5 back.  You're an idiot.

So if Bijon finishes with 0.000001 more fantasy points than Algeier, that's not an RBBC to you. Gotcha. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

that doesn't even make sense.  Pimple is correct on this one. Stating that Allgeier could form an RBBC and devalue Bijon a bit from a fantasy perspective can be 100% true and doesn't mean he thinks Allgeier will outscore Bijon in fantasy. :wacko:

Well then he doesn't have to take the bet.  It can be RBBC, sure, but I don't think it will be, and I think Bijon will be a top 5 back, he was RB7 this week in his first game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

Well then he doesn't have to take the bet.  It can be RBBC, sure, but I don't think it will be, and I think Bijon will be a top 5 back, he was RB7 this week in his first game.

I never said he wasn't, and thanks for acknowledging that I said an RBBC was possible in Atlanta. Your welcome to use one of my butt hairs to floss out the ass that got stuck between your whittle TicTac teef whilst feasting on my ass. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I never said he wasn't, and thanks for acknowledging that I said an RBBC was possible in Atlanta. Your welcome to use one of my butt hairs to floss out the ass that got stuck between your whittle TicTac teef whilst feasting on my ass. 🤣

You're a weird, creepy old man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

You're a weird, creepy old man.

You're a squirming kick-dog midget who sucks at fantasy football.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You're a squirming kick-dog midget who sucks at fantasy football.

🤣

That team I drafted was the top scorer this week you dope. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×