A Drunk DEI CACKLING HYENA Kamala Harris delivers an incoherent, slurred speech during a Cleveland campaign stop

[League Champion 1,896]

 

She's a Drunk, Racially Confused WOKE DEI Cackling Hyena  

[seafoam1 2,803]

She's timmy's and the liberal's God send. Smartest lady they have ever seen since hillary.

 

[The Real timschochet 6,429]

I dunno man every time you try to play the “Kamala is a drunken idiot” card it just makes her more attractive to vote for. Keep it up! 

[The Real timschochet 6,429]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

She's timmy's and the liberal's God send. Smartest lady they have ever seen since hillary.

 

Timmy and the Liberals is a cool name for a band. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I dunno man every time you try to play the “Kamala is a drunken idiot” card it just makes her more attractive to vote for. Keep it up! 

She reminds you of your wife. So does drunk nancy. 

 

[seafoam1 2,803]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Timmy and the Liberals is a cool name for a band. 

Too bad there is no talent there and they are TDS stage 4 inflicted. 

[League Champion 1,896]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Too bad there is no talent there and they are TDS stage 4 inflicted. 

We're seeing a theme here. She's a drunk, Racially Confused, WOKE Liar who F'd her way into politics. She's worse than Demented Joe 

[weepaws 3,157]

The theme we see here, is how the devil controls people with alcohol, it needs to be removed from society.  Amen 

Thanks 

[Maximum Overkill 1,740]

Since we're talking DEI

 

[RLLD 4,143]

Kamala does not have that "thing" which effective orators seem to posses.  Obama had it, he was maybe the best I have seen when it came to delivering a message.  Biden was horrible....just horrible at it......

Trump is actually not that proficient at it himself, be meanders too much....mixes humor and seriousness too much.....

Kamala.....makes Joe seen coherent.  She might have a sharp mind, but from what we can see that is not how she comes across. 

[squistion 1,952]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Kamala does not have that "thing" which effective orators seem to posses.  Obama had it, he was maybe the best I have seen when it came to delivering a message.  Biden was horrible....just horrible at it......

Trump is actually not that proficient at it himself, be meanders too much....mixes humor and seriousness too much.....

Kamala.....makes Joe seen coherent.  She might have a sharp mind, but from what we can see that is not how she comes across. 

She came across as intelligent and articulate when she grilled Brett Kavanaugh as his SCOTUS confirmation hearings. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

She came across as intelligent and articulate when she grilled Brett Kavanaugh as his SCOTUS confirmation hearings. 

What was the subject? A past scotus ruling? The constitution? Cases he presided over? Be nice if you inserted some context. 

[RLLD 4,143]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

She came across as intelligent and articulate when she grilled Brett Kavanaugh as his SCOTUS confirmation hearings. 

And Joe did during the State of the Union.  So what are we to believe, the one remarkable demonstration or the rest of the things we can see?

[MDC 7,131]

I don’t think Kamala needs to worry about coming off as incoherent or unintelligent, she needs to worry about acting smug. 

Trump on the other hand looks like an angry old man having a breakdown day after day.

[squistion 1,952]

41 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And Joe did during the State of the Union.  So what are we to believe, the one remarkable demonstration or the rest of the things we can see?

Most of what we been shown as proof that Kamala is not an effective public speaker have been these short YouTube clips of less than 30 seconds that are taken out of context and probably selectively edited to make her look bad.

And I am old enough to remember the clips of a supposedly "drunk" Nancy Pelosi (who is a teetotaler) that were deliberately slowed down to give the false impression her speech was slurred and she was intoxicated. 

I trust what I actually have seen from Harris (and as a Californian I paid close attention while she was Attorney General and Senator) not these right wing propaganda video clips. 

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,740]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump

ANOTHER TDS THREAD  

[Maximum Overkill 1,740]

 

 

[RLLD 4,143]

3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Most of what we been shown as proof that Kamala is not an effective public speaker have been these short YouTube clips of less than 30 seconds that are taken out of context and probably selectively edited to make her look bad.

And I am old enough to remember the clips of a supposedly "drunk" Nancy Pelosi (who is a teetotaler) that were deliberately slowed down to give the false impression her speech was slurred and she was intoxicated. 

