Jimmy Kimmel's tears are refreshing

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

Why is he so emotional about his? Probably because he's a pedophile. Tik tok Jimmy.

https://x.com/LizCrokin/status/1854626291288621111?s=19

[easilyscan 863]

Girls on trampolines

Right, left, boot.

 

[kilroy69 1,216]

Have you ever seen the Scott Tenorman episode of southpark? That is how I feel about Kimmel.  He is such a betacuck

[squistion 1,954]

8 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Why is he so emotional about his? Probably because he's a pedophile. Tik tok Jimmy.

https://x.com/LizCrokin/status/1854626291288621111?s=19

The Epstein story about a connection with Kimmel was false and has been completely debunked by fact checkers

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-epstein-document-mentions-jimmy-kimmel-2024-01-05/

Fact Check: No evidence Epstein document mentions Jimmy Kimmel

A set of legal documents from a civil lawsuit related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which were released on Jan. 3, contains no mention of comedian Jimmy Kimmel, contrary to online posts sharing an image of a purported excerpt referencing Kimmel.

 

Kimmel has also stated publicly that he had no contact with Epstein, who was arrested on July 6, 2019, and died in a New York jail while being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges.

 

The circulating image visible in a Facebook post, opens new tab shows text resembling a transcript of questions and answers between two unnamed parties about meeting and having sexual relations with Kimmel. The page number 1,375 is visible in a corner of the image.

 

However, neither Kimmel’s name nor the exchange shown in the image appears in the 943-page document set, opens new tab that was unsealed by the Southern District of New York on Jan. 3, 2024. The Guardian newspaper made the full set available online, opens new tab.

 

A search of the documents reveals no mention of Kimmel and the document has no page 1,375. The format of transcripts in the documents also differs from the format seen in the fabricated image, which has been shared by meme, opens new tab pages.

 

In a Jan 2. post, opens new tab on messaging platform X, Kimmel responded to the suggestion made by New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers that Kimmel would be named in the forthcoming documents, saying in part, “for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’.”

 

[kilroy69 1,216]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

The Epstein story about a connection with Kimmel was false and has been completely debunked by fact checkers

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-epstein-document-mentions-jimmy-kimmel-2024-01-05/

Fact Check: No evidence Epstein document mentions Jimmy Kimmel

A set of legal documents from a civil lawsuit related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which were released on Jan. 3, contains no mention of comedian Jimmy Kimmel, contrary to online posts sharing an image of a purported excerpt referencing Kimmel.

 

Kimmel has also stated publicly that he had no contact with Epstein, who was arrested on July 6, 2019, and died in a New York jail while being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges.

 

The circulating image visible in a Facebook post, opens new tab shows text resembling a transcript of questions and answers between two unnamed parties about meeting and having sexual relations with Kimmel. The page number 1,375 is visible in a corner of the image.

 

However, neither Kimmel’s name nor the exchange shown in the image appears in the 943-page document set, opens new tab that was unsealed by the Southern District of New York on Jan. 3, 2024. The Guardian newspaper made the full set available online, opens new tab.

 

A search of the documents reveals no mention of Kimmel and the document has no page 1,375. The format of transcripts in the documents also differs from the format seen in the fabricated image, which has been shared by meme, opens new tab pages.

 

In a Jan 2. post, opens new tab on messaging platform X, Kimmel responded to the suggestion made by New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers that Kimmel would be named in the forthcoming documents, saying in part, “for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’.”

 

Just because he was not with epstein does not mean he is not a pedophile. He always seemed awful friendly with Pdiddy. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,706]

2 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

Just because he was not with epstein does not mean he is not a pedophile. He always seemed awful friendly with Pdiddy. 

Kimmel gets his hot dogs and pizza from Diddy.  Common knowledge

[squistion 1,954]

7 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

Just because he was not with epstein does not mean he is not a pedophile. He always seemed awful friendly with Pdiddy. 

No, but the entire claim he is a pedophile was based on the false Epstein story that Aaron Rodgers ran with (and there has been nothing else).

[jbycho 596]

12 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Kimmel gets his hot dogs and pizza from Diddy.  Common knowledge

He gets a lot more hot dogs than pizza from what I understand..

