Trump’s New Company, net-worth balloons to $6.4B

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Back down under $27 again. 

[RLLD 4,156]

On 4/11/2024 at 9:37 AM, RLLD said:

He is a good leader, and if he can get back in there we can enjoy what actual leadership is and looks like.   

 

And this is what focking leadership looks like

Quote

Hunt explained how Trump wanted “a conditions-based withdrawal” of U.S. troops from Afghanistan when he and then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were negotiating with Taliban leaders. During these negotiations, Trump told Taliban leaders that he would kill them “if you harm a hair on a single American,” prompting the translator present with them to appear stunned.

“And Trump goes, ‘Tell him. Just tell him what I said!’” Hunt said on The Sage Steele Show. “Reached into his pocket, pulled out a satellite photo of the leader of the Taliban’s home, and handed it to him, got up, and walked out the room.”

@Sean Mooney   Looks like, I used another link, eh?

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

On 7/4/2024 at 12:34 PM, RLLD said:

 

And this is what focking leadership looks like

@Sean Mooney   Looks like, I used another link, eh?

I'm glad I shamed you into actually using them. 

But at least you are being genuine now. 

[RLLD 4,156]

19 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

I'm glad I shamed you into actually using them. 

But at least you are being genuine now. 

Except, that....your were proven to be a liar, which is why I posted a collection of examples going way back....showing you to be a despicable liar....

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Except, that....your were proven to be a liar, which is why I posted a collection of examples going way back....showing you to be a despicable liar....

I'm glad this is the thing that broke your brain. 

Please keep posting about it so people can see how mentally soft you are. 

[RLLD 4,156]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

I'm glad this is the thing that broke your brain. 

Please keep posting about it so people can see how mentally soft you are. 

You could just apologize, or amend your earlier lie.....into something less untrue....but you wont even do that, because you would rather lie more....than admit you were wrong.....

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You could just apologize, or amend your earlier lie.....into something less untrue....but you wont even do that, because you would rather lie more....than admit you were wrong.....

This was my original line:

"Look- I know you only accept videos from people on YouTube as evidence but just because someone doesn't go after a person vigorously doesn't mean they like that person. "....which was clearly said in jest because of the interactions we had where you were posting videos with a dude and a skeleton breaking down a video recapping an article you clearly didn't read. 

You took that as- "RLLD only uses YouTube videos and nothing else."

That just makes you look like a dope and mentally soft. Of course you are also the guy who said this:

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

[RLLD 4,156]

2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

This was my original line:

"Look- I know you only accept videos from people on YouTube as evidence but just because someone doesn't go after a person vigorously doesn't mean they like that person. "....which was clearly said in jest because of the interactions we had where you were posting videos with a dude and a skeleton breaking down a video recapping an article you clearly didn't read. 

You took that as- "RLLD only uses YouTube videos and nothing else."

That just makes you look like a dope and mentally soft. Of course you are also the guy who said this:

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

I offered you two opportunities to amend your lie, two separate occasions I suggested you amend that lie....and you declined.....then you were provided ample evidence that should have led to you amending your lie....but you refuse.....   even now..... you want to protect your lie.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,093]

I guess Mooney and Gutterboy have just said Fock it, let’s just lie.  Both of them need to be on medication. 

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I offered you two opportunities to amend your lie, two separate occasions I suggested you amend that lie....and you declined.....then you were provided ample evidence that should have led to you amending your lie....but you refuse.....   even now..... you want to protect your lie.

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

[RLLD 4,156]

4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

So.....when I offered.....for you to amend that statement....and you refused, you do understand.....that these were opportunities for you to clarify your intent....right?

Look sport, you were given the chance to amend it....walk it back.....take it back....clarify it.....whatever, but you stood right by it....

and now, in addition to lying more and more......you want to trot out the ascribing of intent? Well, yeah, I am ascribing it....you are damb skippy....how many times does one have to offer to a liar....before they can ascribe intent? Wanna lay that out for us chief?

[Engorgeous George 2,220]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So.....when I offered.....for you to amend that statement....and you refused, you do understand.....that these were opportunities for you to clarify your intent....right?

