Jump to content
The Real timschochet

VP Debate: Vance vs Walz

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Horseman said:

RIP GutterBoy 

RIP Shooter McGavin

RIP Jeff Probst

RIPPing them off pretty frequently here. You know who isnt a winner. Lets call him a Life Loser.

 :first:

Oh come on. This is stupid. He’s getting banned for stuff we all do, from time to time. It’s b!itch move by someone who has a grudge. Same stuff happened to Drobs, RP and Shotsup. 

To whomever is hitting the report button, I implore you to stop. There are very few lines we self impose, but this stuff does not rise to that level. Be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

I looked at your link but didn't see any policy proposals.  The Google search right?  I didn't review all 12,000 hits.

Do you have one to share?

Second link in the Google search is a law in Minnesota restricting speech in corporations.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/tim-walz-minnesota-free-speech-employers-labor-unions-religion-politics-2d709299

Most of the rest are about Walz saying there is "no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech."  Scary stuff.  I would think a former journalist would see why.

I suppose you are going to say that this isn't listed on the Harris website so it isn't a "policy."  Take your win, you've earned it.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Horseman is an OG. Sad you can't say that.  

Using an alias during a suspension, never banned, for golf drafts is one thing. Getting your original and dozens of handles thereafter banned for good ought to tell you something.  You don't care though, you've got nothing better to do in life. 

:first:

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Horseman is an OG. Sad you can't say that.  

Using an alias during a suspension, never banned, for golf drafts is one thing. Getting your original and dozens of handles thereafter banned for good ought to tell you something.  You don't care though, you've got nothing better to do in life. 

:first:

It tells me there are a lot of little babies here who easily get their feelings hurt and can't deal with it. They don't like being called out on their nonsense.  So they cry about to a mod. You're one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, McBonokon said:

It tells me there are a lot of little babies here who easily get their feelings hurt and can't deal with it. They don't like being called out on their nonsense.  So they cry about to a mod. You're one of them.

Actually, it tells us that you are a pathetic loser who keeps finding ways to sneak into a board where absolutely no one likes you.  And you're supposedly a grown-@ss woman too.  Get a life loser, and find a board where your TDS and far-left views will be celebrated.  Have you tired forums.communistpartyusa.com?  You'd fit right in there.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Oh come on. This is stupid. He’s getting banned for stuff we all do, from time to time. It’s b!itch move by someone who has a grudge. Same stuff happened to Drobs, RP and Shotsup. 

To whomever is hitting the report button, I imply you to stop. There are very few lines we self impose, but this stuff does not rise to that level. Be better.

"implore", if you want to correct it.

I didn't see anything Meph did that remotely warranted suspension. :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Actually, it tells us that you are a pathetic loser who keeps finding ways to sneak into a board where absolutely no one likes you.  And you're supposedly a grown-@ss woman too.  Get a life loser, and find a board where your TDS and far-left views will be celebrated.  Have you tired forums.communistpartyusa.com?  You'd fit right in there.

Admission #4 but you already said the same logged in as @Reality and @BrahmaBulls

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

It tells me there are a lot of little babies here who easily get their feelings hurt and can't deal with it. They don't like being called out on their nonsense.  So they cry about to a mod. You're one of them.

:dunno:. Mike usually just asks me to stop calling people names when GutterBoy (RIP) reports me.  Been suspended a couple times when I really deserved it.  That tells me the moderation is pretty fair. Maybe some self retrospect is in order?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Admission #4 but you already said the same logged in as @Reality and @BrahmaBulls

Yeah, okay nutjob.  You're so far removed from reality it's hilarious to watch you flail. :lol:

Like i said, absolutely NO ONE likes you because you're a far-left nutjob.  Yet you keep trying to sneak in when it's CLEAR you're not wanted - even by the mods - on this board.

Go to your lesbian forums and hang out there with the rest of your Boyosexual crew.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

"implore", if you want to correct it.

I didn't see anything Meph did that remotely warranted suspension. :dunno: 

We kicked off the first of our Halloween festivities last night, and I might be a teeny weeny hungover. :lol: Either that, or autocorrect hates me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, okay nutjob.  You're so far removed from reality it's hilarious to watch you flail. :lol:

Like i said, absolutely NO ONE likes you because you're a far-left nutjob.  Yet you keep trying to sneak in when it's CLEAR you're not wanted - even by the mods - on this board.

