Gaetz withdraws: Pam Bondi is selected.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

I’d like to see Jack Smith, Fat Fanny, Latasha and Alvin Bragg indicted by spring.  

[The Real timschochet 6,760]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Well even the latter part, the precedent has been set with the charges against Trump and others. Stupid focking Democrats screwed that up bad, like everything. Either do it or don’t, but instead they half-assed it and tried to sorta do it without actually doing it. Kvnts

I don’t agree. I believe, firmly, that the charges against Donald Trump were legitimate and it would have been derelict of the Justice Department not to charge him. The only mistake made was not to charge him a year earlier; because of Garland’s hesitation (obviously due to fear of looking political) we now have to deal with him once again as President. 
 

But even if I were absolutely wrong about this, even if the prosecutions against Trump were complete BS and politically motivated, it would still not excuse Bondi attempting to retaliate in any way. 

[MDC 7,408]

49 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Sure you didn't. There's not a soul in here who believes your bullshizz. You've defended the old Man at every turn  

I don’t care what you think. The entire GC thinks trannies get you hard.  

[The Real timschochet 6,760]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’d like to see Jack Smith, Fat Fanny, Latasha and Alvin Bragg indicted by spring.  

I don’t think you would. Such a move would be a national embarrassment for the President, would completely derail the rest of his agenda, and result in no convictions whatsoever. 

[Strike 5,538]

11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

 

If they start attempting to prosecute innocent people based on “retribution” or because Trump regards them as enemies, I’ll have a huge problem with that and hopefully so will most people. But until that happens I’m good.  

Yeah, it's only acceptable when YOUR side does it to conservatives.  Such a tard.

[The Real timschochet 6,760]

Just now, Strike said:

Yeah, it's only acceptable when YOUR side does it to conservatives.  Such a tard.

It’s never acceptable. And it hasn’t happened since the 1950s. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t agree. I believe, firmly, that the charges against Donald Trump were legitimate and it would have been derelict of the Justice Department not to charge him. The only mistake made was not to charge him a year earlier; because of Garland’s hesitation (obviously due to fear of looking political) we now have to deal with him once again as President. 
 

But even if I were absolutely wrong about this, even if the prosecutions against Trump were complete BS and politically motivated, it would still not excuse Bondi attempting to retaliate in any way. 

I’m convinced Merrick Garland is the biggest liberal cuck that ever lived. He could not have focked that up worse and that was on the heels of McConnell making him a b1tch and taking his Supreme Court seat. What a focking pvssy.

Anyway, good luck making that distinction. The door was opened and even if the little b1tch tried to only open it halfway, the precedent is set.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

If I were Jack Smith or Bragg, I’d probably be looking at leaving the country. Fanni already focked herself 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t think you would. Such a move would be a national embarrassment for the President, would completely derail the rest of his agenda, and result in no convictions whatsoever. 

Even if it’s found out that they were meeting about the cases and coordinating? That’s not legal ya know. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Even if it’s found out that they were meeting about the cases and coordinating? That’s not legal ya know. 

Go ahead and prosecute em for whatever bullsh1t you want, I don’t care—they deserve it for being ineffectual losers. But no, I don’t think that is illegal. State and feds coordinate all the time, you should know that  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t think you would. Such a move would be a national embarrassment for the President, would completely derail the rest of his agenda, and result in no convictions whatsoever. 

So it’s not embarrassing because it was accepted that mar a lago is worth 18 million dollars? Or a 30 year old “rape” case was accepted without the witness being able to provide basic details? Just normal justice being handed down? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Go ahead and prosecute em for whatever bullsh1t you want, I don’t care—they deserve it for being ineffectual losers. But no, I don’t think that is illegal. State and feds coordinate all the time, you should know that  

Not across different jurisdictions. You should know that. Why is a local DA going to DC to meet with the AG’s office ? And it depends on what was discussed. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Not across different jurisdictions. You should know that. Why is a local DA going to DC to meet with the AG’s office ? And it depends on what was discussed. 