Look sport, you were given the chance to amend it....walk it back.....take it back....clarify it.....whatever, but you stood right by it....

and now, in addition to lying more and more......you want to trot out the ascribing of intent? Well, yeah, I am ascribing it....you are damb skippy....how many times does one have to offer to a liar....before they can ascribe intent? Wanna lay that out for us chief?

Sport, Skippy, and Chief?  I am going to throw a flag.  You are allowed two but never three in any one posting.

 

Of course this is less objectionable than a single "boyo".

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

Sport, Skippy, and Chief?  I am going to throw a flag.  You are allowed two but never three in any one posting.

What if.....they are spaced out.....with enough dots......Would it still.....be.....acceptable?

Asking for...........a...........................friend

[Engorgeous George 2,220]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

What if.....they are spaced out.....with enough dots......Would it still.....be.....acceptable?

Asking for...........a...........................friend

I'm a big fan of the ellipsis so I may not be an unbiased judge on this matter.  I am going to go with the ellipsis, much like the ampersand, cures most violations. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, Engorgeous George said:

I'm a big fan of the ellipsis so I may not be an unbiased judge on this matter.  I am going to go with the ellipsis, much like the ampersand, cures most violations. 

Thanks.........Champ!

[RLLD 4,156]

6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Sport, Skippy, and Chief?  I am going to throw a flag.  You are allowed two but never three in any one posting.

 

Of course this is less objectionable than a single "boyo".

[RLLD 4,156]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

What if.....they are spaced out.....with enough dots......Would it still.....be.....acceptable?

Asking for...........a...........................friend

Rent free  

[Engorgeous George 2,220]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Thanks.........Champ!

Anytime Duderino (I'm not into the whole brevity thing)

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Rent free  

Mocking you means rent free?

I'll remember..............................................................that

[RLLD 4,156]

14 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Mocking you means rent free?

I'll remember..............................................................that

I had no idea I was this deep in your head 

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

47 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So.....when I offered.....for you to amend that statement....and you refused, you do understand.....that these were opportunities for you to clarify your intent....right?

Look sport, you were given the chance to amend it....walk it back.....take it back....clarify it.....whatever, but you stood right by it....

and now, in addition to lying more and more......you want to trot out the ascribing of intent? Well, yeah, I am ascribing it....you are damb skippy....how many times does one have to offer to a liar....before they can ascribe intent? Wanna lay that out for us chief?

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

 

It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness. 

[RLLD 4,156]

6 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

 

It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness. 

And I remain reticent to ascribe intent.  So the next time someone does what you did, they will get the same opportunity....and if they also refuse to amend their statement, I will ascribe intent to them.  Just because you restrain yourself, does not mean you will never do it.

So, then, the next time you lie, expect the same opportunity to revise your statement, and if you again stand by the lie, I will ascribe intent.

 

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And I remain reticent to ascribe intent.  So the next time someone does what you did, they will get the same opportunity....and if they also refuse to amend their statement, I will ascribe intent to them.  Just because you restrain yourself, does not mean you will never do it.

So, then, the next time you lie, expect the same opportunity to revise your statement, and if you again stand by the lie, I will ascribe intent.

 

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

 

It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,093]

3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people....  particularly negative intent."

 

Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....

 

It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness. 

Ah, going the Gutterboy I was joking route. No very original, but I guess you can throw it out there when the gun is empty. 

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Ah, going the Gutterboy I was joking route. No very original, but I guess you can throw it out there when the gun is empty. 

Your head is empty.

Stay out of this Paul Blart. Go write the next of your one thousand posts a month you no life having sh!t sipper

[Hardcore troubadour 15,093]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

Your head is empty.

Stay out of this Paul Blart. Go write the next of your one thousand posts a month you no life having sh!t sipper

Originality isn’t your thing.  

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Originality isn’t your thing.  

You want to go back to the PM conversation we had before? Maybe this time you will tell me where you are on the autism spectrum

[Hardcore troubadour 15,093]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

You want to go back to the PM conversation we had before? Maybe this time you will tell me where you are on the autism spectrum

You mean that day you asked me that 17 times while you were supposed to be teaching? Ok. 

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

21 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You mean that day you asked me that 17 times while you were supposed to be teaching? Ok. 

