MSNBC favorite joy Reid likes porn for kids

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

This is a big winner for the democrats. Please, more interviews on the subject and then have them go viral. Joy Reid is a gift. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

What stage are we at yet 2 or 3?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

What stage are we at yet 2 or 3?

Joy Reid has sanctioned it. So, 3? 

[BuckSwope 654]

26 minutes ago, MDC said:

My understanding based on the wiki page and Common Sense Media (parents guide) is that All Boys Aren’t Blue describes some adult content but doesn’t include any pictures of it. You can correct me if that’s wrong though since you know so much more about it. 

Assuming that is the case, calling it “porn” is ridiculous. If the argument is that graphic written depictions of sex don’t belong in libraries I’ve got to wonder why this book from 2020 is the target but something like The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski escaped notice for 50+ years? 

Time for a global book audit? 

Sweet Jeebus, not even the book I was talking about.  I even named Gender Queer by title, and Horseman provided links to pics that are in that book above.  

Sure, I've also advocated that there needs to be a sit down with rational adults to knock out this book debate.   That's not going to happen, so both sides look  a bit crazy. .   100% if we are saying sexually explicit shouldn't be allowed, then apply that across the board.   I understand what you are driving about with the usual accusations that the right are only caring now because it's lgbtq depictions of sex.  I often wonder that, especially when I see religious groups behind the push for these book removals.     IMO that changes nothing and my opinion still stands and that's what debate and discussion are for.   The left loses the conversation instantly by not agreeing that something like Gender Queer shouldn't be in a school library.   

 

[MDC 7,131]

7 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Sweet Jeebus, not even the book I was talking about.  I even named Gender Queer by title, and Horseman provided links to pics that are in that book above.  

Sure, I've also advocated that there needs to be a sit down with rational adults to knock out this book debate.   That's not going to happen, so both sides look  a bit crazy. .   100% if we are saying sexually explicit shouldn't be allowed, then apply that across the board.   I understand what you are driving about with the usual accusations that the right are only caring now because it's lgbtq depictions of sex.  I often wonder that, especially when I see religious groups behind the push for these book removals.     IMO that changes nothing and my opinion still stands and that's what debate and discussion are for.   The left loses the conversation instantly by not agreeing that something like Gender Queer shouldn't be in a school library.   

 

I wasn’t talking to you or Horseman. I was addressing the OP’s video. The very first example was a memoir. We already went over this already, like 2 posts back. 

If you want to talk about Gender Queer, maybe it should be age restricted in schools, I dunno. I do know that no serious person calls that “porn.”

[HellToupee 1,588]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

She likes gay people and they like her.

Rachel Maddow frequently had her sub for her as host when Maddow's show was on Mon-Fri. Would Maddow have her host her show if she thought Joy Reid didn't like gay people?

And on Reid's own show she has had several openly gay folks sub for her as host when she is out, such as Jonathan Capehart.

Wow. This is an embarrassing take. Shame on you 

[squistion 1,952]

Just now, MDC said:

I wasn’t talking to you or Horseman. I was addressing the OP’s video. The very first example was a memoir. We already went over this already, like 2 posts back. 

If you want to talk about Gender Queer, maybe it should be age restricted in schools, I dunno. I do know that no serious person calls that “porn.”

As I posted in another thread a month or two back (can't find it in a search) the author of Gender Queer said it should be age restricted to High School kids and is not for ages below that. Also she pointed out that the book has not been made part of any school curriculum outside of being available to HS to read if they wish. 

[squistion 1,952]

Just now, HellToupee said:

Wow. This is an embarrassing take. Shame on you 

It is embarrassing that Rachel Maddow and Jonathan Capehart (both of whom are openly gay/lesbian) obviously don't consider Reid anti-gay or homophobic?

[HellToupee 1,588]

13 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is embarrassing that Rachel Maddow and Jonathan Capehart (both of whom are openly gay/lesbian) obviously don't consider Reid anti-gay or homophobic?

You’re an embarrassment. They only care about $$$. If the politics were reversed you’d be throwing a hissy fit and everyone knows it

[Fireballer 2,639]

5 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Why would I do that?  Look at exit polls friend.  College educated people vote dem at an almost 75% clip.  Not saying that everyone has to be college educated but we all know that folks who are college educated are the ones who move the country forward.

