Trump wants more and earlier debates vs. Biden

[BudBro 175]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm fine without debates this year. Clownzo would just turn them into his usual chest-beating circus of decorum destruction. 

We know nobody, in real life, votes for democrats after they see their first paycheck as an adult.  It's cute how you role play, though.

[Jose M 125]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Not to mention my link already covered the poll he's talking about.  I don't hide data and cherry pick links like he does. 

You shouldn't have to mention it, it's 538. 

I mean it's Tim so I shouldn't be surprised, but, the level of ignorance is just astounding.  How do people like that function in the real world?

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Yep, can't trust Biden not to sh*t himself in public. 

Keep saying that. His State of the Union speech turned the tide of all this nonsense you want so badly to believe. He's shred Clownzo in a debate, but this country doesn't need another chit show of Clownzo debate dooshery.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,134]

3 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm fine without debates this year. Clownzo would just turn them into his usual chest-beating circus of decorum destruction. 

It’s a good way to reassure the independent voters that will decide this election that Biden is up to the task. Good plan. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

1 minute ago, BudBro said:

We know nobody, in real life, votes for democrats after they see their first paycheck as an adult.  It's cute how you role play, though.

Do you fock a blow-up doll of Hannity while having the house to yourself while your wife is out focking a real man?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,134]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Do you fock a blow-up doll of Hannity while having the house to yourself while your wife is out focking a real man?

Married 3x 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s a good way to reassure the independent voters that will decide this election that Biden is up to the task. Good plan. 

Independent voters will have Clownzo's trials on felony charges to enjoy long before then. Battleground states already are swinging back to Biden as common sense and reality sets in. 

[Strike 5,337]

Just now, Jose M said:

You shouldn't have to mention it, it's 538. 

I mean it's Tim so I shouldn't be surprised, but, the level of ignorance is just astounding.  How do people like that function in the real world?

That's what happens when you are a nepotism baby who never had to work for anything in your life.  You take advantage of the desperate illegal immigrants while running your daddy's business and spewing crap all over the interwebs.  If Tim had been forced to earn his own way in life he'd be one of those souls kissing Gavin Newsom's jock for getting him a $5 raise at McDonalds last week.

[jonmx 2,425]

2 hours ago, zsasz said:

LOL....Trump skipped the Republican debates; the guy is phonier than red hair on a Chinaman.

The Democrats refused to have a real primary by keeping RFK jr out of the race.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Married 3x 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Stalks other people's wives and ex-wives on the Internet. Thinks Juneteenth is in December. Thinks aircraft can't transport tanks, despite his military experience. Shall I trot out the rest of the list of your terminal stupidity and creepiness?

 

[Jose M 125]

10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I've seen it all now. That post was the metal helmet of politics.  

[The Real timschochet 6,543]

13 minutes ago, Strike said:

Let me quote the post I replied to:

And when confronted you link ONE poll. Your post suggests there is a trend, that Trump is getting his hat handed to him, and my post is outdated.  So I posted a  link to 538, a respected polling aggregator that even YOU should consider credible.  It shows pretty much ALL the polls, including the ONE you chose to link to.  See, I didn't cherry pick links like you did.  And the data on the site I linked to does show a trend.  The trend is that Trump is leading in MOST of the polls, even ones MORE RECENT than the one you linked to.  Therefore, it PROVES that my assertion is NOT "3 months old" and if anything supports what I said.  You're a focking hack.  As I always say, I'm wiling to debate differences of opinion, but not your posting "misinformation" of the FACTS.

For your convenience, I will repost the link I posted earlier that you either had trouble comprehending or chose not to look at so you can try to educate yourself further on this issue:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/

There is a trend. 538 hasn’t caught up to it. I quoted you one poll because I’m lazy and you’re too stubborn to see what’s happening. Here’s an analyst discussing it: 

https://www.al.com/news/2024/04/election-is-changing-latest-trump-biden-polling-shows-clear-leader-strategist-claims.html?outputType=amp

[BudBro 175]

9 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Do you fock a blow-up doll of Hannity while having the house to yourself while your wife is out focking a real man?