They do it across different jurisdictions all the time. Drugs, human trafficking etc, lots of that implicates many different jurisdictions.

But yeah, I guess it would depend on what was discussed. And it certainly could be made to look politically motivated and I’m sure Bondi can come up with some kind of charge there

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

They do it across different jurisdictions all the time. Drugs, human trafficking etc, lots of that implicates many different jurisdictions.

But yeah, I guess it would depend on what was discussed. And it certainly could be made to look politically motivated and I’m sure Bondi can come up with some kind of charge there

Exactly. Let’s go! And we need a special council to investigate the widespread voter fraud throughout the country. Also indict Mayorkas.  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Exactly. Let’s go! And we need a special council to investigate the widespread voter fraud throughout the country. Also indict Mayorkas.  

Voter fraud  God you guys sounds like kvnts still whining about a made up thing even after you won. Jesus what a total lack of character.

And I don’t know or give a sh1t who Mayorkas even is.

Bur whatever, you win, you get to do your thing. That’s the deal. It’s a bad one for America but it is what they chose.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

28 minutes ago, MDC said:

I don’t care what you think. The entire GC thinks trannies get you hard.  

Pedocrat says what? 

[thegeneral 3,208]

Muh fraud! Didn’t Trump have a special commission on this in his first term. The dude from Kansas. That went just great.

[MDC 7,408]

24 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Pedocrat says what? 

You like what you like, my man. I don’t judge.  

[jonmx 2,429]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

Again, your crybaby b1tching here bears absolutely no relevance to the appointment of Trump’s AG. He picks her, Republican senate confirms. Period. Nobody else to blame or complain about or spin wild conspiracy theories over

Fuk you.   Calling you a fuking moron is not crying you worthless retard. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, jonmx said:

Fuk you.   Calling you a fuking moron is not crying you worthless retard. 

You are a little crybaby kvnt, jon. It’s true

[jerryskids 6,792]

8 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Who is “they”?

You do know republicans control the entirety of government now, right?

They can do whatever the fock they want and nobody can stop them, your nutjob persecution complex notwithstanding

You know the filibuster still exists, right? 

[MDC 7,408]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You know the filibuster still exists, right? 

Trump won in a landslide and his party has both houses of Congress. There is no better situation for a POTUS to walk into. I look forward to the great success he promised everyone!

[jerryskids 6,792]

25 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump won in a landslide and his party has both houses of Congress. There is no better situation for a POTUS to walk into. I look forward to the great success he promised everyone!

I was talking to Worms, but I'll take that as a "no" from you.   

[MDC 7,408]

5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I was talking to Worms, but I'll take that as a "no" from you.   

It’s weird: For months I heard that Trump was gonna MAGA and we’d all frolic in rivers of chocolate. Now he wins in a landslide and has both houses of Congress, and I’m told there are insurmountable obstacles to Don enacting his glorious vision.  

[jerryskids 6,792]

Just now, MDC said:

It’s weird: For months I heard that Trump was gonna MAGA and we’d all frolic in rivers of chocolate. Now he wins in a landslide and has both houses of Congress, and I’m told there are insurmountable obstacles to Don enacting his glorious vision.  

Not sure what to tell you.  Maybe go back to HS and learn how our federal government works?  Mooney is a teacher in PA, perhaps he'd tutor you?  

[Strike 5,538]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

It’s weird: For months I heard that Trump was gonna MAGA and we’d all frolic in rivers of chocolate. Now he wins in a landslide and has both houses of Congress, and I’m told there are insurmountable obstacles to Don enacting his glorious vision.  

Who told you about the Willy Wonkaing of the country?  

[MDC 7,408]

Just now, jerryskids said:

Not sure what to tell you.  Maybe go back to HS and learn how our federal government works?  Mooney is a teacher in PA, perhaps he'd tutor you?  

So we’re not gonna MAGA?  

