Project 2025

[Fnord 2,051]

9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Hard to recover from that.

Hard for who? Fox, or the poor bastards watching ridiculous propaganda all day and night?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Ever since he accidentally posted gay pron here he's been changing handles trying to get away from it.

What’s your excuse? How’s Ron Artest doing? 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

It says america first  in project 2025. No wonder liberals are terrified of it. 

[thegeneral 2,883]

Just now, Fnord said:

Hard for who? Fox, or the poor bastards watching ridiculous propaganda all day and night?

If you consuming Newsmax for info, well, likely a goner. 

[thegeneral 2,883]

15 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Ever since he accidentally posted gay pron here he's been changing handles trying to get away from it.

Wait wiut

[seafoam1 2,798]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Wait wiut

Oh, he's a libtard like you golden showers boy. You should believe him for sure. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Wait wiut

 

He also shared that he lets his wife bang other dudes.  He's a literal cuck.

[thegeneral 2,883]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Oh, he's a libtard like you golden showers boy. You should believe him for sure. 

Someone mentions Gay Pron and Peefoam’s ears perk right up!

[thegeneral 2,883]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

He also shared that he lets his wife bang other dudes.  He's a literal cuck.

[seafoam1 2,798]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Someone mentions Gay Pron and Peefoam’s ears perk right up!

After you jumped in. You beat me to it golden showers boy. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

52 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

"white" and "poor" are not opposite terms.

You should tell that to pedo Joe 

[thegeneral 2,883]

5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

After you jumped in. You beat me to it golden showers boy. 

Sure Powerbottom Peefoam 

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,738]

33 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

He also shared that he lets his wife bang other dudes.  He's a literal cuck.

 

 

 

[Sean Mooney 1,935]

2 hours ago, Fnord said:

I notice you disappear regularly and then come back with new handles. Why is that Tony/Horse/Rodger/Jose? Are you a weakling? Or just too stupid to remember a password? Such a big POS you keep getting banned from a place where you can essentially say anything? I'm sure your reasons are compelling and totally not your fault. Pray tell!

Also ironic he is the one who sits here calling himself a "life winner" yet he has to keep making new names to post here.

He also- as gutterboy said- is the one who posted gay porn links here.

He also is the one who talked about whoring his wife out to others while he watches

He is also the one who said in a discussion that if someone knocks on your door you have to answer because you have no other choice.

He is an idiot

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Also ironic he is the one who sits here calling himself a "life winner" yet he has to keep making new names to post here.

He also- as gutterboy said- is the one who posted gay porn links here.

He also is the one who talked about whoring his wife out to others while he watches

He is also the one who said in a discussion that if someone knocks on your door you have to answer because you have no other choice.

He is an idiot

I think my favorite was when he posted a picture of his rolex for all of us to fawn over and then we all just made fun of him for dropping $20k on a focking watch

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

8 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Also ironic he is the one who sits here calling himself a "life winner" yet he has to keep making new names to post here.

He also- as gutterboy said- is the one who posted gay porn links here.

He also is the one who talked about whoring his wife out to others while he watches

He is also the one who said in a discussion that if someone knocks on your door you have to answer because you have no other choice.

He is an idiot

Lol.  Calling out others for getting banned and using an Alias and in the same post cozies up to Gutterboy.  What a maroon. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I think my favorite was when he posted a picture of his rolex for all of us to fawn over and then we all just made fun of him for dropping $20k on a focking watch

You gonna Fock with him about an Alias too? Probably 

[Voltaire 5,181]

8 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Whoever is in charge of Project 2025 and wrote it- in a thinktank of people or solo- really hates poor people. Especially poor people with kids.

What does Project 2025 say about that? Not a trap question, I have no idea what it in there and while I have looked at the talking points posted earlier, I don't remember seeing something I would disagree with. I only got the 30 second tl/dr version before giving it a thumbs up.

[seafoam1 2,798]

8 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Whoever is in charge of Project 2025 and wrote it- in a thinktank of people or solo- really hates poor people. Especially poor people with kids.

Why are poor people choosing to bring kids into their shlt, poor, broke, lives? The kids get, what their parents choose for them to get. Why are they so focking stupid to put that onto newborn children? Ever think of being smart and planning to raise a child the right way?  

Ever think of that bozo? I'm sure you haven't. Your kids suffer, because of YOU. 

[Voltaire 5,181]

11 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Why are poor people choosing to bring kids into their shlt, poor, broke, lives? The kids get, what their parents choose for them to get. Why are they so focking stupid to put that onto newborn children? Ever think of being smart and planning to raise a child the right way?  

Ever think of that bozo? I'm sure you haven't. Your kids suffer, because of YOU. 

Can you clarify what you are saying here, please. 

At first it looks like poor people shouldn't have kids. Most parents, even poor ones want what's best for their kids. Parents that don't raise kids the right way likely don't know how and likely don't have their own life in order to begin with.