Whichever personality of yours this is needs work.  No men vote democrat.

[Strike 5,337]

26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-4-point-lead-over-054005574.html

From your own link:

Quote

The poll included many ways to measure candidate support– most pointing to a close race.

Even your own link disproves your assertion that my stance is "3 months ago." 

Reading comprehension and logic just aren't your strong suits.   Remember when you promised to stay in your own thread?   Those were good times.......

[The Real timschochet 6,543]

8 minutes ago, Strike said:

That's what happens when you are a nepotism baby who never had to work for anything in your life.  You take advantage of the desperate illegal immigrants while running your daddy's business and spewing crap all over the interwebs.  If Tim had been forced to earn his own way in life he'd be one of those souls kissing Gavin Newsom's jock for getting him a $5 raise at McDonalds last week.

Not surprised that Jose agrees with you. You guys share a similar level of knowledge about politics. 

[The Real timschochet 6,543]

Just now, Strike said:

From your own link:

Even your own link disproves your assertion that my stance is "3 months ago." 

Reading comprehension and logic just aren't your strong suits.   Remember when you promised to stay in your own thread?   Those were good times.......

When I wrote that your stance was 3 months old I was referring to your claim that Biden is incompetent. That perception changed for most people after the state of the union. So maybe it’s 2 months, big deal. 
 

The numbers have changed. Now if inflation continues to be bad it will change again, and not well for Biden. But right now Biden is the favorite, 

[Strike 5,337]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

There is a trend. 538 hasn’t caught up to it. I quoted you one poll because I’m lazy and you’re too stubborn to see what’s happening. Here’s an analyst discussing it: 

https://www.al.com/news/2024/04/election-is-changing-latest-trump-biden-polling-shows-clear-leader-strategist-claims.html?outputType=amp

To further support your argument, that is clearly refuted by my 538 link, you post an article that is all about a Dem strategist's claim that the election is turning in Biden's favor? 

Quote

A key Democratic strategist said the election tide is turning in favor of President Joe Biden’s bid for a second term in office.

And you think that HELPS you?  Even that article says the race is close:

Quote

The poll included many ways to measure candidate support– most pointing to a close race.

You're not doing well in this one.  You should probably quit while you're behind.  I'm about done with this.  It's boring as you continue to misrepresent the FACTS, as is typical for you.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,134]

15 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Independent voters will have Clownzo's trials on felony charges to enjoy long before then. Battleground states already are swinging back to Biden as common sense and reality sets in. 

I think the 5 dollars for a dozen eggs and 4 dollars for a gallon of gas will help too. You guys got this. 

[The Real timschochet 6,543]

Just now, Strike said:

To further support your argument, that is clearly refuted by my 538 link, you post an article that is all about a Dem strategist's claim that the election is turning in Biden's favor? 

And you think that HELPS you?  Even that article says the race is close:

You're not doing well in this one.  You should probably quit while you're behind.  I'm about done with this.  It's boring as you continue to misrepresent the FACTS, as is typical for you.

You should be done with it. You’re not getting it as usual. Go on thinking that Trump is winning. See you in November. 

[The Real timschochet 6,543]

9 minutes ago, BudBro said:

No men vote democrat.

So what you’re saying is that you like Republicans because you’re attracted to all the men? 

[Strike 5,337]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

When I wrote that your stance was 3 months old I was referring to your claim that Biden is incontinent.

 

Glad you agree with me.  Anyways, I've done enough owning of you in this thread.  Engaging with you is like taking candy from a baby, a nepotism baby.  See ya.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,134]

Just now, Strike said:

Glad you agree with me.  Anyways, I've done enough owning of you in this thread.  Engaging with you is like taking candy from a baby, a nepotism baby.  See ya.

Oooh. Good one! 

[jerryskids 6,657]

28 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm fine without debates this year. Clownzo would just turn them into his usual chest-beating circus of decorum destruction. 