[kilroy69 1,216]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

No, but the entire claim he is a pedophile was based on the false Epstein story that Aaron Rodgers ran with (and there has been nothing else).

There was literally no press coverage of Diddy being a pedo rapist either. Just saying. I am willing to bet that a lotttttt of hollywood is scared that diddy will start dropping names 

[squistion 1,954]

2 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

There was literally no press coverage of Diddy being a pedo rapist either. Just saying. I am willing to bet that a lotttttt of hollywood is scared that diddy will start dropping names 

Maybe, but I doubt that Jimmy Kimmel is one of them. 

[Strike 5,213]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

Maybe, but I doubt that Jimmy Kimmel is one of them. 

Is that because you haven't run in to him at one of the parties yet?

[BrahmaBulls 628]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

Maybe, but I doubt that Jimmy Kimmel is one of them. 

You the pedo expert in LA too?  Figures

[jbycho 596]

4 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

You the pedo expert in LA too?  Figures

Likes attract. 

[kilroy69 1,216]

41 minutes ago, squistion said:

Maybe, but I doubt that Jimmy Kimmel is one of them. 

Here is the thing. The only person I do not suspect of being a hollywood pedophile is the rock, keanu reeves and tom hanks. That is it. Till they can prove they are not they are all suspect. 

[Cdub100 3,841]

3 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

Here is the thing. The only person I do not suspect of being a hollywood pedophile is the rock, keanu reeves and tom hanks. That is it. Till they can prove they are not they are all suspect. 

FTFY

[squistion 1,954]

Just now, kilroy69 said:

Here is the thing. The only person I do not suspect of being a hollywood pedophile is the rock and tom hanks. That is it. Till they can prove they are not they are all suspect. 

So they are presumed guilty unless they can prove they are innocent? If you never molested a child how can you prove it? You can't. You can't prove a negative that something didn't or never happened.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

8 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

Here is the thing. The only person I do not suspect of being a hollywood pedophile is the rock, keanu reeves and tom hanks. That is it. Till they can prove they are not they are all suspect. 

Tom Hanks is the biggest pedophile there is.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

Oh man so weird that the head of the Clinton Foundation just quit. Odd

[avoiding injuries 1,511]

4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

FTFY

Yeah, if you’re only naming 3 definites, Hanks and the Rock ain’t them. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

The Epstein story about a connection with Kimmel was false and has been completely debunked by fact checkers

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-epstein-document-mentions-jimmy-kimmel-2024-01-05/

Fact Check: No evidence Epstein document mentions Jimmy Kimmel

A set of legal documents from a civil lawsuit related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which were released on Jan. 3, contains no mention of comedian Jimmy Kimmel, contrary to online posts sharing an image of a purported excerpt referencing Kimmel.

 

Kimmel has also stated publicly that he had no contact with Epstein, who was arrested on July 6, 2019, and died in a New York jail while being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges.

 

The circulating image visible in a Facebook post, opens new tab shows text resembling a transcript of questions and answers between two unnamed parties about meeting and having sexual relations with Kimmel. The page number 1,375 is visible in a corner of the image.

 

However, neither Kimmel’s name nor the exchange shown in the image appears in the 943-page document set, opens new tab that was unsealed by the Southern District of New York on Jan. 3, 2024. The Guardian newspaper made the full set available online, opens new tab.

 

A search of the documents reveals no mention of Kimmel and the document has no page 1,375. The format of transcripts in the documents also differs from the format seen in the fabricated image, which has been shared by meme, opens new tab pages.

 

In a Jan 2. post, opens new tab on messaging platform X, Kimmel responded to the suggestion made by New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers that Kimmel would be named in the forthcoming documents, saying in part, “for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’.”

 

You are going to wonder how the hell the Trump supporters knew all these high profile people were going to get arrested for some type of child trafficking or pedophilia.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

2 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Yeah, if you’re only naming 3 definites, Hanks and the Rock ain’t them. 

Tom Hanks is a massive pedo.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

So they are presumed guilty unless they can prove they are innocent? If you never molested a child how can you prove it? You can't. You can't prove a negative that something didn't or never happened.

