Tennessee City Has Banned Being Gay In Public

[u.k. 9]

38 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

I blame lawyers for this.  Probably outdated wording, but the obvious intent was to ban sexual acts in public.  Anyone who can't see that has an agenda.  

 

If the intent is to ban sexual acts, then ban sexual acts, don't ban homosexuality.

[TheNewGirl 1,347]

2 hours ago, Fnord said:

 

What a clusterfuk. Seems like there's ample opportunity for interpretation here, depending on who is observing the "crime" and who is "committing" it.

1. If a straight dude wearing tight pants walks around with a hard on because he just got fondled by his lady friend, he could be arrested.
2. If a straight woman wears too revealing a tank top, same.
3. If two lesbians are kissing-- off to the clink!
4. Two gay men kissing and embracing-- the hoosgow for you!

I wonder which of those four are most likely to result in an arrest?

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!

 

Dude. 

Focking seriously, to the bolded? You can't sit and wait, or stay home/in your car/in a private location before getting up and walking around? FFS. 

Also, yeah...if the dude is hard with tight pants and walking past a school? May want to rethink his route. Jesus Christ. Give me a break. 

[u.k. 9]

3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

No it doesn't.  Displaying of a pride flag is not sexual conduct.

How is being a homosexual sexual conduct?

[HellToupee 1,584]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Fallswell is quoting directly from the city code. 

You seem to have a persecution fetish 

[squistion 1,947]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

No it doesn't.  Displaying of a pride flag is not sexual conduct.

It can be viewed an expression of being homosexual (or LGBTQ) and acts of homosexuality are considered "sexual conduct" under the ordinance.

It is all open to interpretation and selective enforcement which is why the ACLU is opposing it and it will not withstand a court challenge.

[squistion 1,947]

3 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Hey by the way it’s written I can’t get a BJ in public in Murfreesboro. Seems like all the bases are covered 

The ordinance as written covers a lot more than that.

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

Just now, squistion said:

Fallswell is quoting directly from the city code. 

Oh, then he's just stupid then... or lying?  Which is it?  You see, when a normal person reads the city code, they see "Sexual Conduct" as the header and list acts of sexual conduct.  Being homosexual isn't a sexual conduct, having homosexual SEXUAL CONDUCT is sexual conduct.  They're making sure that straight and homosexual acts are covered.

[HellToupee 1,584]

A gay guys more promiscuous than straight guys or do bi fellows trump them both?

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

5 minutes ago, u.k. said:

How is being a homosexual sexual conduct?

It isn't, but that's not what the bill is about.  It's about sexual conduct in a homosexual manner.  People with common sense and logic get that.

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

It can be viewed an expression of being homosexual (or LGBTQ) and acts of homosexuality are considered "sexual conduct" under the ordinance.

It is all open to interpretation and selective enforcement which is why the ACLU is opposing it and it will not withstand a court challenge.

No it can't and no it doesn't.  It's about sexual ACTS.  Displaying a flag is not a sexual act and everyone knows that.

[u.k. 9]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Oh, then he's just stupid then... or lying?  Which is it?  You see, when a normal person reads the city code, they see "Sexual Conduct" as the header and list acts of sexual conduct.  Being homosexual isn't a sexual conduct, having homosexual SEXUAL CONDUCT is sexual conduct.  They're making sure that straight and homosexual acts are covered.

But there is no mention of heterosexuality, why mention homosexuality?  

[Ultra Max Power 214]

9 minutes ago, u.k. said:

If the intent is to ban sexual acts, then ban sexual acts, don't ban homosexuality.

acts of... in public

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

The ordinance as written covers a lot more than that.

That's right... and it applies to everyone.

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

Just now, u.k. said:

But there is no mention of heterosexuality, why mention homosexuality?  

Sexual intercourse is heterosexuality.  Sexual intercourse is c@ck into vag.  Homosexuality is c@ck into butt.

[u.k. 9]

3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

It isn't, but that's not what the bill is about.  It's about sexual conduct in a homosexual manner.  People with common sense and logic get that.

But not sexual conduct in a heterosexual manner?  gtfo.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,699]

No feather boas and codpieces.  Sorry boyos.  

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

I read somewhere that Trump likes to start his rallies with the YMCA song by the Village People? He might want to stay out of Tennessee. 

[HellToupee 1,584]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I read somewhere that Trump likes to start his rallies with the YMCA song by the Village People? He might want to stay out of Tennessee. 

Is this some kind of homosexual joke? Are you inferring that because Donald likes YMCA he’s gay and should be mocked for it? So obviously you consider a gay man as lesser than, am I correct in my assumption 

Real funny

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

So, once again, drama queen zealot Squidly took something, twisted it into the narrative he wanted to spin and then accused someone else of engaging in the behavior he just made up?