For example, we're communicating right now thanks to folks with education doing science stuff. Republicans would still be tapping on wires if the country was filled with nothing but conservatives.

Do some research friend. 

Do everyone a quick favor…don’t use receiving a college degree and being intelligent as interchangeable situations. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

9 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Do everyone a quick favor…don’t use receiving a college degree and being intelligent as interchangeable situations. 

I think most would agree that having a college degree is more highly correlated with a higher IQ than those without.

And again, we're not communicating like we are because folks choose to get educated and become scientist, entrepreneurs, etc.  Same with life saving medical and drug treatments.

Not something done by those who choose not to get educated.

 

[squistion 1,952]

17 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

You’re an embarrassment. They only care about $$$. If the politics were reversed you’d be throwing a hissy fit and everyone knows it

I love how the truth, which you have not been able to logically refute here, embarrasses you. 

[Horseman 2,367]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

I think most would agree that having a college degree is more highly correlated with a higher IQ than those without.

And again, we're not communicating like we are because folks choose to get educated and become scientist, entrepreneurs, etc.  Same with life saving medical and drug treatments.

Not something done by those who choose not to get educated.

 

There is a difference between smart people seeking out a college education and a college education making dumb people smart.   You're arguing the latter with your proof being the former.  

As a matter of example, it's "we are communicating like we are because folks chose" and the earlier trouble using the formatting.  Smart people who got a college education developed this type of communication.  A dumb person who got a college education is struggling to use it.  

[BeachGuy23 642]

4 minutes ago, Horseman said:

There is a difference between smart people seeking out a college education and a college education making dumb people smart.   You're arguing the latter with your proof being the former.  

As a matter of example, it's "we are communicating like we are because folks chose" and the earlier trouble using the formatting.  Smart people who got a college education developed this type of communication.  A dumb person who got a college education is struggling to use it.  

Wow, you're critiquing quick message board posts for grammar?

Do you also comb through twitter and tweet at folks with bad grammar?

You must be a ball at get togethers friend. "friend your text to me didn't have the comma in the correct place!"

[Horseman 2,367]

16 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Wow, you're critiquing quick message board posts for grammar?

Do you also comb through twitter and tweet at folks with bad grammar?

You must be a ball at get togethers friend. "friend your text to me didn't have the comma in the correct place!"

Grammar, spelling and formatting.  No, just the guy that points to a communication method as an example of intelligence that has trouble using it.

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

17 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Wow, you're critiquing quick message board posts for grammar?

Do you also comb through twitter and tweet at folks with bad grammar?

You must be a ball at get togethers friend. "friend your text to me didn't have the comma in the correct place!"

Post your diploma prove me wrong 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Horseman said:

Grammar and formatting.  No, just the guy that points to a communication method as an example of intelligence that has trouble using it.

Good lord you're an uptight fussy little girl.

I could have said using the internet instead of communicating.  The point was the internet was created by folks who went to college and got further education, not some hayseed shooting rats at the local dump or barely graduated high school.

Now leave me alone, I deal with enough uptight emo dudes during the day to day.  Why are you gays always so high strung?

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Post your diploma prove me wrong 

Are you suggesting I have a diploma (singular)? 

You'd lose that bet friend.   Care to wager by any chance?

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Are you suggesting I have a diploma (singular)? 

You'd lose that bet friend.   Care to wager by any chance?

You’re highly educated where did you receive these diplomas from? 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Dizkneelande said:

You’re highly educated where did you receive these diplomas from? 

This seems to have struck a nerve with you.  Why do you care?

Here's where I didn't get them from:  Any online only college like U of Phoenix, any Ivy, Trump University.

Does that narrow it down enough for you friend?

[Horseman 2,367]

4 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Good lord you're an uptight fussy little girl.

I could have said using the internet instead of communicating.  The point was the internet was created by folks who went to college and got further education, not some hayseed shooting rats at the local dump or barely graduated high school.

Now leave me alone, I deal with enough uptight emo dudes during the day to day.  Why are you gays always so high strung?

 

The point and example is lost on you.  I expected that.  You're not what I'd classify as "highly educated".  

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Horseman said:

The point and example is lost on you.  I expected that.  You're not what I'd classify as "highly educated".  