 

[Strike 5,337]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

You should be done with it. You’re not getting it as usual. Go on thinking that Trump is winning. See you in November. 

If this had been your assertion, we could have had a nice, intelligent debate on this topic.  Which is what you've claimed to want.  Instead, you made a FALSE claim, proven so by your own links.  It's always the same thing with you, different day.  So tiring.  Remember when you promised to stay in your own thread?  You keep promises about as well as Biden.  No wonder you support him.

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

The MAGAturd collective is restless tonight as its beloved Clownzo's ship sinks farther into the abyss.

[shorepatrol 1,870]

41 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not accusing you of being a sycophant. But I do believe that your political beliefs are affecting your ability to look at this objectively. 

 

[5-Points 3,437]

So we all agree that there's no reason why Biden, or Trump, should avoid a debate, right? 

Or multiple debates. Between totally legit court cases or trips to get ice cream and taking naps. There's no reason either of them should not debate the other, right? 

 

 

 

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

1 minute ago, 5-Points said:

So we all agree that there's no reason why Biden, or Trump, should avoid a debate, right? 

Or multiple debates. Between totally legit court cases or trips to get ice cream and taking naps. There's no reason either of them should not debate the other, right? 

 

 

 

 

If Clownzo could actually have a debate that centers on issues and solutions rather than him acting like a petulant child who blowhards on when it's not his turn to speak. He turned the last ones into worldwide embarrassments. 

[Strike 5,337]

3 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

So we all agree that there's no reason why Biden, or Trump, should avoid a debate, right? 

Or multiple debates. Between totally legit court cases or trips to get ice cream and taking naps. There's no reason either of them should not debate the other, right? 

 

It shouldn't matter.  The public deserves to have the debates in order to make an informed decision.  If a candidate is incapable of debating they're incapable of being President.  If they're unwilling then we shouldn't want them to be President.

[Strike 5,337]

Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

If Clownzo could actually have a debate that centers on issues and solutions rather than him acting like a petulant child who blowhards on when it's not his turn to speak. He turned the last ones into worldwide embarrassments. 

Bullsh*t.  And any decorum issues fall on the people running the debates.  Want coherent debates?   Have set time limits and shut the candidate's mic off at the end of that time, midsentence.  If needed have a physical partition between the two so neither can intimidate the other as Hitlery says Trump tried to do to her.  Any decorum issues can be overcome.  The people hosting the debates LIKE it when the candidates act like asses because it's good for ratings.  But they can make a good debate happen if they want to.  It's not up to the candidates, for the same reasons we have refs in sporting events.

[5-Points 3,437]

6 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If Clownzo could actually have a debate that centers on issues and solutions rather than him acting like a petulant child who blowhards on when it's not his turn to speak. He turned the last ones into worldwide embarrassments. 

We remember that completely differently. 

[double tour 90]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Bullsh*t.  And any decorum issues fall on the people running the debates.  Want coherent debates?   Have set time limits and shut the candidate's mic off at the end of that time, midsentence.  If needed have a physical partition between the two so neither can intimidate the other as Hitlery says Trump tried to do to her.  Any decorum issues can be overcome.  The people hosting the debates LIKE it when the candidates act like asses because it's good for ratings.  But they can make a good debate happen if they want to.  It's not up to the candidates, for the same reasons we have refs in sporting events.

Yep. Put each on the clock to answer a question. Then each get two rebuttles to each other, also on the clock. If they go over by a few seconds let them finish then mic gets turned off when they finish their sentence/thought. Rebuttles should be a bit more loose on time but only by like 10 seconds at most.

A child could set up these rules to keep these things in order. 

 

[weepaws 3,159]

Will they debate what is a liberal and what does a conservative look like.  Sounds silly for them to debate when they have the same agenda.  

[5-Points 3,437]

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

It shouldn't matter.  The public deserves to have the debates in order to make an informed decision.  If a candidate is incapable of debating they're incapable of being President.  If they're unwilling then we shouldn't want them to be President.

