Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[jerryskids 6,799]

Just now, thegeneral said:

The economy was growing in the last quarter at a greater pace than last quarter prior to Covid hitting us

So why can't she answer it?  I mean, she already had the question prior to the debate, and has been asked it again since.   

[MDC 7,428]

Sometimes I feel like you guys think whoever wins the argument gets to pick the next POTUS.  

[jerryskids 6,799]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

Sometimes I feel like you guys think whoever wins the argument gets to pick the next POTUS.  

I'm just funnin' with Tim who thinks Word Salad Harris answered 2/3 of the questions.   

[seafoam1 3,025]

17 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

September 2020 was miserable.

4 years later my salary is 50% higher and my 401k is up 60%.  My house is also worth 20% more.

You're right. McDonalds DID give raises in California. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

49 minutes ago, purdygood said:

I could literally say the same about every "independent" who votes for Trump.  They are just bigger hypocrites than the people who lean Harris.  

No, you LITERALLY couldn't. 

[squistion 2,202]

58 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Umm no. I am not a Communist. And I’m not always even a liberal. 
 

I am though, like you, a Caleb Williams fan. The Trojans could sure use him at the moment. 

I would omit the word "always" in the bolded.

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

44 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Why too bad? How many debates does he need to go to to please the idiot democrats? He already disposed of one of your idiots. Why does he need to keep doing what you all demand of him? Let us know when the kameltoe takes questions from the right. 

He doesn’t have to do anymore. He can take his ball and go home, it’s all good. 

[jerryskids 6,799]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He doesn’t have to do anymore. He can take his ball and go home, it’s all good. 

He turned down a CNN debate?  What, was HuffPo not available?

Kamala doesn't have the guts to face Trump on a neutral field.  She is tough though -- she'll shoot intruders, and world tyrants fear her.   

[Strike 5,546]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

He turned down a CNN debate?  What, was HuffPo not available?

Kamala doesn't have the guts to face Trump on a neutral field.  She is tough though -- she'll shoot intruders, and world tyrants fear her.   

Trump offered her two rebates that she turned down.  Tim ignores that fact.

[5-Points 3,533]

5 hours ago, squistion said:

Oh yes she will if Trump really wants to debate her.

After that last debacle where she mopped the floor with him (so to speak) he needs to erase the image of "They're eating the cats" which has made him a viral laughing stock. If he won't agree then it's a Win/Win situation for Harris as she currently has all the momentum (particular with Vance continually shooting the Trump campaign in the foot) and the Georgia fiasco with Robinson. 

If she "mopped the floor with him" last time then she should have no problem doing the next debate on FOX. 

The only reason she would refuse is if she needs the help from her friends to keep from exposing herself as the complete idiot that she is. 

 

[TrailGuy 554]

31 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

He turned down a CNN debate?  What, was HuffPo not available?

Kamala doesn't have the guts to face Trump on a neutral field.  She is tough though -- she'll shoot intruders, and world tyrants fear her.   

He already did a CNN debate and he said they were very fair.  It's obvious why he won't debate because he got humiliated during the first one.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

1 minute ago, TrailGuy said:

He already did a CNN debate and he said they were very fair.  It's obvious why he won't debate because he got humiliated during the first one.

Aww....that's so cute.  You actually believe she did. 

Sure she did, little pig.  Sure she did.

[squistion 2,202]

Just now, TrailGuy said:

He already did a CNN debate and he said they were very fair.  It's obvious why he won't debate because he got humiliated during the first one.

And that he keeps telling us that everyone said he won...if so why not face her again under her terms?

[seafoam1 3,025]

4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

He doesn’t have to do anymore. He can take his ball and go home, it’s all good. 

Why won't the kameltoe take questions from the conservatives off script?

[seafoam1 3,025]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

And that he keeps telling us that everyone said he won...if so why not face her again under her terms?

Why? He already went to 2 debates.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

Kamala is the one that is hiding.  Didn't she turn down 2 debates with him previously?

[seafoam1 3,025]

If the libs insert another candidate, does Trump have to go to two more debates?

[seafoam1 3,025]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Kamala is the one that is hiding.  Didn't she turn down 2 debates with him previously?

Yes she did. And she does nothing ad hoc. Because she is stupid and couldn't handle it. . 

[jerryskids 6,799]

9 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

He already did a CNN debate and he said they were very fair.  It's obvious why he won't debate because he got humiliated during the first one.