Of course Squidtard didn't do any research or read up on anything.  Of course he didn't.  

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

17 minutes ago, u.k. said:

But not sexual conduct in a heterosexual manner?  gtfo.

What?  It says sexual intercourse.  THAT'S heterosexual manner.  Did you go to school in Baltimore or something?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237]

this reminds me when libtards flipped out cause a state added anal sex to statutory rape potential charges

 

[HellToupee 1,584]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

So, once again, drama queen zealot Squidly took something, twisted it into the narrative he wanted to spin and then accused someone else of engaging in the behavior he just made up?

Of course Squidtard didn't do any research or read up on anything.  Of course he didn't.  

This is Squissy’s specialty. No doubt it will fall with his usual MO, it blows up in his face , once it falls off the 1st page he will quickly delete the thread. Then rinse & repeat with @squistion

[wiffleball 4,788]

Try THAT in a small town.

[u.k. 9]

14 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

What?  It says sexual intercourse.  THAT'S heterosexual manner.  Did you go to school in Baltimore or something?

What about anal sex and oral sex?  That's acceptable as long as it's not 2 gays?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

Just now, u.k. said:

What about anal sex and oral sex?  That's acceptable as long as it's not 2 gays?

Hey Wade Garret/James Daulton/BeachGal!!!

New alias this week? 

[u.k. 9]

26 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Is this some kind of homosexual joke? Are you inferring that because Donald likes YMCA he’s gay and should be mocked for it? So obviously you consider a gay man as lesser than, am I correct in my assumption 

Real funny

 

What is it with you cultists that will fall all over yourselves in defense of your hero.

[u.k. 9]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Hey Wade Garret/James Daulton/BeachGal!!!

New alias this week? 

Cultist refuses to answer the questions, cackles on about aliases.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

Just now, u.k. said:

Cultist refuses to answer the questions, cackles on about aliases.

Yep, that you!!  Thanks for confirming!

The funny thing is, YOU'RE the one in the cult!!    

[u.k. 9]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yep, that you!!  Thanks for confirming!

The funny thing is, YOU'RE the one in the cult!!    

I know you are but what am I?

Haven't heard that one since first grade.

[League Champion 1,896]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, the OP doesn't admit or even suggest that. 

We can't say "Gay" anymore? 

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

18 minutes ago, u.k. said:

What about anal sex and oral sex?  That's acceptable as long as it's not 2 gays?

Anal sex is implied as homosexual.  Oral sex is covered in there... or did you not read the document.  It says "physical contact with a person's clothed or unclothed genitals".

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

22 minutes ago, u.k. said:

Cultist refuses to answer the questions, cackles on about aliases.

Hysterical how these alt right freaks are so wound up in knots over some poster they think has tons of aliases.

Shows quite clearly how pathetic their IRL lives are.  Or maybe they're in love with whomever it is?  Hard to tell with these weirdos.

But hey, they're triggered and obsessed and it's quite entertaining.

[u.k. 9]

4 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Anal sex is implied as homosexual.  Oral sex is covered in there... or did you not read the document.  It says "physical contact with a person's clothed or unclothed genitals".

 

So heterosexual anal sex is ok?  Or everything is covered under the physical contact clause?  Your story is falling apart bud.

[League Champion 1,896]

2 minutes ago, u.k. said:

So heterosexual anal sex is ok?

Yes, if she says it's ok. Or she likes it

[BrahmaBulls 628]

Sissy should be banned from here for being gay.  And making up crap too

[League Champion 1,896]

Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

[League Champion 1,896]

 20:13 ~ If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

 20:13 ~ If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them

Naturally the alt right freaks here think a book written by tons of different primitives, who were likely buggering tons of dudes, has any relevance today.

You people need to be rounded up or at least have to wear some kind of identification, so we know who to stay away from. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,482]

4 minutes ago, u.k. said:

So heterosexual anal sex is ok?  Or everything is covered under the physical contact clause?  Your story is falling apart bud.

No, my story isn't falling apart, your lack of understanding common sense and logic is at play here.  EVERYONE is covered... whether they're straight, gay, lesbian, or any other letter of alphabet group, but you want to pretend that certain people are being targeted.  I feel sorry for people who need to deal with you on a regular basis.  LOL

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Naturally the alt right freaks here think a book written by tons of different primitives, who were likely buggering tons of dudes, has any relevance today.

You people need to be rounded up or at least have to wear some kind of identification, so we know who to stay away from. 

Says a guy who they call "AssRot" on a Gay Bodybuilding Forum