This isn't a court of law. That is for the law to determine. As a citizen we can determine if we believe someone is guilty enough. There is more than enough circumstantial evidence for a lot of us to believe these people are guilty.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

Kind of gross how the left automatically sticks up for people when there is a lot of circumstantial evidence showing they are pedophiles.

[squistion 1,954]

Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

Tom Hanks is a massive pedo.

Wrong on that one too.

https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/tom-hanks-sexy-baby-pedophile-epstein/

An Instagram post takes a Tom Hanks clip out of context to falsely claim he condones pedophilia

An Instagram post claims to show proof that the actor Tom Hanks supports pedophilia.

The Jan. 3 post showed a snippet of Hanks clapping his hands and shouting “sexy baby” at a child walking down from a stage.

The video’s caption said, “Tom Hanks Not Even Trying To Hide It,” and includes several hashtags, such as #epstein and #ghislanemaxwell, referring to Jeffrey Epstein, a financier who died in jail in 2019 before being tried on sexual abuse and sex trafficking charges, and Ghislaine Maxwell, a friend of Epstein who in June was sentenced to 20 years in prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors.

PolitiFact has rated Pants on Fire similar, unfounded statements about Hanks and pedophilia.

The Instagram post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

The post takes Hanks’ clip out of context. It’s from a sketch the actor did in 2011 for the late-night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” satirizing the reality television series “Toddlers & Tiaras.”

“Toddlers & Tiaras,” which aired from 2009 to 2016 on TLC, was criticized throughout its run for sexualizing young children competing in beauty pageants, wearing costumes and performing routines that were considered overly adult in tone.

The sketch mocked the reality show; it did not endorse pedophilia.

It featured Hanks as an overbearing father obsessed with a fictional daughter named Sophie winning a nonexistent child beauty pageant called “Miss Ultimate Sexy Baby Nevada.”

QAnon conspiracy theorists have long claimed, without evidence, that some prominent politicians and celebrities are involved in a satanic child sex trafficking ring.

We rate this claim about Hanks as Pants on Fire!

[listen2me 23 1,827]

Aaron Rodgers laughs.  

One side loses an election every 4 years.  To just become a mess is insane to me.  Guy probably hates himself for being on the man show "degrading" women.  Since hes now such a liberal now.   Most any other late night fella in time isnt going to do that.  You focking have a prompter and go over they show a bit beforehand.  Lol.   

Jimmy is the definition of (insert name) these days.   Its pathetic.   

Go listen to Adam Carolla talk, his old partner.  There is a regular dude who didnt get bit by the left.  Very knowledgeable.  Id have to see Jimmy do some pods and talk freely if he is allowed.  But Carolla is much more well versed and sensible.   Night and day.   Some people just fall to woke.  

Jimmy sucks.  What a loser.  

[squistion 1,954]

3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

This isn't a court of law. That is for the law to determine. As a citizen we can determine if we believe someone is guilty enough. There is more than enough circumstantial evidence for a lot of us to believe these people are guilty.

Your so called circumstantial evidence has all been debunked by fact checkers.

[listen2me 23 1,827]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Your so called circumstantial evidence has all been debunked by fact checkers.

Fact checkers!  Lol

We are playing chess mfer.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

1 minute ago, listen2me 23 said:

Fact checkers!  Lol

We are playing chess mfer.  

He doesn't get it. At least Tim realized how much they are being lied to.

[avoiding injuries 1,511]

15 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Tom Hanks is a massive pedo.

There’s less of a chance squizzy is on a list. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

9 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

There’s less of a chance squizzy is on a list. 

Idk who that is 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,706]

10 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

There’s less of a chance squizzy is on a list. 

Hasn’t Hanks left the country for Greece or Italy?   

[listen2me 23 1,827]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

He doesn't get it. At least Tim realized how much they are being lied to.

Tim actually surprises me sometimes.  Hes just so stuck in cali ways that he cant see. Squis who im sure has me on ignore for whatever reason.. hes a flake...is just lost.  Has to put everyone on ignore at some point.  Its too much for him. Hes fragile.    