He faced a dead guy in the CNN one.  And Vox told you he got humiliated.  Independents seem less impressed with her word salads.

[TrailGuy 554]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

He faced a dead guy in the CNN one.  And Vox told you he got humiliated.  Independents seem less impressed with her word salads.

And he talked about how fair CNN was. But now CNN is biased, right?

I don't read vox.  I watched the debate and he was humiliated.  He screamed about eating dogs and cats.  Every independent and even right wing pundits said he was awful. Be better.

[seafoam1 3,025]

Just now, TrailGuy said:

And he talked about how fair CNN was. But now CNN is biased, right?

I don't read vox.  I watched the debate and he was humiliated.  He screamed about eating dogs and cats.  Every independent and even right wing pundits said he was awful. Be better.

Poor pimpledoosh.

[5-Points 3,533]

31 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Kamala is the one that is hiding.  Didn't she turn down 2 debates with him previously?

Yes. But she reconsidered the last one since her best friend, the head of ABC and her sorority sister moderator ensured her that they'd make sure she had an easy go of it. 

[jerryskids 6,799]

9 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

And he talked about how fair CNN was. But now CNN is biased, right?

I don't read vox.  I watched the debate and he was humiliated.  He screamed about eating dogs and cats.  Every independent and even right wing pundits said he was awful. Be better.

My point, boyo, is that Trump felt good after that first debate because there was no way he could have felt otherwise.  He and his team know it will be different on CNN with a live opponent.

Every independent did not say he was awful, that's your feelz.  If I had said that, you would keep quoting it for weeks.

[TrailGuy 554]

15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

My point, boyo, is that Trump felt good after that first debate because there was no way he could have felt otherwise.  He and his team know it will be different on CNN with a live opponent.

Every independent did not say he was awful, that's your feelz.  If I had said that, you would keep quoting it for weeks.

You're gaslighting.

“But look, but Dana and Jake, I used to call him ‘Fake Tapper,'” Trump said. “Now I call him Jake Tapper because he treated us very fairly and so did Dana — treat me very fairly. I think it was, you know, just about neutral.”

Trump admitted the moderation was neutral.  No reason to think it wouldn't be neutral again.

"Every" implies hyperbole which I can define for you if needed.  Otherwise I'll just present this...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-had-bad-night-conservative-034835075.html

https://www.alreporter.com/2024/09/11/polls-panels-and-pundits-agree-kamala-harris-was-the-clear-winner-of-debate/

https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/editorials/inq2/kamala-harris-won-presidential-debate-donald-trump-immigrants-fracking-crime-20240910.html

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/huge-majority-debate-watchers-say-harris-took-home-victory-cnn-poll-finds

https://english.elpais.com/usa/elections/2024-09-11/who-won-the-presidential-debate-prediction-markets-analysts-and-early-polls-declare-kamala-harris-the-winner.html

 

[jerryskids 6,799]

28 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

You're gaslighting.

“But look, but Dana and Jake, I used to call him ‘Fake Tapper,'” Trump said. “Now I call him Jake Tapper because he treated us very fairly and so did Dana — treat me very fairly. I think it was, you know, just about neutral.”

Trump admitted the moderation was neutral.  No reason to think it wouldn't be neutral again.

"Every" implies hyperbole which I can define for you if needed.  Otherwise I'll just present this...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-had-bad-night-conservative-034835075.html

https://www.alreporter.com/2024/09/11/polls-panels-and-pundits-agree-kamala-harris-was-the-clear-winner-of-debate/

https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/editorials/inq2/kamala-harris-won-presidential-debate-donald-trump-immigrants-fracking-crime-20240910.html

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/huge-majority-debate-watchers-say-harris-took-home-victory-cnn-poll-finds

https://english.elpais.com/usa/elections/2024-09-11/who-won-the-presidential-debate-prediction-markets-analysts-and-early-polls-declare-kamala-harris-the-winner.html

 

You obviously did a google search and just posted links you didn't read, boyo. None of them are polls.  One of them is a collection of opinions.

I never said Trump aced it, or even did well.  Back in the thread about the debate, I was clear that I didn't think he did well.  

I explained why Trump said nice things about the last debate, and why his team is more concerned about debating a live person with CNN.  You did not respond to that.

[TrailGuy 554]

17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You obviously did a google search and just posted links you didn't read, boyo. None of them are polls.  One of them is a collection of opinions.