I trust what I actually have seen from Harris (and as a California I paid close attention while she was Attorney General and Senator) not these right wing propaganda video clips. 

 

That trust, when you provided it to Biden, was also misplaced.....    Rather than support her out of some sense of duty to Democrats or Liberalism, or because the media tells you lies that suggest she is great, I might suggest you look at how they lied about Joe for years....before casting him aside when the lie no longer worked.....and start from a position that they are lying about her now....

[squistion 1,952]

Just now, RLLD said:

That trust, when you provided it to Biden, was also misplaced.....    Rather than support her out of some sense of duty to Democrats or Liberalism, or because the media tells you lies that suggest she is great, I might suggest you look at how they lied about Joe for years....before casting him aside when the lie no longer worked.....and start from a position that they are lying about her now....

I don't agree that "they" (whoever they are) lied about Joe for years because I know what I saw with my own eyes.

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, squistion said:

I don't agree that "they" (whoever they are) lied about Joe for years because I know what I saw with my own eyes.

The Democrat Party lied, repeatedly and the media followed suit....lying about his abilities as well.  I mean, this is not new or unknown, there is ample evidence that they willingly provided for years.

So given that propensity for them to unabashedly lie about the abilities of their candidate, I think there is merit in starting with the position that they are lying and then wait for proof to arise that substantiates what they are saying. 

[Cdub100 3,838]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

I don't agree that "they" (whoever they are) lied about Joe for years because I know what I saw with my own eyes.

Yeah that one speech back in March he wasn't a complete mess. That's all you have. How are you so dumb?

[Cdub100 3,838]

Just now, RLLD said:

The Democrat Party lied, repeatedly and the media followed suit....lying about his abilities as well.  I mean, this is not new or unknown, there is ample evidence that they willingly provided for years.

So given that propensity for them to unabashedly lie about the abilities of their candidate, I think there is merit in starting with the position that they are lying and then wait for proof to arise that substantiates what they are saying. 

But but but during the SoTU he did okay... So the dems weren't lying.

[squistion 1,952]

Just now, RLLD said:

The Democrat Party lied, repeatedly and the media followed suit....lying about his abilities as well.  I mean, this is not new or unknown, there is ample evidence that they willingly provided for years.

So given that propensity for them to unabashedly lie about the abilities of their candidate, I think there is merit in starting with the position that they are lying and then wait for proof to arise that substantiates what they are saying. 

It is "The Democratic Party" not "The Democrat Party".

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, squistion said:

It is "The Democratic Party" not "The Democrat Party".

Uh, sure.....why not....

[squistion 1,952]

4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Yeah that one speech back in March he wasn't a complete mess. That's all you have. How are you so dumb?

No that isn't all I have.There were plenty of speeches I saw in their entirety before that and he was fine (while you and others here were only watching the misleadingly edited 15 second YouTube video clips).

[Cdub100 3,838]

Just now, squistion said:

No that isn't all I have.There were plenty of speeches I saw in their entirety before that and he was fine (while you and others here were only watching the misleadingly edited 15 second YouTube video clips).

Now you're lying. Don't be a liar.

[squistion 1,952]

Just now, Cdub100 said:

Now you're lying. Don't be a liar.

I know what I repeatedly saw, I am not lying. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

43 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

That’s a strong black man right there. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,238]

53 minutes ago, squistion said:

Most of what we been shown as proof that Kamala is not an effective public speaker have been these short YouTube clips of less than 30 seconds that are taken out of context and probably selectively edited to make her look bad.

And I am old enough to remember the clips of a supposedly "drunk" Nancy Pelosi (who is a teetotaler) that were deliberately slowed down to give the false impression her speech was slurred and she was intoxicated. 

I trust what I actually have seen from Harris (and as a Californian I paid close attention while she was Attorney General and Senator) not these right wing propaganda video clips. 

 

you paid close attention, but you think her keeping men as slaves past their release date is good, hiding evidence so she didn't have a conviction overturned is amazing, and locking up black men for weed at a record pace is incredible

 

[JuneJuly 193]

 

 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,702]

3 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

 

 

Many people say she loves the malt liquor.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,938]

We know she likes to get high and listen to snoopy dog dog