I see a lot of this since I am assigned the low-end, remedial level 8th graders in my school which come with an assortment of cognitive and social problems.

[seafoam1 2,798]

6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Can you clarify what you are saying here, please. 

At first it looks like poor people shouldn't have kids. Most parents, even poor ones want what's best for their kids. Parents that don't raise kids the right way likely don't know how and likely don't have their own life in order to begin with.

I see a lot of this since I am assigned the low-end, remedial level 8th graders in my school which come with an assortment of cognitive and social problems.

Poor people should be targeted and influenced in one way or another to NOT have children. It's criminal in my book to bring kids into ghettos and shlt situations when the parents themselves are not stable. 

And they want the best for their kids? Then don't have them if you can't afford to raise them in a safe nurturing environment. 

[Voltaire 5,181]

46 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Poor people should be targeted and influenced in one way or another to NOT have children. It's criminal in my book to bring kids into ghettos and shlt situations when the parents themselves are not stable. 

Seel, I'm not worried about poor people.

Its rich liberals that have the problems. If the kid somehow survives the dangerous womb of a self-hating leftoid feminist, his indoctrinated mother is likely to have him castrated anyways because she needs a tranny accessory to register enough virtue signaling points to fit in with her leftoid friends. 

 

[seafoam1 2,798]

1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

Seel, I'm not worried about poor people.

Its rich liberals that have the problems. If the kid somehow survives the dangerous womb of a self-hating leftoid feminist, his indoctrinated mother is likely to have him castrated anyways because she needs a tranny accessory to register enough virtue signaling points and fit in with her leftoid friends. 

 

I don't disagree with that.

[TimHauck 2,598]

20 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Seel, I'm not worried about poor people.

Its rich liberals that have the problems. If the kid somehow survives the dangerous womb of a self-hating leftoid feminist, his indoctrinated mother is likely to have him castrated anyways because she needs a tranny accessory to register enough virtue signaling points to fit in with her leftoid friends. 

 

You’ve definitely been consuming way too much right wing media, you really hit all the buzzwords here.

[Voltaire 5,181]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You’ve definitely been consuming way too much right wing media, you really hit all the buzzwords here.

You know as we watched that leaked internal discussion at Disney where they are talking about putting alphabet content in all their movies, one speaker after the other mentioned how they each have trans kids and I thought "What are the odds that each of them have trans kids?"

It occurred to me that the odds were 100%. These well indoctrinated ideological freaks are literally incapable of raising normal kids.

[Sean Mooney 1,935]

15 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lol.  Calling out others for getting banned and using an Alias and in the same post cozies up to Gutterboy.  What a maroon. 

I think multiple aliases are silly. I never said otherwise. So fook off Paul Blart

11 hours ago, Voltaire said:

What does Project 2025 say about that? Not a trap question, I have no idea what it in there and while I have looked at the talking points posted earlier, I don't remember seeing something I would disagree with. I only got the 30 second tl/dr version before giving it a thumbs up.

It looks to eliminate Title 1 funds. That is money school districts get to support low income students and support students who need extra help for subjects. So say a school has underperforming students in reading. They could apply for and be granted Title 1 funds that are mandated to be spent on a reading support coordinator (or some other such position). Those funds are monitored and if they are not used for targeted purposes the schools can get in trouble. And I would wager any district with lower income students has underperforming schools and numbers and use that money to help bring scores up. Additionally, schools can use that money to bring in an additional teacher to create smaller classrooms to give more direct help. Without it you'd have some class sizes jump to like 35-40 kids. That means fewer books (or spending local tax dollars to buy more books) and would cut back on paraprofessionals for help in classrooms.

It would also eliminate grants that help children in low income homes by helping eliminate- after school programs, summer food programs, college prep programs, and would offer massive cuts to breakfast and lunch programs which for some kids in lower income areas are the only meals they get in a day.

It wants to do away with federal college loans meaning all students would be dropped into private loans which are notoriously predatory.

They want to form educational savings accounts for all parents as opposed to giving money to the schools. This would effectively raise local school taxes more because instead of a given money pool for the local district it would mean students could go anywhere regardless of price. I know school choice is something people all want but the reality of that is it means wealthy families get money to send their kids to high cost private schools or religious based schooling. 

The people who wrote Project 2025 too are the people funding Moms for Liberty behind the scenes and many other groups trying to infiltrate local school boards. 

The question becomes this- should public school tax dollars be used to prop up religious and private schools for families? 

[Voltaire 5,181]

7 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

I think multiple aliases are silly. I never said otherwise. So fook off Paul Blart

It looks to eliminate Title 1 funds. That is money school districts get to support low income students and support students who need extra help for subjects. So say a school has underperforming students in reading. They could apply for and be granted Title 1 funds that are mandated to be spent on a reading support coordinator (or some other such position). Those funds are monitored and if they are not used for targeted purposes the schools can get in trouble. And I would wager any district with lower income students has underperforming schools and numbers and use that money to help bring scores up. Additionally, schools can use that money to bring in an additional teacher to create smaller classrooms to give more direct help. Without it you'd have some class sizes jump to like 35-40 kids. That means fewer books (or spending local tax dollars to buy more books) and would cut back on paraprofessionals for help in classrooms.