I never said Trump aced it, or even did well.  Back in the thread about the debate, I was clear that I didn't think he did well.  

I explained why Trump said nice things about the last debate, and why his team is more concerned about debating a live person with CNN.  You did not respond to that.

I read the links boyo and never said anything about polls.  But the second and fourth links contain poll discussion so maybe you didn't read them.

His team should be concerned about debating a live person because they lost the last time that happened.

But that has nothing to do with the fairness of the moderators.  Trump said CNN was fair.  Were they fair only because of Biden? With Harris they will favor her?  Care to explain why?  Makes no sense.

Anyone who watches the debate saw Harris belittle him, goad him and then call him a disgrace, and the weakling couldn't even look at her.  Pure humiliation.

[TimHauck 2,876]

7 hours ago, purdygood said:

Well they want to go after Trump and his friends because they can have A LOT of success.  All tax cheats. 

 

7 hours ago, jonmx said:

Lol....you are effing clueless.  The whistleblowers inside the IRS are pointing to gross abuses to coverup the cheating of the Biden crime family.  

I would bet it’s more just because they want to keep their jobs and don’t want Elon to fire them all

[TimHauck 2,876]

8 hours ago, 5-Points said:

The last debate was on her terms. She doesn't get to dictate the terms of the next one. She either meets Trump on the debate stage of his choosing or it proves she can't debate him without help from her friends in the media. 

Agree.  Pretty sh1tty of her to make him sound scared if she’s the one demanding it be on CNN.  Has he said he would do one on Fox?

[TrailGuy 554]

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Agree.  Pretty sh1tty of her to make him sound scared if she’s the one demanding it be on CNN.  Has he said he would do one on Fox?

The ABC debate, he agreed to previously.  Those were not her terms.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

16 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

The ABC debate, he agreed to previously.  Those were not her terms.

But, but, but, but ...

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

27 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

I read the links boyo and never said anything about polls.  But the second and fourth links contain poll discussion so maybe you didn't read them.

His team should be concerned about debating a live person because they lost the last time that happened.

But that has nothing to do with the fairness of the moderators.  Trump said CNN was fair.  Were they fair only because of Biden? With Harris they will favor her?  Care to explain why?  Makes no sense.

Anyone who watches the debate saw Harris belittle him, goad him and then call him a disgrace, and the weakling couldn't even look at her.  Pure humiliation.

Tell me you don't read your own links, without telling me you don't read your own links. 

[TimHauck 2,876]

32 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

The ABC debate, he agreed to previously.  Those were not her terms.

He agreed to it, but he obviously wasn’t the one that suggested it.

[jonmx 2,429]

46 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

I would bet it’s more just because they want to keep their jobs and don’t want Elon to fire them all

They started whistkeblowing a year ago and their jobs have been in peril ever sense by the authoritarian bastards you endlessly bootlick for. I hope one day you wake the eff up about all the corrupt evil bastards you are empowering. 

[TimHauck 2,876]

5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

They started whistkeblowing a year ago and their jobs have been in peril ever sense by the authoritarian bastards you endlessly bootlick for. I hope one day you wake the eff up about all the corrupt evil bastards you are empowering. 

By voting for Trump?

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

12 minutes ago, jonmx said:

They started whistkeblowing a year ago and their jobs have been in peril ever sense by the authoritarian bastards you endlessly bootlick for. I hope one day you wake the eff up about all the corrupt evil bastards you are empowering. 

I was missing your use of this word. You’ve had at least a dozen posts without it and I was wondering what happened? It’s like Mahomes never throwing to Kelce anymore. 

[jonmx 2,429]

5 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I was missing your use of this word. You’ve had at least a dozen posts without it and I was wondering what happened? It’s like Mahomes never throwing to Kelce anymore. 

When Trump wins North Carolina by 4 to 8 points will you admit you are being lied to by the media you worship?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

A federal ban on fracking would cost Pennsylvania hundreds of thousands of jobs. Plus the Amish are pissed and Philadelphia is even more of a drug zombie  infested urban war zone. Harris has a problem in Pennsylvania 

[TimHauck 2,876]

4 hours ago, jonmx said:

When Trump wins North Carolina by 4 to 8 points will you admit you are being lied to by the media you worship?

I think Trump will win NC but it won’t be by 4-8 points

[squistion 2,202]

 

[Reality 3,121]