[jerryskids 6,792]

6 minutes ago, MDC said:

So we’re not gonna MAGA?  

I love that you chose to throw away your vote in the most valuable swing state, solely so that you could troll here regardless of who won.  I'll smile whenever you troll like this for the next 4 years.   

[shadrap 228]

5 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t agree. I believe, firmly, that the charges against Donald Trump were legitimate and it would have been derelict of the Justice Department not to charge him. The only mistake made was not to charge him a year earlier; because of Garland’s hesitation (obviously due to fear of looking political) we now have to deal with him once again as President. 
 

But even if I were absolutely wrong about this, even if the prosecutions against Trump were complete BS and politically motivated, it would still not excuse Bondi attempting to retaliate in any way. 

Your last sentence.  All of it correct especially including "were complete BS".  The rest of your diatribe, I agree also.

[shadrap 228]

5 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m convinced Merrick Garland is the biggest liberal cuck that ever lived. He could not have focked that up worse and that was on the heels of McConnell making him a b1tch and taking his Supreme Court seat. What a focking pvssy.

Anyway, good luck making that distinction. The door was opened and even if the little b1tch tried to only open it halfway, the precedent is set.

good post.  never, ever seen the AG office so one sided.  get Trump was the message regardless of the law.

[MDC 7,408]

12 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I love that you chose to throw away your vote in the most valuable swing state, solely so that you could troll here regardless of who won.  I'll smile whenever you troll like this for the next 4 years.   

It doesn’t seem to matter who we vote for.

Muh filibuster.  

[jerryskids 6,792]

17 minutes ago, MDC said:

It doesn’t seem to matter who we vote for.

Muh filibuster.  

Oh, he'll get stuff done, but not all your childish trolling list.  Balanced budget was a campaign goal?  

[HellToupee 1,773]

From Matt Gaetz…..

The Biden Administration has filled hundreds of pages of briefs in federal court claiming that Special Counsels do not require Senate confirmation. 

In case anyone was wondering…
 

MAGA 2.0 fukks hard

[MDC 7,408]

29 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Oh, he'll get stuff done, but not all your childish trolling list.  Balanced budget was a campaign goal?  

Eliminating the federal debt was. In 2016.  

[jerryskids 6,792]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Eliminating the federal debt was. In 2016.  

2016

 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

3 hours ago, MDC said:

Eliminating the federal debt was. In 2016.  

They’re still going to do it. You see, it’s just that when the accounting says they’re running even bigger deficits, they’ll just fix the accounting.

Problem solved! 

 

 

What counts as a tax cut?

That is the question on the minds of many Republicans on Capitol Hill these days as they consider how far — and how fast — they can cut taxes again. The wonky ways of measuring the federal budget are shaping up to be central to the debate.

Forcing the issue is the end of many of the tax cuts Republicans passed in 2017. Without any action by Congress next year, taxes would go up for most Americans, as provisions like lower marginal income rates and a larger standard deduction expired. Republicans want to protect their handiwork and extend the tax cuts before they lapse.

By conventional budget rules in Washington, doing so would amount to a tax cut — and an expensive one at that. Compared with a scenario where all of the 2017 tax cuts end as scheduled, extending them for 10 years would reduce the revenue the government collected by roughly $4 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Republicans are struggling to come up with other tax increases or spending cuts to cover that cost. So maybe it is not a surprise that some of them are starting to advance an alternative theory of the case: that continuing existing tax cuts actually costs nothing.

Senator Michael D. Crapo, an Idaho Republican who is expected to lead the Senate Finance Committee next year, took to Fox Business this week to make that argument.

“If you’re just extending current law, we’re not raising taxes or lowering taxes, that is a $4 trillion deficit. That’s ridiculous,” he said in an interview with Larry Kudlow, who helps advise President-elect Donald J. Trump. Mr. Crapo said later, “We’re going to have to take the bold steps of saying to the American people that we are not going to let $4 trillion of tax hikes happen and that it’s not going to increase the deficit.”