But you are what I'd classify as a fussy little girl.  And most likely gay.

Plus your reading comprehension is no bueno friend.

[HellToupee 1,588]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

But you are what I'd classify as a fussy little girl.  And most likely gay.

Plus your reading comprehension is no bueno friend.

Hey GB , run this by your amigo @squistion

[squistion 1,952]

29 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Wow, you're critiquing quick message board posts for grammar?

Do you also comb through twitter and tweet at folks with bad grammar?

You must be a ball at get togethers friend. "friend your text to me didn't have the comma in the correct place!"

He has always been this annoyingly pedantic. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

9 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

This seems to have struck a nerve with you.  Why do you care?

Here's where I didn't get them from:  Any online only college like U of Phoenix, any Ivy, Trump University.

Does that narrow it down enough for you friend?

No nerve struck just curious where you received these degrees from that make you highly educated.

[BeachGuy23 642]

7 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

No nerve struck just curious where you received these degrees from that make you highly educated.

A whopping 15% of the country has a masters degree or higher.  I have a bachelors and masters from a top 40 state school.

Not sure if that makes me highly educated but I'm sure as crap more educated than most people rolling around this country.

[BeachGuy23 642]

17 minutes ago, squistion said:

He has always been this annoyingly pedantic. 

He certainly is flamboyant. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

It is embarrassing that Rachel Maddow and Jonathan Capehart (both of whom are openly gay/lesbian) obviously don't consider Reid anti-gay or homophobic?

They don’t think Biden is racist. If any republican did and said the things Biden has as it pertains to race they would never stop talking about it. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

6 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

A whopping 15% of the country has a masters degree or higher.  I have a bachelors and masters from a top 40 state school.

Not sure if that makes me highly educated but I'm sure as crap more educated than most people rolling around this country.

Gender studies? 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Gender studies? 

I don't believe that was a thing when I went to college. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

I don't believe that was a thing when I went to college. 

It is now, with a whole slew of other gobbly gook BS degrees. And everyone gets an A. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It is now, with a whole slew of other gobbly gook BS degrees. And everyone gets an A. 

You seem well informed on the subject Mr. Gender Studies graduate.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

You seem well informed on the subject Mr. Gender Studies graduate.

I don’t need to study gender. Men have a pennis and women have a vagina. There ends the lesson. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I don’t need to study gender. Men have a pennis and women have a vagina. There ends the lesson. 

I see no need to converse further.  You have boiled it down quite well. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

I see no need to converse further.  You have boiled it down quite well. 

Sure have. Your president doesn’t think that’s true.  And a scotus justice can’t even say that. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

Highly educated graduates cry about their student loans. It’s working out well for them. Learn garbage and pay through the ass for the privilege.  

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

28 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

A whopping 15% of the country has a masters degree or higher.  I have a bachelors and masters from a top 40 state school.

Not sure if that makes me highly educated but I'm sure as crap more educated than most people rolling around this country.

Ok prove it?

[BeachGuy23 642]

3 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Ok prove it?

No.  I'm not making some outlandish claim like I graudated summa laude from some ivy.

Jeez.  

And quite frankly, IDGAF if you believe me or not friend.  I'd believe whatever you posted about your education.  Who's insecure enough to lie on a message board?

[Baker Boy 1,688]

39 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

A whopping 15% of the country has a masters degree or higher.  I have a bachelors and masters from a top 40 state school.

Not sure if that makes me highly educated but I'm sure as crap more educated than most people rolling around this country.

Unfortunately, the more education you have the more indoctrinated you get. These degrees have nothing to do with intelligence. Today anyone can graduate from college and get a masters. PhD’s aren’t that hard come by either.

[BuckSwope 654]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

As I posted in another thread a month or two back (can't find it in a search) the author of Gender Queer said it should be age restricted to High School kids and is not for ages below that. Also she pointed out that the book has not been made part of any school curriculum outside of being available to HS to read if they wish. 

Who cares what the author said?   My question didn't have anything to do with either point in this post.   I simply asked either of YOU bozos, knowing what is in it, why YOU think it should be in a HS library.  

It's probably the most cited book in the debate, so it would be odd to not know what is in it on your end.  But it's either that, or you know what's in it and evidently find it not that bad or it has some value to override the graphic content.