But hey whatever gets people through the day.  A guy like Tim who is surrounded by total progressives probably feels like hes middle compared to his neighbors.  Hes not but thats probably how he feels.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,241]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

The Epstein story about a connection with Kimmel was false and has been completely debunked by fact checkers

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-epstein-document-mentions-jimmy-kimmel-2024-01-05/

Fact Check: No evidence Epstein document mentions Jimmy Kimmel

A set of legal documents from a civil lawsuit related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which were released on Jan. 3, contains no mention of comedian Jimmy Kimmel, contrary to online posts sharing an image of a purported excerpt referencing Kimmel.

 

Kimmel has also stated publicly that he had no contact with Epstein, who was arrested on July 6, 2019, and died in a New York jail while being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges.

 

The circulating image visible in a Facebook post, opens new tab shows text resembling a transcript of questions and answers between two unnamed parties about meeting and having sexual relations with Kimmel. The page number 1,375 is visible in a corner of the image.

 

However, neither Kimmel’s name nor the exchange shown in the image appears in the 943-page document set, opens new tab that was unsealed by the Southern District of New York on Jan. 3, 2024. The Guardian newspaper made the full set available online, opens new tab.

 

A search of the documents reveals no mention of Kimmel and the document has no page 1,375. The format of transcripts in the documents also differs from the format seen in the fabricated image, which has been shared by meme, opens new tab pages.

 

In a Jan 2. post, opens new tab on messaging platform X, Kimmel responded to the suggestion made by New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers that Kimmel would be named in the forthcoming documents, saying in part, “for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’.”

 

Jimmy Kimmel's best friend was was Epsteins personal chef

[Nomad99 699]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

The Epstein story about a connection with Kimmel was false and has been completely debunked by fact checkers

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-epstein-document-mentions-jimmy-kimmel-2024-01-05/

Fact Check: No evidence Epstein document mentions Jimmy Kimmel

A set of legal documents from a civil lawsuit related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which were released on Jan. 3, contains no mention of comedian Jimmy Kimmel, contrary to online posts sharing an image of a purported excerpt referencing Kimmel.

 

Kimmel has also stated publicly that he had no contact with Epstein, who was arrested on July 6, 2019, and died in a New York jail while being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges.

 

The circulating image visible in a Facebook post, opens new tab shows text resembling a transcript of questions and answers between two unnamed parties about meeting and having sexual relations with Kimmel. The page number 1,375 is visible in a corner of the image.

 

However, neither Kimmel’s name nor the exchange shown in the image appears in the 943-page document set, opens new tab that was unsealed by the Southern District of New York on Jan. 3, 2024. The Guardian newspaper made the full set available online, opens new tab.

 

A search of the documents reveals no mention of Kimmel and the document has no page 1,375. The format of transcripts in the documents also differs from the format seen in the fabricated image, which has been shared by meme, opens new tab pages.

 

In a Jan 2. post, opens new tab on messaging platform X, Kimmel responded to the suggestion made by New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers that Kimmel would be named in the forthcoming documents, saying in part, “for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any ‘list’.”

 

It is telling....the amount of effort you put into some posts.....and the disappearing act you do on others......

[League Champion 1,896]

3 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Why is he so emotional about his? 

Because he's a typical Liberal Pvssy!!! 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,115]

26 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Jimmy Kimmel's best friend was was Epsteins personal chef

Why don't liberals consider these things?

[League Champion 1,896]

3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Why don't liberals consider these things?

Liberal tears make me happy  

[Cdub100 3,841]

1 hour ago, avoiding injuries said:

Yeah, if you’re only naming 3 definites, Hanks and the Rock ain’t them. 

The two times I've been banned was talking about this subject. So all I'm going to say is Tom Hanks is really into pizza.

[easilyscan 863]

7 hours ago, kilroy69 said:

Have you ever seen the Scott Tenorman episode of southpark? That is how I feel about Kimmel.  He is such a betacuck

Cartman did a number on him at the end!

[League Champion 1,896]

A grown ass Man crying over an election? This is also why Liberals should not be in the Military or any position of power. They can't handle everyday life. Kimmel would be the first one to be killed in a firefight. 

But it was just Kimmel, they're all over the place crying