You're absolutely right. The electorate deserve to hear the two candidates debate each other. I think there should be multiple debates, back to back, in different locations, within days of each other. 

There's no reason why that can't happen, is there? 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

11 minutes ago, Strike said:

Bullsh*t.  And any decorum issues fall on the people running the debates.  Want coherent debates?   Have set time limits and shut the candidate's mic off at the end of that time, midsentence.  If needed have a physical partition between the two so neither can intimidate the other as Hitlery says Trump tried to do to her.  Any decorum issues can be overcome.  The people hosting the debates LIKE it when the candidates act like asses because it's good for ratings.  But they can make a good debate happen if they want to.  It's not up to the candidates, for the same reasons we have refs in sporting events.

Then MAGAturds will  when Clownzo gets his mic cut off and then come up with some kind of conspiracy theory even if Fox is hosting the debates.

Everything you're saying is that the people running the debates need to take drastic measures to keep Clownzo on a leash.

How about Clownzo self-leash and show some respect for the debates.

Sure, in the past candidates have gone on past the buzzer, but what Clownzo did in the last debates was a focking embarrassment.

 

[Strike 5,337]

4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Then MAGAturds will  when Clownzo gets his mic cut off and then come up with some kind of conspiracy theory even if Fox is hosting the debates.

Everything you're saying is that the people running the debates need to take drastic measures to keep Clownzo on a leash.

How about Clownzo self-leash and show some respect for the debates.

Sure, in the past candidates have gone on past the buzzer, but what Clownzo did in the last debates was a focking embarrassment.

 

No.  It's not just Biden.  I couldn't watch the recent GOP debates.  I thought I was watching a room full of petulant children.  The Dem debates weren't much better 4 years ago, when Kameltoe was calling Biden a racist before he chose her to be VP.  Good times.  But no, it's been a downward spiral for a long time, not just since Biden couldn't behave himself against Trump last time. 

[double tour 90]

Speaking of debates, when is Biden scheduled to go into his basement bunker for the campaign season? 

[zsasz 366]

13 hours ago, Strike said:

To further support your argument, that is clearly refuted by my 538 link, you post an article that is all about a Dem strategist's claim that the election is turning in Biden's favor? 

And you think that HELPS you?  Even that article says the race is close:

You're not doing well in this one.  You should probably quit while you're behind.  I'm about done with this.  It's boring as you continue to misrepresent the FACTS, as is typical for you.

Why wouldn't it be close...particularly right now?

 

 

 

 

[Jose M 125]

17 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

There is a trend. 538 hasn’t caught up to it. I quoted you one poll because I’m lazy and you’re too stubborn to see what’s happening. Here’s an analyst discussing it: 

https://www.al.com/news/2024/04/election-is-changing-latest-trump-biden-polling-shows-clear-leader-strategist-claims.html?outputType=amp

An analyst?  What the fok are you talking about?

It's a journalist that wrote an article based on a tweet from Simon Rosenberg.  Simon Rosenberg is founder of the New Democratic Network.  

Your level of stupidity is only overshadowed by your insistence to gobble up garbage that tells you what you want to believe.  

Oh and the single poll you provided because "you're lazy":

AllSides Media Bias Rating of The Economist: Lean Left display media bias in ways that align with liberal, progressive, or left-wing thought and/or policy agendas.

Nice work blowhard.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,134]

Just now, Jose M said:

An analyst?  What the fok are you talking about?

It's a journalist that wrote an article based on a tweet from Simon Rosenberg.  Simon Rosenberg is founder of the New Democratic Network.  

Your level of stupidity is only overshadowed by your insistence to gobble up garbage that tells you what you want to believe.  

Oh and the single poll you provided because "you're lazy":

AllSides Media Bias Rating of The Economist: Lean Left display media bias in ways that align with liberal, progressive, or left-wing thought and/or policy agendas.

Nice work blowhard.

 

They like being lied to. What other explanation is there at this point?