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

21 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Who is “they”?

You do know republicans control the entirety of government now, right?

They can do whatever the fock they want and nobody can stop them, your nutjob persecution complex notwithstanding

Well, terchnically not for another 57 days or so.

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

The presumptive Secretary of Education is married to a man whose former employee alleges he forced her to perform sex acts with his friend for an hour and a half after he defecated on her head. The presumptive Commerce Secretary preemptively sued his former assistant in 2018, after her lawyer threatened to publicize “not pretty” 2 a.m. text messages she’d received from him and his wife. The presumptive Health and Human Services director’s explanation for forcibly groping a former nanny’s breasts while holding her hostage in a kitchen pantry was that he “had a very, very rambunctious youth”; he was 46 at the time. The White House efficiency czar, currently a defendant in a putative class-action lawsuit filed by eight former employees who accuse him of perpetrating an “Animal House” work environment of “rampant sexual harassment,” and paid a quarter of a million dollars to a flight attendant who says he got naked and asked her to touch his erect in exchange for the gift of a horse. 

 

And of course the presumptive Defense Secretary was accused of raping a woman who was tasked with monitoring what she described to police as his “creeper vibes” after a Republican women’s conference at which he was a keynote speaker, just a month and change after the birth of his fourth child with a woman who was not his wife at the time. (Reader, she married him.)

 

The aggressive rapeyness of the second Donald Trump administration is so tyrannical it’s almost enough to make a girl wistful for Matt Gaetz, the Florida congressman who withdrew his name from attorney general contention yesterday (to make way for the despicable Pam Bondi) amid an orgy of leaks from two investigations into his sexploits with a 17-year-old procured by a convicted sex trafficker friend. Multiple witnesses testified that Gaetz did not actually know the 17-year-old was underage, you see, and that he ceased having sex with her when he found out. 

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

19 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

The presumptive Secretary of Education is married to a man whose former employee alleges he forced her to perform sex acts with his friend for an hour and a half after he defecated on her head. The presumptive Commerce Secretary preemptively sued his former assistant in 2018, after her lawyer threatened to publicize “not pretty” 2 a.m. text messages she’d received from him and his wife. The presumptive Health and Human Services director’s explanation for forcibly groping a former nanny’s breasts while holding her hostage in a kitchen pantry was that he “had a very, very rambunctious youth”; he was 46 at the time. The White House efficiency czar, currently a defendant in a putative class-action lawsuit filed by eight former employees who accuse him of perpetrating an “Animal House” work environment of “rampant sexual harassment,” and paid a quarter of a million dollars to a flight attendant who says he got naked and asked her to touch his erect in exchange for the gift of a horse. 

And of course the presumptive Defense Secretary was accused of raping a woman who was tasked with monitoring what she described to police as his “creeper vibes” after a Republican women’s conference at which he was a keynote speaker, just a month and change after the birth of his fourth child with a woman who was not his wife at the time. (Reader, she married him.)

The aggressive rapeyness of the second Donald Trump administration is so tyrannical it’s almost enough to make a girl wistful for Matt Gaetz, the Florida congressman who withdrew his name from attorney general contention yesterday (to make way for the despicable Pam Bondi) amid an orgy of leaks from two investigations into his sexploits with a 17-year-old procured by a convicted sex trafficker friend. Multiple witnesses testified that Gaetz did not actually know the 17-year-old was underage, you see, and that he ceased having sex with her when he found out. 

Huh?  You're own candidate's husband knocked up his affair partner while still married to his first wife. 

And it's clear you don't know what "rape" means.  Like all the other words the far-left uses to describe their opponents, it has lost all meaning.

You can get off your moral high-horse - your shaming techniques aren't fooling anyone.  As a card-carrying member of the far-left, you're the LAST person that should be discussing anything about morals.  Maye clean your own house before you start pointing fingers, d0uche.  GTFO. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

Looks like gutter boy was into the Beaujolais last night with the other wine moms at their cry/rage get together last night.