Go to your lesbian forums and hang out there with the rest of your Boyosexual crew.

Knock it off, Max. You sound unhinged. This is not how we function here. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

We kicked off the first of our Halloween festivities last night, and I might be a teeny weeny hungover. :lol: Either that, or autocorrect hates me.

It's Halloween somewhere.  😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm just keepin' it realz.  :thumbsup:

 

No, you really aren’t. Maybe we could all just dial back the rhetoric a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

No, you really aren’t. Maybe we could all just dial back the rhetoric a bit.

Oh, I agree.  Except one person doesn't want to seem to want to do that.  The guy I pointed out.  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Oh, I agree.  Except one person doesn't want to seem to want to do that.  The guy I pointed out.  :dunno:

Yeah, it’s just him. :rolleyes:  

We insult, we name call, we make fun of, but we don’t report. Not unless personal info is being posted/violence is threatened or maybe attacks on family. We’re grown ups here and not a bunch of tattle tales.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, okay nutjob.  You're so far removed from reality it's hilarious to watch you flail. :lol:

Like i said, absolutely NO ONE likes you because you're a far-left nutjob.  Yet you keep trying to sneak in when it's CLEAR you're not wanted - even by the mods - on this board.

So you would rather have a circle jerk where everyone repeats the same opinions from the RNC glory hole?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

So you would rather have a circle jerk where everyone repeats the same opinions from the RNC glory hole?

Glory holes and circle-jerks are a exclusively a liberal/DNC thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

 

Vance is 100% correct on both counts.  Your DEFCON 1 level TDS won't let you see it, tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Horseman said:

:dunno:. Mike usually just asks me to stop calling people names when GutterBoy (RIP) reports me.  Been suspended a couple times when I really deserved it.  That tells me the moderation is pretty fair. Maybe some self retrospect is in order?  

This sounds like motivation for you to report him.

And still waiting for those discord screenshots, liar.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Vance is 100% correct on both counts.  Your DEFCON 1 level TDS won't let you see it, tho.

no, he isn't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

no, he isn't

So, you think Trump issuing an executive order to be king is more of a threat to democracy than the government censoring speech they don't like?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

So, you think Trump issuing an executive order to be king is more of a threat to democracy than the government censoring speech they don't like?

Skids you already took the L here. Harris has never proposed a policy to censor speech they don't like.  You admitted this so stop with the lies.

And you can also stop with the Trump EO to be a king garbage.  That's not the way it goes down.  Look at what Orban has done in Turkey.  Trump praises Orban.  That's the blueprint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, McBonokon said:

Skids you already took the L here. Harris has never proposed a policy to censor speech they don't like.  You admitted this so stop with the lies.

And you can also stop with the Trump EO to be a king garbage.  That's not the way it goes down.  Look at what Orban has done in Turkey.  Trump praises Orban.  That's the blueprint.

I facetiously took the L, Rustor.  Walz said it in the debate, and has enacted laws in Minnesota restricting speech.  Reasonable, intelligent people conclude that this is his desire.  Kamala brings Grampa Assistant Coach Walz to interviews as her emotional security blanket, so one would think he has her ear.  

What's the Orban blueprint for Trump to take over the country?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, okay nutjob.  You're so far removed from reality it's hilarious to watch you flail. :lol:

Like i said, absolutely NO ONE likes you because you're a far-left nutjob.  Yet you keep trying to sneak in when it's CLEAR you're not wanted - even by the mods - on this board.

Go to your lesbian forums and hang out there with the rest of your Boyosexual crew.

Wait, what? We have mods here? 

 

That must be hilarious. :lol:

Can I volunteer my services? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

So, you think Trump issuing an executive order to be king is more of a threat to democracy than the government censoring speech they don't like?

he didnt peacefully transfer power, Vance and you here are ignoring reality for some made up fear mongering. you've lost your way buddy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Herbivore said:

he didnt peacefully transfer power, Vance and you here are ignoring reality for some made up fear mongering. you've lost your way buddy.

😆 what an idiot you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Herbivore said:

he didnt peacefully transfer power, Vance and you here are ignoring reality for some made up fear mongering. you've lost your way buddy.