A majority of those comments were at night...and you kept responding despite what you want to try and present to people here. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,093]

4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

A majority of those comments were at night...and you kept responding despite what you want to try and present to people here. 

 

More lies.  You’re fully committed now.  

[RLLD 4,156]

32 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

You want to go back to the PM conversation we had before? Maybe this time you will tell me where you are on the autism spectrum

And I remain reticent to ascribe intent.  So the next time someone does what you did, they will get the same opportunity....and if they also refuse to amend their statement, I will ascribe intent to them.  Just because you restrain yourself, does not mean you will never do it.

So, then, the next time you lie, expect the same opportunity to revise your statement, and if you again stand by the lie, I will ascribe intent.

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

More lies.  You’re fully committed now.  

Prove it

15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And I remain reticent to ascribe intent.  So the next time someone does what you did, they will get the same opportunity....and if they also refuse to amend their statement, I will ascribe intent to them.  Just because you restrain yourself, does not mean you will never do it.

So, then, the next time you lie, expect the same opportunity to revise your statement, and if you again stand by the lie, I will ascribe intent.

Mentally soft. 

You missed a joke based in hyperbole. And you've posted referencing it now for two weeks while also posting other gibberish about how you don't assign intent when it is clear you did here. You've been exposed. 

[RLLD 4,156]

18 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Prove it

Mentally soft. 

You missed a joke based in hyperbole. And you've posted referencing it now for two weeks while also posting other gibberish about how you don't assign intent when it is clear you did here. You've been exposed. 

So that we are clear.....today.....your position is that you were joking when you posted it, but.....decided to not tell anyone....until....today?

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So that we are clear.....today.....your position is that you were joking when you posted it, but.....decided to not tell anyone....until....today?

June 28th I said:

"I appreciate that the YouTube hyperbole line (which was really about interactions YOU AND I have had) is the line that has broken you."

 

I also said:

"Dude the last few back and forths we have had have led to you relying on anecdotal YouTube videos- including one with a skeleton sitting behind him in a basement. "

which was very clearly me pointing to a few instances.

 

So again- you are mentally soft and weak. 

[RLLD 4,156]

4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

June 28th I said:

"I appreciate that the YouTube hyperbole line (which was really about interactions YOU AND I have had) is the line that has broken you."

 

I also said:

"Dude the last few back and forths we have had have led to you relying on anecdotal YouTube videos- including one with a skeleton sitting behind him in a basement. "

which was very clearly me pointing to a few instances.

 

So again- you are mentally soft and weak. 

OK, so we have a new excuse, really wish you had considered.....revealing this secret motive earlier, but water under the bridge of course.

Now, will you require constant reminders that I link ( and not from youtube) rather frequently? Or should I not include you. Not sure if you might want to try some "humor" around this one in the future....

[Sean Mooney 1,955]

39 minutes ago, RLLD said:

OK, so we have a new excuse, really wish you had considered.....revealing this secret motive earlier, but water under the bridge of course.

Now, will you require constant reminders that I link ( and not from youtube) rather frequently? Or should I not include you. Not sure if you might want to try some "humor" around this one in the future....

Not a new excuse. I said this to you over a week ago and you decided to go down this path. I'd say look in the mirror.

Also- don't say nonsense about not ascribing intent when you do so readily

[RLLD 4,156]

3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Not a new excuse. I said this to you over a week ago and you decided to go down this path. I'd say look in the mirror.

Also- don't say nonsense about not ascribing intent when you do so readily

Oh, well then you revealed this was all just humor a long time ago?   Huh, ok, your posting did not show that aspect. 

[Dozer FBG 324]

I have a little powder left in my Charles Schwab account.

Right now DJT is $31.26

Easy temporary +10% at open.

Could go through the roof the first hour or so…

Sell around lunchtime… That’s the plan, anyway.

[thegeneral 3,044]

1 hour ago, Dozer FBG said:

I have a little powder left in my Charles Schwab account.

Right now DJT is $31.26

Easy temporary +10% at open.

Could go through the roof the first hour or so…

Sell around lunchtime… That’s the plan, anyway.

Problem is you will get in after the bounce. But I have to admit I thought the same thing. Should have a banner week.

[TrailGuy 554]

Good buying opportunity below $20 soon