It would also eliminate grants that help children in low income homes by helping eliminate- after school programs, summer food programs, college prep programs, and would offer massive cuts to breakfast and lunch programs which for some kids in lower income areas are the only meals they get in a day.

It wants to do away with federal college loans meaning all students would be dropped into private loans which are notoriously predatory.

They want to form educational savings accounts for all parents as opposed to giving money to the schools. This would effectively raise local school taxes more because instead of a given money pool for the local district it would mean students could go anywhere regardless of price. I know school choice is something people all want but the reality of that is it means wealthy families get money to send their kids to high cost private schools or religious based schooling. 

The people who wrote Project 2025 too are the people funding Moms for Liberty behind the scenes and many other groups trying to infiltrate local school boards. 

The question becomes this- should public school tax dollars be used to prop up religious and private schools for families? 

TY Sean.

My cr@ptastic school is Title One and I don't support any of the first bit, class sizes are already 26-29. I do enthusiastically support the back end, every kid in my school should transfer out of it to a worthwhile one. My youngest is entering grade six and she isn't going to attend my school.

Also, Moms for Liberty is a wonderful organization, part of the reason I wanted to move to Florida.

[BeachGuy23 642]

27 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

TY Sean.

My cr@ptastic school is Title One and I don't support any of the first bit, class sizes are already 26-29. I do enthusiastically support the back end, every kid in my school should transfer out of it to a worthwhile one. My youngest is entering grade six and she isn't going to attend my school.

Also, Moms for Liberty is a wonderful organization, part of the reason I wanted to move to Florida.

Yikes, imagine being so backwards in your thinking that you believe Moms For Liberty is anything but a bunch of Christian Karen’s running around trying to impose their values on everyone else.

And I guess you root for Gilead in Handmaids Tail.

Holy freaking 1800th century….

[Sean Mooney 1,935]

1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

TY Sean.

My cr@ptastic school is Title One and I don't support any of the first bit, class sizes are already 26-29. I do enthusiastically support the back end, every kid in my school should transfer out of it to a worthwhile one. My youngest is entering grade six and she isn't going to attend my school.

Also, Moms for Liberty is a wonderful organization, part of the reason I wanted to move to Florida.

That's fine if someone wants their kid to go to a private or religious school. I shouldn't have to help pay for it. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

 

Also, Moms for Liberty is a wonderful organization, part of the reason I wanted to move to Florida.

Bruh

[seafoam1 2,798]

15 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Bruh

"Bruh" 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

That's fine if someone wants their kid to go to a private or religious school. I shouldn't have to help pay for it. 

  But they should pay the same as the people that use the public one. 

[seafoam1 2,798]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

That's fine if someone wants their kid to go to a private or religious school. I shouldn't have to help pay for it. 

Same for me with those who want their kids to go to public schools. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

A group of hackers breached the heritage foundation website, stole and published data about members and donors to be expose project 2025.

They call themselves Gay Furry Hackers.

Former Trump official and current Heritage foundation executive Mike Howell responded...

"God created nature, and nature’s laws are vicious. It is why you have to put on a perverted animal costume to satisfy your sexual deviances,” Howell wrote. “Are you aware that you won’t be able to wear a furry tiger costume when you’re getting pounded in the ass in the federal prison I put you in next year?” When vio taunted the executive for this outburst and hinted that they would be posting the conversation online, Howell replied, “Please share widely. I hope the word spreads as fast as the STDs do in your degenerate furry community.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/heritage-foundation-gay-furry-hackers-texts-1235057421/

[Maximum Overkill 1,738]

 

 

[TimHauck 2,598]

15 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Bruh

Are you surprised?

On 6/7/2024 at 8:22 AM, Voltaire said:

I want to live around like-minded people because I have kids. That's why I moved to the Florida panhandle. And its paid off, I haven't seen a single rainbow flag.

 

[squistion 1,944]

https://x.com/BidenHQ/status/1811395079321293161

Here is Trump shaking hands and praising the guy in charge of his Project 2025: “He’s doing an unbelievable job”

[Baker Boy 1,687]

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dems-project-2025-fear-mongering-falls-deaf-ears-even-scary-darth-vader-music
 

Even scary Darth Vader won't help Dems Project 2025 fear mongering

Trump has distanced himself from Heritage Foundation plan
 

But wait... didn't Trump disavow Project 2025 without ambiguity recently? 

Yep. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

4 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dems-project-2025-fear-mongering-falls-deaf-ears-even-scary-darth-vader-music
 

Even scary Darth Vader won't help Dems Project 2025 fear mongering

Trump has distanced himself from Heritage Foundation plan
 

 

But wait... didn't Trump disavow Project 2025 without ambiguity recently? 

Yep.