Well, somebody is succumbing to made up fear mongering.  How did he not peacefully transfer power?  Was he physically removed on 1/20?  

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I facetiously took the L, Rustor.  Walz said it in the debate, and has enacted laws in Minnesota restricting speech.  Reasonable, intelligent people conclude that this is his desire.  Kamala brings Grampa Assistant Coach Walz to interviews as her emotional security blanket, so one would think he has her ear.  

What's the Orban blueprint for Trump to take over the country?

Did you even read about the law you keep referring to?  I don't think you ever did.

Let me help you out here.  The law you reference restricts employers from holding mandatory meetings to discuss politics or religion, and to forbid employers from taking punitive action against any employee that chooses not to attend.

Is that really bad?  I personally don't think so.  You couch this a restriction on freedom of speech.  I see it more as a workers rights issue.

But I would love to hear your argument for why employees should be forced to attend political or religious meetings at work.  Please explain.

Also for Hungary and Orban, you can educate yourself here: https://www.google.com/search?q=loss+of+rights+and+democracy+in+hungary+under+orban&client=ms-android-verizon-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

sorry, I meant the owner.

My offer stands, Mike. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Well, somebody is succumbing to made up fear mongering.  How did he not peacefully transfer power?  Was he physically removed on 1/20?  

you saw, and you know. your excuses are sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

you saw, and you know. your excuses are sad.

He didn't even have the decency to attend the inauguration.  First president in history.  And there was no transition, in the middle of a pandemic and crashing economy.  Terrible character.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

Did you even read about the law you keep referring to?  I don't think you ever did.

Let me help you out here.  The law you reference restricts employers from holding mandatory meetings to discuss politics or religion, and to forbid employers from taking punitive action against any employee that chooses not to attend.

Is that really bad?  I personally don't think so.  You couch this a restriction on freedom of speech.  I see it more as a workers rights issue.

But I would love to hear your argument for why employees should be forced to attend political or religious meetings at work.  Please explain.

Also for Hungary and Orban, you can educate yourself here: https://www.google.com/search?q=loss+of+rights+and+democracy+in+hungary+under+orban&client=ms-android-verizon-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Yes I read it, and I'll use the second paragraph to answer your question.

Quote

A federal court next week will hear a challenge to a 2023 Minnesota law that bars employers from discussing “religious or political matters” at mandatory meetings. The latter includes elections, government regulations, laws and whether to join or support a union. This seems to mean that employers can’t criticize Mr. Walz, advocate for pro-business policies or discourage unionization.

For Hungary, I took your ultra liberal CAP article (first one) and here's what it says:

Quote

In 2011, the introduction of a new constitution marked a pivotal shift in Hungary’s political trajectory, pushing it toward an electoral autocracy, by which autocratic leadership gains power in elections that are neither free nor fair. The new constitution and accompanying legislative changes initiated a strategic redrawing of electoral districts, a culling of parliamentary seats from 386 to 199, and the adoption of the so-called winner compensation mechanism, whereby a proportion of votes from the losing party in elections are tallied for the winner.

Help me understand the mechanism for Trump to enact a new constitution in the US.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, McBonokon said:

He didn't even have the decency to attend the inauguration.  First president in history.  And there was no transition, in the middle of a pandemic and crashing economy.  Terrible character.

Are you focking serious? After all the lies and character assassination the left engaged in, including multiple buIIshit impeachments, you think he should've showed up to Biden's inauguration? 

He stayed away for good reason. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

you saw, and you know. your excuses are sad.

I saw what?  I saw a mob get out of hand, like I saw three months of mobs getting out of hand during the 2020 Summer of Love.  Do you think that maybe those three months of the government doing nothing during unruly mobs maybe gave the 1/6 crowd an idea of what they could do?  Of course not, it's totally different!

Also, since Trump did it, I presume he was charged with insurrection?  Treason?  No?  Oh, it was obscure laws from the 1800s about cheating the government.

Face it, you've drunk the blue koolaid on this.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Herbivore said:

he didnt peacefully transfer power, Vance and you here are ignoring reality for some made up fear mongering. you've lost your way buddy.

The gaslighting by you morons is extraordinary.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×